Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Patient Educ Couns ; 103(9): 1830-1838, 2020 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32418681

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This is a quality assessment of a research design developed for a collaborative study on adolescents and young adults who survived a brain tumor. METHODS: A descriptive and critical mixed methods approach was used to assess the design itself, the quality and information power of the database and the integration of collaborators. Project documentation, field notes and transcripts from focus groups interviews(n = 19) were used for the evaluation, which was based on the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research. RESULTS: The design proved to be pertinent to resolve methodological stakes in a "fragile field". The mobilisation of collaborators as members of a "Sherpa team" in all phases of the project helped the team create a progressive focus approach well-adapted for data gathering and analysis as well as produce a high-quality database. CONCLUSION: The Nesting Dolls Design including the didactic approach developed along the deployment of the project helped researchers, clinicians and resource patients/parents understand the research procedures and the roles of all collaborators. This fostered a meaningful engagement in the project. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Resources and time for training, communication and supervision are necessary to reach the objectives of collaborative research involving novices and are worth the time and efforts.


Asunto(s)
Supervivientes de Cáncer , Conducta Cooperativa , Padres , Médicos , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud , Neoplasias Encefálicas/terapia , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Masculino , Proyectos de Investigación , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA