Diabetes technology: A primer for clinicians.

Diabetes technology is evolving rapidly and is changing the way both patients and clinicians approach the management of diabetes. With more devices gaining US Food and Drug Administration approval and insurance coverage expanding, these new technologies are being widely adopted by people living with diabetes. We provide a summary of the commonly available devices in the market today that clinicians will likely encounter. This includes continuous glucose monitors (CGMs); connected insulin pens, caps, and buttons; and insulin pumps. Clinicians' awareness of and familiarity with this technology will enhance its accessibility for patients with diabetes.

Continuous Glucose Monitoring Using the Dexcom G6 in Cardiac Surgery During the Postoperative Period.

OBJECTIVE: Cardiac surgery is associated with hyperglycemia, which in turn is associated with adverse postsurgical outcomes such as wound infections, acute renal failure, and mortality. This pilot study seeks to determine if Dexcom G6Pro continuous glucose monitor (Dexcom G6Pro CGM) is accurate during the postoperative cardiac surgery period when fluid shifts, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, and vasoactive medications are frequently encountered, compared to standard glucose monitoring techniques. METHODS: This study received institutional review board approval. In this prospective study, correlation between clinical and Dexcom glucose readings was evaluated. Clinical glucose (blood gas, metabolic panel, and point of care) data set included 1428 readings from 29 patients, while the Dexcom G6Pro CGM data included 45 645 data points following placement to upper arm. Additionally, average clinical measurements of day and overnight temperatures and hemodynamics were evaluated. Clinical and Dexcom data were restricted to being at least 1 hour after prior clinical reading Matching Dexcom G6Pro CGM data were required within 5 minutes of clinical measure. Data included only if taken at least 2 hours after Dexcom G6Pro CGM insertion (warm-up time) and analyzed only following intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Finally, a data set excluding the first 24 hours after ICU admission was created to explore stability of the device. Patients remained on Dexcom G6Pro CGM until discharge or 10 days postoperatively. RESULTS: The population was 71% male, 14% with known diabetes; 66% required intravenous insulin infusion. The Clarke error grid plot of all measures post-ICU admission showed 53.5% in zone A, 45.9% in zone B, and 0.6% (n = 5) in zones D or E. The restricted dataset that excluded the first 24 hours post-ICU admission showed 55.9% in zone A, 43.9% in zone B, and 0.2% in zone D. Mean absolute relative difference between clinical and Dexcom G6Pro CGM measures was 20.6% and 21.6% in the entire post-ICU admission data set, and the data set excluding the first 24 hours after ICU admission, respectively. In the subanalysis of the 12 patients who did not have more than a 5-minute tap in the operating room, a consensus error grid, demonstrated that after ICU admission, percentage in zone A was 53.9%, zone B 45.4%, and zone C 0.7%. Similar percentages were obtained removing the first 24 hours post-ICU admission. These numbers are very similar to the entire cohort. A consensus error grid created post-ICU admission demonstrated: (zone A) 54%, (zone B) 45%, (zone C) 0.9%, and the following for the dataset created excluding the first 24 hours: (zone A) 56%, (zone B) 44%, (zone C) 0.4%, which demonstrated very close agreement with the original Clarke error grid. No adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Almost 100% of Dexcom G6Pro CGM and clinical data matching points fell within areas considered as giving clinically correct decisions (zone A) and clinically uncritical decisions (zone B). However, the relatively high mean absolute relative difference precludes its use for both monitoring and treatment in the clinical context. As technology evolves, interstitial glucose monitoring may become an important tool to limit iatrogenic anemia and mitigate glycemic fluctuations.

Glucocorticoid-induced adrenal insufficiency and glucocorticoid withdrawal syndrome: Two sides of the same coin.

Diseases of the adrenal glands can lead to primary adrenal insufficiency, and suppression of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis can cause secondary adrenal insufficiency (adrenal suppression). The most common cause of adrenal suppression is exogenous steroids, a condition recently termed glucocorticoid-induced adrenal insufficiency (GIAI). Similarly, weaning from high doses of glucocorticoids or giving insufficient glucocorticoid replacement after curative surgery for endogenous hypercortisolism (Cushing syndrome) can lead to glucocorticoid withdrawal syndrome, which overlaps with GIAI.

Association of Metformin, Dipeptidyl Dipeptidase-4 Inhibitors, and Insulin with Coronavirus Disease 2019-Related Hospital Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: The effects of diabetes medications on COVID-19 hospitalization outcomes have not been consistent. We sought to determine the effect of metformin, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i), and insulin on admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), need for assisted ventilation, development of renal insufficiency, and mortality in patients admitted with COVID-19 infection after controlling for clinical variables and other relevant diabetes-related medications in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 from a single hospital system. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed that included demographic data, glycated hemoglobin, kidney function, smoking status, insurance, Charlson comorbidity index, number of diabetes medications, and use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and statin prior to admission and glucocorticoids during admission. RESULTS: A total of 529 patients with type 2 DM were included in our final analysis. Neither metformin nor DPP4i prescription was associated with ICU admission, need for assisted ventilation, or mortality. Insulin prescription was associated with increased ICU admission but not with need for assisted ventilation or mortality. There was no association of any of these medications with development of renal insufficiency. CONCLUSIONS: In this population, limited to type 2 DM and controlled for multiple variables that have not been consistently studied (such as a measure of general health, glycated hemoglobin, and insurance status), insulin prescription was associated with increased ICU admission. Metformin and DPP4i prescriptions did not have an association with the outcomes.

Attitudes and Behaviors with Diabetes Technology Use in the Hospital: Multicenter Survey Study in the United States.

Objective: To assess the attitudes, behaviors, and barriers with diabetes technology use in the general medicine hospital wards. Research Design and Methods: The authors developed a nonincentivized web-based anonymous survey that captured demographic and practice data regarding continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) and continuous glucose monitor (CGM) use in the hospital. Setting: Four large hospital systems in the United States. Results: Among 128 survey respondents, 76%, 10%, and 6% were hospitalists, advanced practice providers, and primary care physicians, respectively. The majority of respondents rated the treatment of inpatient hyperglycemia (96%) and the continuation of CSII during the hospital stay (93%) "important." While most respondents (64%) acknowledged knowing the existence of their institution's policies for CSII use, only 84% of those respondents felt somewhat to very familiar with the policy. The most common barrier to CSII use in the inpatient setting was lack of practitioner (70%) and nursing (67%) knowledge of using the device. With regard to CGM use in the hospital, a minority (28%) of respondents were aware of their institution's CGM policies. Less than half of the providers, 43.8%, stated that, when admitting a patient, they reviewed CGM data to guide insulin dosing. Conclusions: In this US multicenter survey, we found that most inpatient practitioners valued glycemic control, but many were not familiar with institutional policies, had lack of knowledge with CSII, and were not reviewing CGM data.

Hospital Diabetes Meeting 2022.

The annual Virtual Hospital Diabetes Meeting was hosted by Diabetes Technology Society on April 1 and April 2, 2022. This meeting brought together experts in diabetes technology to discuss various new developments in the field of managing diabetes in hospitalized patients. Meeting topics included (1) digital health and the hospital, (2) blood glucose targets, (3) software for inpatient diabetes, (4) surgery, (5) transitions, (6) coronavirus disease and diabetes in the hospital, (7) drugs for diabetes, (8) continuous glucose monitoring, (9) quality improvement, (10) diabetes care and educatinon, and (11) uniting people, process, and technology to achieve optimal glycemic management. This meeting covered new technology that will enable better care of people with diabetes if they are hospitalized.

The effect of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator modulators on impaired glucose tolerance and cystic fibrosis related diabetes.

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is an autosomal recessive disorder, with a prevalence of 1 in 2,500 live births. It is caused by mutations in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene. With the significant advancement in CFTR-directed therapies, life expectancy of CF patients has steadily increased. With improved survival, CF related co-morbidities have become more apparent. The most common endocrine complication includes Cystic fibrosis related diabetes (CFRD). Impaired glucose tolerance and insulin deficiency in CFRD leads to a decline in pulmonary function in CF patients. Here we review the underlying mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of CFRD, focusing on the role of CFTR in the regulation of insulin secretion from the ß-cell. We then discuss CFTR modulators and their effect on impaired glucose tolerance and CFRD.

Perioperative management of diabetes in patients undergoing bariatric and metabolic surgery: a narrative review and the Cleveland Clinic practical recommendations.

Bariatric and metabolic surgery is an effective treatment for patients with severe obesity and obesity-related diseases. In patients with type 2 diabetes, it provides marked improvement in glycemic control and even remission of diabetes. In patients with type 1 diabetes, bariatric surgery may offer improvement in insulin sensitivity and other cardiometabolic risk factors, as well as amelioration of the mechanical complications of obesity. Because of these positive outcomes, there are increasing numbers of patients with diabetes who undergo bariatric surgical procedures each year. Prior to surgery, efforts should be made to optimize glycemic control. However, there is no need to delay or withhold bariatric surgery until a specific glycosylated hemoglobin target is reached. Instead, treatment should focus on avoidance of early postoperative hyperglycemia. In general, oral glucose-lowering medications and noninsulin injectables are not favored to control hyperglycemia in the inpatient setting. Hyperglycemia in the hospital is managed with insulin, aiming for perioperative blood glucose concentrations between 80 and 180 mg/dL. Following surgery, substantial changes of the antidiabetic medication regimens are common. Patients should have a clear understanding of the modifications made to their treatment and should be followed closely thereafter. In this review article, we describe practical recommendations for the perioperative management of diabetes in patients with type 2 or type 1 diabetes undergoing bariatric surgery. Specific recommendations are delineated based on the different treatments that are currently available for glycemic control, including oral glucose-lowering medications, noninsulin injectables, and a variety of insulin regimens.

Weight-Based Insulin During and After Intravenous Insulin Infusion Reduces Rates of Rebound Hyperglycemia When Transitioning to Subcutaneous Insulin in the Medical Intensive Care Unit.

OBJECTIVE: Hyperglycemia often occurs after the transition from intravenous insulin infusion (IVII) to subcutaneous insulin. Weight-based basal insulin initiated earlier in the course of IVII in the medical intensive care unit (MICU), and a weight-based basal-bolus regimen after IVII, can potentially improve post-IVII glycemic control by 48 hours. METHODS: This prospective study included 69 patients in MICU who were on IVII for ≥24 hours. Exclusions were end-stage renal disease, type 1 diabetes mellitus, and the active use of vasopressors. The intervention group received weight-based basal insulin (0.2-0.25 units/kg) with IVII and weight-based bolus insulin after IVII. The control group received current care. The primary end points were glucose levels at specific time intervals up to 48 hours after IVII. RESULTS: There were 25 patients in the intervention group and 44 in the control group. The mean age of the patients was 59 ± 15 years, 32 (47%) were men, and 52 (78%) had prior diabetes mellitus. The 2 groups were not different (acute kidney injury/chronic kidney disease, pre-existing diabetes mellitus, illness severity, or nothing by mouth status after IVII), except for the steroid use, which was higher in the control group than in the intervention group (34% vs 12%, respectively). Glucose levels were not lower until 36 to 48 hours after IVII (166.8 ± 39.1 mg/dL vs 220.0 ± 82.9 mg/dL, P < .001). When controlling for body mass index, nutritional status, hemoglobin A1C, and steroid use, glucose level was lower starting at 12 to 24 hours out (166.87 mg/dL vs 207.50 mg/dL, P = .015). The frequency of hypoglycemia was similar between the 2 groups (5.0% vs 7.1%). The study did not reach target enrollment. CONCLUSION: The addition of weight-based basal insulin during, and basal-bolus insulin immediately after, IVII in MICU results in better glycemic control at 24 hours after IVII with no increased hypoglycemia.

Early Post-Renal Transplant Hyperglycemia.

CONTEXT: Though posttransplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM, occurring > 45 days after transplantation) and its complications are well described, early post-renal transplant hyperglycemia (EPTH) (< 45 days) similarly puts kidney transplant recipients at risk of infections, rehospitalizations, and graft failure and is not emphasized much in the literature. Proactive screening and management of EPTH is required given these consequences. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this article is to promote recognition of early post-renal transplant hyperglycemia, and to summarize available information on its pathophysiology, adverse effects, and management. METHODS: A PubMed search was conducted for "early post-renal transplant hyperglycemia," "immediate posttransplant hyperglycemia," "post-renal transplant diabetes," "renal transplant," "diabetes," and combinations of these terms. EPTH is associated with significant complications including acute graft failure, rehospitalizations, cardiovascular events, PTDM, and infections. CONCLUSION: Patients with diabetes experience better glycemic control in end-stage renal disease (ESRD), with resurgence of hyperglycemia after kidney transplant. Patients with and without known diabetes are at risk of EPTH. Risk factors include elevated pretransplant fasting glucose, diabetes, glucocorticoids, chronic infections, and posttransplant infections. We find that EPTH increases risk of re-hospitalizations from infections (cytomegalovirus, possibly COVID-19), acute graft rejections, cardiovascular events, and PTDM. It is essential, therefore, to provide diabetes education to patients before discharge. Insulin remains the standard of care while inpatient. Close follow-up after discharge is recommended for insulin adjustment. Some agents like dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists have shown promise. The tenuous kidney function in the early posttransplant period and lack of data limit the use of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors. There is a need for studies assessing noninsulin agents for EPTH to decrease risk of hypoglycemia associated with insulin and long-term complications of EPTH.

Inpatient Hyperglycemia and Transitions of Care: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: The transition of diabetes care from home to hospital, within the hospital, and upon discharge is fraught with gaps that can adversely affect patient safety and length of stay. We aimed to highlight the variability in care during these transitions and point out areas where research is needed. METHODS: A PubMed search was performed with a combination of search terms that pertained to diabetes, hyperglycemia, hospitalization, locations in the hospital, discharge to home or a nursing facility, and diabetes medications. Studies with at least 50 patients that were written in the English language were included. RESULTS: With the exception of transitioning from intravenous insulin infusion to subcutaneous insulin and perhaps admission to the regular floors, few studies pointedly focused on transitions of care, leading us to extrapolate recommendations based on data from disparate areas of care in the hospital. There is evidence at every stage of care, starting from the entry into the hospital and ending with discharge home or to a facility, that patients benefit from having protocols in place guiding overall care. CONCLUSION: Pockets of care exist in hospitals where methods of effective diabetes management have been studied and implemented. However, there is no sustained continuum of care. Protocols and care teams that follow patients from one physical location to the other may result in improved clinical outcomes during and following a hospital stay.

The importance of implementing inpatient virtual coverage in an endocrinology practice: lessons learned thus far from the COVID-19 pandemic.

The COVID-19 pandemic has rapidly changed the landscape of medical care and the healthcare system needs to quickly adapt in order to continue providing optimal medical care to hospitalized patients in an efficient, effective, and safe manner. Endocrinology diseases are commonly present in patients with COVID-19 and often are major risk factors for development of severe disease. The use of electronic consultation and telemedicine have already been well-established in the outpatient setting but yet not commonly implemented in the inpatient arena. This type of remote medical care has the potential to provide a reliable delivery of endocrine care while protecting providers and patients from spreading infection. This short review intends to provide the initial steps for the development of an inpatient telemedicine endocrine service to patients with endocrine diseases. Telehealth will become part of our daily practices and has a potential to provide a safe and efficient method of consultative service.

The role of SGLT-2 inhibitors in managing type 2 diabetes.

Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors are an exceptionally versatile class of medication, and their glycemic and nonglycemic benefits could help millions of patients with type 2 diabetes. Of note, they have been shown to improve cardiac and renal outcomes, much-needed benefits in patients with type 2 diabetes, who are at a higher risk for developing cardiac and renal dysfunction than those who do not have diabetes. The indications for SGLT-2 inhibitors may continue to expand as ongoing clinical trials provide more insight into these drugs.

Management of diabetes and hyperglycaemia in the hospital.

Hyperglycaemia in people with and without diabetes admitted to the hospital is associated with a substantial increase in morbidity, mortality, and health-care costs. Professional societies have recommended insulin therapy as the cornerstone of inpatient pharmacological management. Intravenous insulin therapy is the treatment of choice in the critical care setting. In non-intensive care settings, several insulin protocols have been proposed to manage patients with hyperglycaemia; however, meta-analyses comparing different treatment regimens have not clearly endorsed the benefits of any particular strategy. Clinical guidelines recommend stopping oral antidiabetes drugs during hospitalisation; however, in some countries continuation of oral antidiabetes drugs is commonplace in some patients with type 2 diabetes admitted to hospital, and findings from clinical trials have suggested that non-insulin drugs, alone or in combination with basal insulin, can be used to achieve appropriate glycaemic control in selected populations. Advances in diabetes technology are revolutionising day-to-day diabetes care and work is ongoing to implement these technologies (ie, continuous glucose monitoring, automated insulin delivery) for inpatient care. Additionally, transformations in care have occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic, including the use of remote inpatient diabetes management-research is needed to assess the effects of such adaptations.

Serum thyroid stimulating hormone level for predicting utility of thyroid uptake and scan.

BACKGROUND: Thyroid uptake and scan (TUS) is a clinical tool used for differentiation of thyrotoxicosis etiologies. Although guidelines recommend ordering a TUS for evaluation of low TSH levels, no specific value is defined. This study aimed to determine a TSH cutoff at which TUSs yield a greater likelihood of successful determination of etiology to avoid unnecessary testing. METHODS: This was a retrospective study on 137 patients seen by an endocrinologist who underwent TUS for evaluation of low TSH (<0.4 µU/mL). A receiver operating curve analysis was performed to determine the TSH cutoff with maximal sensitivity and specificity for prediction of diagnostic utility. RESULTS: Ninety percent of TUSs (n = 123) led to a diagnosis, while 10% (n = 14) were inconclusive or normal. Diagnoses included Graves' diseases (52%), toxic multinodular goiter (19%), thyroiditis (12%), and solitary toxic adenoma (7%). The median TSH value was 0.008 µU/mL (IQR 0.005, 0.011), and the median free T4 value was 1.7 µU/mL (IQR 1.3, 2.8). The ROC analysis produced an area under the curve of 0.86. The optimal TSH cutoff value was 0.02 µU/mL (sensitivity 80%, specificity 93%) for prediction of diagnostic yield. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that TSH is a useful predictor of the utility of TUS in yielding an etiology of thyrotoxicosis. Our analysis showed that TUS had a greater likelihood of determining an etiology when TSH was ≤0.02 µU/mL. This information can help clinicians avoid unnecessary cost and patient time burden when TUS is unlikely to aid in determining the etiology of thyrotoxicosis.

Causes of diabetic ketoacidosis among adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus: insulin pump users and non-users.

INTRODUCTION: Insulin pumps are increasingly being used as a method of insulin delivery in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is a serious complication of T1DM. This study aims to identify the causes of DKA in patients with T1DM on continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) and to compare these with patients with T1DM on multiple daily insulin injections (MDIIs). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This is a prospective observational study between January and June 2019 at the Cleveland Clinic Fairview Hospital. Demographic, clinical, and biochemical data were obtained from chart review. A questionnaire to explore additional clinical data relating to DKA was administered, with additional items for patients on the insulin pump. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients were admitted with a diagnosis of DKA between the period of January and June 2019. Of these, 45 met the inclusion criteria and 43 consented. These were divided into two groups: group 1 included patients on MDII and group 2 included CSII. Overall, the most common precipitating factor for developing DKA was insulin non-adherence, seen in 51.2% of the cases. The most common cause of DKA in group 2 was pump/tubing related to 55% of the cases. CONCLUSION: Despite non-adherence being common in both CSII and MDII, a combination of social factors, education and insulin pump malfunction, such as pump/tubing problems, might be playing a pivotal role in DKA etiology in young adults with T1DM, especially in CSII users. Continued education on pump use may reduce the rate of DKA in pump users.

Hyperglycemia management in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.

It has been well established that patients with diabetes who have COVID-19 have a more severe disease course and higher mortality. Providing adequate care for these patients has required hospitals to adapt protocols for monitoring blood glucose and administering therapy to protect both patient and caregiver safety. Inpatient use of continuous glucose monitoring systems or home-use glucose monitoring systems has provided options for reduced contact glucose monitoring. For therapy, protocols for managing hyperglycemia and diabetes ketoacidosis have been designed with less frequent monitoring and medication administration. Finally, telemedicine has allowed for consultative care in a manner not requiring physical proximity.

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Glargine U300 and Glargine U100 for the Inpatient Management of Medicine and Surgery Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Glargine U300 Hospital Trial.

OBJECTIVE: The role of U300 glargine insulin for the inpatient management of type 2 diabetes (T2D) has not been determined. We compared the safety and efficacy of glargine U300 versus glargine U100 in noncritically ill patients with T2D. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This prospective, open-label, randomized clinical trial included 176 patients with poorly controlled T2D (admission blood glucose [BG] 228 ± 82 mg/dL and HbA1c 9.5 ± 2.2%), treated with oral agents or insulin before admission. Patients were treated with a basal-bolus regimen with glargine U300 (n = 92) or glargine U100 (n = 84) and glulisine before meals. We adjusted insulin daily to a target BG of 70-180 mg/dL. The primary end point was noninferiority in the mean difference in daily BG between groups. The major safety outcome was the occurrence of hypoglycemia. RESULTS: There were no differences between glargine U300 and U100 in mean daily BG (186 ± 40 vs. 184 ± 46 mg/dL, P = 0.62), percentage of readings within target BG of 70-180 mg/dL (50 ± 27% vs. 55 ± 29%, P = 0.3), length of stay (median [IQR] 6.0 [4.0, 8.0] vs. 4.0 [3.0, 7.0] days, P = 0.06), hospital complications (6.5% vs. 11%, P = 0.42), or insulin total daily dose (0.43 ± 0.21 vs. 0.42 ± 0.20 units/kg/day, P = 0.74). There were no differences in the proportion of patients with BG <70 mg/dL (8.7% vs. 9.5%, P > 0.99), but glargine U300 resulted in significantly lower rates of clinically significant hypoglycemia (<54 mg/dL) compared with glargine U100 (0% vs. 6.0%, P = 0.023). CONCLUSIONS: Hospital treatment with glargine U300 resulted in similar glycemic control compared with glargine U100 and may be associated with a lower incidence of clinically significant hypoglycemia.