MiR-223 and MiR-186 Are Associated with Long-Term Mortality after Myocardial Infarction.

Background-The identification and stratification of patients at risk of fatal outcomes after myocardial infarction (MI) is of considerable interest to guide secondary prevention therapies. Currently, no accurate biomarkers are available to identify subjects who are at risk of suffering acute manifestations of coronary heart disease as well as to predict adverse events after MI. Non-coding circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) have been proposed as novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in cardiovascular diseases. The aims of the study were to investigate the clinical value of a panel of circulating miRNAs as accurate biomarkers associated with MI and mortality risk prediction in patients with documented MI. Methods and Results-seven circulating plasma miRNAs were analyzed in 67 MI patients and 80 control subjects at a high cardiovascular risk but without known coronary diseases. Multivariate logistic regression analyses demonstrated that six miRNAs were independently associated with MI occurrence. Among them, miR-223 and miR-186 reliably predicted long-term mortality in MI patients, in particular miR-223 (HR 1.57 per one-unit increase, p = 0.02), after left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) adjustment. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses provided a predictive threshold value of miR-223 expression (p = 0.028) for long-term mortality. Conclusions-Circulating miR-223 and miR-186 are promising predictive biomarkers for long-term mortality after MI.

Mid-term outcome of de novo lesions vs. in stent restenosis treated by intravascular lithotripsy procedures: Insights from the French Shock Initiative.

BACKGROUND: Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) is a promising new technology for disrupting de-novo calcified coronary lesions (DNL) before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We assessed 12-month outcomes of IVL in patients undergoing PCI for DNL or intra stent restenosis (ISR) lesions related to device underexpansion. METHODS: Prospective analysis of patients in the multicentre all-comers French Shock Initiative IVL registry. The primary safety endpoints in this analysis were in-hospital and 12-month major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: cardiac death, myocardial infarction or target vessel revascularization). The primary effectiveness endpoint was procedural success, defined as <30% residual stenosis without severe angiographic complications. Event rates were analysed for the cohort and for DNL and ISR procedures separately. RESULTS: A total of 220 lesions were treated (76.7% DNL and 23.3% ISR) in 202 patients. Procedural success was achieved in 95.5% of patients (DNL group: 96.5%; ISR group: 92.0%). In-hospital MACE occurred in 6.4% of cases, mainly driven by periprocedural infarctions. The rate of MACE-free survival at 1 year was 86.6% in the overall cohort. Rates of target vessel (TVR) and lesion (TLR) revascularisation were 6.4% and 2.5%, respectively. The 1-year MACE rate was 91.5% in DNL group and 83.8% in ISR group. CONCLUSIONS: In this large all-comers IVL cohort, rates of in-hospital and 1-year MACE were moderate. The safety and efficiency of IVL was comparable in DNL and ISR lesions. A comparative study of the impact of IVL on outcomes appears warranted.

Pourquoi et comment j'utilise le Shockwave ?

Les lésions calcifiées coronaires ont une incidence croissante dans la pratique quotidienne de l'angioplastie coronaire et sont un des facteurs essentiels des CHIP (High Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention). La préparation de la plaque calcifiée est essentielle afin de permettre de bonnes expansion et apposition du stent, deux critères indispensables pour un bon résultat à court et long terme de l'angioplastie coronaire. Depuis 2017, le cathéter C2 Shockwave Medical® dispose d'un marquage CE pour la préparation des lésions coronaires calcifiées natives avant l'implantation de stent par le mécanisme de lithotripsie intravasculaire. Ce système se distingue par sa facilité d'utilisation et un très haut niveau de sécurité procédurale, se positionnant comme un challenger des techniques usuelles de préparation de la plaque calcifiée. L'objectif de cette revue est de se focaliser sur le mécanisme d'action de la lithotripsie intracoronaire, les conditions d'utilisation optimale du device et de synthétiser les données de littérature les plus récentes.

Suture- or Plug-Based Large-Bore Arteriotomy Closure: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to test the superiority in terms of efficacy and safety of a dedicated plug-based vascular closure device (VCD) during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) over a suture-based VCD. BACKGROUND: Vascular complications after TAVR are relevant and often associated with VCD failure. METHODS: The MASH (MANTA vs. Suture-based vascular closure after transcatHeter aortic valve replacement) trial is an international, 2-center pilot randomized controlled trial comparing the MANTA VCD (Teleflex, Wayne, Pennsylvania) versus 2 ProGlides (Abbott Vascular, Abbott Park, Illinois). The primary composite endpoint consisted of access site-related major or minor vascular complications at 30-days' follow-up. Secondary endpoints included clinically relevant access site bleeding, time to hemostasis, and modified VCD failure (defined as failure to achieve hemostasis within 5 min or requiring additional endovascular maneuvers such as endovascular stenting, surgical techniques, or additional closure devices). Adverse events were adjudicated by an independent clinical events committee according to the VARC-2 definitions. RESULTS: A total of 210 TAVR patients were included between October 2018 and January 2020. Median age was 81 years, 54% were male, and the median STS score was 2.7%. There was no significant difference in the primary endpoint of access site-related vascular complications between MANTA and ProGlide (10% vs. 4%; p = 0.16). Clinically significant access site bleedings were similar with both closure techniques (9% vs. 6%; p = 0.57). Modified VCD failure occurred less frequently in MANTA versus ProGlide (20% vs. 40%; p < 0.01). Suture-based closure required more often additional closure devices, whereas MANTA numerically needed more covered stents and surgical bailouts. CONCLUSIONS: Plug-based large-bore arteriotomy closure was not superior to suture-based closure. Plug-based closure required fewer, but a different kind of bailout maneuvers.

Transcatheter Treatment of Residual Significant Mitral Regurgitation Following TAVR: A Multicenter Registry.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to describe baseline characteristics, and periprocedural and mid-term outcomes of patients undergoing transcatheter mitral valve interventions post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and examine their clinical benefit. BACKGROUND: The optimal management of residual mitral regurgitation (MR) post-TAVR is challenging. METHODS: This was an international registry of 23 TAVR centers. RESULTS: In total, 106 of 24,178 patients (0.43%) underwent mitral interventions post-TAVR (100 staged, 6 concomitant), most commonly percutaneous edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (PMVR). The median interval post-TAVR was 164 days. Mean age was 79.5 ± 7.2 years, MR was >moderate in 97.2%, technical success was 99.1%, and 30-day device success rate was 88.7%. There were 18 periprocedural complications (16.9%) including 4 deaths. During a median follow-up of 464 days, the cumulative risk for 3-year mortality was 29.0%. MR grade and New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class improved dramatically; at 1 year, MR was moderate or less in 90.9% of patients (mild or less in 69.1%), and 85.9% of patients were in NYHA functional class I/II. Staged PMVR was associated with lower mortality versus medical treatment (57.5% vs. 30.8%) in a propensity-matched cohort (n = 156), but this was not statistically significant (hazard ratio: 1.75; p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: For patients who continue to have significant MR, remain symptomatic post-TAVR, and are anatomically suitable for transcatheter interventions, these interventions are feasible, safe, and associated with significant improvement in MR grade and NYHA functional class. These results apply mainly to PMVR. A staged PMVR strategy was associated with markedly lower mortality, but this was not statistically significant. (Transcatheter Treatment for Combined Aortic and Mitral Valve Disease. The Aortic+Mitral TRAnsCatheter Valve Registry [AMTRAC]; NCT04031274).

Identification of a miRNA Based-Signature Associated with Acute Coronary Syndrome: Evidence from the FLORINF Study.

BACKGROUND: The discovery of novel biomarkers that improve risk prediction models of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is needed to better identify and stratify very high-risk patients. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are essential non-coding modulators of gene expression. Circulating miRNAs recently emerged as important regulators and fine-tuners of physiological and pathological cardiovascular processes; therefore, specific miRNAs expression profiles may represent new risk biomarkers. The aims of the present study were: i) to assess the changes in circulating miRNAs levels associated with ACS and ii) to evaluate the incremental value of adding circulating miRNAs to a clinical predictive risk model. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study population included ACS patients (n = 99) and control subjects (n = 103) at high to very high cardiovascular risk but without known coronary event. Based on a miRNA profiling in a matched derivation case (n = -6) control (n = 6) cohort, 21 miRNAs were selected for validation. Comparing ACS cases versus controls, seven miRNAs were significantly differentially expressed. Multivariate logistic regression analyses demonstrated that among the seven miRNAs tested, five were independently associated with the occurrence of ACS. A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that the addition of miR-122 + miR-150 + miR-195 + miR-16 to the clinical model provided the best performance with an increased area under the curve (AUC) from 0.882 to 0.924 (95% CI 0.885-0.933, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Our study identified a powerful signature of circulating miRNAs providing additive value to traditional risk markers for ACS.

Coronary angiography in the setting of acute infective endocarditis requiring surgical treatment.

BACKGROUND: International guidelines recommend that preoperative coronary angiography is performed on patients at risk of coronary disease who have infective endocarditis requiring surgical treatment. However, the risks of contrast-induced nephropathy or vegetation embolization in case of aortic endocarditis should be considered. AIMS: To assess the safety, therapeutic implications and prognostic impact of coronary angiography in patients requiring surgical treatment for active infective endocarditis. METHODS: This retrospective monocentric study was conducted in patients referred to a tertiary care centre for active endocarditis management with a theoretical indication for surgery between January 2013 and February 2017. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-three patients were included; 73.1% were men, the mean age was 61.9±16.3 years and the median EuroSCORE II was 5.8%. One hundred and nineteen patients (61.7%) had aortic endocarditis, which was associated with aortic vegetation in 74 cases (38.3%). Invasive coronary angiography was performed in 142 patients (73.6%) - 130 (91.6%) by radial approach - and 14 patients were evaluated by coronary multislice computed tomography (one patient had exploration with both techniques). Acute renal failure after coronary angiography was observed in 15 patients (10.6%), two patients (1.4%) presented a stroke within 24h after coronary angiography, but none had aortic endocarditis. Among the 178 patients (92.2%) who underwent surgery, 35 (19.7%) had significant coronary lesion(s) and 25 (14.0%) underwent an associated coronary artery bypass graft. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative coronary angiography in patients affected by infective endocarditis provides relevant information in a significant proportion of patients and can be performed safely.