Sex, racial, ethnic, and geographical disparities in major adverse cardiovascular outcome of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists among patients with and without diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis of placebo-controlled randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have been pivotal in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and in the reduction of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Notably, large cardiovascular outcomes trials (CVOTs) demonstrate significant disparities in inclusion, based on sex, race, ethnicity, and geographical regions. OBJECTIVES: We examined the impact of GLP-1RA on MACE in patients with or without T2DM, based on sex, race, ethnicity, and geography. METHODS: A literature search for placebo controlled RCTs on GLP-1RA treatment was conducted. Thorough data extraction and quality assessment were carried out, focusing on key outcome, and ensuring a robust statistical analysis using a random effects model to calculate log odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: A total of 8 CVOTs comprising 71,616 patients were included. Compared with placebo, GLP-1RAs significantly reduced MACE in both sexes (females: logOR -0.19, (95% CI, -0.28 to -0.10), p < 0.01] versus males: logOR -0.17, 95% CI, -0.23 to -0.10), p < 0.01], (p interaction NS)], and among Asians (logOR -34 (95% CI, -0.53 to -0.15, p < 0.01), and Whites (logOR -17 (95% CI, -0.25 to -0.09, p < 0.01), with no difference in MACE among Blacks and Hispanics. Odds of MACE were also reduced in Asia (logOR -31 (95% CI, -0.50 to -0.11, p < 0.01), and Europe (logOR -27 (95% CI, -0.40 to -0.13, p < 0.01), but there was no statistical difference in MACE in North America and Latin America. CONCLUSION: Significant reductions in MACE with GLP-1RA treatment were demonstrated between both sexes and across certain ethnicities and certain geographical regions.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists modestly reduced blood pressure among patients with and without diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis and meta-regression.

AIM: The cardiovascular benefits provided by glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) extend beyond weight reduction and glycaemic control. One possible mechanism may relate to blood pressure (BP) reduction. We aim to quantify the BP-lowering effects of GLP1-RAs. METHODS: A comprehensive database search for placebo-controlled randomized controlled trials on GLP-1RA treatment was conducted until December 2023. Data extraction and quality assessment were carried out, employing a robust statistical analysis using a random effects model to determine outcomes with a mean difference (MD) in mmHg and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The primary endpoint was the mean difference in systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP. Subgroup analyses and meta-regressions were done to account for covariates. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, GLP-1RAs modestly reduced SBP [semaglutide: MD -3.40 (95% CI -4.22 to -2.59, p < .001); liraglutide: MD -2.61 (95% CI -3.48 to -1.74, p < .001); dulaglutide: MD -1.46 (95% CI -2.20 to -0.72, p < .001); and exenatide: MD -3.36 (95% CI -3.63 to -3.10, p < .001)]. This benefit consistently increased with longer treatment durations. Diastolic BP reduction was only significant in the exenatide group [MD -0.94 (95% CI -1.78 to -0.1), p = .03]. Among semaglutide cohorts, mean changes in glycated haemoglobin and mean changes in body mass index were directly associated with SBP reduction. CONCLUSION: Patients on GLP-1RA experienced modest SBP lowering compared with placebo. This observed effect was associated with weight/body mass index reduction and better glycaemic control, which suggests that BP-lowering is an indirect effect of GLP-1RA and unlikely to be responsible for the benefits.

Pulmonary artery pulsatility index in patients with tricuspid valve regurgitation: a simple non-invasive tool for risk stratification.

AIMS: Tricuspid valve regurgitation (TR) is a common valvular disease associated with increased mortality. There is a need for tools to assess the interaction between the pulmonary artery (PA) circulation and the right ventricle in patients with TR and to investigate their association with outcomes. The pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi) has emerged as a haemodynamic risk predictor in left heart disease and pulmonary hypertension (PH). Whether PAPi discriminates risk in unselected patients with greater than or equal to moderate TR is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 5079 patients with greater than or equal to moderate TR (regardless of aetiology) and PA systolic and diastolic pressures measured on their first echocardiogram, we compared all-cause mortality at 5 years based on the presence or absence of PH and PAPi levels. A total of 2741 (54%) patients had PH. The median PAPi was 3.0 (IQR 1.9, 4.4). Both the presence of PH and decreasing levels of PAPi were associated with larger right ventricles, worse right ventricular systolic function, higher NT-pro BNP levels, greater degrees of right heart failure, and worse survival. In a subset of patients who had an echo and right heart catheterization within 24 h, the correlation of non-invasive to invasive PA pressures and PAPi levels was very good (r = 0.76). CONCLUSION: In patients with greater than or equal to moderate TR with and without PH, lower PAPi is associated with right ventricular dysfunction, right heart failure, and worse survival. Incorporating PA pressure and PAPi may help stratify disease severity in patients with greater than or equal to moderate TR regardless of aetiology.

Validation of a Brief Dietary Questionnaire for Use in Clinical Practice: Mini-EAT (Eating Assessment Tool).

Background There is a scarcity of validated rapid dietary screening tools for patient use in the clinical setting to improve health and reduce cardiovascular risk. The Healthy Eating Index (HEI) 2015 measures compliance with the 2015 to 2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans but requires completion of an extensive diet assessment to compute, which is time consuming and impractical. The authors hypothesize that a 19-item dietary survey assessing consumption of common food groups known to affect health will be correlated with the HEI-2015 assessed by a validated food frequency questionnaire and can be further reduced without affecting validity. Methods and Results A 19-item Eating Assessment Tool (EAT) of common food groups was created through literature review and expert consensus. A cross-sectional survey was then conducted in adult participants from a preventive cardiology clinic or cardiac rehabilitation and in healthy volunteers (n=661, mean age, 36 years; 76% women). Participants completed an online 156-item food frequency questionnaire, which was used to calculate the HEI score using standard methods. The association between each EAT question and HEI group was analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis test. Linear regression models were subsequently used to identify univariable and multivariable predictors for HEI score for further reduction in the number of items. The final 9-item model of Mini-EAT was validated by 5-fold cross validation. The 19-item EAT had a strong correlation with the HEI score (r=0.73) and was subsequently reduced to the 9 items independently predictive of the HEI score: fruits, vegetables, whole grains, refined grains, fish or seafood, legumes/nuts/seeds, low-fat dairy, high-fat dairy, and sweets consumption, without affecting the predictive ability of the tool (r=0.71). Conclusions Mini-EAT is a 9-item validated brief dietary screener that correlates well with a comprehensive food frequency questionnaire. Future studies to test the Mini-EAT's validity in diverse populations and for development of clinical decision support systems to capture changes over time are needed.

Tricuspid Regurgitation Impact on Outcomes (TRIO): A Simple Clinical Risk Score.

OBJECTIVE: To determine which clinical variables infer the highest risk for mortality in patients with notable tricuspid regurgitation (TR) and to develop a clinical assessment tool (the Tricuspid Regurgitation Impact on Outcomes [TRIO] score). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A single-center retrospective cohort of 13,608 patients with undifferentiated moderate to severe TR at the time of index echocardiography between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2016, was included. Baseline demographic and clinical data were obtained. Patients were randomly assigned to a training (N=10,205) and a validation (N=3403) cohort. Median follow-up was 6.5 years (interquartile range, 0.8 to 11.0 years). Variables associated with mortality were identified by Cox proportional hazards methods. A geographically distinct cohort of 7138 patients was used for further validation. The primary end point was all-cause mortality over 10 years. RESULTS: The 5-year probability of death was 53% for moderate TR, 63% for moderate-severe TR (hazard ratio [HR], 1.24 [95% CI, 1.17 to 1.31]; P<.001 vs moderate), and 71% for severe TR (HR, 1.55 [95% CI, 1.47 to 1.64]; P<.001 vs moderate). Factors associated with all-cause mortality on multivariate analysis included age 70 years or older, male sex, creatinine level greater than 2 mg/dL, congestive heart failure, chronic lung disease, aspartate aminotransferase level of 40 U/L or greater, heart rate of 90 beats/min or greater, and severe TR. Variables were assigned 1 or 2 points (HR, >1.5) and added to compute the TRIO score. The score was associated with all-cause mortality (C statistic = 0.67) and was able to separate patients into risk categories. Findings were similar in the second, independent and geographically distinct cohort. CONCLUSION: The TRIO score is a simple clinical tool for risk assessment in patients with notable TR. Future prospective studies to validate its use are warranted.

Inter-Individual Variability in Lipid Response: A Narrative Review.

Lipid-lowering guidelines emphasize shared decision-making between clinicians and patients, resulting in patients anticipating the degree of response from diet or drug therapy. Challenging for physicians is understanding the sources of variability complicating their management decisions, which include non-adherence, genetic considerations, additional lipid parameters including lipoprotein (a) levels, and rare systemic responses limiting benefits that result in non-responsiveness to monoclonal antibody injection. In this narrative review, we focus on the variability of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) response to guideline-directed interventions such as statins, ezetimibe, bile acid sequestrants, fibrates, proprotein/convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 inhibitors, and LDL-C-lowering diets. We hypothesize that the variability in individual lipid responses is multifactorial. We provide an illustrative model with a check list that can be used to identify factors that may be present in the individual patient.

Characteristics of Transgender Women Referred to Women's Heart Clinic.

INTRODUCTION: Transgender women have been reported to have a high burden of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and risk factors based largely on surveys. Our aim was to describe the prevalence of CVD and associated comorbidities among a cohort of older transgender women referred to cardiology as part of their gender-affirming care. METHODS: This was a retrospective, cross-sectional study of transgender women at a single institution from 2017 to 2019. RESULTS: Fifty-two consecutive patients were included. The most common reasons for referral were cardiac risk factor management (45%) and pre-operative cardiac risk stratification prior to gender-affirming surgery (35%). The mean age was 57 ± 10 years, 87% were white, and 92% had insurance coverage. Forty-eight patients (92%) were taking gender-affirming hormone therapy; 5 had undergone breast augmentation, 4 had undergone orchiectomy, and 2 had undergone vaginoplasty. The most common comorbidities were depression and/or anxiety (63%), obesity (58%), and hyperlipidemia (54%). Excluding aldosterone antagonists, 46% were on cardiac medications; changes were recommended for 25% of patients: new prescriptions in 9, dose adjustments in 5, and discontinuations in 4. According to the pooled cohort equation, the 10-year risk of atherosclerotic CVD was 9.4 ± 7.7% when the study population was calculated as male and 5.2 ± 5.1% when calculated as female (p <0.001). For patients who completed exercise testing, the functional aerobic capacity was fair (77.6 ± 21.4%) when calculated as male and average (99.5 ± 27.5%) as female (p < .0001); there was inconsistency in sex used for calculating the result on the formal report. CONCLUSIONS: Older transgender women may have an underestimated prevalence of CVD and its risk factors. More research is needed to identify cardiovascular health profiles, improve practice consistency, and establish normative values for transgender patients.