RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Adult long-term care (LTC) facilities have high rates of antibiotic use, raising concerns about antimicrobial resistance. Few studies have examined antibiotic use in paediatric LTC facilities. AIM: To describe antibiotic use in three paediatric LTC facilities and to describe the factors associated with use. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted from September 2012 to December 2015 in three paediatric LTC facilities. Medical records were reviewed for demographics, healthcare-associated infections (HAIs), antimicrobial use and diagnostic testing. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors for antibiotic use. The association between susceptibility testing results and appropriate antibiotic coverage was determined using Chi-squared test. FINDINGS: Fifty-eight percent (413/717) of residents had at least one HAI, and 79% (325/413) of these residents were treated with at least one antibiotic course, totalling 2.75 antibiotic courses per 1000 resident-days. Length of enrolment greater than one year, having a neurological disorder, having a tracheostomy, and being hospitalized at least once during the study period were significantly associated with receiving antibiotics when controlling for facility (all P < 0.001). Diagnostic testing was performed for 40% of antibiotic-treated HAIs. Eighty-six percent of antibiotic courses for identified bacterial pathogens (201/233) provided appropriate coverage. Access to susceptibility testing was not associated with appropriate antibiotic choice (P = 0.26). CONCLUSION: Use of antibiotics in paediatric LTC facilities is widespread. There is further need to assess antibiotic use in paediatric LTC facilities. Evaluation of the adverse outcomes associated with inappropriate antibiotic use, including the prevalence of resistant organisms in paediatric LTC facilities, is critical.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infección Hospitalaria/diagnóstico , Infección Hospitalaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Utilización de Medicamentos , Hospitales Pediátricos , Cuidados a Largo Plazo , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Standard precaution (SP) adherence is universally suboptimal, despite being a core component of healthcare-associated infection (HCAI) prevention and healthcare worker (HCW) safety. Emerging evidence suggests that patient safety climate (PSC) factors may improve HCW behaviours. Our aim was to examine the relationship between PSC and SP adherence by HCWs in acute care hospitals. A systematic review was conducted as guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis. Three electronic databases were comprehensively searched for literature published or available in English between 2000 and 2014. Seven of 888 articles identified were eligible for final inclusion in the review. Two reviewers independently assessed study quality using a validated quality tool. The seven articles were assigned quality scores ranging from 7 to 10 of 10 possible points. Five measured all aspects of SP and two solely measured needlestick and sharps handling. Three included a secondary outcome of HCW exposure; none included HCAIs. All reported a statistically significant relationship between better PSC and greater SP adherence and used data from self-report surveys including validated PSC measures or measures of management support and leadership. Although limited in number, studies were of high quality and confirmed that PSC and SP adherence were correlated, suggesting that efforts to improve PSC may enhance adherence to a core component of HCAI prevention and HCW safety. More clearly evident is the need for additional high-quality research.
Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Adhesión a Directriz , Personal de Salud , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Seguridad del Paciente , HumanosRESUMEN
To assess the prevalence and risk factors for colonization with Staphylococcus aureus in inmates entering two maximum-security prisons in New York State, USA, inmates (N=830) were interviewed and anterior nares and oropharyngeal samples collected. Isolates were characterized using spa typing. Overall, 50·5% of women and 58·3% of men were colonized with S. aureus and 10·6% of women and 5·9% of men were colonized with MRSA at either or both body sites. Of MSSA isolates, the major subtypes were spa type 008 and 002. Overall, risk factors for S. aureus colonization varied by gender and were only found in women and included younger age, fair/poor self-reported general health, and longer length of prior incarceration. Prevalence of MRSA colonization was 8·2%, nearly 10 times greater than in the general population. Control of epidemic S. aureus in prisons should consider the constant introduction of strains by new inmates.
Asunto(s)
Prisioneros , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Femenino , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , New York/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Staphylococcus aureus/aislamiento & purificación , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteraemia cause significant morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients. Using a nested case-control design, 204 MRSA bacteraemia cases were compared to 301 unmatched methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) bacteraemia controls and were matched 1:2 with non-infected controls. The independent risk factors for MRSA bacteraemia compared to MSSA bacteraemia were older age (P = 0·048), major organ transplant during current hospital stay (P = 0·016) and quinolone use (P = 0·016). Cases were more likely than non-infected controls to have renal failure (P = 0·003), cirrhosis (P = 0·013), and a central venous catheter (P = 0·003) after controlling for other risk factors. This large case-control study made it possible to assess risk factors for MRSA bacteraemia using two sets of controls and showed that risk factors differed greatly depending on the control group chosen. These results confirm the need for careful selection of appropriate control groups and the need to carefully adjust for underlying severity of illness.
Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia/microbiología , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Interpretación Estadística de Datos , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Masculino , Resistencia a la Meticilina , Oportunidad Relativa , Proyectos de Investigación , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de VirulenciaRESUMEN
We developed nine polymorphic microsatellite loci for evening primrose (Oenothera biennis). These loci have two to 18 alleles per locus and observed heterozygosities ranging from 0 to 0.879 in a sample of 34 individuals. In a pattern consistent with the functionally asexual reproductive system of this species, 17/36 pairs of loci revealed significant linkage disequilibrium and three loci showed significant deviations from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. The loci will be informative in identifying genotypes in multigenerational field studies to assess changes in genotype frequencies.
RESUMEN
Attempts to address the growing problem of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) and their impact on healthcare systems have historically relied on infection control policies that recommend good hygiene through standard and enhanced precautions (e.g. barrier precautions and patient isolation). In order for infection control strategies to be effective, however, healthcare workers' behaviour must be congruent with these policies. The purposes of this systematic review were to evaluate studies testing the effectiveness of interventions aimed at changing healthcare workers' behaviour (in reducing HAIs) and to summarize the findings of the studies with the highest quality scores. A total of 33 published studies met the inclusion criteria and were evaluated. Four of these earned a study quality score of > or =80%. In all four significant reductions in HAI or colonization rates were reported. Behavioural interventions used in these high quality studies included an educational programme (in four), the formation of a multi-disciplinary quality improvement team (three), compliance monitoring and feedback (two), and a mandate to sign a hand hygiene requirement statement (one). In all 33 studies, bundles of two to five interventions were employed, making it difficult to determine the effectiveness of individual interventions. The usefulness of "care bundling" has recently been recognized and recommended by the Institute for Healthcare Improvement. Considering the multi-factorial nature of the HAI problem and the logistical and ethical difficulties of applying the randomized clinical trial approach to infection control research, it may be necessary to study interventions as sets of practices.
Asunto(s)
Control de la Conducta , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , HumanosRESUMEN
Compliance with hand hygiene is widely recognized as the most important factor in preventing transmission of infection to patients in health care settings. However, there is no standardized method for measuring compliance. The three major methods used are direct observation, self-report and indirect measurement of hand hygiene product usage. This review discusses the methods of compliance monitoring and the advantages and drawbacks of each.
Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Adhesión a Directriz , Desinfección de las Manos/normas , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Control de Infecciones/normas , Gestión de Riesgos/métodosRESUMEN
This prevalence study was conducted to compare the counts, types and antimicrobial resistance profiles of bacterial flora on the hands of individuals in the community to that of nurses at a nearby university teaching hospital, with an intense hand hygiene regimen. Hand cultures were obtained from 204 individuals during a home visit and 119 nurses in two neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). The mean total log counts of organisms were 5.73 and 5.24 for the homemakers [defined as the person (usually the mother) who is the primary person responsible for arranging childcare, cooking, cleaning etc] and nurse hands, respectively (P<0.0001). Significantly more homemakers had Acinetobacter lwoffii, Enterobacter cloacae, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, P. fluorescens/putida, and Staphylococcus aureus on their hands compared with the nurses (all P<0.05). However, significantly more nurses had Enterococcus faecalis, S. epidermidis, and S. warneri on their hands (P<0.05). Of note, the hands of nurses harboured significantly more S. epidermidis strains resistant to amoxicillin/clavulanate, cefazolin, clindamycin, erythromycin, and oxacillin and S. warneri resistant to amoxicillin/clavulanate, cefazolin, clindamycin, and oxacillin (P<0.05). Surprisingly, significantly more trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole-resistant S. epidermidis and ciprofloxacin-resistant S. warneri was recovered from the hands of homemakers (P<0.05). This study demonstrates differences in prevalence, bacterial composition and antimicrobial resistance of hand flora of hospital personnel compared with homemakers. Moreover, the hands of homemakers may serve as community reservoirs for antimicrobial resistant strains of clinical importance.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones Bacterianas/microbiología , Portador Sano/microbiología , Mano/microbiología , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal , Madres , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital , Adulto , Infecciones Bacterianas/epidemiología , Infecciones Bacterianas/prevención & control , Portador Sano/epidemiología , Portador Sano/prevención & control , Recuento de Colonia Microbiana , Reservorios de Enfermedades/estadística & datos numéricos , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/microbiología , Femenino , Desinfección de las Manos , Hospitales Universitarios , Humanos , Infecciones por Klebsiella/microbiología , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Madres/estadística & datos numéricos , Ciudad de Nueva York/epidemiología , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Vigilancia de la Población , Prevalencia , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/microbiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To describe and analyze trends in hygiene-related advertisements and examine potential social and regulatory changes that might be associated with these trends. METHODS: From 1940 to 2000, advertisements in January issues of 2 widely read magazines were analyzed every fifth year, and 2 additional magazines only available from 1960 to 2000 were also analyzed every fifth year. In a content analysis, the total number of advertisements were determined and specific advertisements were grouped into categories (personal hygiene, dishwashing, laundry, and house cleaning) and further examined for the presence of 4 key claims (aesthetics, health effects, time-saving, and microbial effects). RESULTS: From 1940 to 2000 for all magazines combined, 10.4% of the advertisements were devoted to hygiene products. After 1960 there were significantly fewer hygiene advertisements as compared with 1940 to 1955, and there was a significant increase after 1980 (P <.00001). Throughout all 6 decades, most advertisements related to personal hygiene. There were no significant differences over time in the proportion of advertisements that made claims related to health, microbial effects, or aesthetics, but significantly more advertisements before 1960 made time-savings claims (P =.009). CONCLUSIONS: This content analysis reflects a cyclical attention in consumer advertising to personal and home hygiene products during the past 6 decades, with a waning of interest in the decades from 1960 to 1980 and an apparent resurgence of advertisements from 1985 to 2000. The potential contributions of federal regulatory bodies and societal changes (e.g., new marketing strategies and options, product development, new and re-emerging infectious diseases, increasing concern about antimicrobial resistance, and increasing recognition that infectious diseases are unlikely to be eradicated) to these marketing trends are discussed.
Asunto(s)
Publicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Agencias Gubernamentales/legislación & jurisprudencia , Higiene , Publicaciones Periódicas como Asunto , Publicidad/clasificación , Humanos , Factores de Tiempo , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
A prospective study was performed to describe the density of bacterial counts on the skin of neurosurgical patients and examine the association between total colony-forming unit (cfu) counts of skin flora at the operative site and surgical site infection (SSI). Two skin cultures were obtained, immediately before and after skin preparation, from the operative sites of 609 neurosurgical patients. SSI surveillance that used Centers for Disease Control/National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance definitions was performed. Predictors for high bacterial counts and SSI among craniotomies were analyzed by means of logistic regression. Neither pre- nor postpreparation counts were associated with SSI. Other SSI risk factors were obesity (relative risk [RR], 2.5), duration of surgery (RR, 1.3 for every additional 30 minutes) and age (RR, 0.7 for each additional 10 years). Duration of skin preparation was not correlated with postpreparation cfu counts. We were unable to detect an association between preoperative bacterial skin counts and SSI.
Asunto(s)
Bacterias/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones Bacterianas/microbiología , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/efectos adversos , Piel/microbiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/microbiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bacterias/clasificación , Recuento de Colonia Microbiana , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
The role of the home environment in the transmission of infectious diseases has been well described in the developing world but has received less attention in developed countries. An increasing focus on home hygiene has emerged in debates regarding the use of antimicrobial products in the home and the potential for development of resistance and in discussions regarding "when is clean too clean" and "what is clean." Studies are clearly needed to further explicate the role of the home in the spread of infectious agents, but before these can be conducted, adequate measurement tools are essential. This article describes extensive psychometric testing undertaken to develop valid and reliable methods and tools to measure home hygiene and focuses on a neighborhood that was primarily Spanish speaking in New York City. The Home Hygiene Assessment Tool described in this article can be used by clinicians and researchers to further elucidate the role of the home environment in the prevention and control of infections.
Asunto(s)
Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles , Higiene , Evaluación en Enfermería/métodos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Recuento de Colonia Microbiana , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Humanos , Ciudad de Nueva York , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Características de la ResidenciaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To compare skin condition and skin microbiology among intensive care unit personnel using one of two randomly assigned hand hygiene regimens: a 2% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG)-containing traditional antiseptic wash and a waterless handrub containing 61% ethanol with emollients (ALC). DESIGN: Prospective, randomized clinical trial. SETTING: Two critical care units (medical and surgical) in a large, metropolitan academic health center in Manhattan. SUBJECTS: Fifty staff members (physicians, nurses, housekeepers, respiratory therapists) working full time in the intensive care unit. INTERVENTIONS: One of two hand hygiene regimens randomly assigned for four consecutive weeks. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The two outcomes were skin condition (measured by two tools: Hand Skin Assessment form and Visual Skin Scaling form) and skin microbiology. Samples were obtained at baseline, on day 1, and at the end of wks 2 and 4. Participants in the ALC group had significant improvements in the Hand Skin Assessment scores at wk 4 (p = 0.04) and in Visual Skin Scaling scores at wks 3 (p = 0.01) and 4 (p = 0.0005). There were no significant differences in numbers of colony-forming units between participants in the CHG or ALC group at any time period. The ALC regimen required significantly less time than the CHG regimen (mean: 12.7 secs and 21.1 secs, respectively; p = 0.000) and resulted in a 50% reduction in material costs. CONCLUSIONS: Changes in hand hygiene practices in acute care settings from the traditional antiseptic wash to use of plain, mild soap and an alcohol-based product should be considered. Further research is needed to examine the association between use of antiseptic products for hand hygiene of staff and reductions in nosocomial infection rates among patients.
Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos/uso terapéutico , Clorhexidina/análogos & derivados , Clorhexidina/uso terapéutico , Desinfección de las Manos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Piel/microbiología , Adulto , Femenino , Guantes Protectores , Humanos , Higiene , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Personal de HospitalRESUMEN
Twenty surgical staff members participated in a clinical trial to compare the microbiology and skin condition of hands when using a traditional surgical scrub (TSS) with a detergent-based antiseptic containing 4% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) and a short application without scrub of a waterless hand preparation (HP) containing 61% ethyl alcohol, 1% CHG, and emollients. The HP was associated with less skin damage (P = .002) and lower microbial counts postscrub at days five (P = .002) and 19 (P = .02). The HP protocol had shorter contact time (HP mean [M] = 80.7 seconds; TSS M = 144.9 seconds; P < .0001), and more subjects preferred the HP regimen (P = .001). The HP performed better than the TSS, was less costly, and should be evaluated in larger trials and considered for widespread implementation.
Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos Locales , Antisepsia/métodos , Desinfección de las Manos/métodos , Piel/efectos de los fármacos , Adulto , Análisis de Varianza , Antiinfecciosos Locales/economía , Antiinfecciosos Locales/farmacología , Clorhexidina , Recuento de Colonia Microbiana , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Eritema/inducido químicamente , Etanol , Femenino , Dermatosis de la Mano/inducido químicamente , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , New York , Enfermería de Quirófano , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
Handwashing practices are persistently suboptimal among healthcare professionals and are also stubbornly resistant to change. The purpose of this quasi-experimental intervention trial was to assess the impact of an intervention to change organizational culture on frequency of staff handwashing (as measured by counting devices inserted into soap dispensers on four critical care units) and nosocomial infections associated with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE). All staff in one of two hospitals in the mid-Atlantic region received an intervention with multiple components designed to change organizational culture; the second hospital served as a comparison. Over a period of 8 months, 860,567 soap dispensings were recorded, with significant improvements in the study hospital after 6 months of follow-up. Rates of MRSA were not significantly different between the two hospitals, but rates of VRE were significantly reduced in the intervention hospital during implementation.
Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Desinfección de las Manos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Cultura Organizacional , Enterococcus/patogenicidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Resistencia a la Meticilina , Mid-Atlantic Region/epidemiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/prevención & control , Resistencia a la VancomicinaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Changes in skin flora have been reported among hospitalized and critically ill patients, but little is known about whether these changes are associated with hospitalization or with chronic, serious illness. The purpose of this survey was to compare skin flora of chronically ill outpatients and inpatients. METHODS: Aerobic skin flora of forearm and midsternum of 250 patients in an intensive care unit and 251 outpatients was sampled by contact plates. RESULTS: Mean colony-forming units were 160.6, forearm; 229. 4, sternum (P <.000). In logistic regression analysis, patients in the medical intensive care unit were significantly more likely to have high counts on the arm (odds ratio, 2.48; 95% confidence interval: 1.34-4.43; P =.004), and blacks were significantly more likely to have higher counts on the sternum when compared with other ethnic groups (odds ratio, 1.92; confidence interval: 1.18-3.11; P =. 009). No differences were noted between inpatients or outpatients in prevalence of methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus, but inpatients were more likely to carry methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (arm, P =.007; sternum, P =.02). Outpatients had a higher prevalence of micrococci and gram-negative bacteria at both skin sites (all P <.01) and yeast at the sternal site (P =.007). CONCLUSIONS: This comparison provides data to differentiate between effects of hospitalization and effects of chronic illness on skin flora.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crónica , Piel/microbiología , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Meticilina/uso terapéutico , Resistencia a la Meticilina , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Staphylococcus aureus/aislamiento & purificaciónAsunto(s)
Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles/tendencias , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa/prevención & control , Atención Domiciliaria de Salud/normas , Higiene/normas , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles/normas , Microbiología Ambiental , Predicción , Guías como Asunto , Humanos , Estados UnidosAsunto(s)
Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles , Enfermedades Transmisibles/epidemiología , Guías como Asunto , Investigación en Enfermería/organización & administración , Proyectos de Investigación/normas , Enfermedades Transmisibles/diagnóstico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Desarrollo de Programa , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
The objective of this study was to determine from the published epidemiological literature whether there is evidence for a causal association between service in the Gulf War and illness in U.S. veterans. Eleven published studies were analyzed using standardized epidemiologic criteria for assessing causality. A consistent association was found between deployment to the Gulf and self-reports of symptoms. No consistency was seen in physical findings or laboratory results. Strength of association varied with different study designs. Dose-response information is limited, because of lack of quantitative data on exposures. Biological plausibility varies for different risk factors. Specificity of association is not seen. Frequency of self-reported symptoms is increased in U.S. Gulf War veterans compared to other veterans of the same era, but specific causes of illnesses cannot be ascertained. Major gaps in data that impeded this analysis include (1) lack of objective data on specific environmental exposures (2) lack of baseline health assessments, and (3) lack of objective measures of post-deployment health status. In future deployment of U.S. troops, accurate exposure and health data will be needed if the causes of subsequent illnesses are to be accurately assessed.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome del Golfo Pérsico/etiología , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales , Femenino , Indicadores de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Personal Militar , Sensibilidad Química Múltiple/epidemiología , Síndrome del Golfo Pérsico/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , VeteranosRESUMEN
In a prospective observational study of 40 nurses (20 with diagnosed hand irritation and 20 without), nurses with damaged hands did not have higher microbial counts (P = .63), but did have a greater number of colonizing species (means: 3.35 and 2.63, P = .03). Although numbers were small, nurses with damaged hands were significantly more likely to be colonized with Staphylococcus hominis (P = .03). Fifty-nine percent of S hominis isolates from nurses with damaged hands were resistant to methicillin compared with 27% of isolates from those with healthy skin (P = .14). Twenty percent of nurses with damaged hands were colonized with Staphylococcus aureus compared with none of the nurses with normal hands (P = .11). Nurses with damaged hands were also twice as likely to have gram-negative bacteria (P = .20), entercocci (P = .13), and Candida (P = .30) present on the hands. Antimicrobial resistance of the coagulase-negative staphylococcal flora (with the exception of S hominis) did not differ between the 2 groups, nor did a trend toward increasing resistance exist when compared with other studies during the past decade. Skin moisturizers and protectant products were used almost universally by nurses at work, primarily products brought from home. Efforts to improve hand condition are warranted because skin damage can change microbial flora. Such efforts should include assessment or monitoring of hand care practices, formal institutional policy adoption and control of use of skin protectant products or lotions, and prudent use of latex gloves or more widespread use of powder-free and nonlatex products.