Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BMC Infect Dis ; 16: 386, 2016 08 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27506948

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: It has been challenging to determine the true clinical impact of Acinetobacter spp., due to the predilection of this pathogen to colonize and infect critically ill patients, who often have a poor prognosis. The aim of this study was to assess whether Acinetobacter spp. bacteremia is associated with lower survival compared with bacteremia caused by other pathogens in critically ill patients. METHODS: This study was performed at Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo, Brazil. There are 12 intensive care units (ICUs) in the hospital: five Internal Medicine ICUs (emergency, nephrology, infectious diseases and respiratory critical care), three surgical ICU (for general surgery and liver transplantion), an Emergency Department ICU for trauma patients, an ICU for burned patients, a neurosurgical ICU and a post-operative ICU. A retrospective review of medical records was conducted for all patients admitted to any of the ICUs, who developed bacteremia from January 2010 through December 2011. Patients with Acinetobacter spp. were compared with those with other pathogens (Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, Enterobacter spp., Enterococcus spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa). We did a 30-day survival analysis. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to determine the overall survival. Potential prognostic factors were identified by bivariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: One hundred forty-one patients were evaluated. No differences between patients with Acinetobacter spp. and other pathogens were observed with regard to age, sex, APACHE II score, Charlson Comorbidity Score and type of infection. Initial inappropriate antimicrobial treatment was more frequent in Acinetobacter bacteremia (88 % vs 51 %). Bivariate analysis showed that age > 60 years, diabetes mellitus, and Acinetobacter spp. infection were significantly associated with a poor prognosis. Multivariate model showed that Acinetobacter spp. infection (HR = 1.93, 95 % CI: 1.25-2.97) and age > 60 years were independent prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: Acinetobacter is associated with lower survival compared with other pathogens in critically ill patients with bacteremia, and is not merely a marker of disease severity.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Acinetobacter/mortalidad , Acinetobacter/patogenicidad , Bacteriemia/mortalidad , Infecciones por Acinetobacter/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Acinetobacter/microbiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Brasil/epidemiología , Comorbilidad , Enfermedad Crítica , Femenino , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones por Klebsiella/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Klebsiella/microbiología , Infecciones por Klebsiella/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/microbiología , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/mortalidad , Análisis de Supervivencia , Adulto Joven
2.
Am. j. trop. med. hyg ; 93(6): 1214-1218, Dec. 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | Sec. Est. Saúde SP, SESSP-IIERPROD, Sec. Est. Saúde SP | ID: biblio-1017266

RESUMEN

The standard treatment of mucosal leishmaniasis (ML) is pentavalent antimonials, agents with serious adverse effects. Alternative agents include amphotericin B deoxycholate and liposomal amphotericin B. We performed a retrospective study including 29 patients treated with liposomal amphotericin B, most of whom had comorbidities, history of previous treatment of ML, and contraindications to the use of antimonial pentavalent or amphotericin B deoxycholate. We observed a cure rate of 93.1%. Kidney failure was the most important side effect, reported in five patients (17.2%). This study showed a good efficacy and safety profile of liposomal amphotericin B in patients with ML and contraindications to the use of other agents


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Anfotericina B/uso terapéutico , Leishmaniasis Mucocutánea/tratamiento farmacológico
3.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 93(6): 1214-8, 2015 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26483120

RESUMEN

The standard treatment of mucosal leishmaniasis (ML) is pentavalent antimonials, agents with serious adverse effects. Alternative agents include amphotericin B deoxycholate and liposomal amphotericin B. We performed a retrospective study including 29 patients treated with liposomal amphotericin B, most of whom had comorbidities, history of previous treatment of ML, and contraindications to the use of antimonial pentavalent or amphotericin B deoxycholate. We observed a cure rate of 93.1%. Kidney failure was the most important side effect, reported in five patients (17.2%). This study showed a good efficacy and safety profile of liposomal amphotericin B in patients with ML and contraindications to the use of other agents.


Asunto(s)
Anfotericina B/uso terapéutico , Antiprotozoarios/uso terapéutico , Leishmaniasis Mucocutánea/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anfotericina B/efectos adversos , Antiprotozoarios/efectos adversos , Brasil , Femenino , Humanos , Leishmania/efectos de los fármacos , Leishmaniasis Mucocutánea/diagnóstico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Insuficiencia Renal/inducido químicamente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA