Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Ann Biol Clin (Paris) ; 79(5): 456-459, 2021 Oct 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34782311

RESUMEN

Babesiosis is a tick-borne infectious disease, caused by an intraerythrocytic parasite of the genus Babesia. It has clinical, biological and microbiological similarities with Plasmodium related infections. In rare cases, babesiosis may be complicated by hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, which occurs preferentially in the immunodeficient patient. We report here the case of a non-immunocompromised patient living in Manhattan, New York hospitalized for a complicated babesiosis of a hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. After 7 days of hospitalization and treatment by azithromycin 500 mg/day and atovaquone 750 mg twice a day, the patient was discharged with an improvement in clinical symptoms and biological parameters.


Asunto(s)
Babesia , Babesiosis , Atovacuona/uso terapéutico , Azitromicina/uso terapéutico , Babesiosis/complicaciones , Babesiosis/diagnóstico , Babesiosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos
2.
Int J Infect Dis ; 104: 617-623, 2021 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33453395

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Ceftriaxone and cefotaxime share a similar antibacterial spectrum and similar indications but have different pharmacokinetic characteristics. Ceftriaxone is administered once daily and 40% of its clearance is by biliary elimination, whereas cefotaxime requires three administrations per day and shows less than 10% biliary elimination. The high biliary elimination of ceftriaxone suggests a greater impact of this antibiotic on the gut microbiota than cefotaxime. The objective of this study was to compare the impact of ceftriaxone and cefotaxime on the gut microbiota. METHODS: A prospective clinical trial was performed that included 55 patients treated with intravenous ceftriaxone (1 g/24 h) or cefotaxime (1 g/8 h) for at least 3 days. Three fresh stool samples were collected from each patient (days 0, 3, and 7 or at the end of intravenous treatment) to assess the emergence of third-generation cephalosporin (3GC)-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, toxigenic Clostridioides difficile, and vancomycin-resistant enterococci. RESULTS: The emergence of 3GC-resistant gram-negative enteric bacilli (Enterobacteriaceae) (5.9% vs 4.7%, p > 0.99), Enterococcus spp, and non-commensal microorganisms did not differ significantly between the groups. Both antibiotics reduced the counts of total gram-negative enteric bacilli and decreased the cultivable diversity of the microbiota, but the differences between the groups were not significant. CONCLUSION: No significant difference was observed between ceftriaxone and cefotaxime in terms of the emergence of resistance.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Cefotaxima/uso terapéutico , Ceftriaxona/uso terapéutico , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Microbioma Gastrointestinal/efectos de los fármacos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Heces/microbiología , Femenino , Bacterias Gramnegativas/efectos de los fármacos , Hospitalización , Humanos , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Prospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...