Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open ; 2(1): e12355, 2021 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33532756

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to determine the sensitivity and specificity of novice emergency physician-performed point-of-care ultrasound diagnosis of papilledema using optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) against ophthalmologist-performed dilated fundoscopy. This observational study retrospectively analyzed results of ultrasound-measured ONSD of emergency department (ED) patients with suspected intracranial hypertension from a period spanning June 2014 to October 2017. METHODS: This study concerns a population of ED patients at a large, tertiary-care urban academic medical center from June 2014 to October 2017 over the age of 18 years with primary vision complaints evaluated for papilledema both by an emergency physician-performed ultrasound and an ophthalmologist-performed fundoscopic examination during their ED stay. Sensitivity and specificity of emergency physician-performed ultrasound measurement of optic nerve sheath diameter in the diagnosis of papilledema were primary outcomes for this study. RESULTS: A total of 206 individual patients (male 49%, female 51%; median age 45 years) were included in the study with a total of 212 patient encounters. Calculated sensitivity for the ocular ultrasound examination performed by emergency physicians to diagnose papilledema was 46.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 32.5% to 61.7%), and specificity was 87.0% (95% CI, 82.8% to 90.5%). Positive predictive value and negative predictive value were calculated to be 35.4% (95% CI, 23.9% to 48.2%) and 91.5% (95% CI, 87.8% to 94.4%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Sonographic measurement of ONSD by emergency physicians has low sensitivity but high specificity for detection of papilledema compared to ophthalmologist-conducted fundoscopy.

2.
J Emerg Med ; 58(5): 741-748, 2020 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32229136

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Previous studies show that myocardial infarctions (MIs) occur most frequently in the morning. OBJECTIVES: We hypothesized that there no longer is a morning predominance of MI, and that the timing of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) vs. non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) presentation differs. METHODS: We reviewed MI, STEMI, and NSTEMI patients (2013-2017) from a multiple-hospital system, identified by diagnostic codes. Daily emergency department arrival times were categorized into variable time intervals for count and proportional analysis, then examined for differences. RESULTS: There were 18,663 MI patients from 12 hospitals included in the analysis. Most MIs occurred between 12:00 pm and 5:59 pm (35.7%), and least between 12:00 am-5:59 am (16.3%). After subdividing all MIs into STEMIs and NSTEMIs, both groups continued to have the greatest presentation between 12:00 pm and 5:59 pm (33.1% and 36.0%, respectively). STEMIs (17.2%) and NSTEMIs (16.2%) were least frequent between 12:00 am and 5:59 am. We found the second most common presentation time for MIs was in the 6 pm-11:59 pm time period, which held true for both subtypes (MI 26.7%, STEMI 26.4%, NSTEMI 26.7%). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest a potential shift in the circadian pattern of MI, revealing an afternoon predominance for both STEMI and NSTEMI subtypes.


Asunto(s)
Infarto del Miocardio , Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Humanos , Infarto del Miocardio/diagnóstico , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST/diagnóstico , Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/diagnóstico , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA