Is delayed time to surgery associated with increased postoperative complications in patients with pathologic humerus fractures?

INTRODUCTION: Delayed time to surgery, in the case of orthopedic trauma, is well known to be associated with higher morbidity and mortality, an extended duration of hospitalization, and an associated rise in overall cost. Delayed time to surgery of at least 3 days following hospital admission is associated with elevated risk of complications following surgery for a standard, non-pathologic, humeral shaft fracture. To our knowledge, it is unknown whether the same association is present for pathologic humerus fractures. The primary objective of this study was to identify risk factors, including patient characteristics, comorbidities, and postoperative complications, that are associated with delayed time to surgery following pathologic humeral fracture. METHODS: All patients undergoing surgical management of pathologic humerus fractures across a 6-year period from 2015 to 2021 were queried using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database. Postoperative complications were reported within 30 days of procedure. Delayed time to surgery was defined by ≥ 2 days from hospital admission to surgery. We identified a total of 248 patients, and 39.9% (n = 99) of patients had delayed time to surgery. Multivariate logistic regression adjusted for all significantly associated variables was employed to identify predictors of delayed time to surgery for pathologic humerus fractures. RESULTS: The characteristics of patients significantly associated with delayed time to surgery were ASA classification ≥ 3 (p = 0.016), dependent functional status (p = 0.041), and congestive heart failure (p = 0.008). After adjusting for all significantly associated patient variables, the characteristics of patients independently associated with delayed time to surgery were non-home discharge (OR: 2.93, 95% CI 1.53-5.63; p = 0.001) and extended length of stay (OR: 2.00, 95% CI 1.06-3.77; p = 0.033). CONCLUSION: Delayed time to surgery of at least 2 days was independently associated with non-home discharge and extended postoperative length of stay. After controlling for baseline patient characteristics and comorbidities, delayed time to surgery was not independently associated with increased 30-day complications after surgical treatment of pathologic humeral fractures. This is in contrast to standard, non-pathologic humerus fractures in which delayed time to surgery is associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: Retrospective Cohort Comparison; Prognosis Study.

Preoperative chronic steroid use as a risk factor for complications following open reduction internal fixation for proximal humerus fracture.

PURPOSE: The primary objective of this study was to investigate the association between preoperative chronic steroid use and postoperative complications following open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) for proximal humerus fractures (PHF). METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement (ACS-NSQIP) database was queried for all patients who underwent PHF ORIF between 2015 and 2021. A total of 6,273 patients were included in this study, of which 3.4% (n = 212) were in the chronic steroid use cohort. Patient characteristics including demographics, comorbidities, and 30-day postoperative complications after PHF ORIF were collected. Bivariate logistic regression and multivariate logistic regression analysis, adjusted for all significantly associated variables, was conducted to investigate the relationship between preoperative chronic steroid use and postoperative complications. RESULTS: Chronic steroid use was significantly associated with age ≥ 75 (p < 0.001), male gender (p =0.006), dependent functional status (p = 0.008), American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) ≥ 3 (p < 0.001), CHF (p = 0.007), hypertension (p < 0.001), COPD (p < 0.001), bleeding disorder (p = 0.007), ascites (p = 0.040), disseminated cancer (p< 0.001), and systemic sepsis (p < 0.001). After adjusting for all significantly associated variables, chronic steroid use was independently associated with major complication (OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.06-2.43; p = 0.026), and non-home discharge (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.01-1.08; p = 0.014). CONCLUSION: Preoperative chronic steroid use is associated with increasing rate of postoperative complications following PHF ORIF. Better understanding and characterizing chronic steroid use as a preoperative risk factor can aid physicians in risk stratification to reduce rates of postoperative complications following PHF ORIF. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III. Retrospective Cohort Comparison; Prognosis Study.

Neuroinflammation drives sex-dependent effects on pain and negative affect in a murine model of repeated mild traumatic brain injury.

ABSTRACT: The Center for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that 75% of reported cases of traumatic brain injury (TBI) are mild, where chronic pain and depression are 2 of the most common symptoms. In this study, we used a murine model of repeated mild TBI to characterize the associated pain hypersensitivity and affective-like behavior and to what extent microglial reactivity contributes to these behavioral phenotypes. Male and female C57BL/6J mice underwent sham or repeated mild traumatic brain injury (rmTBI) and were tested for up to 9 weeks postinjury, where an anti-inflammatory/neuroprotective drug (minocycline) was introduced at 5 weeks postinjury in the drinking water. Repeated mild traumatic brain injury mice developed cold nociceptive hypersensitivity and negative affective states, as well as increased locomotor activity and risk-taking behavior. Minocycline reversed negative affect and pain hypersensitivities in male but not female mice. Repeated mild traumatic brain injury also produced an increase in microglial and brain-derived neurotropic factor mRNA transcripts in limbic structures known to be involved in nociception and affect, but many of these changes were sex dependent. Finally, we show that the antiepileptic drug, gabapentin, produced negative reinforcement in male rmTBI mice that was prevented by minocycline treatment, whereas rmTBI female mice showed a place aversion to gabapentin. Collectively, pain hypersensitivity, increased tonic-aversive pain components, and negative affective states were evident in both male and female rmTBI mice, but suppression of microglial reactivity was only sufficient to reverse behavioral changes in male mice. Neuroinflammation in limbic structures seems to be a contributing factor in behavioral changes resulting from rmTBI.

A Scoping Review of Quality-of-Life Assessments Employed in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction.

INTRODUCTION: Surgeons use several quality-of-life instruments to track outcomes following abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR); however, there is no universally agreed upon instrument. We review the instruments used in AWR and report their utilization trends within the literature. METHODS: This scoping review was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines using the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane databases. All published articles in the English language that employed a quality-of-life assessment for abdominal wall hernia repair were included. Studies which focused solely on aesthetic abdominoplasty, autologous breast reconstruction, rectus diastasis, pediatric patients, inguinal hernia, or femoral hernias were excluded. RESULTS: Six hernia-specific tools and six generic health tools were identified. The Hernia-Related Quality-of-Life Survey and Carolinas Comfort Scale are the most common hernia-specific tools, while the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) is the most common generic health tool. Notably, the SF-36 is also the most widely used tool for AWR outcomes overall. Each tool captures a unique set of patient outcomes which ranges from abdominal wall functionality to mental health. CONCLUSIONS: The outcomes of AWR have been widely studied with several different assessments proposed and used over the past few decades. These instruments allow for patient assessment of pain, quality of life, functional status, and mental health. Commonly used tools include the Hernia-Related Quality-of-Life Survey, Carolinas Comfort Scale, and SF-36. Due to the large heterogeneity of available instruments, future work may seek to determine or develop a standardized instrument for characterizing AWR outcomes.