Overcoming the Axillary Nerve Blind Spot Through the Deltopectoral and Axillary Approaches: A Cadaveric Study.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of exploring the axillary nerve (AN) at the 6 o'clock position (blind spot) using the deltopectoral approach, with the interval lateral to the conjoint tendon (CJT) or combined with the axillary approach. METHODS: Four ANs were dissected combining the deltopectoral approach-medial to the CJ (A), the deltopectoral approach-lateral to the CJT (B) and the axillary approach (C) in 3 sequences: A-B-C, B-A-C, and C-B-A. After the first approach was completed, the proximal and distal margins were marked. Additional exposure with the second and third approaches and the 6 o'clock position were also marked. Then, the AN was excised and the amount of exposed nerve with the 3 approaches was measured. RESULTS: The deltopectoral approach-medial to the conjoint tendon did not allow exposure of the AN at the 6 o'clock position. Six o'clock position exposure was accomplished using the lateral interval of the deltopectoral and the axillary approaches. A deltopectoral approach lateral to the CJT allowed exploration of the AN at the blind spot, but not the terminal branches. The axillary approach was able to expose the AN at the 6 o'clock position, the terminal branches, but not the nerve-muscle junction. Combining the 3 approaches exposed 81% to 94% of the total length of the AN. CONCLUSIONS: The deltopectoral approach allowed visualization of the AN at the 6 o'clock position when explored lateral to the CJT. The axillary approach allowed visualization of the terminal branches of the AN and the 6 o'clock position of the glenoid. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The deltopectoral approach lateral to the conjoint tendon allows the surgeon to assess continuity of the AN at the 6-o'clock position and to perform a neurolysis. If nerve repair, nerve grafting, or nerve transfer is attempted, a combination of the 3 approaches could be used.

Role of Ligament Stabilizers of the Proximal Carpal Row in Preventing Dorsal Intercalated Segment Instability: A Cadaveric Study.

BACKGROUND: Isolated injuries of the scapholunate interosseous ligament (SLIL) are insufficient to produce dorsal intercalated segment instability. There is no consensus about which additional ligamentous stabilizers are critical determinants of dorsal intercalated segment instability. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of the long radiolunate (LRL), scaphotrapeziotrapezoid (STT), and dorsal intercarpal (DIC) ligaments in preventing dorsal intercalated segment instability. METHODS: Thirty fresh-frozen forearms were randomized to 5 ligament section sequences to study the SLIL, LRL, STT, and DIC ligaments. The DIC-lunate insertion (DIC) and scaphoid insertion (DIC) were studied separately; the DIC insertions on the trapezium and triquetrum were left intact. Loaded posteroanterior and lateral fluoroscopic images were obtained at baseline and repeated after each ligament was sectioned. After each sequence, the wrists were loaded cyclically (71 N). The radiolunate angle was measured with load. Dorsal intercalated segment instability was defined as an increase of >15° in the radiolunate angle compared with baseline. RESULTS: Division of the SLIL did not increase the radiolunate angle. Section of the SLIL+LRL or SLIL+DIC significantly increased the radiolunate angle but did not produce dorsal intercalated segment instability. Section of the SLIL+STT or SLIL+DIC+DIC produced dorsal intercalated segment instability. CONCLUSIONS: In order to produce dorsal intercalated segment instability, complete scapholunate injuries require the disruption of at least 1 critical ligament stabilizer of the scaphoid or lunate (the STT or DIC+DIC). CLINICAL RELEVANCE: When treating SLIL tears with dorsal intercalated segment instability, techniques to evaluate the volar and dorsal critical stabilizers of the proximal carpal row should be considered.