Clinical Features of Non-Lateralized Tinnitus.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to analyze and confirm the clinical features of patients with non-lateralized tinnitus and to identify clues that can be used in their management. METHODS: Data from 469 patients who visited a university hospital complaining of tinnitus between March 2020 and December 2021 were reviewed. The patients' medical histories, Tinnitus Handicap Inventory, Beck Depression Inventory, and numerical rating scale scores on tinnitus awareness, annoyance, loudness, and effect on life, audiological profiles, and quantitative electroencephalography findings were documented. RESULTS: Forty-nine (10.4%) patients had non-lateralized tinnitus. They were older and had a shorter duration of symptoms (13.91 ± 34.16 months) than patients with bilateral tinnitus (duration: 39.15 ± 80.82 months) (P -lt; .05). The accompanying symptoms, Tinnitus Handicap Inventory scores, and numerical rating scale scores were not significantly different between the 2 groups (P -gt; .05). Patients with non-lateralized tinnitus had worse hearing at 12 kHz on the left side than those with unilateral tinnitus. Hearing asymmetry was least common in non-lateralized tinnitus (n=11/49, 10.4%), followed by bilateral tinnitus (n=54/198, 42.2%) and unilateral tinnitus (n=97/222, 47.3%) (P-lt; .001). Regarding quantitative electroencephalography, there were significant differences in the absolute power of the theta, alpha, beta, gamma, and total frequency bands based on tinnitus lateralization (P -lt; .001). CONCLUSION: Non-lateralized tinnitus can be perceived in elderly patients with symmetric and extended high-frequency hearing loss before habituation is achieved at an early stage of tinnitus. However, there was no difference in the questionnaire scores and accompanying symptoms; therefore, it may not be worth managing non-lateralized tinnitus separately from tinnitus in the ear.

Short-Term Effect of Adjunctive Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation on Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss and Tinnitus: A Preliminary Study.

BACKGROUND: Transcranial random noise stimulation has previously been used to manage tinnitus. This study assessed the feasibility of adjuvant transcranial random noise stimulation with conventional steroid treatment for idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss with or without tinnitus. METHODS: Prospective, randomized, single-blind study was conducted in Eulji University hospital. Twenty-four patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss were admitted for treatment between March 2019 and February 2020. The study group received 4 sessions of adjuvant transcranial random noise stimulation (frequency band: 0.1-100 Hz; target, T7/T8; duration: 20 minutes), while the control group received only conventional treatment. Hearing levels at admission, discharge day (day 7), and 4 weeks later and clinical characteristics were assessed. The primary outcome measure was hearing improvement at 4 weeks after neuromodulation. The secondary outcome measure was the presence of tinnitus at 4 weeks. RESULTS: The mean hearing thresholds improved significantly over time (P < .05). Although initial hearing levels did not differ between the 2 groups, the study group had a significantly better hearing at 4 weeks after discharge (P > .05). A significant interaction was also observed between the mean hearing thresholds at various timepoints and transcranial random noise stimulation (P=.001). However, the persistence of tinnitus after treatment did not differ irrespective of the allocation groups. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant transcranial random noise stimulation seems to be a potential treatment option for hearing restoration in patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss without serious complications. However, transcranial random noise stimulation does not seem to alleviate tinnitus.

Clinical Findings That Differentiate Co-Occurrence of Hyperacusis and Tinnitus from Tinnitus Alone.

PURPOSE: We aimed to assess the characteristics of patients with concurrent tinnitus and hyperacusis, determine the best audiological criteria for predicting hyperacusis, and confirm whether objective evidence of changes in the brain exists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records of patients with tinnitus who visited the hospital between March 2020 and December 2021 were reviewed. Data on accompanying hyperacusis, audiological profiles, and questionnaires including the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI), Beck Depression Inventory, and numerical rating scale were analyzed. Resting-state quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG) using power spectral density (PSD) and event-related spectral perturbation (ERSP) were performed to objectively quantify changes in the brain. RESULTS: A total of 194 patients were analyzed. Among them, 51 (26.3%) reported combined subjective hyperacusis with tinnitus. However, the proportions widely varied from 7.4% to 68.4% based on three audiological criteria for assessment. A higher score on the THI questionnaire was independently associated with the co-occurrence of tinnitus and hyperacusis. Fair agreement was observed between subjective hyperacusis and the audiological criterion based on a loudness discomfort level (LDL) of ≤90 dB at two or more frequencies for the diagnosis of hyperacusis. An increased beta-PSD and decreased levels of gamma-PSD, all-ERSP, and delta-ERSP were observed in patients with hyperacusis (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Patients with co-occurring tinnitus and hyperacusis had more severe tinnitus distress. An LDL of ≤90 dB at two or more frequencies may be applicable to predict accompanying hyperacusis in subjects with tinnitus, and qEEG also provides more objective information.

Audiological and psychological assessment of tinnitus patients with normal hearing.

Introduction: This study was performed to assess identifiable abnormalities in tinnitus patients with normal hearing. Methods: The medical records of subjective non-pulsatile tinnitus patients with normal hearing confirmed by conventional pure-tone audiometry who visited our tinnitus clinic between March 2020 and May 2022 were reviewed. The loudness discomfort level (LDL), extended high-frequency hearing loss (EHFHL), summating potential (SP)/action potential (AP) ratio, distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE), thresholds of auditory brainstem response (ABR) wave V, somatic modulation, and psychiatric symptoms, such as anxiety, depression, and stress were evaluated by questionnaires. Results: Decreased LDL (n = 48, 59.8%) was the most frequent finding, followed by EHFHL (n = 29, 35.4%), increased SP/AP ratio (n = 27, 32.9%), psychiatric symptoms (n = 24, 29.3%), decreased DPOAE (n = 17, 20.7%), somatic modulation (n = 8, 9.8%), and increased ABR threshold (n = 3, 3.7%); 75.6% of patients had one or more of these findings. The presence of psychiatric symptoms was independently associated with the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) score. Conclusion: Tinnitus in patients with normal hearing may be accompanied by a combination of various subclinical abnormal audiological findings. However, the presence of psychiatric symptoms alone was independently associated with tinnitus distress.