Comparisons of cardiac surgery outcomes in Jehovah's versus Non-Jehovah's Witnesses.

Jehovah's Witnesses is a Christian faith whose members will not accept blood or blood products under any circumstances on the basis of religious grounds. To date, no comparative studies have evaluated the outcome of open heart surgery in Jehovah's Witnesses compared with patients who accept the transfusion of blood products. The present study was conducted to systematically compare the operative mortality and early clinical outcome after open cardiac surgery in Jehovah's Witnesses versus non-Jehovah's Witnesses. From January 1990 to July 2004, 49 Jehovah's Witness patients underwent cardiac surgery, and their data were compared with those of a contemporaneous control group of 196 non-Jehovah's Witnesses. Logistic regression analysis was used to compare operative mortality, postoperative intensive care unit care, and hospital length of stay between the 2 groups, controlling for preoperative risk factors. The Jehovah's Witnesses were matched in a 1:4 ratio to the non-Jehovah's Witnesses using propensity scores. No significant differences were identified in unadjusted stroke (p = 0.5), acute myocardial infarction (p = 0.6), new-onset atrial fibrillation (p = 0.106), prolonged ventilation (p = 0.82), acute renal failure (p = 0.70), and hemorrhage-related reexploration (p = 0.59) rates between the 2 groups. On multivariate analysis, Jehovah's Witnesses had operative mortality (odds ratio 0.66, 95% confidence interval 0.12 to 3.59, p = 0.63), intensive care unit stay (odds ratio 1.36, 95% confidence interval 0.46 to 3.97, p = 0.58), and postoperative length of stay (odds ratio 1.43, 95% confidence interval 0.92 to 2.20, p = 0.16) comparable to those of the non-Jehovah's Witnesses, after controlling for preoperative risk factors through matching. In conclusion, cardiac surgery in Jehovah's Witnesses is associated with clinical outcomes comparable to those of non-Jehovah's Witnesses by adhering to blood conservation protocols.

Impact of follow-up on the success rate of the cryosurgical maze procedure in patients with rheumatic heart disease and enlarged atria.

OBJECTIVES: The most important predictors for failure of the maze procedure are long standing atrial fibrillation (AF), rheumatic heart disease (RHD), and enlarged atria. It is well documented, however, that some patients have recurrence of atrial arrhythmia only late in follow-up. The aims of this study are to assess the effectiveness of the maze procedure and late cardioversion (pharmacologic or electrical) in patients wtih an increased risk for procedure failure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-five patients with AF, enlarged left atrium (>5 cm), and/or RHD were enrolled in the study. Cryosurgery was performed on all patients and was combined with bipolar radiofrequency in the last four patients. The lesion pattern resembles the maze procedure. A follow-up was completed on all patients (24.5 +/- 9.6 months with a range of 3-39 months). RESULTS: The operative mortality was 3.7% (2 patients), both deaths unrelated to the maze procedure. Ninety-eight percent of patients were free of AF upon discharge, with an 11% incidence of early pacemaker implantation. In the first three months postoperatively, 53% of the patients experienced intermittent atrial arrhythmia. Four patients were recorded with permanent AF in late follow-up. The only predictor for late AF (>3 months of follow-up) was perioperative AF. Atrial size, RHD, and AF duration did not predict late failure. CONCLUSIONS: The maze procedure can be applied with high success rate in patients with RHD, enlarged atria, and long-standing AF. In our experience many of the late recurrences were recorded late in the follow-up and were treated successfully with antiarrhythmic drugs and/or cardioversion. Therefore a close follow-up is required to enhance the success rate of the procedure.

Efficacy and safety of heparinase I versus protamine in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with and without cardiopulmonary bypass.

BACKGROUND: Hemodynamic protamine reactions with heparin reversal during cardiac surgery are common and associated with adverse outcomes. As an alternative to protamine, the authors examined heparinase I reversal of heparin after aortocoronary bypass graft surgery. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy trial, 167 on- and off-pump aortocoronary bypass graft surgery patients received either heparinase I (maximum 35 microg/kg) or protamine (maximum 650 mg) for heparin reversal, monitored by activated clotting time values and clinical assessment. Hemodynamic parameters were recorded electronically; safety evaluation was to 30 days postoperatively. Noninferiority was predefined as 400 ml or less median 12-h chest tube drainage from intensive care unit arrival for heparinase I patients, after risk adjustment. Hemodynamic instability was defined as systemic hypotension (> or = 30 mmHg decrease) and/or pulmonary hypertension (> or = 40 mmHg with an increase > or = 10 mmHg) within 30 min of heparin reversal initiation. RESULTS: Patient enrollment was terminated on advisement of the Data Safety Monitoring Board. Although heparinase I was noninferior for 12-h chest tube drainage, protamine had a superior safety profile. Overall, heparinase I subjects had longer hospital stays (P = 0.04), were more likely to experience a serious adverse event (P = 0.01), and were less likely to avoid transfusion (P = 0.006). A composite morbidity score was not different (P = 0.24), and similar rates of hemodynamic instability were observed between groups. Findings were consistent in analyses stratified by on- and off-pump surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Heparinase I reverses heparin anticoagulation after aortocoronary bypass graft surgery but is not equivalent to protamine because of its inferior safety profile.

Adjunctive transmyocardial revascularization: five-year follow-up of a prospective, randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: In a prospective, randomized trial involving 263 patients who would be incompletely revascularized by coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) alone, CABG plus transmyocardial revascularization (CABG/TMR) provided an early mortality benefit with similar angina relief compared with CABG alone at 1 year. We evaluated the long-term outcome of patients randomized to CABG/TMR or CABG alone. METHODS: Thirteen centers that enrolled 83% (218/263) of the patients in the original trial participated in this longitudinal study. Between 1996 and 1998, these centers randomized 218 patients who would be incompletely revascularized by CABG alone because of diffusely diseased target vessels to either holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (holmium:YAG) CABG/TMR (n = 110) or CABG alone (n = 108). Baseline demographics and operative characteristics were similar between groups. Follow-up (mean 5.0 +/- 1.7 years) included survival and blinded angina class assessment. RESULTS: At this 5-year follow-up both groups experienced significant angina improvement from baseline, however, the CABG/TMR group had a lower mean angina score (0.4 +/- 0.7 vs 0.7 +/- 1.1, p = 0.05), a significantly lower proportion of patients with severe angina (class III/IV: 0% [0/68] vs 10% [6/60], p = 0.009), and a trend towards greater number of angina-free patients (78% [53/68] vs 63% [38/60], p = 0.08), compared with CABG alone patients. Kaplan-Meier survival at 6 years was similar between CABG/TMR and CABG alone patients (76% vs 80%, p = 0.90). CONCLUSIONS: Five-year follow-up of prospectively randomized patients who would be incompletely revascularized because of diffuse coronary artery disease indicates that the addition of TMR to conventional CABG provides superior angina relief compared to CABG alone.

Mortality from time of listing for transplantation as an indicator of candidate outcomes.

CONTEXT: Survival after transplantation has traditionally been the statistic most closely scrutinized as to the efficacy of the procedure and a program's performance. We propose that mortality from the time of listing is a more significant outcome measure for potential transplant candidates. We present our lung transplant program's outcomes using this measure. METHODS: An analysis was performed on all patients listed for lung transplantation at our institution between 1997 and 2002. Kaplan-Meier analyses of survival at 1, 2, and 3 years after listing were assessed. RESULTS: One hundred forty-eight patients qualified for the analysis; of these, 96 received transplants. The median time to transplantation was 142 days. Twenty-five of the patients died while waiting for a transplant. The median time to death for these patients was 311 days. Of the 27 transplant recipients who died, the median time from listing to death was 547 days. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year mortality rates after being listed were 20.0%, 32.4%, and 39.7%, respectively, for all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality after listing is a more relevant statistic for prospective transplant candidates. Intraprogram comparisons of listed nontransplant survival to listed transplant survival may facilitate the acceptance of sicker patients for transplant consideration. It may also help foster the development of an "alternate" list for transplantation and prove useful in helping determine organ prioritization.

Heart transplantation in a patient with isolated noncompaction of the left ventricular myocardium.

We describe a patient with isolated noncompaction of the left ventricle who presented with worsening congestive heart failure and was successfully treated with heart transplantation. The prognosis for these patients is poor because of accelerated event rates of fatal arrhythmias, thromboemboli, and profound left ventricular decompensation. Only 7 patients with isolated noncompaction of the left ventricle have been reported to have undergone heart transplantation. Herein we describe a patient with isolated noncompaction of the left ventricle who underwent successful heart transplantation.

Postoperative complications among octogenarians after cardiovascular surgery.

BACKGROUND: The octogenarian patient is often perceived as too fragile to undergo cardiothoracic surgery. Our study aimed to compare postoperative complications in patients aged less than 80 versus elderly patients (80 years or more) after surgical cardiac intervention (coronary artery bypass or valve replacement). METHODS: Subjects were all patients (n = 8,361) who had an open-heart procedure, either coronary artery bypass or valve implantation or replacement, at two medical centers located in northern Virginia using the same surgical group. A computerized medical record database was reviewed to determine preoperative risk factors and postoperative outcomes. Predictors of complications were identified by univariate and multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 3,214 complications were recorded. The most prevalent complications were prolonged ventilation time in the intensive care unit, reoperation for bleeding, and pneumonia. The overall mortality rate was 2.4% (204 of 8,361). Persons aged over 80 years had nearly double the mortality rate compared with younger patients (4.1% [18 of 444] to 2.3% [186 of 7,917]). Age greater than 80 years (odds ratio = 2.65, 95% confidence interval = 2.18 to 3.22) and male gender (odds ratio = 0.62, 95% confidence interval = 0.56 to 0.69) were the best univariate predictors of a single postoperative complication. CONCLUSIONS: Octogenarian patients manifested twice the risk of death from a cardiac intervention with an average 2-day longer hospital stay compared with their younger counterparts. Furthermore, octogenarians were at markedly higher risk of nonfatal postoperative complications.