Immunohistochemical findings and clinicopathological features of breast cancers with pathogenic germline mutations in Non-BRCA genes.

Deleterious germline mutations in multiple genes confer an increased breast cancer (BC) risk. Immunohistochemical (IHC) expression of protein products of mutated high-risk genes has not been investigated in BC. We hypothesized that pathogenic mutations may lead to an abnormal IHC expression pattern in the tumor cells. BCs with deleterious germline mutations in CHEK2, ATM, PALB2 & PTEN were identified. Immunohistochemistry was performed using Dako staining platform on formalin fixed paraffin embedded tumor tissue. Primary antibodies for PALB2 (ab202970), ATM [2C1(1A10)}, CHK2 (EPR4325), and PTEN (138G6) proteins were used for BCs with respective deleterious mutations. IHC expression was assessed in tumor and adjacent benign breast tissue. Total 27 BCs with 10 CHEK2, 9 ATM, 6 PALB2 & 2 PTEN deleterious germline mutations were identified. IHC staining was performed on 8 CHEK2, 7 ATM, 6 PALB2 & 2 PTEN cases. Abnormal CHEK2 IHC staining was identified in 7/8(88%) BCs. Three distinct CHK2 IHC patterns were noted: 1) Strong diffuse nuclear positivity (5 BC), 2) Null-pattern (2 BC), & 3) Normal breast-like staining in 1 BC Four of 5 (80%) strong CHK2 staining BC had missense CHEK2 mutations. Null-pattern was present with a missense & a frameshift mutation. Normal breast-like CHEK2 IHC staining pattern was present in 1 BC with CHEK2 frameshift mutation. Loss of nuclear/cytoplasmic PTEN IHC expression was noted in 2 in-situ carcinomas. Abnormal PTEN and CHK2 IHC were present in atypical ductal hyperplasia and flat epithelial atypia. ATM and PALB2 IHC expression patterns were similar in tumor cells and benign breast epithelium: mild to moderate intensity nuclear and cytoplasmic staining. We report abnormal CHEK2 IHC expression in 88% of BCs with pathogenic CHEK2 mutations. With PTEN and CHEK2 pathogenic mutations, abnormal IHC patterns are seen in early atypical proliferative lesions. IHC may be applied to identify CHEK2 & PTEN mutated BCs and precursor lesions.

TBCRC 031: Randomized Phase II Study of Neoadjuvant Cisplatin Versus Doxorubicin-Cyclophosphamide in Germline BRCA Carriers With HER2-Negative Breast Cancer (the INFORM trial).

PURPOSE: Platinum compounds have activity in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) in germline BRCA mutation carriers (BRCA carriers). Limited data exist for estrogen receptor (ER)-positive (+) breast cancer among BRCA carriers. INFORM is a randomized, multicenter, phase II trial comparing pathologic complete response (pCR) rates (ypT0/is, N0) after neoadjuvant single-agent cisplatin (CDDP) versus doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide (AC) in BRCA carriers with stage I-III human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer. Secondary objectives included residual cancer burden scores (RCB) of 0 or 1 (combined) and toxicity. The goal was to determine whether pCR was ≥ 20% higher with CDDP than AC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: BRCA carriers with cT1-3 (≥ 1.5 cm), cN0-3 HER2-negative breast cancer were randomly assigned to preoperative CDDP (75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks × 4 doses) or AC (doxorubicin 60 mg/m2; cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 every 2-3 weeks × 4 doses) followed by surgery. Pathologic responses were confirmed by central review. RESULTS: A total of 118 patients were randomly assigned; 117 were included in outcome analyses. Mean age was 42 years (range, 24-73 years); 69% were BRCA1+, 30% were BRCA2+, and 2% had both mutations. Clinical stage was I for 19%, II for 63%, and III for 18%; 45% had nodal involvement at baseline. Seventy percent had TNBC. Clinical and tumor characteristics were well matched between treatment arms. The pCR rate was 18% with CDDP and 26% with AC, yielding a risk ratio (RR) of 0.70 (90% CI, 0.39 to 1.2). The risk of RCB 0 or 1 (RCB 0/1) was 33% with CDDP and 46% with AC (RR, 0.73; 90% CI, 0.50 to 1.1). Both regimens were generally well tolerated without unexpected toxicities. CONCLUSION: pCR or RCB 0/1 is not significantly higher with CDDP than with AC in BRCA carriers with stage I-III HER2-negative breast cancer for both TNBC and ER+/HER2-negative disease.

Choosing high-risk screening vs. surgery and the effect of treatment modality on anxiety and breast-specific sensuality in BRCA mutation carriers.

BACKGROUND: We have previously shown that breast cancer surgery affects breast specific sensuality, and that women who undergo mastectomy may have worse sexual function outcomes than those who undergo lumpectomy. It is less clear if patients who undergo prophylactic mastectomy are equally as affected as those with a cancer diagnosis. We sought to compare sexual function outcomes and their relationship to depression and anxiety between BRCA mutation carriers (mBRCA) with and without cancer in order to guide surgical counseling and improve survivorship outcomes. METHODS: A confidential, cross-sectional survey was distributed electronically to mBRCA at least 18 years of age. The survey included investigator-generated questions, the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) surveys. Responses were analyzed in total and divided into two subgroups: those with and without breast cancer. RESULTS: Sixty-three mBRCA responded (37%) of 170 email addresses were identified, and 77% were postmenopausal. Although more than half of all mBRCA reported that the role of the breast in intimacy was important, most patients without cancer and all of those with cancer experienced an impressive decline in certain breast-specific sensuality parameters postoperatively. Among those without cancer, anxiety scores were not different between those choosing prophylactic mastectomy and high-risk screening (HRS). Sexual function as measured by the FSFI was negatively correlated with depression and anxiety in mBRCA. FSFI scores were not significantly different between those with and without cancer. However, the median FSFI of mBRCA with cancer, those undergoing HRS, and those who underwent prophylactic mastectomy indicated sexual dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: As the availability of genetic testing increases, more women are found to harbor BRCA mutations and must choose between HRS and prophylactic surgery. Women with BRCA mutations, both with and without breast cancer, are susceptible to derangements in sexual function during the course of both screening or treatment, and this appears to be negatively correlated to depression and anxiety.

Advances in Medical Management of Early Stage and Advanced Breast Cancer: 2015.

Standard management of early stage and advanced breast cancer has been improved over the past few years by knowledge gained about the biology of the disease, results from a number of eagerly anticipated clinical trials and the development of novel agents that offer our patients options for improved outcomes or reduced toxicity or both. This review highlights recent major developments affecting the systemic therapy of breast cancer, broken down by clinically relevant patient subgroups and disease stage, and briefly discusses some of the ongoing controversies in the treatment of breast cancer and promising therapies on the horizon.

Adherence patterns to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines for referral to cancer genetic professionals.

OBJECTIVE: Genetic predisposition is responsible for 5-10% of breast cancer, 10% of ovarian cancer and 2-5% of uterine cancer. The study objective was to compare genetic counseling and testing referral rates among women with breast cancer that met NCCN referral guidelines to the referral rates among women with gynecologic cancers and determine predictors of referral. METHODS: Utilizing an institutional tumor registry database, patients from an academic women's oncology program were identified who met a subset of NCCN guidelines for genetic referral between 2004 and 2010. Patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer, breast cancer ≤50years of age, or uterine cancer <50years of age were included. A retrospective electronic chart review was conducted to evaluate for a genetic referral and uptake of genetic testing. RESULTS: 820 women were included (216 uterine, 314 breast, and 290 ovarian cancer). The overall genetic referral rate was 21.7%. 34% of eligible breast cancer patients were referred compared to 13.4% of uterine cancer and 14.5% of ovarian cancer patients (p<0.0001). Younger age, breast cancer diagnosis, family history and earlier stage were all significant referral predictors. The odds of being referred increased with the number of affected family members. 70.8% of referred patients, consulted with genetics. Among those who consulted with genetics, 95.2% underwent testing. CONCLUSIONS: Although increasing, genetic counseling remains underutilized across cancer diagnosis. Women with breast cancer are more likely to be referred than women with gynecologic cancers. Younger age, earlier stage and positive family history appear to be predictive of referral for genetic evaluation.

Targeted T-cell Therapy in Stage IV Breast Cancer: A Phase I Clinical Trial.

PURPOSE: This study reports a phase I immunotherapy trial in 23 women with metastatic breast cancer consisting of eight infusions of anti-CD3 × anti-HER2 bispecific antibody (HER2Bi) armed anti-CD3-activated T cells (ATC) in combination with low-dose IL-2 and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor to determine safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), technical feasibility, T-cell trafficking, immune responses, time to progression, and overall survival (OS). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: ATC were expanded from leukapheresis product using IL2 and anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody and armed with HER2Bi. In 3+3 dose escalation design, groups of 3 patients received 5, 10, 20, or 40 × 10(9) armed ATC (aATC) per infusion. RESULTS: There were no dose-limiting toxicities and the MTD was not defined. It was technically feasible to grow 160 × 10(9) ATC from a single leukapheresis. aATC persisted in the blood for weeks and trafficked to tumors. Infusions of aATC induced anti-breast cancer responses and increases in immunokines. At 14.5 weeks after enrollment, 13 of 22 (59.1%) evaluable patients had stable disease and 9 of 22 (40.9%) had progressive disease. The median OS was 36.2 months for all patients, 57.4 months for HER2 3+ patients, and 27.4 months for HER2 0-2+ patients. CONCLUSIONS: Targeting HER2(+) and HER2(-) tumors with aATC infusions induced antitumor responses, increases in Th1 cytokines, and IL12 serum levels that suggest that aATC infusions vaccinated patients against their own tumors. These results provide a strong rationale for conducting phase II trials.

Prevalence and predictors of loss of wild type BRCA1 in estrogen receptor positive and negative BRCA1-associated breast cancers.

INTRODUCTION: The majority of breast cancers that occur in BRCA1 mutation carriers (BRCA1 carriers) are estrogen receptor-negative (ER-). Therefore, it has been suggested that ER negativity is intrinsic to BRCA1 cancers and reflects the cell of origin of these tumors. However, approximately 20% of breast cancers that develop in BRCA1 carriers are ER-positive (ER+); these cancers are more likely to develop as BRCA1 carriers age, suggesting that they may be incidental and unrelated to BRCA1 deficiency. The purpose of this study was to compare the prevalence of loss of heterozygosity due to loss of wild type (wt) BRCA1 in ER+ and ER- breast cancers that have occurred in BRCA1 carriers and to determine whether age at diagnosis or any pathologic features or biomarkers predict for loss of wt BRCA1 in these breast cancers. METHODS: Relative amounts of mutated and wt BRCA1 DNA were measured by quantitative polymerase chain reaction performed on laser capture microdissected cancer cells from 42 ER+ and 35 ER- invasive breast cancers that developed in BRCA1 carriers. BRCA1 gene methylation was determined on all cancers in which sufficient DNA was available. Immunostains for cytokeratins (CK) 5/6, 14, 8 and 18, epidermal growth factor receptor and p53 were performed on paraffin sections from tissue microarrays containing these cancers. RESULTS: Loss of wt BRCA1 was equally frequent in ER+ and ER- BRCA1-associated cancers (81.0% vs 88.6%, respectively; P = 0.53). One of nine cancers tested that retained wt BRCA1 demonstrated BRCA1 gene methylation. Age at diagnosis was not significantly different between first invasive ER+ BRCA1 breast cancers with and without loss of wt BRCA1 (mean age 45.2 years vs 50.1 years, respectively; P = 0.51). ER+ BRCA1 cancers that retained wt BRCA1 were significantly more likely than those that lost wt BRCA1 to have a low mitotic rate (odds ratio (OR), 5.16; 95% CI, 1.91 to ∞). BRCA1 cancers with loss of wt BRCA1 were more likely to express basal cytokeratins CK 5/6 or 14 (OR 4.7; 95% CI, 1.85 to ∞). CONCLUSIONS: We found no difference in the prevalence of loss of wt BRCA1 between ER+ and ER- invasive BRCA1-associated breast cancers. Our findings suggest that many of the newer therapies for BRCA1 breast cancers designed to exploit the BRCA1 deficiency in these cancers may also be effective in ER+ cancers that develop in this population.

Estrogen receptor positive breast cancers in BRCA1 mutation carriers: clinical risk factors and pathologic features.

INTRODUCTION: Most breast cancers that occur in women with germline BRCA1 mutations are estrogen receptor-negative (ER-) and also typically lack expression of progesterone receptor (PR) and HER2 overexpression. We undertook a study to assess the clinical factors that predict for an estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer in BRCA1 mutation carriers and to characterize the pathologic features of these tumors. METHODS: Clinical characteristics of BRCA1 carriers with 58 ER+ and 114 ER- first invasive breast cancers were compared. Pathologic features of BRCA1 ER+ cancers were compared to those of BRCA1 ER- cancers and to age-matched ER+ sporadic cancers. RESULTS: BRCA1 carriers aged > or = 50 at diagnosis of first invasive breast cancer were more likely to have an ER+ cancer compared to those aged < 50 (57% vs 29%, P = 0.005). ER+ BRCA1 cancers were less likely than ER- BRCA1 cancers to have "BRCA-associated" features such as high mitotic activity, geographic necrosis/fibrotic focus, and pushing margins (RR 0.06, 0.22, 0.24; P < 0.001, 0.02, 0.03 respectively). When compared to sporadic ER+ cancers, ER+ BRCA1 cancers were more often of invasive ductal type (RR 2.4, P = 0.03), with a high mitotic rate (RR 5.0, P = 0.006) and absent or mild lymphocytic infiltrate (RR 10.2, P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: BRCA1 carriers who are older at first breast cancer diagnosis are more likely to have ER+ tumors than younger BRCA1 carriers. These ER+ cancers appear pathologically "intermediate" between ER- BRCA1 cancers and ER+ sporadic breast cancers raising the possibility that either some ER+ BRCA1 cancers are incidental or that there is a unique mechanism by which these cancers develop.

Addressing clinical trials: can the multidisciplinary Tumor Board improve participation? A study from an academic women's cancer program.

OBJECTIVE: The Tumor Board (TB) allows for an interdisciplinary approach to cancer treatment designed to encourage evidence-based treatment. However, its role in facilitating clinical trial participation has not been reported. We aimed to determine whether a prospective TB is an effective strategy for trial recruitment and to identify steps within the TB process that facilitate discussion of trial eligibility and optimize accrual. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of women presented to Gynecologic Oncology TB between March and December 2008. Patient demographics, TB recommendations, and post-TB patient discussions were abstracted. These were compared to data derived from the Department of Oncology Research to determine research team awareness of eligible patients and confirm trial enrollment(s). Data analysis was completed with Chi-square test; risk ratios and confidence intervals were calculated as summary measures. RESULTS: We reviewed 1213 case presentations involving 916 women. Overall, 358 TB recommendations (30%) identified eligible patients, of which enrollment consisted of 87 (24%) trials (6% therapeutic trials and 18% non-therapeutic trials). Compared to other types of TB recommendations, those involving trials were discussed less frequently at post-TB patient visits (79% vs. 44%). Documentation of trial discussion at the post-TB visit was more likely to result in trial participation, versus solely relying on the research staff to communicate enrollment eligibility with the treating team (RR 2.5, p=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Patients identified by the TB were 2.5-times as likely to enroll in a clinical trial, but trials were mentioned only 44% of the time. Interventions that facilitate trial discussions during post-TB meetings are needed to improve trial participation.

Clinical characteristics and choices regarding risk-reducing surgery in BRCA mutation carriers.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: BRCA mutation carriers have a high lifetime risk of developing breast and ovarian malignancies. As genetic testing becomes widely available, preventative measures are a choice. We evaluated the characteristics of BRCA mutation carriers who chose prophylactic surgery (PS) compared to those who opted for surveillance. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients with a mutation in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes was performed. RESULTS: Ninety women were included, of whom 46 (51%) underwent PS. They were more likely to be a BRCA2 mutation carrier, parous, married, employed, and had a prior history of breast cancer. PS included 39 bilateral salpingo-oophorectomies and 13 mastectomies. Pathology was typically benign; however, 15% showed ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast, 8% reported infiltrating ductal carcinoma of the breast, 3% was adenocarcinoma of the fallopian tube, and 3% was adenocarcinoma of the ovary. CONCLUSION: It is notable that BRCA1 mutation carriers were less inclined to elect for PS. Evaluating the reasons for pursuing PS among women with a BRCA mutation is necessary and will require a larger data set. Long-term follow-up is required to describe the potential side effects of PS on quality of life.

Management of hematological malignancies during pregnancy.

The management of hematological malignancies during pregnancy is a challenging endeavor, which not only requires technical skills and knowledge by the clinicians but also requires sound clinical judgment and compassion, keeping in mind the patient and family preferences and, ultimately, the wellbeing of the neonate. The incidence of hematological malignancies during pregnancy is rare, ranging from 1 in 1,000 to 1 in 10,000 deliveries, impeding the design and execution of large prospective studies. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the limited existing data and make useful suggestions in the management of acute and chronic leukemias, Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphomas, plasma cell myeloma, and other hematological malignancies, such as myelodysplastic syndromes and hairy cell leukemia, during pregnancy.

Frequent pathologic complete responses in aggressive stages II to III breast cancers with every-4-week carboplatin and weekly paclitaxel with or without trastuzumab: a Brown University Oncology Group Study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant carboplatin and weekly paclitaxel +/- weekly trastuzumab in resectable and locally advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women with stages IIA to IIIB disease received carboplatin dosed by six times the area under the curve every 4 weeks and paclitaxel 80 mg/m(2) weekly for 16 weeks, and weekly trastuzumab was added for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) -positive status. The primary end point was the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate, defined as the absence of invasive disease in the breast and axillary nodes. Postoperative therapies were at the discretion of the treating physicians. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients were enrolled, and of these 43 had resectable disease. The median age was 54 years (range, 31 to 74 years). Treatment was well tolerated; there were no episodes of febrile neutropenia or grade 4 thrombocytopenia, and there were only two instances of grade 3 peripheral neuropathy. Overall, the pCR rate was 45%. The pCR rate was 43% (95% CI, 28% to 58%) in patients with resectable disease. Higher pCR rates occurred in patients with HER2-positive tumors (76% v 31% for HER2-negative tumors; P = .003), with estrogen receptor (ER) -negative tumors (75% v 27% for ER-positive tumors; P = .001), or with triple-negative tumors (67% v 12% ER-positive and HER2-negative tumors; P = .002). At a median of 28 months postoperation, recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 88.7%. If patients with ER-positive and HER2-negative tumors are excluded from analysis, patients who achieved a pCR were less likely to experience disease recurrence (RFS, 86%) than those who did not achieve a pCR (RFS, 75%). CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant carboplatin and weekly paclitaxel +/- trastuzumab achieve high pCR rates in patients with HER2-positive and triple-negative disease without exposure to an anthracycline. Preliminary RFS results are encouraging but are likely influenced by adjuvant therapy received. Additional study of this regimen in high-risk patients is warranted.

For women receiving chemotherapy for clinically apparent early ovarian cancer, is there a benefit to surgical staging?

BACKGROUND: For women with early stage ovarian cancer (ESOC), comprehensive staging is the standard of care and studies suggest that these patients may not require further treatment. For women with incidentally diagnosed ovarian cancer there is a lack of consensus as to whether surgical staging be performed, particularly if chemotherapy is recommended. OBJECTIVE: We performed this retrospective study to determine the outcomes of women treated with chemotherapy for clinically apparent ESOC, stratified by whether staging was performed or not. METHODS: This study was approved by institutional review board. All patients presenting to the Multidisciplinary Gynecologic Oncology Tumor Board between 1998 and 2005 with a consensus opinion of having clinically apparent ESOC were identified. Staging (partial or complete) was determined by a study pathologist and patients were stratified as being staged or unstaged. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. STATA 8.0 was used for all calculations. RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients were identified: 52 (59%) were staged and 36 (31%) were not. Median follow-up was 50 and 59.5 months, respectively. The majority of patients received carboplatin and paclitaxel in both cohorts with a median of 6 cycles. Five-year Disease Free Survival was 85% versus 80%, respectively (P = 0.54). Five-year Overall Survival was 85% versus 88% (P = 0.688). CONCLUSION: For women presenting with a clinically apparent ESOC in whom chemotherapy is administered, there does not seem to be an additional benefit to surgical staging. A prospective trial of women with clinically apparent ESOC to test this hypothesis should be considered.

Does the platinum-free interval predict the incidence or severity of hypersensitivity reactions to carboplatin? The experience from Women and Infants' Hospital.

OBJECTIVES: Carboplatin (C) is a standard treatment for gynecologic cancers, but its use in recurrence is associated with an increased risk of hypersensitivity reactions (HSR) in those previously treated with C. However, there is no way to predict those at risk for a C-HSR. We sought to evaluate whether the platinum-free interval (PFI) was predictive of incidence and severity of HSRs. METHODS: Patients treated with C between 1/99 and 12/2005 were identified through our chemotherapy database. Records were reviewed in those receiving multiple C regimens or with C HSR. Severity was defined as mild or severe based on symptoms. RESULTS: 126 patients were identified who had multiple C regimens. 63 (50%) experienced C HSRs of which 36 (29%) were severe. The incidence of C HSR was 25.8% for PFI < 12 months and 56.5% if > or = 12 months (p=0.0023). The incidence of a severe C HSR significantly increased with time as well: 6.5% PFI < 12 months, 23.9% PFI 12-24 months and 47% PFI > or = 24 months (p=0.0091). Of those receiving a 3rd regimen of C, 8/8 had a HSR and these were severe in seven (88%). Of note, 60 patients received > 8 (range 9-19) cycles with the first C regimen, and none of the patients reacted after cycle 8. CONCLUSIONS: A duration of greater than 12 months between C regimens is associated with an increased risk of both any--and severe--HSR. Our data also suggests that upfront treatment with C beyond eight cycles is not associated with an increased risk of HSR.

Cross-sensitivity between paclitaxel and docetaxel in a women's cancers program.

PURPOSE: With the use of steroid premedication, the incidence of severe hypersensitivity reactions (S-HSR) to paclitaxel is estimated to be 2%. For those who develop a S-HSR to paclitaxel, docetaxel has been employed as an alternative agent though the presence of cross-sensitivity has not been established. We sought to define the incidence of S-HSR to docetaxel following a paclitaxel S-HSR in an academic women's cancer program. METHODS: Patients treated with either paclitaxel (P) or docetaxel (D) between 11/1999 and 8/2004 were identified through our pharmacy database. Records were reviewed and data collected on those patients who had a S-HSR, defined as symptoms for which drug was discontinued, to P, D, or both. RESULTS: 718 patients received P and 93 received D. 59 received D following treatment with P. The presence of S-HSR for P was 2.2% (16/718 patients) and for D was 9.7% (9/93 patients). 10 patients with S-HSR to P crossed over to D and all nine patients reacting to D had a prior reaction to T for a cross-sensitivity rate of 90% (9/10 patients). CONCLUSIONS: Cross-sensitivity of D after P was 90% at our institution. Given the different vehicles used in P and D, it is likely attributed to the taxane moiety. Caution is required with re-challenge of patients with docetaxel if they have previously reacted to paclitaxel.

Two for good measure: six versus eight cycles of carboplatin and paclitaxel as adjuvant treatment for epithelial ovarian cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Although the standard of care for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is six cycles (6C) of platinum-taxane (PT), there have been no studies on the optimal duration of treatment in the era of adjuvant taxanes. At our center, some women receive eight cycles (8C) of PT, based on physician judgment. We were interested in evaluating the outcomes of women treated with 8C of PT for EOC as compared to a cohort who received 6C. METHODS: We retrospectively identified women with Stage III or IV EOC between 1998 and 2003 who received 6C or 8C of PT. The endpoints were disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS). CA-125 response was defined as a decrease in CA-125 of 50% in four serial samples or of 75% over three samples. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-two women met criteria for inclusion; 84 received 6C, and 38 received 8C. Comparing the cohorts receiving 6C versus 8C, 71% versus 26% were optimally debulked (P < 0.01). 79 patients were evaluable by CA-125 (52 6C/27 8C), and all responded. 88% receiving 6C and 81% receiving 8C normalized their CA-125 at end of treatment (P = 0.20). The proportion with a normal CA-125 at Cycle 2 was 29% versus 12%, respectively (P = 0.15) and, at Cycle 4, was 88% versus 36%, respectively (P < 0.01). DFS was 13 months with 6C and 8 months with 8C (P = 0.01). OS was 31 versus 23.5 months (P = 0.02), respectively. When the survival analysis is restricted to suboptimal debulked patients only, the DFS is 12.5 versus 8 months (P = 0.02), and OS is 32 versus 26.5 months (P = 0.15), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Two further cycles of PT did not improve DFS or OS for patients with advanced EOC. Patients who do not achieve remission after 6C are unlikely to benefit from additional chemotherapy using the same agents and should be considered for clinical trials involving novel agents with different mechanisms of action.

PKC412 overcomes resistance to imatinib in a murine model of FIP1L1-PDGFRα-induced myeloproliferative disease.

FIP1L1-PDGFRalpha causes hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) and is inhibited by the tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib (Gleevec). Imatinib is a potent inhibitor of ABL, ARG, PDGFRalpha, PDGFRbeta, and KIT and induces durable hematologic responses in HES patients. However, we observed relapse with resistance to imatinib as consequence of a T674I mutation in FIP1L1-PDGFRalpha, analogous to the imatinib-resistant T315I mutation in BCR-ABL. We developed a murine bone marrow transplant model of FIP1L1-PDGFRalpha-induced myeloproliferative disease to evaluate the efficacy of PKC412, an alternative inhibitor of PDGFRalpha, for the treatment of HES. PKC412 is effective for treatment of FIP1L1-PDGFRalpha-induced disease and of imatinib-induced resistance due to the T674I mutation. Our data establish PKC412 as molecularly targeted therapy for HES and other diseases expressing activated PDGFRalpha and demonstrate the potential of alternative kinase inhibitors to overcome resistance in target tyrosine kinases.