Neurocognitive subgroups among newly diagnosed patients with schizophrenia spectrum or bipolar disorders: A hierarchical cluster analysis.

Studies across schizophrenia (SZ) and bipolar disorder (BD) indicate common transdiagnostic neurocognitive subgroups. However, existing studies of patients with long-term illness precludes insight into whether impairments result from effects of chronic illness, medication or other factors. This study aimed to investigate whether neurocognitive subgroups across SZ and BD can be demonstrated during early illness stages. Data from overlapping neuropsychological tests were pooled from cohort studies of antipsychotic-naïve patients with first-episode SZ spectrum disorders (n = 150), recently diagnosed BD (n = 189) or healthy controls (HC) (n = 280). Hierarchical cluster analysis was conducted to examine if transdiagnostic subgroups could be identified based on the neurocognitive profile. Patterns of cognitive impairments and patient characteristics across subgroups were examined. Patients could be clustered into two, three and four subgroups, of which the three-cluster solution (with 83% accuracy) was selected for posthoc analyses. This solution revealed a subgroup covering 39% of patients (predominantly BD) who were cognitively relatively intact, a subgroup of 33% of patients (more equal distributions of SZ and BD) displaying selective deficits, particularly in working memory and processing speed, and a subgroup of 28% (mainly SZ) with global impairments. The globally impaired group exhibited lower estimated premorbid intelligence than the other subgroups. Globally impaired BD patients also showed more functional disability than cognitively relatively intact patients. No differences were observed across subgroups in symptoms or medications. Neurocognitive results can be understood by clustering analysis with similar clustering solutions occurring across diagnoses. The subgroups were not explained by clinical symptoms or medication, suggesting neurodevelopmental origins.

The relative and interactive impact of multiple risk factors in schizophrenia spectrum disorders: a combined register-based and clinical twin study.

BACKGROUND: Research has yielded evidence for genetic and environmental factors influencing the risk of schizophrenia. Numerous environmental factors have been identified; however, the individual effects are small. The additive and interactive effects of multiple risk factors are not well elucidated. Twin pairs discordant for schizophrenia offer a unique opportunity to identify factors that differ between patients and unaffected co-twins, who are perfectly matched for age, sex and genetic background. METHODS: Register data were combined with clinical data for 216 twins including monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ) proband pairs (one or both twins having a schizophrenia spectrum diagnosis) and MZ/DZ healthy control (HC) pairs. Logistic regression models were applied to predict (1) illness vulnerability (being a proband v. HC pair) and (2) illness status (being the patient v. unaffected co-twin). Risk factors included: A polygenic risk score (PRS) for schizophrenia, birth complications, birth weight, Apgar scores, paternal age, maternal smoking, season of birth, parental socioeconomic status, urbanicity, childhood trauma, estimated premorbid intelligence and cannabis. RESULTS: The PRS [odds ratio (OR) 1.6 (1.1-2.3)], childhood trauma [OR 4.5 (2.3-8.8)], and regular cannabis use [OR 8.3 (2.1-32.7)] independently predicted illness vulnerability as did an interaction between childhood trauma and cannabis use [OR 0.17 (0.03-0.9)]. Only regular cannabis use predicted having a schizophrenia spectrum diagnosis between patients and unaffected co-twins [OR 3.3 (1.1-10.4)]. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that several risk factors contribute to increasing schizophrenia spectrum vulnerability. Moreover, cannabis, a potentially completely avoidable environmental risk factor, seems to play a substantial role in schizophrenia pathology.