Real-world Outcomes With Rituximab-based Therapy for Posttransplant Lymphoproliferative Disease Arising After Solid Organ Transplant.

BACKGROUND: Optimal upfront therapy for posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) arising after solid organ transplant remains contentious. Rituximab monotherapy (R-Mono) in unselected patients has shown a lack of durable remissions. Cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone (CHOP)-based chemotherapy confers improved response rates, although concerns exist about toxicity. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study reports outcomes for adults with biopsy-proven B-cell PTLD treated initially with R-Mono or Rituximab plus CHOP (R-CHOP). Selection of therapy was made according to physician preference. RESULTS: Among 101 patients, 41 received R-Mono and 60 had R-CHOP. Most (93%) had undergone renal or liver transplantation. R-CHOP showed a trend toward improved complete (53% versus 71%; P = 0.066) and overall (75% versus 90%; P = 0.054) response rates. In the R-Mono group, 13 of 41 (32%) subsequently received chemotherapy, while 25 of 41 (61%) remained progression-free without further therapy. With median follow-up of 47 months, overall survival (OS) was similar for R-Mono and R-CHOP, with 3-year OS of 71% and 63%, respectively (P = 0.722). Non-PTLD mortality was 3 of 41 (7%) and 4 of 60 (7%) within 12 months of R-Mono or R-CHOP, respectively. The International Prognostic Index was statistically significant, with low- (0-2 points) and high-risk (≥3 points) groups exhibiting 3-year OS of 78% and 54%, respectively (P = 0.0003). In low-risk PTLD, outcomes were similar between therapies. However, in high-risk disease R-Mono conferred an inferior complete response rate (21% versus 68%; P = 0.006), albeit with no impact on survival. CONCLUSIONS: Our data support R-Mono as initial therapy for PTLD arising after renal or liver transplantation. However, upfront R-CHOP may benefit selected high-risk cases in whom rapid attainment of response is desirable.

Author Correction: High-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation in enteropathy-associated and other aggressive T-cell lymphomas: a UK NCRI/Cancer Research UK Phase II Study.

In the original version of this article, the mention of 'ifosfamide 1500 mg/m2 days 1-3' should, in fact, read 'ifosfamide 1500 mg/m2 bd days 1-3'. This has now been updated in the original version of the article.

A New and Validated Clinical Prognostic Model (EPI) for Enteropathy-Associated T-cell Lymphoma.

PURPOSE: Enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma (EATL) is a rare intestinal non-Hodgkin lymphoma with a poor, though variable prognosis. The International Prognostic Index (IPI) and the prognostic index for peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PIT) have limited predictive value for outcome of EATL. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a prognostic model for EATL, which can identify high-risk patients who need more aggressive therapy. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: This retrospective multicenter study was based on 92 patients and included 45 patients diagnosed with EATL between 1999 and 2009 from the Netherlands and 47 patients from England and Scotland, diagnosed with EATL between 1994 and 1998. A new EATL prognostic index (EPI) was constructed using the RPART (recursive partitioning and regression trees) procedure. Validation was performed applying the bootstrap method. RESULTS: Three risk groups were distinguished (P < 0.0001): a high-risk group, characterized by the presence of B-symptoms [median overall survival (OS) of 2 months]; an intermediate-risk group, comprising patients without B-symptoms and an IPI score ≥ 2 (7 months); and a low-risk group, representing patients without B-symptoms and an IPI score of 0 to 1 (34 months). Internal validation showed stability of statistical significance and prognostic discrimination. In contrast with the IPI and PIT, the EPI better classified patients in risk groups according to their clinical outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Our new, validated, prognostic model EPI accurately predicts survival outcome in EATL and may be used for patient selection for new therapeutic strategies and evaluation of clinical trials.

Enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma: epidemiology, clinical features, and current treatment strategies.

Enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma (EATL) is a rare non-Hodgkin lymphoma of T-cell origin. The recent 2008 World Health Organization classification of hematologic malignancies distinguishes between two types of EATL. The disease is associated with celiac disease, particularly with its late, adult onset. Currently, there are no standardized diagnostic or treatment protocols for EATL, mostly because of its rarity. Historically, the patients have been treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy with or without surgery. The outcome of patients with EATL treated with these approaches is poor. The reported death rates in the biggest studies are approximately 80-84%, with median progression-free survival (PFS) of 3.4-6.0 months and overall survival of 7.1-10.0 months. The 5-year PFS ranged from 3.2% to 18% and OS from 19.7% to 20%. The results of a novel induction regimen with ifosfamide, etoposide, and epirubicin alternating with intermediate-dose methotrexate followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) are more promising, with a 5-year PFS of 52% and OS of 60%. The alternative approach, with a more common induction with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, etoposide, and prednisone followed by ASCT has also delivered promising results, with a 3-year PFS of 52% and OS of 47%. This review summarizes recently published data on epidemiology and clinical features, as well as standard and novel treatments including high-dose chemotherapy with ASCT and their outcome in EATL.

Evaluation of enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma comparing standard therapies with a novel regimen including autologous stem cell transplantation.

Enteropathy associated T-cell lymphoma (EATL) is a rare type of peripheral T-cell lymphoma. At present, there are no standardized diagnostic or treatment protocols for EATL. We describe EATL in a population-based setting and evaluate a new treatment with aggressive chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). From 1979 onward the Scotland and Newcastle Lymphoma Group prospectively collected data on all patients newly diagnosed with lymphoma in the Northern Region of England and Scotland. Between 1994 and 1998, records of all patients diagnosed with EATL were reviewed, and 54 patients had features of EATL. Overall incidence was 0.14/100 000 per year. Treatment was systemic chemotherapy (mostly anthracycline-based chemotherapy) with or without surgery in 35 patients and surgery alone in 19 patients. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.4 months and overall survival (OS) was 7.1 months. The novel regimen IVE/MTX (ifosfamide, etoposide, epirubicin/methotrexate)-ASCT [corrected] was piloted from 1998 for patients eligible for intensive treatment, and 26 patients were included. Five-years PFS and OS were 52% and 60%, respectively, and were significantly improved compared with the historical group treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy (P = .01 and P = .003, respectively). EATL is a rare lymphoma with an unfavorable prognosis when treated with conventional therapies. The IVE/MTX-ASCT regimen is feasible with acceptable toxicity and significantly improved outcome.

Posttransplantation imatinib as a strategy to postpone the requirement for immunotherapy in patients undergoing reduced-intensity allografts for chronic myeloid leukemia.

Disease relapse is a major cause of treatment failure after reduced-intensity allografts and while donor lymphocyte infusions (DLIs) can be effective salvage therapy they are associated with severe graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) when administered early after transplantation. We have therefore examined whether imatinib mesylate can delay relapse and postpone the requirement for DLI in 22 patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) allografted using a reduced-intensity regimen. Imatinib was commenced on day + 35 and continued until 1 year after transplantation. Posttransplantation imatinib was well tolerated and abolished the risk of relapse during this period. Twenty-one patients completed 11 months of imatinib therapy, 15 of whom subsequently relapsed and received DLI. Ten patients to date have achieved molecular remission after DLI. Adjunctive targeted therapy allows the kinetics of disease relapse after a reduced-intensity allograft to be manipulated and represents a novel strategy by which outcome may be improved in patients who undergo transplantation for CML and other leukemias.

Acute renal failure and disseminated intravascular coagulation following an idiosyncratic reaction to Alemtuzumab (Campath 1H) or fludarabine.

Alemtuzumab (Campath 1H) is a recombinant DNA derived humanized monoclonal antibody which targets CD52 antigens on B and T cells. It is increasingly used as a conditioning agent for bone marrow transplantation. We describe the case of a 37 year old woman who developed acute renal failure and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) following one dose of Campath and Fludarabine. Campath was thought to be the most likely causal agent although Fludarabine alone or in combination with Campath cannot be excluded. Despite there being many documented side effects of Campath there are currently no reports in the literature of acute renal failure and DIC. The transplant had to be aborted and 9 months on the patient is still requiring dialysis twice a week.

Imatinib induces durable hematologic and cytogenetic responses in patients with accelerated phase chronic myeloid leukemia: results of a phase 2 study.

Chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) is caused by expression of the BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase oncogene, the product of the t(9;22) Philadelphia translocation. Patients with CML in accelerated phase have rapidly progressive disease and are characteristically unresponsive to existing therapies. Imatinib (formerly STI571) is a rationally developed, orally administered inhibitor of the Bcr-Abl kinase. A total of 235 CML patients were enrolled in this study, of whom 181 had a confirmed diagnosis of accelerated phase. Patients were treated with imatinib at 400 or 600 mg/d and were evaluated for hematologic and cytogenetic response, time to progression, survival, and toxicity. Imatinib induced hematologic response in 82% of patients and sustained hematologic responses lasting at least 4 weeks in 69% (complete in 34%). The rate of major cytogenetic response was 24% (complete in 17%). Estimated 12-month progression-free and overall survival rates were 59% and 74%, respectively. Nonhematologic toxicity was usually mild or moderate, and hematologic toxicity was manageable. In comparison to 400 mg, imatinib doses of 600 mg/d led to more cytogenetic responses (28% compared to 16%), longer duration of response (79% compared to 57% at 12 months), time to disease progression (67% compared to 44% at 12 months), and overall survival (78% compared to 65% at 12 months), with no clinically relevant increase in toxicity. Orally administered imatinib is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for patients with CML in accelerated phase. A daily dose of 600 mg is more effective than 400 mg, with similar toxicity.