Use of the folinic acid/5-fluorouracil/irinotecan (FOLFIRI 1) regimen in elderly patients as a first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a Phase II study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of a combination of folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and irinotecan (FOLFIRI 1) administered every 2 weeks in a population of elderly subjects with advanced colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer included in this study were aged at least 70 years, with a performance status of 0/1, without geriatric syndrome and without previous palliative chemotherapy. They received irinotecan [180 mg/m(2) intravenous (iv) infusion over 90 min] followed by folinic acid (400 mg/m(2) iv over 2 h), then 5FU (400 mg/m(2) iv bolus) and 5FU (2,400 mg/m(2) continuous iv infusion for 46 h) every 2 weeks. RESULTS: Forty eligible patients were included. The median age was 77.3 years (range 70-84.7). The objective response rate was 40% and the stabilisation rate was 45%. Median progression-free survival was 8 months, overall survival was 17.2 months and cancer-related specific survival was 20.2 months. In total, 300 cycles of chemotherapy were administered with a median number of eight cycles per patient (range 1-18). Tolerance was good; grade 3/4 toxicities included diarrhoea (15%), asthenia (15%), nausea/vomiting (7.5%) and neutropenia (7.5%). One toxic death was observed due to grade 4 diarrhoea. CONCLUSION: The FOLFIRI 1 regimen is a valid therapeutic option for elderly patients in good clinical condition.

Cetuximab shows activity in colorectal cancer patients with tumors for which FISH analysis does not detect an increase in EGFR gene copy number.

BACKGROUND: EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) gene gain assessed by FISH (fluorescence in situ hybridization) has been shown to be predictive of response to EGFR-targeted therapies in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. The aim or our study was to relate the EGFR gene copy number to therapeutic results in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) treated with a cetuximab-containing regimen. METHODS: Forty-seven patients with metastatic CRC treated with a cetuximab-containing regimen between August 2004 and September 2006 were included in our study. EGFR status was assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and by FISH on fixed paraffin-embedded sections of tumor specimens. RESULTS: By IHC (n = 47), 39 patients (83%) had EGFR-positive tumors. EGFR gene copy gain was detected in 8 (19.5%) of 41 tumors. Neither EGFR expression assessed by IHC nor EGFR gene copy gain assessed by FISH were statistically significantly correlated with objective response rate, disease control rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Of the 33 patients whose tumors were FISH negative, 8 patients (24.2%) had a partial response, and 10 (30.3%) had stable disease. CONCLUSIONS: EGFR FISH analysis does not seem to be a sufficiently robust test for selecting candidate CRC patients for cetuximab therapy.

Phase II trial evaluating a docetaxel-capecitabine combination as treatment for hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Docetaxel is a well-recognized drug in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC), either alone or combined with estramustine. In this indication, a Phase II trial was conducted investigating a docetaxel-capecitabine combination. METHODS: Forty-six patients presenting with documented HRPC were enrolled in the study. The treatment regimen consisted of docetaxel (D) at a dose of 35 mg /m2/week (intravenously, 3 consecutive weeks) plus oral capecitabine (C) at a dose of 625 mg/m2 twice daily (Days 5-18) every 28 days for 4 cycles. The primary endpoint was the biological response defined as a reduction in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level > or =50%. Secondary endpoints were overall survival, safety, and quality of life. RESULTS: Thirty of 44 assessable patients (68.2%) achieved a biological response, 14 of whom (31.8%) normalized their PSA value. The median overall survival time was 17.7 months (95% confidence interval, 15.8 to not reached). Four treatment cycles were completed by 87% of the patients. Hematologic toxicity was mild. The main Grade 3-4 toxicities were cutaneous toxicity (13.1%) and changes in nails (6.5%). Physical functioning and role scales were higher before treatment (P = .02 and P = .003, respectively), fatigue and diarrhea were more frequent during and after treatment (P = .0003 and P = .03, respectively), and pain was lower during and after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study demonstrated the high efficacy of the DC combination in patients with HRPC, and the associated good tolerability. This combination offers a new alternative to the docetaxel-estramustine combination. Further randomized trials are warranted.