Supplementing decompression with instrumented fusion for symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis-a critical appraisal of available randomized controlled trials.

Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is one of the most common indications for surgery in the USA. The addition of instrumented fusion to decompression for the treatment of LSS has become common, but recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have produced percieved conflicting results with unclear clinical implications. This review seeks clarity through an analysis of available RCTs. We performed a search of the PubMed database for RCTs that directly addressed decompression vs. decompression and fusion for the surgical treatment of LSS. RCTs were screened and reviewed to compare content such as patient selection, pathology, radiographic criteria, and operative technique. Five RCTs resulted from our search and were included in our analysis. Two studies yielded class I data while three yielded class III data due to study design related issues. Heterogeneity between these studies is emphasized with regard to patient selection, LSS definition, spondylolisthesis, instability, and surgical technique. Efforts to decipher which patients will truly benefit from instrumented fusion for the surgical treatment of LSS are still ongoing. Surgeon judgment will remain a crucial component for surgical decision making until future trials provide clarity. Instrumented fusion should be tailored to the individual patient rather than incorporated as a routine practice.

Electronic Residency Application Service Application Characteristics Associated with Successful Residency Matching in Neurosurgery in 2009-2016.

BACKGROUND: Resident applicants in neurosurgery often wonder what factors impact their chances of successfully matching. Using data published by the National Residency Match Program for 2009-2016, we examined which components of the Electronic Residency Application Service application correlated with successful residency matching. METHODS: Data were collected from the National Residency Match Program publication Charting Outcomes in the Match from all years it was available for neurosurgery (2009, 2011, 2014, 2016). Individual factors reported (number of contiguous ranks, research projects, publications and presentations, work experiences, volunteer experiences, United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 and 2 score deciles, categorical data about Alpha Omega Alpha status, Ph.D. degree, other degree, and strength of medical school National Institutes of Health funding) were aggregated for all 3 years. Categorical data were available only for U.S. seniors. Spearman correlation and χ2 were used for ranked data and categorical data, respectively. Separate analyses were run for U.S. seniors and independent applicants. RESULTS: For U.S. seniors applying to neurosurgery, number of contiguous ranks, United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 and 2 scores, research projects, Alpha Omega Alpha status, and medical school top 40 National Institutes of Health funding were significantly associated with successful matching of applicants. Number of volunteer experiences was nearly statistically significant. For independent applicants, only United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 and 2 scores and number of research projects were statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to analyze National Residency Match Program data for predictors of success in neurosurgical matching. Students applying to neurosurgery residency and their mentors should be aware of which baseline objective factors are associated with match success.