NSAIDs for Pain Control During the Peri-Operative Period of Hip Fracture Surgery: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Hip fracture (HF) mostly affects older adults and is responsible for increased morbidity and mortality. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are part of the peri-operative multimodal analgesic management, but their use could be associated with adverse events in older adults. This systematic review aimed to assess outcomes associated with NSAIDs use in the peri-operative period of HF surgery. METHODS: This systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Three databases (PubMed/EMBASE/Cochrane Central) were used to search for clinical trials and observational studies assessing efficacy, safety and impact of NSAIDs use on non-specific post-operative outcomes, such as functional status and post-operative complications. RESULTS: Among the 1320 references initially identified, four provided data on efficacy, four on safety and six on non-specific post-operative outcomes (three randomized controlled clinical trials, three observational studies). Mean study population ages ranged from 68 to 87 years. Two studies found that NSAIDs were effective on pain control, but two studies found conflicting results on opioid sparing. No increased risk of acute kidney injury was observed, while results concerning bleeding risk and delirium were conflicting. No study has found any effect of NSAIDs use on walk recovery. Quality of evidence was high for pain control, but low to very low for all the other studied outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The use of NSAIDs may be effective for pain control in the peri-operative period of HF surgery. However, safety data were conflicting with low levels of certainty. Further studies are needed to assess their benefit-risk balance in this context. The research protocol was previously registered on PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42021237649).

Implementation of clinical medication review in a geriatric ward to reduce potentially inappropriate prescriptions among older adults.

PURPOSE: The impact of several pharmaceutical interventions to reduce the use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) and potentially omitted medications (POMs) has been recently studied. We aimed to determine whether clinical medication review (CMR) (i.e. a systematic and patient-centred clinical assessment of all medicines currently taken by a patient) performed by a geriatrician and a pharmacist added to standard pharmaceutical care (SPC) (i.e. medication reconciliation and regular prescription review by the pharmacist) resulted in more appropriate prescribing compared to SPC among older inpatients. METHODS: A retrospective observational single-centre study was conducted in a French geriatric ward. Six criteria for appropriate prescribing were chosen: the number of PIMs and POMs as defined by the STOPP/STARTv2 list, the total number of drugs prescribed, the number of administrations per day and the number of psychotropic and anticholinergic drugs. These criteria were compared between CMR and SPC group using linear and logistic regression models weighted on propensity scores. RESULTS: There were 137 patients included, 66 in the CMR group and 71 in the SPC group. The mean age was 87 years, the sex ratio was 0.65, the mean number of drugs prescribed was 9, the mean MMSE was 21 and at admission 242 POMs, and 363 PIMs were prescribed. Clinical medication review did not reduce the number of PIMs at discharge compared to SPC (beta = - 0.13 [- 0.84; 0.57], p = 0.71) nor did it reduce the number of drugs prescribed (p = 0.10), the number of psychotropic drugs (p = 0.17) or the anticholinergic load (p = 0.87). Clinical medication review resulted in more POMs being prescribed than in standard pharmaceutical care (beta = - 0.39 [- 0.72; - 0.06], p = 0.02). Cardiology POMs were more implemented in the medication review group (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Clinical medication review did not reduce the number of PIMs but helped clinicians introduce underused drugs, especially cardiovascular drugs, which are known to be associated with morbidity and mortality risk reduction.

Factors Associated with Transfer from an Acute Geriatric Unit to a Post-Acute Care Facility among Community-Dwelling Patients: Results from the DAMAGE Cohort.

Background: Acute geriatric units (AGUs) require efficient discharge planning tools. Risk factors for discharge from an AGU to post-acute care (PAC) have not previously been investigated in detail. Methods: The objective is to identify risk factors for PAC transfer. The DAMAGE (prospective multicenter cohort) consecutively included more than 3500 subjects aged 75 or older and admitted to an AGU. The patients underwent a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) during their stay in the AGU. Only community-dwelling patients admitted to the AGU from the emergency department were included in the analysis. We recorded the characteristics of the care pathway and identified risk factors for discharge to home or to a PAC facility. Results: 1928 patients were included. Loss of functional independence (a decrease in the Katz activities of daily living (ADL) score between 1 month prior to admission and AGU admission), living alone, social isolation, a high Katz ADL score at home, a low Katz ADL on admission, and delirium on admission were risk factors for transfer to PAC. Obesity, an elevated serum albumin level, and community-acquired infection were associated with discharge to home. Neither sex nor age was a risk factor for home discharge or transfer to PAC. Conclusion: The present results might help clinicians and discharge planning teams to identify patients at risk of transfer to PAC more reliably and promptly in AGUs.

Development of a Predictive Score for Mortality at 3 and 12 Months After Discharge From an Acute Geriatric Unit as a Trigger for Advanced Care Planning.

BACKGROUND: There is a need for a mortality score that can be used to trigger advanced care planning among older patients discharged from acute geriatric units (AGUs). OBJECTIVE: We developed a prognostic score for 3- and 12-month mortality after discharge from an AGU, based on a comprehensive geriatric assessment, in-hospital events, and the exclusion of patients already receiving palliative care. METHODS: Devenir Après la Médecine Aigue Gériatrique (DAMAGE) is a French multicenter, prospective, cohort study. The broad inclusion criteria ensured that the cohort is representative of patients treated in an AGU. The DAMAGE participants underwent a comprehensive geriatric assessment, a daily clinical checkup, and follow-up visits 3 and 12 months after discharge. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to develop a prognostic score for the derivation and validation subsets. RESULTS: A total of 3 509 patients were assessed and 3 112 were included. The patient population was very old and frail or dependant, with a high proportion of deaths at 3 months (n = 455, 14.8%) and at 12 months (n = 1 014, 33%). The score predicted an individual risk of mortality ranging from 1% to 80% at 3 months and between 5% and 93% at 12 months, with an area under the receiving operator characteristic curve in the validation cohort of 0.728 at 3 months and 0.733 at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Our score predicted a broad range of risks of death after discharge from the AGU. Having this information at the time of hospital discharge might trigger a discussion on advanced care planning and end-of-life care with very old, frail patients. Clinical Trials Registration Number: NCT02949635.

Risk Factors for Hospital Readmission and Death After Discharge of Older Adults from Acute Geriatric Units: Taking the Rank of Admission into Account.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the impact of the number of hospital readmissions on the risks of further hospital readmission and death after adjustment for a range of risk factors. METHODS: We performed a multicentre prospective study of the DAMAGE cohort in the Hauts-de-France region of France. Patients aged 75 and over hospitalized initially in an acute geriatric unit (AGU) were included and followed up for 12 months. The risk of hospital readmission was analyzed using a Cox model, and its extension for recurrent events and the risk of death were analyzed using a Cox model for time-dependent variables. RESULTS: A total of 3081 patients were included (mean (SD) age: 86.4 (5.5)). In the multivariate analysis, the relative risk (95% confidence interval [CI]) of hospital readmission rose progressively to 2.66 (1.44; 5.14), and the risk of death rose to 2.01 (1.23; 3.32) after five hospital admissions, relative to a patient with no hospital readmissions. The number of hospital readmissions during the follow-up period was the primary risk factor and the best predictor of the risk of hospital readmission and the risk of death. CONCLUSION: Hospital readmission is the primary risk factor for further hospital readmissions and for death in older subjects discharged from an AGU.

Effectiveness of an intervention campaign on influenza vaccination of professionals in nursing homes: A cluster-randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Seasonal influenza has a major individual and collective impact, especially among the elderly living in nursing homes. To prevent infection by influenza viruses, vaccination of residents and professionals is an essential measure. However, while the vaccination rates of residents are generally high (>85%), rates among professionals are generally approximately 20%. To evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention campaign on the improvement of the influenza vaccination rate of professionals, a regional intervention study was proposed for nursing homes during the 2014-15 season. METHODS: Cluster-randomized controlled trial (with a nursing home representing a cluster). In the intervention group, a campaign on influenza vaccination was offered to staff, combining different teaching aids in a multimodal approach. In the control group, no intervention was proposed. The primary endpoint was the rate of influenza vaccination among staff. Before and after the study, professionals were asked to complete short questionnaires on their perceptions of influenza vaccination. A multilevel analysis was carried out to compare the vaccination rates between the 2 groups and their evolution before/after the winter period. RESULTS: A total of 32 nursing homes were randomized, and 6 were excluded. Initial vaccination rates were 27.6% in the intervention group and 24.2% in the control group (p = 0.16). After the study, these rates increased to 33.7% and 22.9%, respectively, which was a relative difference of +22.1% in the intervention group compared to -5.4% in the control group, p = 0.0025. CONCLUSIONS: Despite professionals' reluctance to be vaccinate, participation in a promotional campaign with a pragmatic approach has increased the rate of influenza vaccination. The approach will be offered to all nursing homes in the region after revision of the tools to enhance their ease of use and pedagogical messages focused on the direct benefits to professionals.

Psychotropic Polypharmacy in Adults 55 Years or Older: A Risk for Impaired Global Cognition, Executive Function, and Mobility.

OBJECTIVES: With their broad spectrum of action, psychotropic drugs are among the most common medications prescribed to the elderly. Consequently, the number of older adults taking multiple psychotropic drugs has more than doubled over the last decade. To improve knowledge about the deleterious effects of psychotropic polypharmacy, we investigated whether there is a threshold number of psychotropic molecules that could lead to impairment of global cognition, executive function, or mobility. Furthermore, relationships between the number of psychotropic molecules and cognitive and mobility impairment were examined. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: University Hospital of Caen (France) and advertisements in medical offices. PARTICIPANTS: Community-dwelling older adults 55 years and older (n = 177; 69.8 ± 9.3 years; 81% women). MEASUREMENTS: Number of psychotropic molecules taken daily, global cognition assessed with the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), processing speed with the Trail Making Test (TMT) A, executive function with the TMT B and TMT B-A, and mobility with the Time Up and Go (TUG). The threshold numbers of psychotropic molecules were determined by ROC curves analysis. Based on these threshold values, multinomial logistic regression adjusting for covariates was then performed. RESULTS: Logistic regressions showed that the threshold of two daily psychotropic molecules, identified by the ROC curves analysis, increases the risk of impaired executive function (p = .05 and.005 for the TMT B and TMT B-A, respectively), global cognition (p = .006 and.001 for the MMSE and MoCA, respectively), and mobility (p = .005 for the TUG), independent of confounding factors, including comorbidities. Furthermore, psychotropic polypharmacy would affect mobility through executive functions. CONCLUSION: Impairment of global cognition, executive function, and mobility when as few as two psychotropic molecules are consumed in relatively healthy young older adults should alert physicians when prescribing combinations of psychotropic medications.

Status report of analgesic prescriptions by general practitioners in elderly people aged 75 and over, upon admission in geriatric medicine.

The main objective of this study is to describe the current therapeutic strategy for pain in elderly patients, by general practitioners. In this prospective study, 149 patients aged 75 years and over, hospitalized in geriatric medicine at the University Hospital of Caen, were recruited between June and September 2015. All analgesic data was recorded from the patients' prescriptions and medical files. 66% of the patients had at least one analgesic. More than 96% of patients who took analgesics were treated with a step 1 analgesic (mainly paracetamol), and approximately 30% received a step 2 analgesic (69% tramadol). Only 8% received step 3 analgesics. The proportion of patients treated with an antiepileptic was higher in cases of neuropathic pain. Adjuvant drugs were prescribed 17.3% on doctor's orders. Pain was mainly of a mechanical nature, due to osteoarthritis. The results of the study exhibit a well-balanced therapeutic management of pain by general practitioners for ambulatory elderly patients in agreement with the guidelines.

Evolution of analgesic prescriptions in ambulatory care patients aged 75 and over, three months after a hospitalization in geriatric medicine.

The main objective is to analyze the evolution of analgesic treatment three to five months after a hospitalization in geriatric medicine for patients aged 75 and over, considering the influences of various factors and reasons of modifications. In this single institution and cohort study, patients were included from geriatric medicine at the University Hospital of Caen. Analgesic treatments were collected during hospitalization. Three months post-hospitalization, general practitioners were contacted regarding the evolution of the analgesic treatment. Patients included were hospitalized between June and September 2015. Three months after hospitalization, 75 patients had useful data. There were changes of treatment for 58.7 % of patients (n=44), most of whom had a reduction of treatment (n=23). The main cause for change was the occurrence of an intercurrent event, 34.1 % (n=15), in particular a new hospitalization (n=11), and pain improvement : 31.9 % (n=14). The presence of tramadol on discharge prescriptions was an influent factor of the treatment change three months post-hospitalization. After a hospitalization, general practitioners have an important role in the necessary adaptation of pain treatment in the patient's everyday life.

[Crushing or opening medication: what practices, what risks?] / Écrasement ou ouverture des médicaments : quelles pratiques, quels risques ?

The practice of crushing tablets or opening up capsules to be taken orally, when it is not prescribed, can affect the efficacy of a treatment, or even cause an adverse event. A survey carried out in 2016 revealed that this is a common practice, especially among elderly people. However, alternative forms exist and can be prescribed.

[Elderly hospitalised people and walking capacities]. / Personnes âgées hospitaliséeset capacités de marche.

Falls in the elderly are frequent. A study carried out over 6 months in a university hospital's acute geriatric unit highlighted the real walking capacities of hospitalised elderly people. It also changed the perception of caregivers, doctors and nurses with regard to the real physical aptitudes of these patients enabling the risk of falls to be reduced in preparation for their return home or to a residential care home.

Polypharmacy Cut-Off for Gait and Cognitive Impairments.

BACKGROUND: Polypharmacy is a well-established risk factor for falls, and these are one of the major health problems that affect the quality of life as people age. However, the risk of mobility and cognitive impairments consecutive to polypharmacy has been little addressed, despite the association between these adverse outcomes and falls. Moreover, the rare polypharmacy cut-offs were all but one arbitrarily determined. OBJECTIVE: Studying relationships between polypharmacy and both mobility and cognitive impairments, and statistically determining a cut-off point in the number of medicinal molecule beyond which polypharmacy has deleterious consequences with respect to mobility and cognitive impairment. METHODS: We enrolled 113 community-dwelling adults aged 55 years and older with a fall history, with or without injury, in the previous year. We carefully collected information about daily medicinal molecules taken. We assessed basic mobility and global cognition with the Time-Up-and-Go and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test, respectively (clinicaltrials.gov NCT02292316). RESULTS: Timed-Up and Go test and MoCA scores were both significantly correlated with the number of molecule, used. Receiver Operating Characteristic curves indicate, with high prediction (p < 0.002), that daily consumption of five or more molecules is associated with risk for both impaired mobility and global cognition. These relationships were independent of the number of comorbidities and of the pharmacological class. CONCLUSION: Community-dwelling adults aged 55 years and older who take five or more daily medicinal molecules are at high risk for both mobility and cognitive impairments. Physicians and patients should be aware of these new findings, especially when there are multiple prescribers involved in the care of the patient.