RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To investigate 2-year post-operative hearing performance, safety, and patient-reported outcomes of hearing-impaired adults treated with the Osia® 2 System, an active osseointegrated bone-conduction hearing implant that uses piezoelectric technology. METHODS: A prospective, multicenter, open-label, single-arm, within-subject clinical study conducted at three tertiary referral clinical centers located in Melbourne, Sydney and Hong Kong. Twenty adult recipients of the Osia 2 System were enrolled and followed up between 12 and 24 months post-implantation: 17 with mixed or conductive hearing loss and 3 with single-sided sensorineural deafness. Safety data, audiological thresholds, speech recognition thresholds in noise, and patient-reported outcomes were collected and evaluated. In addition, pre-and 6-month post-implantation data were collected retrospectively for this recipient cohort enrolled into the earlier study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04041700). RESULTS: Between 6- and 24-month follow-up, there was no statistically significant change in free-field hearing thresholds or speech reception thresholds in noise (p = > 0.05), indicating that aided improvements were maintained up to 24 months of follow-up. Furthermore, improvements in health-related quality of life and daily hearing ability, as well as clinical and subjective measures of hearing benefit remained stable over the 24-month period. No serious adverse events were reported during extended follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: These study results provide further evidence to support the longer term clinical safety, hearing performance, and patient-related benefits of the Osia 2 System in patients with either a conductive hearing loss, mixed hearing loss, or single-sided sensorineural deafness. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04754477. First posted: February 15, 2021.
Asunto(s)
Sordera , Audífonos , Perdida Auditiva Conductiva-Sensorineural Mixta , Pérdida Auditiva Sensorineural , Pérdida Auditiva , Percepción del Habla , Adulto , Humanos , Pérdida Auditiva Conductiva/cirugía , Perdida Auditiva Conductiva-Sensorineural Mixta/cirugía , Estudios de Seguimiento , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Retrospectivos , Audición , Conducción Ósea , Medición de Resultados Informados por el PacienteRESUMEN
(1) Background: Tinnitus, often related to hearing loss, is an addressable public health concern affecting health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This study aimed to explore the influence of bone conduction hearing aid (BCHA) implantation on HRQoL and hearing disability in patients with hearing loss suffering from tinnitus. (2) Methods: Data were collected from an international hearing implant registry. Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI-3), Spatial and Qualities of Hearing- 49 Questionnaire (SSQ) and self-reported tinnitus burden data for adult patients implanted with a BCHA (n = 42) who provided baseline as well as follow-up data 1-year post-implantation were extracted from the registry. Wilcoxon signed rank tests and paired samples t-tests were used to analyse outcomes data. (3) Results: Patients, with or without tinnitus, demonstrated clinically important mean improvements in HUI-3 multi-attribute utility scores, HUI-3 hearing attribute and SSQ scores. Hearing loss patients with tinnitus presented with a lower HRQoL than patients without tinnitus. (4) Conclusions: These findings demonstrate the importance of hearing rehabilitation in improving the quality of life and hearing disability of patients with or without tinnitus and in providing tinnitus relief in some patients with hearing loss and tinnitus.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To map healthcare utilized by subjects with chronic otitis media, with or without cholesteatoma and perform a cost analysis to determine key drivers of healthcare expenditure. METHODS: A registry study of 656 adult subjects with chronic otitis media that underwent a middle ear surgery between 2014 and 2018. Healthcare contacts related to all publicly funded specialist ENT care, audiological care and primary care for a disease of the ear and mastoid process were extracted. The data are extracted from the Swedish National Patient Registry on subjects that reside in western Sweden. RESULTS: Subjects made 13,782 healthcare contacts at a total cost 61.1 million SEK (6.0 million EUR) between 2014 and 2018. The mean cost per subject was 93,075 SEK (9071 EUR) and ranged between 3971 SEK (387 EUR) and 468,711 SEK (45,683 EUR) per individual. In the most expensive quartile of subjects, mean cost was 192,353 SEK (18,747 EUR) over the 5-year period. These subjects made 3227 ENT contacts (roughly four each year) and 60% of total costs were associated with in-patient ENT care. CONCLUSION: Patients with chronic otitis media are associated with high ENT resource utilization that does not diminish after surgical intervention and the disease places a long-term burden on healthcare systems. Significant costs are attributed to revision surgeries, indicating that these patients could be managed more effectively. In many such cases, reoperation cannot be avoided, especially due to recurrence of cholesteatoma. However, in some patients, when the indication for subsequent surgery is only hearing improvement, alternative options, such as hearing aids or implants, should also be considered. This is especially true in difficult cases, where revision ossiculoplasty is likely.
Asunto(s)
Colesteatoma del Oído Medio , Colesteatoma , Otitis Media , Adulto , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Oído Medio/cirugía , Otitis Media/complicaciones , Otitis Media/cirugía , Colesteatoma/complicaciones , Atención a la Salud , Enfermedad Crónica , Colesteatoma del Oído Medio/complicaciones , Colesteatoma del Oído Medio/cirugíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Hearing loss is a growing public health issue that significantly impacts both health-related quality of life and working life. This study investigates how hearing rehabilitation with bone conduction hearing implants impacts health-related quality of life and working life in adults of working age with hearing impairment. DESIGN: This longitudinal study used data from Cochlear's Implant Recipient Observational Study to assess hearing disabilities and job satisfaction in 18-65-year-old recipients of bone conduction hearing implants. Baseline data were collected pre-implantation and patients were followed-up at 12-months post-implantation. STUDY SAMPLE: Patient demographics, Health Utilities Index Mark 3, the Speech Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale, and self-reported employment data are presented for a sample ranging from 30 to 43 patients, pre-implantation and at 12-months follow-up following implantation with a bone conduction hearing implant. RESULTS: Significant improvements in hearing and speech attribute, and overall health-related quality of life were observed between pre-and post-implantation. Overall hearing disability decreased post-implantation and job satisfaction improved. CONCLUSIONS: Hearing rehabilitation using bone conduction hearing implants are shown to improve health-related quality of life, reduce hearing disability, and improve work performance and satisfaction. Results are representative of healthy and actively working users of bone conduction hearing implants.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Chronic otitis media is a major public health burden that can result in a disabling hearing loss. Bone conduction hearing implants are an accepted form of hearing rehabilitation in these patients, but evidence supporting their usage typically comes from studies investigating mixed indications. The objective of our study was to examine how these devices impact health-related quality of life and hearing-disability in adult patients suffering from chronic otitis media. METHODS: Health Utilities Index-mark III (n = 10) and Speech Spatial and Qualities of Hearing-49 data (n = 6) were extracted for adult patients with chronic otitis media from an international hearing implant registry. Data were compared at baseline and at 12-month post-implantation with a bone conduction hearing implant. RESULTS: Patients demonstrated a clinically relevant mean utility gain of 0.145 following implantation and clinically relevant mean improvement in global speech spatial and qualities of hearing score following implantation. CONCLUSIONS: Bone conduction implantation was found to improve hearing and health-related quality of life and reduce hearing disability in a small cohort of patients with chronic otitis media. These data highlight the importance of providing appropriate hearing rehabilitation for individuals with chronic otitis media.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical performance, safety, and patient-reported outcomes of an active osseointegrated steady-state implant system that uses piezoelectric technology. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, multicenter, open-label, single-arm, within-subject clinical investigation. SETTING: Three tertiary referral clinical centers located in Melbourne, Sydney, and Hong Kong. PATIENTS: Twenty-nine adult subjects, 24 with mixed hearing loss or conductive hearing loss and 5 with single-sided sensorineural deafness. INTERVENTION: Implantation with the Cochlear Osia 2 System. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Audiological threshold evaluation and speech recognition in quiet and in noise. Patient satisfaction and safety. RESULTS: At 6-month follow-up after surgery, a mean improvement in pure-tone average of 26.0 dB hearing level and a mean improvement of 8.8 dB signal-to-noise ratio in speech reception threshold in noise was achieved with the investigational device as compared with the unaided situation. Usability of the investigational device was rated 71.4/100 mm for sound processor retention and 81.4/100 mm for overall comfort using a visual analog scale. CONCLUSION: These outcomes confirm the clinical safety, performance, and benefit of an innovative active transcutaneous bone conduction implant using a piezoelectric transducer design in subjects with conductive hearing loss, mixed hearing loss, or single-sided sensorineural deafness.
Asunto(s)
Sordera , Audífonos , Perdida Auditiva Conductiva-Sensorineural Mixta , Pérdida Auditiva Sensorineural , Pérdida Auditiva , Percepción del Habla , Adulto , Conducción Ósea , Pérdida Auditiva/cirugía , Pérdida Auditiva Conductiva/cirugía , Perdida Auditiva Conductiva-Sensorineural Mixta/cirugía , Pérdida Auditiva Sensorineural/cirugía , Humanos , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the influence of maximum power output of bone conduction hearing devices on speech recognition in quiet and in noise in experienced users of bone conduction hearing devices. DESIGN: Prospective, randomised cross-over investigation comparing speech recognition performance, subjective sound quality, and device preference between two bone conduction hearing devices with different maximum power outputs. STUDY SAMPLE: Sixteen adult subjects with conductive or mixed hearing loss. RESULTS: Both speech recognition in quiet and speech recognition in noise improved significantly when using the device with high vs. lower maximum power output. Mean improvement in word recognition score in quiet was 10.5% and the mean speech reception threshold in noise improved by 0.9 dB SNR. Compared to the device with lower maximum power output, the sound quality was rated significantly higher with the device with high maximum power output, which was also the device of preference for 81% of the subjects. CONCLUSION: Bone conduction hearing devices with higher maximum power output have the potential to improve speech recognition in both quiet and noisy listening environments.
Asunto(s)
Audífonos , Percepción del Habla , Adulto , Conducción Ósea , Estudios Cruzados , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , HablaRESUMEN
For several decades, a multitude of studies have documented the ability of Raman spectroscopy (RS) to differentiate between tissue types and identify pathological changes to tissues in a range of diseases. Furthermore, spectroscopists have illustrated that the technique is capable of detecting disease-specific alterations to tissue before morphological changes become apparent to the pathologist. This study draws comparisons between the information that is obtainable using RS alongside immunohistochemistry (IHC), since histological examination is the current GOLD standard for diagnosing a wide range of diseases. Here, Raman spectral maps were generated using formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded colonic tissue sections from healthy patients and spectral signatures from principal components analysis (PCA) were compared with several IHC markers to confirm the validity of their localizations. PCA loadings identified a number of signatures that could be assigned to muscle, DNA and mucin glycoproteins and their distributions were confirmed with antibodies raised against anti-Desmin, anti-Ki67 and anti-MUC2, respectively. The comparison confirms that there is excellent correlation between RS and the IHC markers used, demonstrating that the technique is capable of detecting compositional changes in tissue in a label-free manner, eliminating the need for antibodies.
Asunto(s)
Antígenos/análisis , Espectrometría Raman/métodos , Colon/citología , Formaldehído , Humanos , Adhesión en Parafina , Fijación del TejidoRESUMEN
Raman spectroscopy (RS) is a powerful technique that permits the non-destructive chemical analysis of cells and tissues without the need for expensive and complex sample preparation. To date, samples have been routinely mounted onto calcium fluoride (CaF2) as this material possesses the desired mechanical and optical properties for analysis, but CaF2 is both expensive and brittle and this prevents the technique from being routinely adopted. Furthermore, Raman scattering is a weak phenomenon and CaF2 provides no means of increasing signal. For RS to be widely adopted, particularly in the clinical field, it is crucial that spectroscopists identify an alternative, low-cost substrate capable of providing high spectral signal to noise ratios with good spatial resolution. Results show that these desired properties are attainable when using mirrored stainless steel as a Raman substrate. When compared with CaF2, data show that stainless steel has a low background signal and provides an average signal increase of 1.43 times during tissue analysis and 1.64 times when analyzing cells. This result is attributed to a double-pass of the laser beam through the sample where the photons from the source laser and the forward scattered Raman signal are backreflected and retroreflected from the mirrored steel surface and focused towards collection optics. The spatial resolution on stainless steel is at least comparable to that on CaF2 and it is not compromised by the reflection of the laser. Steel is a fraction of the cost of CaF2 and the reflection and focusing of photons improve signal to noise ratios permitting more rapid mapping. The low cost of steel coupled with its Raman signal increasing properties and robust durability indicates that steel is an ideal substrate for biological and clinical RS as it possesses key advantages over routinely used CaF2. © 2016 The Authors. Journal of Raman Spectroscopy Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.