Antibiotic dosing recommendations in critically ill patients receiving new innovative kidney replacement therapy.

BACKGROUND: The Tablo Hemodialysis System is a new innovative kidney replacement therapy (KRT) providing a range of options for critically ill patients with acute kidney injury. The use of various effluent rate and treatment durations/frequencies may clear antibiotics differently than traditional KRT. This Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) study was to develop antibiotic doses likely to attain therapeutic targets for various KRT combinations. METHODS: Published body weights and pharmacokinetic parameter estimates were used to predict drug exposure for cefepime, ceftazidime, imipenem, meropenem and piperacillin/tazobactam in virtual critically ill patients receiving five KRT regimens. Standard free ß-lactam plasma concentration time above minimum inhibitory concentration targets (40-60%fT> MIC and 40-60%fT> MICx4) were used as efficacy targets. MCS assessed the probability of target attainment (PTA) and likelihood of toxicity for various antibiotic dosing strategies. The smallest doses attaining PTA ≥ 90% during 1-week of therapy were considered optimal. RESULTS: MCS determined ß-lactam doses achieving ∼90% PTA in all KRT options. KRT characteristics influenced antibiotic dosing. Cefepime and piperacillin/tazobactam regimens designed for rigorous efficacy targets were likely to exceed toxicity thresholds. CONCLUSION: The flexibility offered by new KRT systems can influence ß-lactam antibiotic dosing, but doses can be devised to meet therapeutic targets. Further clinical validations are warranted.

Vancomycin and daptomycin dosing recommendations in patients receiving home hemodialysis using Monte Carlo simulation.

BACKGROUND: Few drug dosing recommendations for patients receiving home hemodialysis (HHD) have been published which has hindered the adoption of HHD. HHD regimens vary widely and differ considerably from conventional, thrice weekly, in-center hemodialysis in terms of treatment frequency, duration and blood and dialysate flow rates. Consequently, vancomycin and daptomycin clearances in HHD are also likely to be different, consequently HHD dosing regimens must be developed to ensure efficacy and minimize toxicity when these antibiotics are used. Many HHD regimens are used clinically, this study modeled ten common HHD regimens and determined optimal vancomycin and daptomycin dosing for each HHD regimen. METHODS: Monte Carlo simulations using pharmacokinetic data derived from the literature and demographic data from a large HHD program treating patients with end stage kidney disease were incorporated into a one-compartment pharmacokinetic model. Virtual vancomycin and daptomycin doses were administered post-HHD and drug exposures were determined in 5,000 virtual patients receiving ten different HHD regimens. Serum concentration monitoring with subsequent dose changes was incorporated into the vancomycin models. Pharmacodynamic target attainment rates were determined for each studied dose. The lowest possible doses that met predefined targets in virtual patients were chosen as optimal doses. RESULTS: HHD frequency, total dialysate volumes and HHD durations influenced drug exposure and led to different dosing regimens to meet targets. Antibiotic dosing regimens were identified that could meet targets for 3- and 7-h HHD regimens occurring every other day or 4-5 days/week. HHD regimens with 3-day interdialytic periods required higher doses prior to the 3-day period. The addition of vancomycin serum concentration monitoring allowed for calculation of necessary dosing changes which increased the number of virtual subjects meeting pharmacodynamic targets. CONCLUSIONS: Doses of vancomycin and daptomycin that will meet desired pharmacodynamic targets in HHD are dependent on patient and HHD-specific factors. Doses used in conventional thrice weekly hemodialysis are unlikely to meet treatment goals. The antibiotic regimens paired with the HHD parameters studied in this analysis are likely to meet goals but require clinical validation.

Stability and compatibility of intraperitoneal antimicrobials in peritoneal dialysate solutions.

To optimise antimicrobial administration in patients with peritoneal dialysis (PD)-related peritonitis, healthcare providers need literature-based information to develop patient-centred pharmacotherapeutic plans. Traditional PD solutions promote osmosis using dextrose or icodextrin with a lactate buffer. Newer PD solutions have modified the osmotic vehicle and buffer. Knowledge of antimicrobial compatibility and stability with newer PD solutions will assist with determining the route of antimicrobial administration as compatible and stable solutions could be delivered directly to the peritoneum using intraperitoneal administration. This review updates the compatibility and stability of antimicrobial additives in newer PD solutions for PD-related peritonitis.

Erratum to "Impact of pharmacist intervention to deprescribe inappropriate aspirin therapy in an outpatient anticoagulation clinic at a community hospital" [Am. Heart J. Plus: Cardiol. Res. Pract. volume 17, May 2022, 100165].

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2022.100165.].

Optimal antipseudomonal ꞵ-lactam drug dosing recommendations in critically-ill Asian patients receiving CRRT.

INTRODUCTION: The average body weight is smaller in Asian patients compared with Western patients, but influence of body weight in antibiotic dosing is unknown. This study was to predict the optimal ceftazidime, cefepime, meropenem, piperacillin/tazobactam doses in Asian patients undergoing continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH). METHODS: Monte Carlo simulations (MCS) were performed using published Asian demographics and pharmacokinetics parameters in 5000 virtual patients at three CVVH effluent rates (Qeff; 20, 30, 40 mL/kg/h). Various dosing regimens were assessed for the probability of target attainments using 60% fT > 1 × MIC or 4xMIC and neurotoxicity risk at 48-h using suggested neurotoxicity thresholds. RESULTS: Ceftazidime 1 g q12h, meropenem 1 g q12h, and piperacillin/tazobactam 3.375 g q6h were optimal for all Qeff settings against fT > 1 × MIC. Cefepime 2 g q24h and 2 g q12h were optimal at 20 and 30-40 mL/kg/h respectively. For the aggressive PD target (4 × MIC), optimal ceftazidime regimens were 1.25 g q8h (20-30 mL/kg/h) and 1.5 g q8h (40 mL/kg/h). Cefepime 2 g q8h and meropenem 1 g q8h were optimal at all Qeff settings. No simulated piperacillin doses attained the aggressive PD target. Increased neurotoxicity risk was predicted with ceftazidime and cefepime doses attaining the efficacy. CONCLUSION: MCS enabled the prediction of optimal ß-lactam dosing regimens for Asian patients receiving CVVH at varying Qeff. Clinical validation is warranted.

An optimal extended-infusion dosing of cefepime and ceftazidime in critically ill patients with continuous renal replacement therapy.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine optimal extended-infusion dosing regimens for cefepime and ceftazidime in critically ill patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy using Monte Carlo Simulations (MCS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pharmacokinetic models were built using published pharmacokinetic/demographic data to predict drug disposition in 5000 virtual critically ill patients receiving continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) with the standard (20-30 mL/kg/h) and a higher (40 mL/kg/h) effluent rates. MCS was performed to assess the probability of target attainment (PTA) of four cefepime and ceftazidime doses administered over 4-h with the target of ≥60% fT > 4×MIC. The lowest dose attaining PTA ≥90% during the first 48-h was considered optimal. Additionally, risk of drug toxicity was assessed at 48-h using suggested neurotoxicity thresholds. RESULTS: Cefepime 2 g loading dose (LD), then extended-infusion of 2 g q8hr was optimal in CVVH at 20 mL/kg/h and the same ceftazidime dose was optimal in CVVH at 20-30 mL/kg/h. Higher cefepime and ceftazidime doses were required to be optimal at higher effluent rates. This optimal dose particularly for cefepime likely increases neurotoxicity risk in most virtual patients with all CVVH settings. CONCLUSIONS: Cefepime and ceftazidime 2 g LD, followed by extended-infusion 2 g q8hr may be optimal in CVVH with standard effluent rates.

Elective Induction of Labor or Expectant Management: Outcomes Among Nulliparous Women with Uncomplicated Pregnancies.

INTRODUCTION: Cesarean birth rates among women who are nulliparous with uncomplicated full-term pregnancies have been shown to decrease if labor is electively induced. The purpose of this study was to compare the cesarean birth rate for women with pregnancies at 39.0 weeks' gestation or later admitted for spontaneous labor or medically indicated induction of labor (IOL) with that of women receiving elective IOL at term. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted by searching electronic health records of all nulliparous women with uncomplicated pregnancies who gave birth between January 2018 through February 2020 at one academic medical center. Select maternal demographic data and approach to labor management were the primary variables analyzed in determining the odds of cesarean birth. RESULTS: A total of 1528 women were included in this study. Among these, 158 received elective IOL, and 1370 did not. The cesarean birth rates (31.0% vs 23.9%, elective induction of labor vs expectant management, respectively, P = .048), neonatal intensive care admissions (9.5% vs 7.6%, P = .41), and Apgar scores were similar among women in both management groups, respectively (P = .08). Accounting for other potential risk factors, the odds of having cesarean birth were not statistically different between management groups (adjusted odds ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.5-1.1; P = .09). There were 2 fetal deaths among women whose labor was not electively induced. In the total cohort, women who were older, who had higher body mass index (BMI), and who identified as non-Hispanic Black had an increased odds of experiencing a cesarean birth. The associations between women in management groups and cesarean birth were not modified by age, BMI, race, or ethnicity (P = .33, .67, and .87, respectively). DISCUSSION: Elective IOL was not associated with lower cesarean rates in this study. Further research is needed before implementing clinical practice changes that encourage more use of IOL.

Comparison of antimicrobial dosing recommendations in patients receiving intermittent hemodialysis among drug information resources.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Tertiary drug information resources are frequently consulted for the optimal antimicrobial dosing in intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) patients. Yet, significant discrepancy may exist in dosing recommendations between resources. This study was to evaluate the consistency of antimicrobial dosing recommendations in IHD among four different drug information resources and the relevance of referenced pharmacokinetic studies. METHODS: Dosing recommendations of 29 commonly prescribed antimicrobials in IHD patients were collected from Micromedex, LexiComp, Clinical Pharmacology and Drug Prescribing in Renal Impairment to compare dosing categorization and the total daily dose (TDD). Significant dosing discrepancies were defined as ≥30% difference. Referenced pharmacokinetic studies were evaluated for their relevance in current practice, using sample size, hemodialyzer types, the use of optimal pharmacodynamic targets and the consideration of different interdialytic dosing periods. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: A significant variation was found both in dosing categorization and recommended doses between resources. Seventeen drugs were compared for TDD with significant dosing discrepancy in 8 drugs. Among 42 referenced pharmacokinetic studies, 40 were evaluated. Mean patient numbers of pharmacokinetic studies were 13 ranging from 3 to 70. Sixty per cent of studies utilized contemporary hemodialyzers (e.g., high-flux and/or high efficiency). The optimal pharmacodynamic targets and the impact of different interdialytic intervals were assessed only in 27.5% and 7.5% respectively. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Inconsistent antimicrobial dosing recommendations for IHD patients exist among four well-established resources. Many referenced pharmacokinetic studies utilized outdated or less pharmacodynamically relevant study methods. Newer studies are warranted to reflect contemporary dialysis practice and assess its impact on optimal antimicrobial dosing.

Impact of pharmacist intervention to deprescribe inappropriate aspirin therapy in an outpatient anticoagulation clinic at a community hospital.

Study objective: This study describes a pharmacist-led process to identify and discontinue inappropriate aspirin in patients receiving concomitant anticoagulant therapy and to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention. Setting: The study took place in an outpatient anticoagulation clinic within a small community hospital. Participants: Patients ≥40 years old on indefinite anticoagulation therapy for atrial fibrillation and/or venous thromboembolism were included. Design: This is a quality improvement initiative. Interventions: Utilizing the electronic medical record and patient interview, use and indication for daily aspirin therapy was confirmed. Prospectively collected patient demographics and past medical history were used to determine appropriateness of aspirin therapy. For patients identified as receiving inappropriate aspirin therapy, a fax was sent to the referring provider recommending aspirin discontinuation. Main outcome measures: To assess the effectiveness of the intervention, outcomes were retrospectively measured. The primary outcome was the percentage of "accepted" recommendations. Secondary outcomes included the prevalence, dosing, and indications for aspirin therapy. Results: Eighty (33 %) of 242 patients were on aspirin. Fifty-two patients with atrial fibrillation and/or venous thromboembolism were assessed and aspirin was deemed inappropriate in 22 patients. The provider agreed with deprescribing aspirin therapy in 45 %. The most common dose and indication of aspirin therapy was 81 mg (98 %) and primary prevention (40 %) respectively. Conclusions: In our small practice, pharmacist-led interventions were an effective means to recommend aspirin discontinuation in our identified patients. Further studies are needed to optimize a pharmacist's role and address the long-term effects of deprescription.

Telavancin pharmacokinetics in patients with chronic kidney disease receiving haemodialysis.

BACKGROUND: Telavancin is a lipoglycopeptide antibiotic with limited pharmacokinetic data to guide drug dosing in patients receiving haemodialysis. OBJECTIVES: This study characterized telavancin pharmacokinetics in patients receiving haemodialysis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a Phase IV, prospective, open-label, single-centre, crossover pharmacokinetic study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02392208). Eight subjects with end-stage kidney disease requiring maintenance haemodialysis (mean ±â€ŠSD: 47 ±â€Š20 years, 69.5 ±â€Š17.1 kg) received 5 mg/kg telavancin IV 3 h before starting a 3.5 hour haemodialysis treatment with a high-permeability haemodialyser (haemodialysis period). After a 14 day washout period, a second 5 mg/kg dose was administered post-haemodialysis (control period). Telavancin plasma concentrations were measured over a 2 day period after each dose and non-compartmental pharmacokinetic analyses were performed. RESULTS: The geometric mean (GM) of telavancin overall clearance was 11.2 mL/h/kg (intrinsic clearance and dialytic clearance) in the haemodialysis period and 5.9 mL/h/kg (off-haemodialysis clearance) in the control period [GM ratio (GMR) = 1.89; 90% CI: 1.70-2.10; P < 0.01]. The GM t½ was 13.1 h when haemodialysis occurred 3 h post-dosing in the haemodialysis period but extended to 20.9 h with post-haemodialysis dosing in the control period (GMR = 0.63; 90% CI: 0.54-0.73; P < 0.01). The GM of telavancin plasma concentrations removed by haemodialysis was 27.7%. The GMR of peak plasma concentration and volume of distribution of the haemodialysis period and the control period were 0.88 (90% CI: 0.79-0.98; P = 0.08) and 1.17 (90% CI: 1.05-1.30; P = 0.048), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Haemodialysis with high-permeability haemodialysers removes telavancin considerably (∼⅓ of body load). Telavancin 5 mg/kg every 48 h post-haemodialysis dosing is recommended, but dose adjustments may be warranted if haemodialysis starts within 3 h of telavancin administration.

Splenic rupture as the presenting symptom in infective endocarditis: a rare and dangerous complication.

Infective endocarditis remains a dangerous condition and carries a mortality risk of approximately 20%. Splenic rupture is a rare complication of endocarditis. A 60-year-old woman with a history of atrial fibrillation, mitral valve repair and severe mitral regurgitation was admitted with a fall and abdominal pain. Emergency laparotomy was performed leading to a diagnosis of splenic rupture, for which splenectomy was performed. Four months later, the patient represented with symptoms of a transient ischaemic attack. Transthoracic and transoesophageal echocardiogram confirmed a large vegetation on the anterior mitral valve leaflet. Treatment with antibiotics and re-do mitral valve surgery was performed. The cause of the initial splenic rupture was felt to have been secondary to undiagnosed infective endocarditis. It is imperative to consider endocarditis in a case of spontaneous splenic rupture particularly in high-risk patients such as those with previous valve surgery.

Further Adaptations and Reflections by an Assertive Community Treatment Team to Serve Clients with Severe Mental Illness During COVID-19.

In September of 2020, Guan and colleagues wrote about their experience of an Assertive Community Psychiatry Program responding to the COVID-19 pandemic. We describe our own experience as an Assertive Community Treatment team in Minnesota responding to challenges of effectively and safely delivering service to clients. As the pandemic has progressed since last year, so has the literature, and updated references are highlighted. Common threads are woven between our experience, the experience of Guan and colleagues, and others to suggest the beginnings of a template to adapt services to a new post-pandemic world.

Evaluation and Development of Vancomycin Dosing Schemes to Meet New AUC/MIC Targets in Intermittent Hemodialysis Using Monte Carlo Simulation Techniques.

Published vancomycin dosing recommendations for patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis were not designed to meet newly recommended 24-hour area under the curve/minimum inhibitory concentration (AUC24h /MIC) pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets. The aims of this study were to predict pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target attainment rates with a commonly used vancomycin regimen and to design a new dosing scheme incorporating therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) to maximize target attainment in patients receiving vancomycin and hemodialysis with high- or low-flux hemodialyzers. Vancomycin pharmacokinetic- and dialysis-specific parameters were incorporated into Monte Carlo simulations (MCS). A commonly used vancomycin regimen was modeled to determine its likelihood of attaining AUC24h /MIC targets for 1 week of thrice-weekly hemodialysis treatments. MCS was then used to develop optimal initial vancomycin dosing for patients receiving intradialytic or postdialytic vancomycin administration with either high- or low-flux hemodialyzers. Finally, a new MCS model incorporating TDM was built to further optimize the probability of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target attainment. Traditional vancomycin dosing methods are unlikely to meet AUC24h /MIC targets. Vancomycin doses necessary to attain AUC24h /MIC targets are significantly influenced by hemodialyzer permeability and whether vancomycin is administered intradialytically or after hemodialysis. Depending on dialyzer type and whether vancomycin is administered during or after hemodialysis, loading doses of 25 to 35 mg/kg followed by maintenance doses of 7.5 to 15 mg/kg are necessary to reach minimum AUC24h /MIC targets in 90% of virtual patients. For a 3-day interdialytic period, a 30% higher maintenance dose is required to maintain target attainment. Dosing based on a single vancomycin serum concentration obtained prior to the second dialysis session greatly enhances the probability of target attainment.

Novel therapeutic agents for the treatment of diabetic kidney disease.

INTRODUCTION: Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) involves multifaceted pathophysiology which increases the risk of cardiorenal events and mortality. Conventional therapy is limited to renin-angiotensin aldosterone system inhibition and management of hyperglycemia and hypertension. Recent clinical trials have demonstrated promising nephroprotective effects of antihyperglycemic agents thus modifying guideline treatment recommendations for type 2 diabetic patients with chronic kidney disease. AREAS OF COVERED: Relevant studies and clinical trials were searched via PubMed and clinicaltrials.gov through August 2020. Authors offer an update on clinical evidence regarding nephroprotective effects and side effects of sodium-glucose-cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, glucagon-like-peptide-1 (GLP1) agonists and dipeptidylpeptidase-4 (DPP4) inhibitors. They discuss the potential benefits of novel therapy targeting DKD pathogenic processes including inflammation, oxidative stress, fibrosis, and vasoconstriction shown in early phases of clinical trials and offer an opinion on key challenges and directions for future progress. EXPERT OPINION: SGLT2 inhibitors are the most promising agents for DKD and improving cardiorenal outcomes. Mineralocorticoid-receptor antagonists and janus kinase inhibitors are also promising investigational therapies that target oxidative stress, nitric oxide synthesis, and inflammation. Novel therapeutic targets and the identification of clinically useful biomarkers may provide future therapies that detect early stages of DKD enabling a slower kidney function decline.

Harmonizing antibiotic regimens with renal replacement therapy.

Introduction: Critically ill patients with acute kidney injury often require renal replacement therapy and antibiotic therapy. Mortality rates are high in these patients, possibly due to ineffective dosing due to altered pharmacokinetic profiles and drug removal by renal replacement therapy. Areas covered: The main types of renal replacement therapies are intermittent hemodialysis, prolonged intermittent renal replacement therapy and continuous renal replacement therapy. Each of these renal replacement therapies may have drastic, yet different, effects on antibiotic serum concentration profiles. Moreover, three antibiotic administration strategies are often used: (1) standard infusion; (2) extended infusion; and (3) continuous infusion. A literature review was conducted on Medline in December 2019 to identify pertinent research. Expert opinion: Renal replacement therapies used in the treatment of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients usually complicates antibiotic use. Although antibiotic toxicity can be seen, most studies find that these patients do not receive sufficient antibiotic doses to achieve desired pharmacodynamic targets. Clinicians should dose antibiotics to match renal replacement therapy drug clearance characteristics to antibiotic pharmacodynamic profiles.