Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 6 de 6
1.
Child Abuse Negl ; 153: 106807, 2024 Jul.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38677178

BACKGROUND: Although evidence in supporting the associations between childhood maltreatment (CM), parenting style and anxiety in children and adolescents exists, few high-quality analytical epidemiological studies which focusing on clinically diagnosed anxiety disorders (AD) had been published. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to further corroborate the associations between CM, parenting style, and AD in a large representative sample of Chinese children and adolescents. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: Study subjects were derived from the Mental Health Survey for Children and Adolescents in Yunnan (MHSCAY), a population-based cross-sectional program. METHODS: Individually matched case-control study design was adopted. Univariate and multivariate conditional binary logistic regression models were used to estimate the associations between CM, parenting style and AD. Dose-response trends were estimated using the Cochran-Armitage Chi-square test. A series of stratified analyses were conducted to explore effect modification on exposure-outcome association by some important features. RESULTS: Totally we screened out 202 cases and 404 matched controls, with an age mean of 14.43 years. Conditional logistic regression models revealed that EA and a higher level of parental over-protection were significantly associated with increased risk of AD, with adjusted ORs of 3.39 (95 % CI: 2.07-5.56) and 1.93 (95 % CI: 1.28-2.90). Stratified analysis identified noticeable effect modification by sex, age, and whether the only child in the family. CONCLUSIONS: Major findings of this study suggested that children and adolescents who had experienced EA or raised up by over-protective parents are at increased risk of AD. Targeted intervention measures should be developed and implemented for these high-risk youths.


Anxiety Disorders , Child Abuse , Parenting , Humans , Case-Control Studies , Male , Female , Adolescent , Child Abuse/statistics & numerical data , Child Abuse/psychology , Parenting/psychology , Child , China/epidemiology , Anxiety Disorders/epidemiology , Anxiety Disorders/psychology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Logistic Models , Risk Factors , Anxiety/epidemiology , Anxiety/psychology , East Asian People
2.
BMC Public Health ; 24(1): 615, 2024 Feb 26.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38408963

BACKGROUND: School bullying is prevalent in children and adolescents. Bullying victims are seen higher risk of negative psychological outcomes. Previously published studies suggested that social indicators may pose significant influence on bullying victimization. However, the association between social poverty and bullying victimization has not been exclusively discussed. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we analyzed the association between 6 commonly used social poverty indicators (Poverty Headcount Ratio, PHR; Poverty Gap, PG; Squared Poverty Gap, SPG; monthly household per capita income, PCI; Watts' Poverty Index, WPI; the Gini Index, Gini) and the prevalence of school bullying at country level by using the Global school-based Student Health Survey (GSHS) database. RESULTS: Altogether 16 countries were included into the final analysis, with school bullying victimization prevalence ranged from 12.9 to 47.5%. Bubble plots revealed statistically significant associations between the three indicators measuring absolute poverty level (PHR, PCI, WPI) and bullying victimization. Subsequently performed principal component regression indicated that, for all types of bullying victimization, the increase of absolute poverty level was related to elevated prevalence rates, and the association was particularly strong for verbal bullying victimization. CONCLUSIONS: Our study results may suggest that absolute social poverty is an important parameter for constructing and implementing school bullying victimization intervention strategies and measures.


Bullying , Crime Victims , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Child , Adolescent , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Health Surveys , Students , Poverty
3.
BMC Cancer ; 23(1): 1248, 2023 Dec 18.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38110876

BACKGROUND: Existing literature suggests that tertiary lymphatic structure (TLS) is associated with the progression of cancer. However, the prognostic role of TLS in digestive system cancers remains controversial. This meta-analysis aims to synthesize currently available evidence in the association between TLS and the survival of digestive system cancers. METHODS: We systematically searched three digital databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science) for articles published from database inception to December 23, 2022. Study selection criteria are based on PECO framework: P (population: patients with digestive system cancers), E (exposure: presence of TLS), C (comparator: absence of TLS), O (outcome: overall survival, OS; recurrence-free survival, RFS; disease-free survival, DFS). The Quality in Prognostic Studies (QUIPS) tool was used to assess risk of bias for included studies. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023416307). RESULTS: A total of 25 studies with 6910 patients were included into the final meta-analysis. Random-effects models revealed that the absence of TLS was associated with compromised OS, RFS, and DFS of digestive system cancers, with pooled hazard ratios (HRs) of 1.74 (95% CI: 1.50-2.03), 1.96 (95% CI: 1.58-2.44), and 1.81 (95% CI: 1.49-2.19), respectively. Subgroup analyses disclosed a stronger TLS-survival association for pancreatic cancer, compared with other digestive system cancers. CONCLUSION: TLS may be of prognostic significance for digestive system cancers. More original studies are needed to further corroborate this finding.


Digestive System Neoplasms , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms , Tertiary Lymphoid Structures , Humans , Prognosis , Biomarkers, Tumor
4.
JAMA Netw Open ; 6(10): e2338174, 2023 10 02.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37851443

Importance: Mental disorders among children and adolescents are global health concerns. Published studies have provided discordant results regarding treatment rates for mental disorders among youths. Objective: To estimate combined treatment rates for several common psychiatric disorders among children and adolescents. Data Sources: PubMed, Web of Science, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Embase were searched from database inception until September 23, 2022, and supplemented with hand-searching of reference lists. Study Selection: Included studies were those that used validated methods to report treatment rates for any mental disorder, depressive disorders, anxiety disorders, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and behavior disorders among children and adolescents. Data Extraction and Synthesis: This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline. Two reviewers independently assessed study eligibility, extracted data, and scored quality. Studies with a Joanna Briggs Institute score of 5 or more were included in the meta-analysis. Treatment rates were pooled using random-effects models. Subgroup analyses were performed to investigate the association with treatment rates of factors, such as year of data collection, World Health Organization region, age, income level, timeframe of diagnosis, informant source, service type, sample origin, and internalizing or externalizing disorder. Main Outcomes and Measures: Treatment rates for mental disorders among children and adolescents were the main outcomes, measured as percentage estimates. Results: Forty studies were included in the analysis, comprising 310 584 children and adolescents, with boys accounting for 39% of participants (sex was not reported in 10 studies). The pooled treatment rate was 38% (95% CI, 30%-45%) for any mental disorder, 36% (95% CI, 29%-43%) for depressive disorders, 31% (95% CI, 21%-42%) for anxiety disorders, 58% (95% CI, 42%-73%) for ADHD, and 49% (95% CI, 35%-64%) for behavior disorders. Age, income level, and region were significantly associated with the combined treatment rates of mental disorders in children and adolescents. The treatment rate for depressive disorders was higher among adolescents than children (36% [95% CI, 25%-46%] vs 11% [95% CI, 0%-25%]), whereas the treatment rate for anxiety disorders was higher among children than adolescents (64% [95% CI, 52%-75%] vs 20% [95% CI, 9%-30%]). The treatment rate for any mental disorder in lower-middle income countries was 6% (95% CI, 2%-14%), in upper-middle income countries was 24% (95% CI, 2%-47%), and in high-income countries was 43% (95% CI, 35%-52%). For depressive disorders, treatment rates were higher in the Americas (40% [95% CI, 30%-51%]) than in Europe (28% [95% CI, 13%-43%]) and the Western Pacific region (6% [95% CI, 1%-16%]). Conclusions and Relevance: This study suggests that, in general, the treatment rates for mental disorders among children and adolescents were low, especially for depression and anxiety. Targeted intervention policies and effective measures should be designed and implemented to improve treatment rates of psychiatric disorders among youths.


Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity , Conduct Disorder , Male , Adolescent , Child , Humans , Anxiety Disorders , Anxiety/therapy , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/epidemiology , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/therapy , Combined Modality Therapy
5.
J Affect Disord ; 331: 386-392, 2023 06 15.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36990285

OBJECTIVE: The independent associations among childhood maltreatment (CM), parenting style, and school bullying in children and adolescents have not been adequately discussed. Epidemiological evidence of higher quality is still scarce. We intend to investigate this topic by using a case-control study design in a large sample of Chinese children and adolescents. METHOD: Study participants were chosen from the Mental Health Survey for Children and Adolescents in Yunnan (MHSCAY), a mega ongoing cross-sectional study. The combined database from four study sites was used. The population-based case-control study was individually matched by study site, age, sex, race, left-behind status, whether a single child, and whether a boarding student. RESULTS: Cases were observed to have a significantly higher prevalence of CM, higher scores for parental rejection and over-protection, and lower scores for parental emotional warmth. Multiple conditional logistic regression revealed that CM, especially emotional abuse (EA) and sexual abuse (SA), were associated with a prominently increased risk of school bullying involvement, with adjusted odds ratio (OR) of 2.28 (95 % CI: 2.03, 2.57) and 1.90 (95 % CI: 1.67, 2.17). Subsequent analysis further corroborated the robustness of EA-bullying and SA-bullying associations. Although parenting style generally showed a weaker association with school bullying, a higher level of parental rejection was related to an increased risk of bullying victimization. CONCLUSIONS: Chinese children and adolescents who are victims of EA or SA, or experienced a higher level of parental rejection, are more vulnerable to school bullying. Targeted interventions should be designed and implemented.


Bullying , Child Abuse , Parenting , Adolescent , Child , Humans , Bullying/psychology , Case-Control Studies , Child Abuse/psychology , China/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , East Asian People , Parenting/psychology , Schools
6.
J Glob Antimicrob Resist ; 25: 72-76, 2021 06.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33689828

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the antibiotic susceptibility profiles of Mycobacterium abscessus complex (MABC) isolates and to investigate the relationship between susceptibility profiles and genetic mechanisms of macrolide resistance. METHODS: More than 200 isolates collected from respiratory specimens between 2014 and 2018 were randomly analysed in this study. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (Mics) of ten potential antimicrobial agents were determined by the microplate alamarBlue assay. RESULTS: We identified 43 MABC isolates, including 32 M. abscessus subsp. abscessus (M. abscessus) (6 from immunocompromised patients) and 11 M. abscessus subsp. massiliense (M. massiliense). The majority of MABC isolates were susceptible to amikacin (96.9% and 100.0% for M. abscessus and M. massiliense, respectively), linezolid (96.9% and 100.0%, respectively), cefoxitin (100.0% and 100.0%, respectively), imipenem (90.6% and 72.7%, respectively) and tobramycin (90.6% and 72.7%, respectively). The resistance rates to clarithromycin and doxycycline in isolates of M. abscessus (68.8% and 100.0%) were significantly higher than those in isolates of M. massiliense (18.2% and 63.6%) (P < 0.05), whereas the percentage of tobramycin-resistant isolates among M. abscessus (9.4%) was significantly lower than among M. massiliense (27.3%) (P = 0.007). Sequencing analyses showed significant differences between erm(41) of M. abscessus and M. massiliense. CONCLUSION: Mycobacterium abscessus is the dominant pathogen of pulmonary MABC infections in our hospital. Aminoglycosides (amikacin and tobramycin), ß-lactams (cefoxitin and imipenem) and linezolid exhibited potent inhibitory activity against MABC in vitro. The erm(41) gene may be a promising marker to predict macrolide susceptibility for M. abscessus.


Mycobacterium Infections, Nontuberculous , Mycobacterium abscessus , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , China , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Humans , Macrolides/pharmacology , Mycobacterium abscessus/genetics
...