Protocadherin 10 suppresses tumorigenesis and metastasis in colorectal cancer and its genetic loss predicts adverse prognosis.

Protocadherin 10 (PCDH10), a novel tumor suppressor gene in human cancers, is located in a common deleted region at chromosome 4q28 in colorectal cancer (CRC). This study aimed to ascertain the genetic loss of PCDH10 and its clinical relevance in CRC and to explore the tumor suppressor function of PCDH10. The genetic deletion of PCDH10 was determined in 171 pairs of primary tumors and corresponding normal mucosae by loss of heterozygosity study. In total, 53 carcinomas were positive for allelic loss of PCDH10. The genetic aberration was significantly associated with tumor progression and distant metastasis (p = 0.021 and p = 0.018, respectively) and was an independent predictor of poor survival for CRC patients (p = 0.005). Expression of PCDH10 gene was silenced or markedly down-regulated in all of 12 CRC cell lines tested and in 41 of 53 colorectal carcinomas compared with their matched normal mucosae. Ectopic expression of PCDH10 suppressed cancer cell proliferation, anchorage-independent growth, migration and invasion in vitro. Subcutaneous injection of PCDH10-expressing CRC cells into SCID mice revealed the reduction of tumor growth compared with that observed in mock-inoculated mice. Furthermore, through intrasplenic implantation, the re-expression of PCDH10 in silenced cells restrained liver metastasis and improved survival in SCID mice. In conclusion, PCDH10 is a pivotal tumor suppressor in CRC, and the loss of its function promotes not only tumor progression but also liver metastasis. In addition, the genetic deletion of PCDH10 represents an adverse prognostic marker for the survival of patients with CRC.

Minor histocompatibility antigen HA-1 and HA-2 polymorphisms in Taiwan: frequency and application in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Minor histocompatibility antigens influence the occurrence of graft-vs.-host disease and graft-vs.-leukemia effects after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). We determined the population frequencies of HA-1 and HA-2 alleles in Taiwan and exploited their potential applications in allogeneic HSCT. METHODS: HA-1 and HA-2 were genotyped using polymerase chain reaction and restriction fragment length polymorphism in healthy controls (221 for HA-1 and 306 for HA-2) and HLA-matched donor-recipient sibling pairs with HSCT (92 for HA-1 and 38 for HA-2). The association of genetic polymorphisms with HSCT outcome was evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The allele frequencies in controls were 35.3% and 64.7% for HA-1(H) and HA-1(R), and 89.0% and 11.0% for HA-2(V) and HA-2(M), respectively. HA-1 disparity was denoted in 16.3% of HLA-matched donor-recipient sibling pairs, while it was not associated with HSCT outcome. HA-2 disparity was not observed in the donor-recipient pairs studied. The possibilities of using HA-1 and HA-2 variabilities as molecular markers for hematopoietic chimerism after HSCT were 39.2% and 18.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our data provide the information on allele and genotype frequencies of HA-1 and HA-2 in a Taiwanese population, and suggest that prospective genomic typing for HA-1 and HA-2 alleles of the donor and recipient could be a useful approach for molecular identification of hematopoietic chimerism after HSCT, rather than prognosis of clinical outcome.

Functional polymorphism of CTLA-4 and ICOS genes in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

BACKGROUND: T cells play a critical role in alloimmune recognition and thus contribute to graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and relapse prevention in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) and inducible costimulator (ICOS) are costimulatory molecules of T cell activation and their genetic variations can affect the capacity of T cells to become activated or inactivated. METHODS: We examined CTLA-4 (-318 C/T and +49 A/G) and ICOS (c.602 A/C and c.1624 C/T) genotypes in 123 patients with HSCT and their HLA-matched sibling donors, and then evaluated the impacts of the genetic polymorphisms on GVHD, disease relapse, and survival. RESULTS: By multivariate analysis, the donor CTLA-4 -318 TT genotype increased the risk of disease relapse (Hazard ratio [HR]: 5.91, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.17-29.79, P=0.0313). Recipients who received a graft from a donor with ICOS c.602 CC genotype had worse disease-free survival (HR: 5.97, 95% CI: 1.49-23.87, P=0.0115). Additionally, recipients with ICOS c.1624 TT genotype had worse overall survival (HR: 12.98, 95% CI: 2.58-65.35, P=0.0019). Nevertheless, CTLA-4 and ICOS genotypes were not associated with acute and chronic GVHD. CONCLUSIONS: Both donor and recipient CTLA-4 and ICOS gene polymorphisms might be of importance for the outcome of allogeneic HSCT.