Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Horm Metab Res ; 47(1): 9-15, 2015 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25376549

RESUMEN

Islet transplantation alone (ITA) is indicated for patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) with disabling severe hypoglycaemia (SH) despite optimised medical therapy. We examined outcomes for patients referred to an islet transplant unit with recurrent SH. Retrospective case note audit of 45 patients with ≥1 SH per year who were referred to our ITA unit between 2009-2012; 36 patients attended follow-up appointments. The cohort was 52.8% male, mean (± SD) age 43.9 (± 11.4) years, and duration of diabetes 26.5 (± 12.9) years. Baseline HbA1c was 8.3% (± 1.7) (67.2 mmol/mol), median (IQR) frequency of SH was 6.0 (2.0-24.0) per/patient/year and 83.3% had impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia (IAH). 80.6% of patients were referred from other secondary diabetes services, 22.2% had completed structured education, and 30.6% were using continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII). Seventeen patients were optimised with conventional therapy; SH reduced from 2.0 (1.5-9.0) to 0.0 (0.0-0.5) episodes/patient/year; p<0.001, and there was concurrent improvement in HbA1c (8.1-7.7%; 65.0 vs. 60.7 mmol/mol; p=0.072). Ten patients were listed for transplantation as they were not optimised despite structured education, CSII, and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). The remaining 9 had a reduction in SH [7.0 (4.8-40.5) to 4.0 (2.5-6.3) episodes/patient/year; p=0.058] and either left the service (n=5) or are still being optimised (n=4). In conclusion, 47.2% of patients presenting with problematic hypoglycaemia resolved with optimal medical therapy, with a further 25% achieving clinically relevant improvement, however 27.8% required transplantation despite access to all therapies. Provision of expertise in hypoglycaemia management is essential to focus limited transplant resources on those who need it most.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/terapia , Hipoglucemia/complicaciones , Trasplante de Islotes Pancreáticos , Derivación y Consulta , Especialización , Adulto , Femenino , Hemoglobina Glucada/metabolismo , Humanos , Masculino , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Am J Transplant ; 12(12): 3414-24, 2012 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23016623

RESUMEN

Shortage of organs for transplantation has led to the renewed interest in donation after circulatory-determination of death (DCDD). We conducted a retrospective analysis (2001-2009) and a subsequent prospective validation (2010) of liver Maastricht-Category-3-DCDD and donation-after-brain-death (DBD) offers to our program. Accepted and declined offers were compared. Accepted DCDD offers were divided into donors who went on to cardiac arrest and those who did not. Donors who arrested were divided into those producing grafts that were transplanted or remained unused. Descriptive comparisons and regression analyses were performed to assess predictor models of donor cardiac arrest and graft utilization. Variables from the multivariate analysis were prospectively validated. Of 1579 DCDD offers, 621 were accepted, and of these, 400 experienced cardiac arrest after withdrawal of support. Of these, 173 livers were transplanted. In the DCDD group, donor age < 40 years, use of inotropes and absence of gag/cough reflexes were predictors of cardiac arrest. Donor age >50 years, BMI >30, warm ischemia time >25 minutes, ITU stay >7 days and ALT ≥ 4× normal rates were risk factors for not using the graft. These variables had excellent sensitivity and specificity for the prediction of cardiac arrest (AUROC = 0.835) and graft use (AUROC = 0.748) in the 2010 prospective validation. These models can feasibly predict cardiac arrest in potential DCDDs and graft usability, helping to avoid unnecessary recoveries and healthcare expenditure.


Asunto(s)
Muerte Encefálica , Supervivencia de Injerto/fisiología , Paro Cardíaco/etiología , Trasplante de Hígado/métodos , Modelos Estadísticos , Preservación de Órganos/métodos , Donantes de Tejidos/provisión & distribución , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos
3.
Am J Transplant ; 7(10): 2318-25, 2007 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17845565

RESUMEN

Islets from brain-dead donors (BDDs) are being used in the treatment of Type 1 diabetes. However, both donor numbers and islet survival are limited. We explored the clinical potential for islets from non-heart-beating donors (NHBDs), who have lower circulating cytokines, by comparing islets from 10 NHBDs against 12 identically-isolated islets from BDDs over the same time period. The quantity and quality of islets from NHBDs was good. NHBD yielded approximately 12.6% more islets than those of BDDs (505,000 +/- 84,230 vs. 400,970 +/- 172,430 islet equivalent number [IEQ]/pancreas, p = 0.01) with comparable viability. ATP and GTP contents were lower (6.026 +/- 3.076 vs. 18.105 +/- 7.8 nM/mg protein, p = 0.01 and 1.52 +/- 0.87 vs. 3.378 +/- 0.83 nM/mg protein, p = 0.04) and correlated negatively to warm ischemia time (R(2)= 0.8022 and R(2)= 0.7996, respectively). Islets from NHBDs took longer to control hyperglycemia in diabetic mice, but were equally able to sustain euglycemia. With a warm ischemia time (WIT) of

Asunto(s)
Muerte Súbita Cardíaca , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/cirugía , Trasplante de Islotes Pancreáticos/fisiología , Islotes Pancreáticos/fisiología , Donantes de Tejidos , Adolescente , Adulto , Supervivencia Celular , Citocinas/sangre , Muerte Súbita Cardíaca/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Trasplante de Islotes Pancreáticos/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tamaño de los Órganos , Páncreas/anatomía & histología
7.
Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl ; 7(2): 173-7, 1996.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18417935

RESUMEN

Liver disease is a major medical problem in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and is mostly due to viral hepatitis. Liver transplantation is the only option for patients with end-stage liver disease offering good long-term survival. The first liver transplant at the King Fahad National Guard Hospital was performed in February 1994 and since then, 40 liver transplants have been performed on 37 patients. Immunosuppression consisted of prednisone combined with cyclosporin (Neoral) or FK 506. Maintenance immunosuppression was with the use of cyclosporin or FK 506 as monotherapy. All, but one patient, survived the surgical procedure; there were no cases of primary non-function; acute cellular rejection occurred in 12 patients all of whom responded to steroids. Pneumonia and biliary sepsis occurred in 12 patients each. A total of 10 patients died, with sepsis being the leading cause of death. The overall graft survival was 73%. Donor shortage continues to be a major limiting factor.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...