Does recall period matter? Comparing PROMIS® physical function with no recall, 24-hr recall, and 7-day recall.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of recall periods on the assessment of physical function, we compared, in cancer and general population samples, the standard administration of PROMIS Physical Function items without a recall period to administrations with 24-hour and 7-day recall periods. METHODS: We administered 31 items from the PROMIS Physical Function v2.0 item bank to 2400 respondents (n = 1001 with cancer; n = 1399 from the general population). Respondents were randomly assigned to one of three recall conditions (no recall, 24-hours, or 7-days) and one of two "reminder" conditions (with recall periods presented only at the start of the survey or with every item). We assessed items for potential differential item functioning (DIF) by recall time period. We then tested recall and reminder effects with analysis of variance controlling for demographics, English fluency, and co-morbidities. RESULTS: Based on conservative pre-set criteria, no items were flagged for recall time period-related DIF. Using analysis of variance, each condition was compared to the standard PROMIS administration for Physical Function (no recall period). There was no evidence of significant differences among groups in the cancer sample. In the general population sample, only the 24-hour recall condition with reminders was significantly different from the "no recall" PROMIS standard. At the item level, for both samples, the number of items with non-trivial effect size differences across conditions was minimal. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to no recall, the use of a recall period has little to no effect upon PROMIS physical function responses or scores. We recommend that PROMIS Physical Function be administered with the standard PROMIS "no recall" period.

Outcomes of angioembolization and nephrectomy for renal angiomyolipoma associated with tuberous sclerosis complex: a real-world US national study.

OBJECTIVE: To examine outcomes of clinical procedures for renal angiomyolipoma associated with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) based on US national health claims databases. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study selected two cohorts of TSC patients, who underwent either embolization or nephrectomy (either partial or complete) for renal angiomyolipoma in the years from 2000 through 2011. Based on claims diagnosis codes, we estimated the prevalence rates of 10 angiomyolipoma-related conditions and 50 embolization- or nephrectomy-related conditions in the pre- and post-baseline periods respectively, and made cross-year and cross-period comparison of these rates with repeated measures analysis methods. RESULTS: The embolization cohort (N = 4280) and the nephrectomy cohort (N = 3842) had mean baseline ages of 50.7 and 51.7 years with 52.5% and 51.3% males, respectively. After the intervention, the embolization cohort had statistically significant reductions (all p < .05) in gross hematuria (-27.7%), retroperitoneal hemorrhage (-8.4%), and abdominal mass (-6.9%), and increases in hypertension (15.5%), renal mass or unspecified disorder of kidney and ureter (13.8%), anemia (5.1%), and renal insufficiency (3.3%). Similarly, the nephrectomy cohort saw statistically significant reductions (all p < .05) in gross hematuria (-30.6%), flank pain (-7.5%), and abdominal mass (-6.4%), but increases in hypertension (11.9%), renal insufficiency (10.4%), and anemia (7.6%). Embolization was associated with post-procedure increases in renal mass or unspecified kidney/ureter disorder (13.9%), other disorders of kidney and ureter (3.4%), non-acute renal insufficiency (3.1%), flank pain (3.7%), renal insufficiency (3.2%), etc. (all p < .05). Nephrectomy was associated with post-procedure increases in postoperative ileus (5.3%), pain and headache (4.8%), paralytic ileus (3.6%), etc. (all p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Both embolization and nephrectomy were effective, but associated with increases in certain angiomyolipoma-related conditions. Further, the embolization effect on gross hematuria, retroperitoneal hemorrhage, and abdominal mass might subside after the intervention year.

Surgical resection of subependymal giant cell astrocytomas (SEGAs) and changes in SEGA-related conditions: a US national claims database study.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the prevalence rates of clinical conditions related to subependymal giant cell astrocytomas (SEGAs) before and after SEGA surgery among patients with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC). METHODS: Based on three US national claims databases, we analyzed and compared the prevalence rates of 21 SEGA-related conditions (including seizures, hydrocephalus, headaches and stroke or hemiparesis) in the six months preceding surgery with the rates in the second through sixth post-surgery months and in the seventh through twelfth post-surgery months among TSC patients who underwent SEGA surgery during 2000-2009. Repeated measures analysis with a bootstrapping method was used to assess the surgery impact. RESULTS: Patients (N = 47) had a mean age of 11.5 years at their first SEGA surgery, and 66% were male. Compared with the six months preceding surgery, the post-surgery prevalence rates increased by 23-26% for seizures, 21-26% for hydrocephalus, 17-19% for headache and 6-9% for stroke or hemiparesis (all p < 0.05). Repeated measures analysis confirmed the impact of surgery on the prevalence rate of these five conditions (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: SEGA surgery has its important role in SEGA treatment. However, after SEGA surgery this group of TSC patients had increased prevalence rates of seizures, hydrocephalus, vision disorders, headaches, stroke or hemiparesis, and autism. Future research to examine the causes of these symptoms is imperative. LIMITATIONS: The study results have limitations in data source representativeness, coding accuracy, and study design.

Outcomes of resecting subependymal giant cell astrocytoma (SEGA) among patients with SEGA-related tuberous sclerosis complex: a national claims database analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the outcomes following resection of subependymal giant cell astrocytoma (SEGA) among patients with SEGA-associated tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC). METHODS: Using three large US national healthcare claims databases, we retrospectively examined the outcomes of SEGA surgery among TSC patients who underwent SEGA surgery between 2000 and 2009. The examined outcomes were: prevalence rates of post-surgery SEGA, repeated SEGA surgery, and postoperative complications (surgical procedure complications, nervous system complications, postoperative infections, complications of subdural empyemas, and complications of epidural abscesses). Descriptive data analysis and two-sided one sample t-test for mean or proportion were used to assess the characteristics of patients and the outcomes of SEGA surgery. RESULTS: The selected patients (N = 47) had a mean age of 11.6 years at their first SEGA surgery and 66% were male. During the third through twelfth months following surgery, 34% had post-surgery SEGA (diagnosis) and 12% underwent repeated SEGA surgeries. During the first post-surgery year, 48.9% of patients developed postoperative complications (34.0% had complications relating to the surgical procedure, 12.8% had nervous system complications, 6.4% developed postoperative infections, 17.0% had complications of subdural empyemas, and 2.1% had complications of epidural abscesses). CONCLUSIONS: SEGA surgery was associated with statistically significant risks of developing post-surgery SEGA, requiring repeated SEGA surgery and developing postoperative complications. Future efforts in reducing these outcomes, either through improving surgical procedures or through alternative treatments, are urgently needed. LIMITATIONS: This study has its limitation in data source representativeness and measurement accuracy.