Pharmacokinetics and safety of a new generic lurasidone: a phase I bioequivalence study in healthy Chinese subjects.

Latuda® is a novel antipsychotic drug for schizophrenia and bipolar depression. A bioequivalence trial was performed to investigate the bioequivalence of Latuda® and its generic drug lurasidone. Two independent trials were carried out, each involving 28 subjects. In the fasting trial, subjects were randomly assigned to two groups (1:1 ratio), receiving either 40 mg of generic lurasidone or Latuda®. After a 7-day washout period, subjects entered the second period with a crossover administration of 40 mg of generic lurasidone or Latuda®. The postprandial study design was similar to that of the fasting study. In the fasting study, the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameter values of generic lurasidone and Latuda® were as follows: the Cmax was 28.84 ± 19.34 ng/ml and 28.22 ± 21.19 ng/ml, respectively; the AUC0-t was 121.39 ± 58.47 h*ng/ml and 118.35 ± 52.24 h*ng/ml, respectively; and the AUC0-∞ was 129.63 ± 63.26 h*ng/ml and 126.59 ± 57.99 h*ng/ml, respectively. The primary pharmacokinetic parameter, Cmax, was assessed for equivalence using reference-scaled average bioequivalence (RSABE), while other parameters (AUC0-t, AUC0-∞) were evaluated using average bioequivalence (ABE). The results indicate that both Cmax and AUC meet the equivalence criteria. In the postprandial study, the PK values of generic lurasidone and Latuda® were as follows: the Cmax was 74.89 ± 32.06 ng/ml and 83.51 ± 33.52 ng/ml, respectively; the AUC0-t was 274.77 ± 103.05 h*ng/ml and 289.26 ± 95.25 h*ng/ml, respectively; and the AUC0-∞ was 302.44 ± 121.60 h*ng/ml and 316.32 ± 109.04 h*ng/ml, respectively. The primary pharmacokinetic parameters (Cmax, AUC0-t, AUC0-∞) were assessed for equivalence using ABE, and both met the equivalence criteria. In the study, lurasidone and Latuda® both exhibited acceptable safety and tolerability. The results displayed that lurasidone and Latuda® were bioequivalent and safe in healthy Chinese participants. Clinical Trial Registry: This trial is registered at chinadrugtrials.org.cn (no.: CTR20191717, date: 2019.08.29).

Antipsychotic-induced epigenomic reorganization in frontal cortex of individuals with schizophrenia.

Genome-wide association studies have revealed >270 loci associated with schizophrenia risk, yet these genetic factors do not seem to be sufficient to fully explain the molecular determinants behind this psychiatric condition. Epigenetic marks such as post-translational histone modifications remain largely plastic during development and adulthood, allowing a dynamic impact of environmental factors, including antipsychotic medications, on access to genes and regulatory elements. However, few studies so far have profiled cell-specific genome-wide histone modifications in postmortem brain samples from schizophrenia subjects, or the effect of antipsychotic treatment on such epigenetic marks. Here, we conducted ChIP-seq analyses focusing on histone marks indicative of active enhancers (H3K27ac) and active promoters (H3K4me3), alongside RNA-seq, using frontal cortex samples from antipsychotic-free (AF) and antipsychotic-treated (AT) individuals with schizophrenia, as well as individually matched controls (n=58). Schizophrenia subjects exhibited thousands of neuronal and non-neuronal epigenetic differences at regions that included several susceptibility genetic loci, such as NRG1, DISC1, and DRD3. By analyzing the AF and AT cohorts separately, we identified schizophrenia-associated alterations in specific transcription factors, their regulatees, and epigenomic and transcriptomic features that were reversed by antipsychotic treatment; as well as those that represented a consequence of antipsychotic medication rather than a hallmark of schizophrenia in postmortem human brain samples. Notably, we also found that the effect of age on epigenomic landscapes was more pronounced in frontal cortex of AT-schizophrenics, as compared to AF-schizophrenics and controls. Together, these data provide important evidence of epigenetic alterations in the frontal cortex of individuals with schizophrenia, and remark for the first time on the impact of age and antipsychotic treatment on chromatin organization.

Epigenomic tomography for probing spatially defined chromatin state in the brain.

Spatially resolved epigenomic profiling is critical for understanding biology in the mammalian brain. Single-cell spatial epigenomic assays were developed recently for this purpose, but they remain costly and labor intensive for examining brain tissues across substantial dimensions and surveying a collection of brain samples. Here, we demonstrate an approach, epigenomic tomography, that maps spatial epigenomes of mouse brain at the scale of centimeters. We individually profiled neuronal and glial fractions of mouse neocortex slices with 0.5 mm thickness. Tri-methylation of histone 3 at lysine 27 (H3K27me3) or acetylation of histone 3 at lysine 27 (H3K27ac) features across these slices were grouped into clusters based on their spatial variation patterns to form epigenomic brain maps. As a proof of principle, our approach reveals striking dynamics in the frontal cortex due to kainic-acid-induced seizure, linked with transmembrane ion transporters, exocytosis of synaptic vesicles, and secretion of neurotransmitters. Epigenomic tomography provides a powerful and cost-effective tool for characterizing brain disorders based on the spatial epigenome.

A randomized, single-blind, single-dose, parallel-group study in healthy subjects to demonstrate the pharmacokinetic equivalence of trastuzumab and its biosimilar.

BACKGROUND: Trastuzumab is a humanized anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody used in the treatment of breast cancer. This study compared the pharmacokinetics (PK), immunogenicity and safety of trastuzumab (Roche Pharma AG) and its biosimilar (Chia Tai Tianqing Pharmaceutical Group Co. Ltd) in healthy Chinese subjects. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A randomized, parallel, double-blind, single-dose study was conducted. Healthy male subjects were randomized to receive trastuzumab (n = 43) or its biosimilar (n = 43) intravenously at a dose of 4 mg. Plasma drug concentrations were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and PK parameters were statistically analyzed. Safety and immunogenicity were also evaluated. RESULTS: The geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of AUC0-t, Cmax and AUC0-∞ for trastuzumab and its biosimilar were 92.3%, 100.77% and 92.2%, respectively. The 90% CIs were all within 80%-125%, meeting the bioequivalence standards. No serious adverse events or immunogenicity were reported, and all the adverse events reported were mild and similar between the two treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Trastuzumab was well tolerated, showed a similar safety profile to its biosimilar, and demonstrated PK equivalence. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered at the [anonymized].

Droplet-based bisulfite sequencing for high-throughput profiling of single-cell DNA methylomes.

The genome-wide DNA methylation profile, or DNA methylome, is a critical component of the overall epigenomic landscape that modulates gene activities and cell fate. Single-cell DNA methylomic studies offer unprecedented resolution for detecting and profiling cell subsets based on methylomic features. However, existing single-cell methylomic technologies are based on use of tubes or well plates and these platforms are not easily scalable for handling a large number of single cells. Here we demonstrate a droplet-based microfluidic technology, Drop-BS, to construct single-cell bisulfite sequencing libraries for DNA methylome profiling. Drop-BS takes advantage of the ultrahigh throughput offered by droplet microfluidics to prepare bisulfite sequencing libraries of up to 10,000 single cells within 2 days. We apply the technology to profile mixed cell lines, mouse and human brain tissues to reveal cell type heterogeneity. Drop-BS offers a promising solution for single-cell methylomic studies requiring examination of a large cell population.

Droplet-based bisulfite sequencing for high-throughput profiling of single-cell DNA methylomes.

Genome-wide DNA methylation profile, or DNA methylome, is a critical component of the overall epigenomic landscape that modulates gene activities and cell fate. Single-cell DNA methylomic studies offer unprecedented resolution for detecting and profiling cell subsets based on methylomic features. However, existing single-cell methylomic technologies are all based on use of tubes or well plates and these platforms are not easily scalable for handling a large number of single cells. Here we demonstrate a droplet-based microfluidic technology, Drop-BS, to construct single-cell bisulfite sequencing libraries for DNA methylome profiling. Drop-BS takes advantage of the ultrahigh throughput offered by droplet microfluidics to prepare bisulfite sequencing libraries of up to 10,000 single cells within 2 d. We applied the technology to profile mixed cell lines, mouse and human brain tissues to reveal cell type heterogeneity. Drop-BS will pave the way for single-cell methylomic studies requiring examination of a large cell population.

Comparing the bioequivalence and safety of liraglutide in healthy Chinese subjects: an open, single-dose, randomized, repeated, two-sequence, two-cycle phase I clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) is an endogenous incretin hormone. Liraglutide, a GLP-1 receptor agonist, can lower blood sugar by increasing insulin production and inhibiting the production of glucagon. This study researched the bioequivalence and safety of the test and reference drugs in healthy Chinese subjects. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Subjects (N = 28) were randomly divided into group A and group B at a ratio of 1:1 for a two-cycle cross-over study. There was single dose per cycle with subcutaneous injection of the test and reference drugs, respectively. The washout was set at 14 days. Plasma drug concentrations were detected by specific liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) assays. Statistical analysis of major pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters was conducted to assess drug bioequivalence. In addition, we evaluated the safety of the drugs throughout the trial. RESULTS: The geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ for the test and reference drugs were 107.11%, 106.56%, 106.09%, respectively. The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) were all within 80%-125%, meeting the bioequivalence standards. In addition, both had good safety in this study. CONCLUSION: The study shows that the two drugs had similar bioequivalence and safety. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: DCTR: CTR20190914; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05029076.

Pharmacokinetics and safety of dasatinib and its generic: a phase I bioequivalence study in healthy Chinese subjects.

BACKGROUND: Dasatinib (Sprycel®) is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor for treating chronic myeloid leukemia and Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia. RESEARCH DESIGN & METHODS: We designed a clinical study to demonstrate that the dasatinib tablet (YiNiShu®) (Chia Tai Tianqing Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd) and Dasatinib (Bristol Myers Squibb) were bioequivalent under fasting and fed conditions. The whole study was structured into the fasting trial and the postprandial trial. Each period, subjects were given 50 mg dasatinib or its generic. The RSABE (reference scale average bioequivalence) and ABE (average bioequivalence) methods were employed to assess bioequivalence by pharmacokinetics (PK) parameters for a highly variable drug. RESULTS: 32 and 24 eligible volunteers were enrolled in the fasting and postprandial trials, respectively. In the fasting trial, the RSABE method was performed, and point estimates of Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ met the bioequivalence criteria. In the postprandial trial, the ABE method was performed, and the 90% CI of the geometric mean ratio (GMR) for PK parameters met the requirements of bioequivalence standards. CONCLUSION: The results proved that the PK parameters of the two drugs were similar and bioequivalent, indicating that both drugs had a good safety profile. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (Number: NCT05640804) and Drug Clinical Trial Registration and Information Disclosure Platform (Number: CTR20181708).

Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of two pomalidomide capsules in healthy chinese subjects under fasting and fed conditions.

OBJECTIVE: Imnovid® is an immunomodulatory drug with antineoplastic activity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the bioequivalence and safety of the generic drug pomalidomide (Chia Tai Tianqing Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd) and its originator product Imnovid® (Celgene Europe Ltd) in the fasting and fed states, respectively. METHODS: The research consisted of two parts: one with a dose of 1 mg and the other with a dose of 4 mg. 48 healthy subjects were included in each study and were divided into two groups (fasting group and fed group) at a 1:1 ratio to administrate study drugs orally. The plasma drug concentrations were determined by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). RESULTS: The 90% CI of GMR for main pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters (Cmax, AUC0 - t and AUC0-∞) met the requirements of bioequivalence standards. The incidence and severity of AEs associated with pomalidomide and Imnovid® were similar. CONCLUSION: The results proved the PK parameters of pomalidomide and Imnovid® were similar and bioequivalent. Both drugs showed safety profile well.

A randomized, open-label, two-cycle, two-crossover phase I clinical trial comparing the bioequivalence and safety of afatinib and Giotrif® in healthy Chinese subjects.

OBJECTIVE: Afatinib is an oral, irreversible ErbB family blocker. It binds covalently to the kinase domains of epidermal growth factor (EGFR), HER2 and HER4, resulting in irreversible inhibition of tyrosine kinase autophosphorylation. Our trial compared the bioequivalence and safety between afatinib produced by Chia Tai Tianqing Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd. and Giotrif® produced by Boehringer Ingelheim. METHODS: Healthy Chinese subjects (N = 36) were randomly divided into two groups at a ratio of 1:1. There was a single dose per period of afatinib and Giotrif®. The washout was set as 14 days. Plasma drug concentrations of afatinib and Giotrif® were analyzed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Statistical analysis of major pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters was conducted to assess drug bioequivalence. In addition, we evaluated the safety of the drugs throughout the trial. RESULTS: The geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ for afatinib and Giotrif® were 102.80%, 101.83%, and 101.58%, respectively. The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) were all within 80%-125%, meeting the bioequivalence standards. In addition, both drugs showed a good safety profile during the trial. CONCLUSION: This study showed that afatinib was bioequivalent to Giotrif® in healthy Chinese subjects with well safety. CHINESE CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY: This trial is registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial website ( http://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn/index.html # CTR20171160).

Pharmacokinetics and safety of the two oral cefaclor formulations in healthy chinese subjects in the fasting and postprandial states.

We conducted a phase I bioequivalence trial in healthy Chinese subjects in the fasting and postprandial states. The goal of this trial was to compare the pharmacokinetics and safety of the test preparation Cefaclor granule (Disha Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd.) and the reference preparation Cefaclor suspension (Ceclor®, Eli Lilly and Company). In this trial, 24 subjects were selected in the fasting and postprandial states, respectively. Enrolled subjects randomly accepted a single dose of 0.125 g Cefaclor granule or Cefaclor suspension. The washout period was set as 2 days. Blood samples were collected within 8 h after administration in the fasting state and within 10 h after administration in the postprandial state. Plasma concentrations were determined by Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Pharmacokinetic parameters (AUC, Cmax) were used to evaluate bioequivalence of the two drugs. In the fasting trial, the geometric mean ratios (90% confidence intervals CIs) for Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ were 93.01% (85.96%-100.63%), 97.92% (96.49%-99.38%) and 97.95% (96.52%-99.41%), respectively. The GMR (90% CIs) for Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ in postprandial state were 89.27% (81.97%-97.22%), 97.31% (95.98%-98.65%) and 97.31% (95.93%-98.71%), respectively. The 90% CIs of AUC and Cmax in the fasting and postprandial states were within the 80-125% bioequivalence range. Therefore, Cefaclor granule and Cefaclor suspension were bioequivalent and displayed similar safety profiles. Furthermore, food intake affected the pharmacokinetic parameters of both drugs.

A randomized, double-blind, single-dose, parallel phase I clinical trial to compare the bioequivalence, immunogenicity, and safety of bevacizumab biosimilar and bevacizumab in healthy Chinese subjects.

BACKGROUND: Bevacizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody against VEGF, can be used as a target therapy for colorectal cancer. A phase I clinical trial was conducted to compare the bioequivalence, immunogenicity, and safety of bevacizumab biosimilar (Chia Tai Tianqing Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd.) and Bevacizumab (Roche Diagnostics GmbH) in healthy Chinese males. RESEARCH DESIGN & METHOD: Healthy Chinese subjects (N = 98) were randomly divided into two groups. A single-dose bevacizumab biosimilar or Bevacizumab was given per cycle. Plasma drug concentrations were detected by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MC/MS) assay. We detected the levels of anti-drug antibody (ADA) to evaluate drug immunogenicity and the safety of drugs throughout the study. RESULTS: The geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of AUC0-t, Cmax, and AUC0-∞ for bevacizumab biosimilar and Bevacizumab were 96.27%, 93.69%, and 97.01%, respectively. The 90% CIs were all within 80-125%, meeting the bioequivalence standards. The levels of ADA were similar. In addition, the two drugs both demonstrated excellent safety in the trial. CONCLUSION: This study showed that bevacizumab biosimilar and Bevacizumab had similar pharmacokinetics (PK) parameters and safety in healthy Chinese subjects.

Corrigendum: Pharmacokinetics, Immunogenicity and Safety Study for SHR-1309 Injection and Perjeta® in Healthy Chinese Male Volunteers.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.660541.].

A randomized, open-label, single-dose, two-cycle crossover study to evaluate the bioequivalence and safety of lenvatinib and Lenvima® in Chinese healthy subjects.

BACKGROUND: Lenvatinib is a tyrosine kinase receptor inhibitor that inhibits vascular and endothelial growth factor receptor kinase activity. This study evaluated the bioequivalence and safety of lenvatinib with Lenvima® . RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The fasting and postprandial groups were two independent trials. Subjects were randomly divided into two sequences at a ratio of 1:1 for two-cycle crossover administration. Subjects took 10 mg lenvatinib or Lenvima® once per cycle. The wash-out period was 14 days. Detected the plasma drug concentrations and assessed the bioequivalence of two drugs. Besides, we evaluated the safety of the drugs throughout the trial. RESULTS: In the fasting state, the GMRs of Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ were 99.89%, 102.98% and 103.19%, respectively. The 90% CIs were all within 80%-125%. In the postprandial state, the GMRs of Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ were 98.96%, 94.25% and 95.27%, respectively. The 90% CIs were all within 80%-125%. All results met the bioequivalence criteria. Both drugs had good safety and tolerance in this trial. CONCLUSION: This study showed that lenvatinib and Lenvima® had similar bioequivalence and safety in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting and postprandial conditions. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial website (http://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn/index.html # CTR20191172).

A randomized, crossover, phase I clinical study to evaluate bioequivalence and safety of tofacitinib and Xeljanz® in Chinese healthy subjects.

OBJECTIVE: Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor that has been marketed and approved in the USA for the clinical treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis and other inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. A phase I clinical trial was conducted to compare the bioequivalence and safety of tofacitinib (Chia Tai Tianqing Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd.) and Xeljanz® (Pfizer Inc.) in healthy Chinese subjects, providing basis for the clinical application of tofacitinib. METHODS: Healthy Chinese subjects (N = 32) were randomly assigned to two groups at a 1:1 ratio. Subjects orally took 5 mg tofacitinib or Xeljanz® per cycle in random sequence. Blood samples were collected at 15 sampling points per cycle, and plasma drug concentrations of tofacitinib or Xeljanz® were analyzed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and statistical analysis for the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters. Subjects' physical indicators were monitored during the whole process to evaluate drug safety. RESULTS: The adjusted geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of the peak concentration (Cmax), area under the curve (AUC) from time zero to the last measurable concentration (AUC0-t) and AUC from time zero to observed infinity (AUC0-∞) were all within the range of 80-125%. The other PK parameter values were similar. The above values were all meeting the bioequivalence criteria with well safety. CONCLUSION: The pharmacokinetic parameters and safety profile of tofacitinib were similar to those of Xeljanz® in healthy Chinese subjects. Therefore, tofacitinib can be considered bioequivalent to Xeljanz®, and the findings of this trial will promote the clinical application of tofacitinib.

nMOWChIP-seq: low-input genome-wide mapping of non-histone targets.

Genome-wide profiling of interactions between genome and various functional proteins is critical for understanding regulatory processes involved in development and diseases. Conventional assays require a large number of cells and high-quality data on tissue samples are scarce. Here we optimized a low-input chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing (ChIP-seq) technology for profiling RNA polymerase II (Pol II), transcription factor (TF), and enzyme binding at the genome scale. The new approach produces high-quality binding profiles using 1,000-50,000 cells. We used the approach to examine the binding of Pol II and two TFs (EGR1 and MEF2C) in cerebellum and prefrontal cortex of mouse brain and found that their binding profiles are highly reflective of the functional differences between the two brain regions. Our analysis reveals the potential for linking genome-wide TF or Pol II profiles with neuroanatomical origins of brain cells.

A randomized, double-blind, single-dose, two-way, parallel phase I clinical study comparing the pharmacokinetics and safety of adalimumab injecta and Humira® in healthy Chinese male volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Humira® is a fully humanized anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α) monoclonal antibody that has been marketed and approved in the United States for the clinical treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis, psoriasis and other immune-mediated diseases. This study compared the bioequivalence, immunogenicity and safety of adalimumab injecta (a biosimilar of Humira® produced by Chia Tai Tianqing Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd) and Humira® in healthy Chinese male subjects in a phase I clinical study. METHODS: Healthy Chinese male subjects (N = 164) were randomly given a subcutaneous injection of 40 mg adalimumab or Humira® at a 1:1 ratio. Plasma drug concentrations were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and primary pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were statistically analyzed. To evaluate drug immunogenicity, anti-drug antibody (ADA) and neutralizing antibody (nAb) levels were detected. To evaluate the safety of the drugs, the subjects' physical indicators, such as multiple vital signs and routine blood tests, were continuously monitored. RESULTS: The similarity ratios of adalimumab and Humira® PK parameters were all within 80%-125%, meeting the bioequivalence standards. Drug-induced ADA and nAb levels were similar, and the drug safety in subjects was also similar. CONCLUSIONS: All study drugs showed similar bioequivalence, immunogenicity and safety. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: CTR20182070 (Chinese Clinical Trial Registry).

A randomized, double-blind, single-dose, single-center, parallel phase I clinical study comparing the pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, safety, and tolerance of pertuzumab injection and Perjeta® in healthy Chinese male subjects.

BACKGROUND: Perjeta® is a recombinant, humanized monoclonal antibody that has been marketed and approved for the targeted therapy of human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2) positive breast cancer in the United States. This study compared the bioequivalence, immunogenicity, and safety of pertuzumab injection (a biosimilar of Perjeta® produced by Chia Tai Tianqing Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd) and Perjeta® (produced by Roche Pharma AG) in healthy Chinese males. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Healthy Chinese male subjects (N = 87) were randomly given intravenous injection of 5 mg/kg pertuzumab or Perjeta® at a 1:1 ratio. Plasma drug concentrations were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and primary pharmacokinetic parameters were statistically analyzed. We detected the levels of anti-drug antibody (ADA) and neutralizing antibody (nAb) to evaluate drug immunogenicity and safety of the drugs throughout the study. RESULTS: The geometric mean ratios of AUC0-t, Cmax, and AUC0-∞ for pertuzumab and Perjeta® were 100.42%, 96.71%, and 101.47%, respectively. The 90% CIs were all within 80%-125%, meeting the bioequivalence standards. The levels of ADA and nAb were similar. In addition, both had good safety in the study. CONCLUSION: The study shows that pertuzumab injection and Perjeta® had similar bioequivalence, immunogenicity, and safety.

Pharmacokinetics, Immunogenicity and Safety Study for SHR-1309 Injection and Perjeta® in Healthy Chinese Male Volunteers.

Objectives: Pertuzumab is a monoclonal antibody for the treatment of breast cancer. The aim of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity and safety of the test preparation SHR-1309 injecta and the reference preparation Perjeta® in healthy Chinese male subjects. Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, single dose, two-way, parallel bioequivalence trial, a total of 80 qualified Chinese male subjects were selected and randomly divided into two groups. Each subject was intravenously injected with SHR-1309 or Perjeta®. Blood samples were collected at 21 different time points for pharmacokinetic analysis. In addition, immunogenicity was assessed at five different time points. The safety of the medication was monitored throughout the whole trial. Results: Cmax and AUC0-t were the primary pharmacokinetic parameters. Under a 90% confidence interval, their geometric mean ratios were 98.30 and 88.41% for SHR-1309 injection and Perjeta®, respectively. The geometric mean ratio of secondary pharmacokinetic parameters AUC0-∞ was 88.58%. These evaluation indexes are in the standard range of 80-125%, so SHR-1309 can be considered bioequivalent to Perjeta®. After 1,680 h (day 70) of administration, the two groups had 12 and 13 subjects who produced antidrug antibody (ADA), respectively. The occurrence time and proportion of ADA in SHR-1309 and Perjeta® were similar between subjects, and they had similar immunogenicity. During the entire trial period, there were 71 drug-related adverse reactions in 29 subjects who received SHR-1309 and 61 drug-related adverse reactions in 32 subjects who received Perjeta®. The incidence of adverse reactions between the two drugs was similar. Conclusion: The pharmacokinetic parameters, immunogenicity and safety of the biosimilar SHR-1309 injection produced by Shanghai Hengrui Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. were similar to the original drug Perjeta® produced by Roche Pharma AG. The two drugs met the bioequivalence evaluation criteria. Therefore, SHR-1309 is bioequivalent to Perjeta®. Clinical trial registration: CTR20200,738.

Bioequivalence of two esomeprazole magnesium enteric-coated formulations in healthy Chinese subjects.

BACKGROUND: The pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of esomeprazole in healthy Chinese subjects and the effects of food on the pharmacokinetics have not been well studied. AIM: To evaluate the pharmacokinetic characteristics of esomeprazole magnesium (Eso) enteric- coated capsule in the healthy subjects in China and the bioequivalence of the two formulations. METHODS: This study was conducted in the Phase I Clinical Trial Unit of the Affiliated Hospital of Changchun University of Chinese Medicine. A total of 64 healthy subjects were enrolled in the study. Thirty-two subjects fasted or fed, took the test or reference formulation Eso enteric-coated capsule by a four-cycle, two-sequence crossover of fasting/fed, self-controlled method. The liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry was performed to determine the drug plasma concentration at 16 different time points within 12 h after drug administration. The pharmacokinetic parameters Cmax, area under the curve (AUC)0-t, and AUC0-inf were calculated to evaluate the bioequivalence. RESULTS: Pharmacokinetic parameters were evaluated after subjects took the test formulation and control formulation under fasting status. The ratio of geometric means of Cmax was 104.15%, with a confidence interval (CI) of 98.20-110.46%. The ratio of geometric means of AUC0-t was 105.26%, with a CI of 99.80-111.01%. The ratio of geometric means of AUC0-inf was 105.37%, with a CI of 99.97-111.06%. The pharmacokinetic parameters were also evaluated after subjects took the reference formulation of Eso enteric-coated capsule after eating. The upper limit of 95% CI of the geometric mean ratio of pharmacokinetic parameters of Eso enteric-coated capsules in the postprandial state Cmax was -0.1689, and the point estimate was 0.9509 (0.80-1.25). The upper limit of 95% CI of the geometric mean ratio of pharmacokinetic parameters of Eso enteric-coated capsules in the postprandial state AUC0-t was -0.1015 (≤ 0) , and the point estimate was 0.9003 (0.80-1.25). The upper limit of 95% CI of the geometric mean ratio of pharmacokinetic parameters of Eso enteric-coated capsules in the postprandial state AUC0-inf was -0.0593 (≤ 0), and the point estimate was 0.8453 (0.80-1.25). The results indicated that the two formulations were bioequivalent under both fasting and fed states. CONCLUSION: The two types of esomeprazole tablets were bioequivalent under both fasting and fed states, and both were generally well tolerated.