Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 90(4): 1066-1080, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38031322

RESUMEN

AIMS: We propose using glomerular filtration rate (GFR) as the physiological basis for distinguishing components of renal clearance. METHODS: Gentamicin, amikacin and vancomycin are thought to be predominantly excreted by the kidneys. A mixed-effects joint model of the pharmacokinetics of these drugs was developed, with a wide dispersion of weight, age and serum creatinine. A dataset created from 18 sources resulted in 27,338 drug concentrations from 9,901 patients. Body size and composition, maturation and renal function were used to describe differences in drug clearance and volume of distribution. RESULTS: This study demonstrates that GFR is a predictor of two distinct components of renal elimination clearance: (1) GFR clearance associated with normal GFR and (2) non-GFR clearance not associated with normal GFR. All three drugs had GFR clearance estimated as a drug-specific percentage of normal GFR (gentamicin 39%, amikacin 90% and vancomycin 57%). The total clearance (sum of GFR and non-GFR clearance), standardized to 70 kg total body mass, 176 cm, male, renal function 1, was 5.58 L/h (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.50-5.69) (gentamicin), 7.77 L/h (95% CI 7.26-8.19) (amikacin) and 4.70 L/h (95% CI 4.61-4.80) (vancomycin). CONCLUSIONS: GFR provides a physiological basis for renal drug elimination. It has been used to distinguish two elimination components. This physiological approach has been applied to describe clearance and volume of distribution from premature neonates to elderly adults with a wide dispersion of size, body composition and renal function. Dose individualization has been implemented using target concentration intervention.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Vancomicina , Recién Nacido , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Anciano , Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Vancomicina/farmacocinética , Amicacina/farmacocinética , Gentamicinas/farmacocinética , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Tasa de Depuración Metabólica , Creatinina
2.
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn ; 50(4): 297-314, 2023 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36947282

RESUMEN

Model-based meta-analysis (MBMA) is an approach that integrates relevant summary level data from heterogeneously designed randomized controlled trials (RCTs). This study not only evaluated the predictability of a published MBMA for forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and its link to annual exacerbation rate in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) but also included data from new RCTs. A comparative effectiveness analysis across all drugs was also performed. Aggregated level data were collected from RCTs published between July 2013 and November 2020 (n = 132 references comprising 156 studies) and combined with data used in the legacy MBMA (published RCTs up to July 2013 - n = 142). The augmented data (n = 298) were used to evaluate the predictive performance of the published MBMA using goodness-of-fit plots for assessment. Furthermore, the model was extended including drugs that were not available before July 2013, estimating a new set of parameters. The legacy MBMA model predicted the post-2013 FEV1 data well, and new estimated parameters were similar to those of drugs in the same class. However, the exacerbation model overpredicted the post-2013 mean annual exacerbation rate data. Inclusion of year when the study started on the pre-treatment placebo rate improved the model predictive performance perhaps explaining potential improvements in the disease management over time. The addition of new data to the legacy COPD MBMA enabled a more robust model with increased predictability performance for both endpoints FEV1 and mean annual exacerbation rate.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Humanos , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Volumen Espiratorio Forzado
3.
Pharm Res ; 39(8): 1779-1787, 2022 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35233731

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The current study aimed to illustrate how a non-linear mixed effect (NLME) model-based analysis may improve confidence in a Phase III trial through more precise estimates of the drug effect. METHODS: The FULFIL clinical trial was a Phase III study that compared 24 weeks of once daily inhaled triple therapy with twice daily inhaled dual therapy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Patient reported outcome data, obtained by using The Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms in COPD (E-RS:COPD) questionnaire, from the FULFIL study were analyzed using an NLME item-based response theory model (IRT). The change from baseline (CFB) in E-RS:COPD total score over 4-week intervals for each treatment arm was obtained using the IRT and compared with published results obtained with a mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) analysis. RESULTS: The IRT included a graded response model characterizing item parameters and a Weibull function combined with an offset function to describe the COPD symptoms-time course in patients receiving either triple therapy (n = 907) or dual therapy (n = 894). The IRT improved precision of the estimated drug effect compared to MMRM, resulting in a sample size of at least 3.64 times larger for the MMRM analysis to achieve the IRT precision in the CFB estimate. CONCLUSION: This study shows the advantage of IRT over MMRM with a direct comparison of the same primary endpoint for the two analyses using the same observed clinical trial data, resulting in an increased confidence in Phase III.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Administración por Inhalación , Broncodilatadores/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico
4.
AAPS J ; 23(4): 79, 2021 06 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34080077

RESUMEN

This study aimed to illustrate how a new methodology to assess clinical trial outcome measures using a longitudinal item response theory-based model (IRM) could serve as an alternative to mixed model repeated measures (MMRM). Data from the EXACT (Exacerbation of chronic pulmonary disease tool) which is used to capture frequency, severity, and duration of exacerbations in COPD were analyzed using an IRM. The IRM included a graded response model characterizing item parameters and functions describing symptom-time course. Total scores were simulated (month 12) using uncertainty in parameter estimates. The 50th (2.5th, 97.5th) percentiles of the resulting simulated differences in average total score (drug minus placebo) represented the estimated drug effect (95%CI), which was compared with published MMRM results. Furthermore, differences in sample size, sensitivity, specificity, and type I and II errors between approaches were explored. Patients received either oral danirixin 75 mg twice daily (n = 45) or placebo (n = 48) on top of standard of care over 52 weeks. A step function best described the COPD symptoms-time course in both trial arms. The IRM improved precision of the estimated drug effect compared to MMRM, resulting in a sample size of 2.5 times larger for the MMRM analysis to achieve the IRM precision. The IRM showed a higher probability of a positive predictive value (34%) than MMRM (22%). An item model-based analysis data gave more precise estimates of drug effect than MMRM analysis for the same endpoint in this one case study.


Asunto(s)
Modelos Biológicos , Piperidinas/farmacocinética , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Proyectos de Investigación , Sulfonas/farmacocinética , Administración Oral , Anciano , Interpretación Estadística de Datos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Piperidinas/administración & dosificación , Placebos/administración & dosificación , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/diagnóstico , Tamaño de la Muestra , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Sulfonas/administración & dosificación , Brote de los Síntomas , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
Pediatr Blood Cancer ; 65(2)2018 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28901726

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of an antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) intervention, involving introduction of new guidelines on the treatment of febrile neutropenia (FN), on improving the use of gentamicin in paediatric oncology patients. DESIGN AND INTERVENTION: Updated guidelines for gentamicin usage in paediatrics with FN were implemented at a tertiary children's teaching hospital, in Brisbane, Australia. Data on gentamicin usage before and after the guideline change were collected retrospectively from children with cancer admitted to hospital with FN between January 2012 and December 2013. Gentamicin use, duration of gentamicin therapy and therapeutic monitoring practice were compared against bacterial culture status for admissions before and after the guideline change to assess the impact on practice. RESULTS: Data were collected from 227 children corresponding to 453 separate admissions, 195 preguideline and 257 post-guideline change. Following guideline change, the proportion of admissions in which gentamicin was administered reduced from 79.0 to 20.9% (P-value < 0.001) and administrations not associated with a cultured Gram-negative organism dropped from 87.2 to 58.2% (P-value < 0.001), indicating a change in practice according to the new guideline. Following guideline change, admissions in which gentamicin was used for >48 hr despite the absence of a confirmed Gram-negative infection decreased from 85.6 to 46.9% (P-value < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Guideline changes driven through an AMS initiative involving paediatric oncology patients significantly improved targeted- and nontargeted-antimicrobial use potentially reducing the risk of emergence of resistance against gentamicin in this cohort.


Asunto(s)
Neutropenia Febril/tratamiento farmacológico , Gentamicinas/administración & dosificación , Bacterias Gramnegativas , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Niño , Preescolar , Neutropenia Febril/microbiología , Neutropenia Febril/patología , Femenino , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/microbiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/patología , Adhesión a Directriz , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias/microbiología , Neoplasias/patología , Neoplasias/terapia , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Estudios Retrospectivos
6.
J Paediatr Child Health ; 54(2): 141-147, 2018 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29083076

RESUMEN

AIMS: Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is estimated daily in paediatric oncology patients; however, few equations, particularly ones that do not include serum creatinine, have been evaluated in this population. We aimed to compare the predictive performance of different equations available to estimate GFR in paediatric oncology patients. METHODS: GFR was measured (mGFR) in paediatric oncology patients based on a chromium 51-labeled ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid excretion test. GFR was estimated (eGFR) in these same patients using equations identified from the literature. mGFR and eGFR values were compared, and the predictive performance of various eGFR equations was assessed in terms of their bias, precision and accuracy. RESULTS: In total, 124 mGFR values ranging from 7 to 146 mL/min were available for analysis from 73 children. Twenty-two equations were identified from the literature. The Flanders metadata equation displayed the lowest absolute bias (mean error of 0.9 mL/min) and the greatest precision (root mean square error of 13.1 mL/min). The univariate Schwartz equation predicted the highest percentage (81.5%) of eGFR values within 30% of mGFR values, and the Rhodin fat-free mass equation predicted the highest percentage (37.1%) of eGFR values within 10% of mGFR values. CONCLUSIONS: A number of equations were identified that could be used to estimate renal function in paediatric oncology patients; however, none was found to be highly accurate. The Flanders metadata equation and univariate Schwartz performed the best in this study, and we would suggest that these two equations may be used cautiously in paediatric oncology patients for clinical decision making, understanding their limitations.


Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Pruebas Diagnósticas de Rutina/métodos , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Pediatría , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Neoplasias , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica
7.
AAPS J ; 20(1): 14, 2017 12 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29204823

RESUMEN

This study aimed to determine the optimal starting dose of gentamicin in paediatric oncology patients. A population pharmacokinetic model describing drug exposure, a semi-mechanistic model describing bacterial killing and an Emax model describing renal cortex accumulation were linked in a utility function using NONMEM®. The optimal gentamicin starting dose was estimated in patients aged from 0.1 to 18.2 years, by balancing the probability of efficacy on day 1 against relative renal function reduction on day 7 with continued dosing. Using achievement of a gentamicin area under the concentration time curve to bacterial minimum inhibitor concentration (MIC) ratio of ≥ 100 and maximum concentration to MIC ratio of ≥ 10 as the efficacy endpoints, a starting dose of 7.1, 9.5, 10.8 and 14.6 mg/kg/q24h was optimal at a MIC of 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 mg/L respectively, with ≥ 75% probability of obtainment. Using achievement of a 2-log10 bacterial count reduction at 24-h post-dose as the efficacy endpoint, a starting dose of 12.8 mg/kg/q24h was optimal, with 85.6% probability of obtainment. Under these different dosing scenarios, relative reduction in renal function ranged on average from 6.9 to 14.5% on day 7. The current recommended starting dose of gentamicin of 7.5 mg/kg/q24h may not be sufficient to achieve efficacy on day 1 if bacterial MIC is > 0.5 mg/L. A higher initial dose (up to 14.6 mg/kg/q24h), in less sensitive microorganisms, would likely cause only a relatively small reduction in renal function at day 7. Close monitoring is crucial if high doses are given, especially for longer than 7 days.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Gentamicinas/administración & dosificación , Riñón/efectos de los fármacos , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Adolescente , Carga Bacteriana , Niño , Preescolar , Esquema de Medicación , Gentamicinas/efectos adversos , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Riñón/fisiopatología , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Neoplasias/fisiopatología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...