Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
QJM ; 116(4): 279-283, 2023 Apr 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34586408

RESUMEN

Emerging reports raise concerns on the potential association between the COVID-19 vaccines and cardiac manifestations. We sought to evaluate cardiac complications associated with COVID-19 vaccination in a pooled analysis from our institution's cohort study and systematic review. Consecutive patients admitted to a tertiary hospital in Singapore between 1 January 2021 and 31 March 2021, with the onset of cardiac manifestations within 14 days following COVID-19 vaccination, were studied. Furthermore, a systematic review was performed, with PubMed, Embase, Research Square, MedRxiv and LitCovid databases accessed from inception up to 29 June 2021. Relevant manuscripts reporting individual patient data on cardiac complications following COVID-19 vaccination were included. Thirty patients were included in the study cohort, with 29 diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and 1 with myocarditis. Five patients developed heart failure, two had cardiogenic shock, three intubated, and one had cardiovascular-related mortality. In the systematic review, 16 studies were included with 41 myocarditis and 6 AMI cases. In the pooled analysis of the study cohort and the systematic review, 35 patients had AMI and 42 had myocarditis. Majority were men, and myocarditis patients were younger than AMI patients. Myocarditis patients tended to present 72 h postvaccination, while AMI patients were older and typically presented 24 h postvaccination. Majority with AMI or myocarditis developed symptoms after the first and second vaccination dose, respectively. This pooled analysis of patients presenting with cardiac manifestations following COVID-19 vaccination highlights the differences between myocarditis and AMI presentations in temporal association with the vaccination.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Infarto del Miocardio , Miocarditis , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Miocarditis/etiología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Estudios de Cohortes , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Infarto del Miocardio/etiología , Vacunación/efectos adversos
5.
J Intern Med ; 259(3): 276-84, 2006 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16476105

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Treatment of angina recalcitrant to conventional pharmacological therapy and revascularization remains problematic. Safe, effective and affordable treatments with high patient acceptability are desirable. Enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) may fulfil these criteria better than many other proposed interventions. OBJECTIVE: To examine the immediate and long-term effect of EECP in treatment of chronic stable refractory angina. DESIGN: Prospective observational study of consecutive patients treated with EECP and follow-up for 1 year. SETTING: Teaching hospital. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) angina grading, weekly angina frequency and glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) use. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients were treated with EECP and 58 completed a course of treatment. Further analysis is confined to those who completed EECP. About 52% of patients suffered from CCS III and IV angina prior to EECP. Immediately post-EECP, angina improved by at least one CCS class in 86% and by two classes in 59%. At 1-year follow-up, sustained improvement in CCS was observed in 78% of the patients. The median weekly angina frequency and GTN use were significantly reduced immediately after EECP [7 (4-14) vs. 1 (0-4) episodes per week and 7 (2-16) vs. 0 (0-2) times per week respectively, P < 0.0001; data in median (interquartile range)]. The reduction was sustained at 1-year follow-up. In 48 patients, their mean exercise time improved significantly after EECP [301 +/- 130 s vs. 379 +/- 147 s, P < 0.0001]. Major adverse treatment-related events were rare. CONCLUSION: This study shows that for patients who fail to respond to conventional measures, a high proportion gain symptomatic benefit from EECP.


Asunto(s)
Angina de Pecho/terapia , Contrapulsación/métodos , Anciano , Angina de Pecho/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad Crónica , Terapia Combinada , Contrapulsación/efectos adversos , Esquema de Medicación , Prueba de Esfuerzo , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nitroglicerina/administración & dosificación , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vasodilatadores/administración & dosificación
6.
Heart ; 92(6): 775-9, 2006 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16251233

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the prognostic value of various conventional and novel echocardiographic indices in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) caused by left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction. METHODS: 185 patients with a mean (SD) age of 67 (11) years with CHF and LV ejection fraction < 45% despite optimal pharmacological treatment were prospectively enrolled. The patients underwent two dimensional echocardiography with tissue harmonic imaging to assess global LV systolic function and obtain volumetric data. Transmitral flow was assessed with conventional pulse wave Doppler. Systolic (Sm), early, and late diastolic mitral annular velocities were measured with the use of colour coded Doppler tissue imaging. RESULTS: During a median follow up of 32 months (range 24-38 months in survivors), 34 patients died and one underwent heart transplantation. Sm velocity (hazard ratio (HR) 0.648, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.463 to 0.907, p = 0.011), diastolic arterial pressure (HR 0.965, 95% CI 0.938 to 0.993, p = 0.015), serum creatinine (HR 1.006, 95% CI 1.001 to 1.011, p = 0.023), LV ejection fraction (HR 0.945, 95% CI 0.899 to 0.992, p = 0.024), age (HR 1.035, 95% CI 1.000 to 1.071, p = 0.052), LV end systolic volume index (HR 1.009, 95% CI 0.999 to 1.019, p = 0.067), and restrictive pattern of transmitral flow (HR 0.543, 95% CI 0.278 to 1.061, p = 0.074) predicted the outcome of death or transplantation on univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis, only Sm velocity (HR 0.648, 95% CI 0.460 to 0.912, p = 0.013) and diastolic arterial pressure (HR 0.966, 95% CI 0.938 to 0.994, p = 0.016) emerged as independent predictors of outcome. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with CHF and LV systolic dysfunction despite optimal pharmacological treatment, the strongest independent echocardiographic predictor of prognosis was Sm velocity measured with quantitative colour coded Doppler tissue imaging.


Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Válvula Mitral/fisiopatología , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/fisiopatología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedad Crónica , Ecocardiografía Doppler en Color , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico por imagen , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/etiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Válvula Mitral/diagnóstico por imagen , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Sístole , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/complicaciones , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/diagnóstico por imagen
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...