End-of-life care pathway of head and neck cancer patients: single-institution experience.

BACKGROUND: Studies on palliative care of head and neck cancer (HNC) patients are scarce although the affected patient population is quite large. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of a specialised palliative-care pathway of HNC patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data on all HNC patients who were treated at the Helsinki University Hospital Palliative Care Center during 1 year were retrospectively reviewed. The analysis comprised 60 patients (49 males; mean age 67 years; range 28-88). All patients had a minimum follow-up of 1 year or until death. RESULTS: Fifty-nine (98%) out of the 60 patients died during the follow-up period. Median survival after diagnosis was 11 months (range 3 weeks-11.9 years) and after withholding disease-specific therapies 3 months (range 0-16). Thirty-three (55%) patients received palliative radiotherapy, 27 (45%) had PEG tube and 17 (28%) tracheostomy. Thirty-seven (66%) patients visited an emergency department (ED) (median 1.3 visits; range 0-6) and 21 (35%) were hospitalised at the university hospital during the palliative period. The most common severe complications were infection (also the most common reason for ED visits and hospitalisation), bleeding (four massive airway bleedings with one death), delirium and airway obstruction (one emergency tracheostomy). Twelve (35%) out of the 34 patients who were referred to specialised home care died at home as compared with three (12%) out of the 26 patients not supported by a specialised home-care team. CONCLUSIONS: Severe complications leading to an emergency unit visit and hospitalisation are common among HNC patients in their relatively short palliative period reflecting the need for early-integrated palliative care. Collaboration with a specialised palliative home-care team seems to increase end-of-life care at home.

Trends in the 15D health-related quality of life over the first year following diagnosis of head and neck cancer.

Management of head and neck cancer influences both physical and mental wellbeing. Measuring the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is important, as various treatment modalities are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. In this prospective cohort study, we tested the feasibility of the generic 15D HRQoL instrument in 214 head and neck cancer patients managed with surgery, definitive (chemo)radiotherapy, or with combined modality treatment. HRQoL was assessed at baseline and three times after treatment onset during 1 year, and compared with that of general population standardized for age and sex. At baseline, the patients' mean 15D score was significantly worse compared with general population. Overall HRQoL was at lowest at 3 months after treatment onset, it gradually improved towards 12 months but never reached baseline levels. The dimensions "vitality", "distress", "depression" and "sexual activity" showed marked deterioration at 3 months after the treatment onset, but improved gradually during 12 months. The 15D instrument seems useful for evaluation of HRQoL of head and neck cancer patients. Dimensions reflecting mental wellbeing improved gradually after 3 months, but they seldom reached baseline levels. The support for patients at the time of diagnosis, during treatment, and recovery is emphasized.

Health-related quality of life of head and neck cancer patients with successful oncological treatment.

Oncological treatment of head and neck carcinoma is associated with high morbidity. Measuring of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is crucial in this patient group but there is no consensus on which measure would be preferable to be used. In this study, HRQoL was measured with the generic 15D, which has not been used before for assessing this patient population. It is a prospective cohort study among 64 patients with laryngeal, pharyngeal or nasal cavity carcinoma treated with definitive (chemo) radiotherapy between November 2007-July 2012. HRQoL was assessed with the 15D before and at 3, 6 and 12 months after the treatment onset. HRQoL results of the patients were compared with those of the age-standardized general population. Overall HRQoL declined significantly during the first 3 months after the treatment onset but then gradually improved towards the end of the follow-up. At baseline or at 12 months, no significant differences were detected in overall HRQoL between the patients and the general population. Dimensions reflecting mental well-being showed gradual improvement, exceeding the baseline scores at the end of the follow-up. Nevertheless, on these dimensions, the patient group presented with consistently lower scores compared with the general population. The mean HRQoL was lower among patients with pharyngeal carcinoma compared with the laryngeal carcinoma patients. The 15D instrument is feasible for evaluation of HRQoL in oncologically treated head and neck cancer patients. It seems to detect differences among different patient subgroups. Multidisciplinary supportive management of this patient population is recommended to ensure improved mental well-being.