Everolimus plus endocrine therapy beyond CDK4/6 inhibitors progression for HR+ /HER2- advanced breast cancer: a real-world evidence cohort.

PURPOSE: Everolimus in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) was formerly approved as 2nd-line therapy in HR(+)/HER2(-) advanced breast cancer (aBC) patients (pts) progressing during or after a non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI). Since this approval, the treatment landscape of aBC has changed dramatically, particularly with the arrival of CDK 4-6 inhibitors. Endocrine monotherapy after progression to CDK4/6 inhibitors has shown a limited progression-free survival (PFS), below 3 months. Evidence of the efficacy of everolimus plus ET after CDK4/6 inhibitors is scarce. METHODS: A retrospective observational study of patients with aBC treated with everolimus and ET beyond CDK4/6-i progression compiled from February 2015 to December 2022 in 4 Spanish hospitals was performed. Clinical and demographic data were collected from medical records. The main objective was to estimate the median progression-free survival (mPFS). Everolimus adverse events (AE) were registered. Quantitative variables were summarized with medians; qualitative variables with proportions and the Kaplan-Meier method were used for survival estimates. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-one patients received everolimus plus ET (exemestane: 96, fulvestrant: 54, tamoxifen: 10, unknown: 1) after progressing on a CDK4/6 inhibitor. The median follow-up time was 15 months (interquartile range: 1-56 months). The median age at diagnosis was 49 years (range: 35-90 years). The estimated mPFS was 6.0 months (95%CI 5.3-7.8 months). PFS was longer in patients with previous CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy lasting for > 18 months (8.7 months, 95%CI 6.6-11.3 months), in patients w/o visceral metastases (8.0 months, 95%CI 5.8-10.5 months), and chemotherapy-naïve in the metastatic setting (7.2 months, 95%CI 5.9-8.4 months). CONCLUSION: This retrospective analysis cohort of everolimus plus ET in mBC patients previously treated with a CDK4/6 inhibitor suggests a longer estimated mPFS when compared with the mPFS with ET monotherapy obtained from current randomized clinical data. Everolimus plus ET may be considered as a valid control arm in novel clinical trial designs.

Considerations for the design of antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) for clinical development: lessons learned.

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have emerged as a novel therapeutic strategy that has successfully reached patient treatment in different clinical scenarios. ADCs are formed by an antibody against a specific tumor-associated antigen (TAA), a cytotoxic payload, and a chemical linker that binds both. To this regard, most efforts have been focused on target identification, antibody design and linker optimization, but other relevant aspects for clinical development have not received the necessary attention. In this article using data from approved ADCs, we evaluated all characteristics of these agents, including payload physicochemical properties, in vitro potency, drug antibody ratio (DAR), exposure-response relationships, and clinical development strategies. We suggest that compounds with best options for clinical development include those with optimal payload physicochemical properties and cleavable linkers that would lead to a bystander effect. These modalities can facilitate the development of ADCs in indications with low expression of the TAA. Early clinical development strategies including changes in the schedule of administration with more frequent doses are also discussed in the context of an efficient strategy. In conclusion, we highlight relevant aspects that are needed for the optimal development of ADCs in cancer, proposing options for improvement.

Uncovering therapeutic opportunities in the clinical development of antibody-drug conjugates.

INTRODUCTION: Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are a family of therapeutic agents that have demonstrated clinical activity in several indications. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this article, we performed a deep analysis of their clinical landscape matched with public genomic human datasets from tumour antigen targets (TATs), to identify empty areas for clinical development. RESULTS: We observed that TATs used in haematological malignancies were more specific than the ones developed in solid cancers. Those included CD19, CD22, CD30, CD33 and CD79b. In solid tumours, we identified TATs, with approved ADCs, widely expressed in non-explored niche indications like Enfortumab vedotin (anti-Nectin4) in lung or cervical cancer; Tisotumab vedotin (anti-TF) in glioblastoma or pancreatic cancer; and Sacituzumab govitecan (anti-TROP2) in pancreatic, gastric, thyroid or endometrial cancer, among others. Similarly, niche indications for ADCs in clinical development included targets for CD71, PSMA, PTK7 or CD74, in tumours like breast, lung, stomach or colon. Some of these TATs were essential for the survival of tumour cells like CD71, PSMA and PTK7. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, our study opens the door for further evaluation of ADCs in several indications not explored before.

Clinical Experience with Abemaciclib in Patients Previously Treated with Another CDK 4/6 Inhibitor in a Tertiary Hospital: A Case Series Study.

The three approved cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors, including abemaciclib, have shown differences in their preclinical, pharmacological, and clinical data. Abemaciclib stands out for its broader target range and more rapid and intense activity. It has demonstrated efficacy as a monotherapy or in combination with tamoxifen in endocrine-refractory metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients with prior chemotherapy. However, the clinical data on abemaciclib after exposure to previous CDK4/6 inhibitors are limited. In this single-center retrospective case series, we identified all patients who received abemaciclib until February 2022 after experiencing documented progression on palbociclib or ribociclib. The safety profile and clinical outcomes of abemaciclib treatment in this specific patient cohort were evaluated. Eleven patients were included in this retrospective case series, nine receiving abemaciclib with tamoxifen. Eight patients had visceral involvement, and the median age was 69 (ranging from 42 to 84). The median time from the end of prior CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment to abemaciclib initiation was 17.5 months (ranging from 3 to 41 months). Patients had undergone a median of three prior therapies (ranging from 1 to 7), including chemotherapy in 54.5% of cases. The median follow-up time was six months (ranging from 1 to 22 months). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 8 months (95% CI 3.9-12). Five patients continued abemaciclib treatment, and one patient with liver metastases achieved a complete hepatic response. The most common adverse events were diarrhea (72.7%, no grade ≥ 3) and asthenia (27.3%, no grade ≥ 3). Our preliminary findings suggest that abemaciclib could be an effective and safe treatment option for MBC patients who have previously received palbociclib or ribociclib.

Case report: Clinical success targeting BRAF-mutated, hormone receptor positive, HER2- negative advanced breast cancer patient with BRAF-inhibitor plus MEK- inhibitor.

BACKGROUND: Hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor 2-negative advanced breast cancer patients have had a wide range of therapeutical options since the incorporation of targeted therapies alongside classic chemotherapy. However, because of their disease, virtually all patients will eventually experience disease progression that might compromise their lives. Thriving investigation regarding molecular therapies has provided clinicians with new options for the treatment of many cancer patients. Dabrafenib and trametinib combination has proven useful in treating malignant melanoma patients harboring a BRAF V600E mutation, improving progression-free survival and overall survival, and it has been tested in other tumors. Here we report the case of a metastatic breast cancer patient harboring a BRAF V600E mutation that achieved complete response with dabrafenib and trametinib combination.

Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour of an unusual presentation in the uterine cervix: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour is an infrequent mesenchymal neoplasia of unknown aetiology and variable behaviour, ranging from rather benign lesions to locally aggressive and even metastatic disease. Its presence has been described in almost all organs; however, its location in the female genital tract has rarely been reported. CASE PRESENTATION: We present the case of a 47-year-old female, who was studied in our institution for a recent medical history of several weeks of dyspareunia and abdominal pain. She underwent pertinent studies including ultrasonography and CT scan. Under suspicion of degenerated leiomyoma, a total hysterectomy was performed. Unexpectedly, the pathological study of the surgical specimen showed very few tumour cells with focal fusiform morphology surrounded by an abundant inflammatory infiltrate; a thorough immunohistochemistry study lead to myofibroblastic tumour of the cervix diagnosis. A PET-CT scan did not show metastatic disease. The patient did not undergo any adjuvant treatment, and she is currently on surveillance with no evidence of disease relapse. CONCLUSIONS: Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour remains a rare entity yet to be fully elucidated. The diagnosis is based on pathological study due to the lack of typical clinical manifestations and typical radiological images. Surgical resection is the most frequent treatment, whereas chemotherapy and radiotherapy are restricted to locally advanced or metastatic disease. Tirosine kinase inhibitor crizotinib has shown promising results especially in tumours harbouring ALK mutation.

Safety and efficacy of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor rechallenge following ribociclib-induced limiting hypertransaminasemia.

Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors (CDKIs) and endocrine therapy (ET) are the corner-stone of systemic therapy for patients with hormone-positive (HR+) HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, limited data exist regarding rechallenge treatment strategies with CDKIs after limiting toxicity. In this report, we provide evidence of the safety and efficacy of sequential treatment with palbociclib or abemaciclib in 6 HR+/HER- MBC patients who experienced grade ≥3 ribociclib-induced hypertransaminasemia. Until results from large observational or randomized studies are communicated, empirical evidence may help make individualized decisions on CDKI rechallenge beyond ribociclib-induced unacceptable liver toxicity.