RESUMEN
CFR-PEEK is gaining popularity in spinal oncological applications due to its reduction of imaging artifacts and radiation scattering compared with titanium, which allows for better oncological follow-up and efficacy of radiotherapy. We evaluated the use of these materials for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases (DDs) and considered the biomechanical potential of the carbon fiber in relation to its modulus of elasticity being similar to that of bone. Twenty-eight patients with DDs were treated using CRF-PEEK instrumentation. The clinical and radiographic outcomes were collected at a 12-month FU. Spinal fusion was evaluated in the CT scans using Brantigan scores, while the clinical outcomes were evaluated using VAS, SF-12, and EQ-5D scores. Out of the patients evaluated at the 12-month FU, 89% showed complete or almost certain fusion (Brantigan score D and E) and presented a significant improvement in all clinical parameters; the patients also presented VAS scores ranging from 6.81 ± 2.01 to 0.85 ± 1.32, EQ-5D scores ranging from 53.4 ± 19.3 to 85.0 ± 13.7, SF-12 physical component scores (PCSs) ranging from 29.35 ± 7.04 to 51.36 ± 9.75, and SF-12 mental component scores (MCSs) ranging from 39.89 ± 11.70 to 53.24 ± 9.24. No mechanical complications related to the implant were detected, and the patients reported a better tolerance of the instrumentation compared with titanium. No other series of patients affected by DD that was stabilized using carbon fiber implants have been reported in the literature. The results of this pilot study indicate the efficacy and safety of these implants and support their use also for spinal degenerative diseases.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Percutaneous cement discoplasty (PCD) is a minimally invasive surgical procedure that can provide a segmental stabilizing and indirect decompression effect in the case of severely degenerated discs characterized by vacuum phenomenon. This systematic review aims to analyze the available literature relating to correct indications and clinical and radiologic efficacy of PCD in patients affected by advanced degenerative spine conditions. METHODS: The search was conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) guideline. Comprehensive research of PubMed, Scopus, and OVID databases was made using the following Mesh terms: ((cement) AND (discoplasty) AND ((vertebral) OR (spinal) OR (spine))). Modal distribution was used to assess the most frequent levels of PCD per patient. Quality assessment of each article was performed according to the Oxford Level of Evidence, Methodological Index for Non-Randomized studies, and Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies score by 2 authors. RESULTS: After the databases search, 5 full-text articles were included in the systematic review for a total of 291 patients (218 females and 73 males). Median PCD levels were 2.2. Despite promising clinical results, the methodologic index showed poor Methodological Index for Non-Randomized and Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies scores. CONCLUSIONS: PCD provides good clinical results in elderly patients, especially for pain relief. However, the current literature is poor and the article included in the systematic review showed a poor methodologic score, which could affect the conclusions.
