2022 Update of indications and contraindications for lung transplantation in France.

Lung transplantation (LTx) is a steadily expanding field. The considerable developments have been driven over the years by indefatigable work conducted at LTx centers to improve donor and recipient selection, combined with multifaceted efforts to overcome challenges raised by the surgical procedure, perioperative care, and long-term medical complications. One consequence has been a pruning away of contraindications over time, which has, in some ways, complicated the patient selection process. The Francophone Pulmonology Society (Société de Pneumology de Langue Française, SPLF) set up a task force to produce up-to-date working guidelines designed to assist pulmonologists in managing end-stage respiratory insufficiency, determining which patients may be eligible for LTx, and appropriately timing LTx-center referral. The task force examined the most recent literature and evaluated the risk factors that limit patient survival after LTx. Ideally, the objectives of LTx are to prolong life while also improving quality of life. The guidelines developed by the task force apply to a limited resource and are consistent with the ethical principles described below.

Changes on chest HRCT in systemic sclerosis-related interstitial lung disease after autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate extent of interstitial lung disease (ILD) and oesophageal involvement using high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) in early diffuse SSc patients after autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT). METHODS: Overall chest HRCT, lung function and skin score changes were evaluated in 33 consecutive diffuse SSc patients before and after aHSCT during yearly routine follow-up visits between January 2000 and September 2016. Two independent radiologists blindly assessed the ILD extent using semi-quantitative Goh and Wells method, the widest oesophageal diameter (WOD) and the oesophageal volume (OV) on HRCT. Patients were retrospectively classified as radiological responders or non-responders, based on achieved stability or a decrease of 5% or more of HRCT-ILD at 24 months post-aHSCT. RESULTS: Using a linear mixed model, the regressions of the extent of ILD and of ground glass opacities were significant at 12 months (ILD P = 0.001; ground glass opacities P = 0.0001) and at 24 months (ILD P = 0.007; ground glass opacities P = 0.0008) after aHSCT, with 18 patients classified as radiological responders (probability of response 0.78 [95% CI 0.58, 0.90]). Meanwhile the WOD and the OV increased significantly at 12 months (WOD P = 0.03; OV P = 0.34) and at 24 months (WOD P = 0.002; OV P = 0.007). Kaplan-Meier analyses showed a trend towards better 5-year survival rates (100% vs 60%; hazard ratio 0.23 [95% CI 0.03, 1.62], P = 0.11) among radiological responders vs non-responders at 24 month follow-up after aHSCT. CONCLUSION: Real-world data analysis confirmed significant improvement in extent of HRCT SSc-ILD 24 months after aHSCT, although oesophageal dilatation worsened requiring specific attention.