Brazilian Psychiatric Association guidelines for the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Pharmacological and Psychotherapy approach. Perspectives.

OBJECTIVE: To combine elements of a systematic review and critical review to produce best evidence synthesis for the treatament of GAD. METHOD: There was included systematic reviews, metanalysis, and randomized controlled trials. Descriptor used was "generalized anxiety disorder", resulting in 4860 articles and 7 other studies, of which 59 were selected. RESULTS: Antidepressants and benzodiazepines are indicated, as well as pregabalin. From, atypical antipsychotics quetiapine has been studied. Cognitive behavior therapy (third wave of behavioral and cognitive therapies) as well as individual CBT proven to be effective. CONCLUSION: There is extensive literature on many effective treatments for GAD. The present work summarizes the therapeutic possibilities, emphasizing those available in the Brazil. Further studies are still needed to compare other available medications, to assess psychotherapies in more depth, new treatments and specially to assess the ideal time for maintaining therapy.

Longitudinal invariance and validity of the Impact of Event Scale-Revised under COVID-19 pandemic in a Brazilian sample.

Although the Impact Event Scale-Revised is widely used, its factor structure is still controversial. In addition, its longitudinal measurement invariance (LMI) remains uninvestigated. In this sense, we carried out three studies to investigate its psychometric properties. In Study 1, we evaluated the factorial structure of the scale comparing the different models existing in the literature in Brazilian samples who responded to the instrument during the COVID-19 pandemic. In Study 2, we provide support for a five-factor model throughout convergent validity with psychological distress and sleep problems, and criterion validity between people with diagnostic of mental disorders. Finally, we evaluated the LMI over a 6-month interval. The results indicated that the five-factor model has excellent goodness of fit and holds strict longitudinal invariance. Additionally, internal consistency and stability coefficients indicate that the scale is appropriate to measure posttraumatic stress symptomatology) in nonclinical samples across multiple assessments. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Preditores de sofrimento psicológico e prevalência de transtornos mentais autodeclarados em profissionais de saúde e na população em geral durante a pandemia de Covid-19 no Brasil / Predictors of psychological distress and prevalence of self-reported mental disorders in health care professionals and in the general population during the Covid-19 pandemic in Brazil

O fardo dos transtornos mentais pode aumentar durante a pandemia de Covid-19. Por isso, é estratégico caracterizar a saúde mental da população. Analisamos dados coletados pela Internet de 164.881 profissionais de saúde e 5.635 participantes da população geral. O Índice de Gravidade Global (GSI) do Inventário Breve de Sintomas, diagnóstico autodeclarado de transtornos mentais, características sociodemográficas, estado de saúde física, história de contato com a Covid-19, percepções e preocupações e medidas preventivas adotadas foram comparados entre as amostras. Análises de regressão múltipla foram usadas para investigação de fatores associados ao GSI. O distresse psicológico foi classificado como alto ou muito alto em 13,4% dos profissionais de saúde e em 31,4% dos participantes da população geral. A prevalência de transtornos mentais ao longo da vida foi 36% para profissionais de saúde e 44,7% para a população geral, sendo os mais frequentes transtornos depressivos e ansiedade generalizada. Entre os profissionais de saúde, ser do sexo feminino e mais jovem foi associado à maior distresse psicológico. Para a população geral foram preditores de distresse a classe econômica e um domicílio com mais pessoas. Foram significativamente associados ao GSI sintomas de Covid-19, sentir-se menos produtivo no trabalho, medo de transmitir o vírus para a família, medo de dificuldades financeiras e sentir que os relacionamentos em casa pioraram. A prevalência de transtornos mentais atinge parte relevante da população brasileira. Fatores sociodemográficos, aspectos familiares e instabilidade financeira devem ser considerados no entendimento do distresse psicológico durante a pandemia.(AU)

BACKGROUND: The burden of mental disorders is likely to increase during the Covid-19 pandemic. Knowing the rate of psychological distress and mental disorders, its severity, and factors associated with psychological distress is strategical. METHOD: We analyzed online cross-sectional data from 164,881 health professionals and from 5,635 participants from the general population in Brazil. The Global Severity Index (GSI) from the Brief Symptom Inventory, self-reported diagnosis of mental disorders, sociodemographic characteristics, and factors related to Covid-19, such as physical health status, diagnosis and contact history, perceptions and concerns, and precautionary measures were compared between samples. Multiple regression analysis was used to investigate factors related to GSI scores. RESULTS: Psychological distress was high or very high in 13.4% of health professionals and in 31.4% of the general population. Health professionals reported a lower rate of current or previous history of mental disorders (36%) than participants from the general population (44.7%). Age (younger) and gender (female) predicted higher psychological distress for health professionals and economic class (lower) and household size (more members) for the general population. People with higher GSI scores reported to have experienced more physical symptoms associated with Covid-19, feeling less productive at work, being afraid of transmitting the coronavirus to the family, fear of financial difficulties, and feeling that home relations were worse during the pandemic outbreak. CONCLUSIONS: Psychological distress at the first wave of Covid-19 was associated with sociodemographic features and an anxious perception of physical symptoms, virus transmission to loved ones, disruption of family relations, and financial situation.(AU)

INTRODUCCIÓN: Es probable que la carga de los trastornos mentales aumente durante la pandemia de Covid-19. Conocer la tasa de malestar psicológico y de los trastornos mentales, su gravedad y los factores asociados al malestar psicológico es estratégico. MÉTODO: Se analizaron datos transversales en línea de 164.881 profesionales de la salud y 5.635 participantes de la población general de Brasil. Se compararon entre las muestras el Índice de Gravedad Global (GSI) del Inventario Breve de Síntomas, el diagnóstico auto declarado de trastornos mentales, las características sociodemográficas y los factores relacionados con la Covid-19. Se utilizó un análisis de regresión múltiple para investigar los factores relacionados con las puntuaciones del GSI. RESULTADOS: El malestar psicológico era alto o muy alto en 13,4% de los profesionales de la salud y en 31,4% de la población general. Los profesionales de la salud declararon tasa de 36% de trastornos mentales y la población general de 44,7%. La edad (más joven) y el sexo (femenino) predijeron un mayor malestar psicológico para los profesionales de la salud y la clase económica (más baja) y el tamaño de la familia (más miembros) para la población general. Las personas con puntuaciones más altas en el GSI declararon haber experimentado más síntomas físicos asociados a la Covid-19, sentirse menos productivos en el trabajo, tener miedo de transmitir el coronavirus a la familia, temer dificultades económicas y sentir que las relaciones domésticas empeoraron. CONCLUSIONES: La angustia psicológica se asoció a las características sociodemográficas y a la percepción ansiosa de los síntomas físicos, la transmisión del virus a los seres queridos, la perturbación de las relaciones familiares y la situación económica.(AU)