Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 3 de 3
1.
AAS Open Res ; 2: 2, 2019 Jan 08.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31517248

Background: Cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4) T cells play a central role in regulation of adaptive T cell-mediated immune responses. Low CD4 T cell counts are not routinely reported as a marker of immune deficiency among HIV-negative individuals, as is the norm among their HIV positive counterparts. Despite evidence of mortality rates as high as 40% among Ugandan critically ill HIV-negative patients, the use of CD4 T cell counts as a measure of the immune status has never been explored among this population. This study assessed the immune status of adult critically ill HIV-negative patients admitted to Ugandan intensive care units (ICUs) using CD4 T cell count as a surrogate marker. Methods: A multicentre prospective cohort was conducted between 1st August 2017 and 1st March 2018 at four Ugandan ICUs. A total of 130 critically ill HIV negative patients were consecutively enrolled into the study. Data on sociodemographics, clinical characteristics, critical illness scores, CD4 T cell counts were obtained at baseline and mortality at day 28. Results: The mean age of patients was 45± 18 years (mean±SD) and majority (60.8%) were male. After a 28-day follow up, 71 [54.6%, 95% CI (45.9-63.3)] were found to have CD4 counts less than 500 cells/mm³, which were not found to be significantly associated with mortality at day 28, OR (95%) 1 (0.4-2.4), p = 0.093. CD4 cell count receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC) area was 0.5195, comparable to APACHE II ROC area 0.5426 for predicting 24-hour mortality. Conclusions: CD4 T cell counts were generally low among HIV-negative critically ill patients. Low CD4 T cells did not predict ICU mortality at day 28. CD4 T cell counts were not found to be inferior to APACHE II score in predicting 24 hour ICU mortality.

2.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 19(1): 68, 2019 Jan 25.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30683083

BACKGROUND: There is little information about the current management of pain after obstetric surgery at Mulago hospital in Uganda, one of the largest hospitals in Africa with approximately 32,000 deliveries per year. The primary goal of this study was to assess the severity of post cesarean section pain. Secondary objectives were to identify analgesic medications used to control post cesarean section pain and resultant patient satisfaction. METHODS: We prospectively followed 333 women who underwent cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. Subjective assessment of the participants' pain was done using the Visual Analogue Scale (0 to 100) at 0, 6 and 24 h after surgery. Satisfaction with pain control was ascertained at 24 h after surgery using a 2-point scale (yes/no). Participants' charts were reviewed for records of analgesics administered. RESULTS: Pain control medications used in the first 24 h following cesarean section at this hospital included diclofenac only, pethidine only, tramadol only and multiple pain medications. There were mothers who did not receive any analgesic medication. The highest pain scores were reported at 6 h (median: 37; (IQR:37.5). 68% of participants reported they were satisfied with their pain control. CONCLUSION: Adequate management of post-cesarean section pain remains a challenge at Mulago hospital. Greater inter-professional collaboration, self-administered analgesia, scheduled prescription orders and increasing availability of analgesic drugs may contribute to improved treatment of postoperative pain with better pain scores.


Cesarean Section/adverse effects , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Adolescent , Adult , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Anesthesia, Spinal/adverse effects , Cesarean Section/psychology , Female , Humans , Pain Management/psychology , Pain Measurement/methods , Pain, Postoperative/psychology , Patient Satisfaction , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies , Tertiary Care Centers , Treatment Outcome , Uganda , Young Adult
3.
Biomed Res Int ; 2016: 2015251, 2016.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27042657

INTRODUCTION: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common occurrence in the intensive care unit (ICU). Studies have looked at outcomes of renal replacement therapy using intermittent haemodialysis (IHD) in ICUs with varying results. Little is known about the outcomes of using IHD in resource-limited settings where continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is limited. We sought to determine outcomes of IHD among critically ill patients admitted to a low-income country ICU. METHODS: A retrospective review of patient records was conducted. Patients admitted to the ICU who underwent IHD for AKI were included in the study. Patients' demographic and clinical characteristics, cause of AKI, laboratory parameters, haemodialysis characteristics, and survival were interpreted and analyzed. Primary outcome was mortality. RESULTS: Of 62 patients, 40 had complete records. Median age of patients was 38.5 years. Etiologic diagnoses associated with AKI included sepsis, malaria, and ARDS. Mortality was 52.5%. APACHE II (OR 4.550; 95% CI 1.2-17.5, p = 0.028), mechanical ventilation (OR 13.063; 95% CI 2.3-72, p = 0.003), and need for vasopressors (OR 16.8; 95% CI 3.4-82.6, p = 0.001) had statistically significant association with mortality. CONCLUSION: IHD may be a feasible alternative for RRT in critically ill haemodynamically stable patients in low resource settings where CRRT may not be available.


Acute Kidney Injury/therapy , Renal Dialysis/methods , Shock, Septic/therapy , APACHE , Acute Kidney Injury/epidemiology , Acute Kidney Injury/physiopathology , Adult , Africa , Aged , Critical Illness , Female , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Male , Middle Aged , Renal Dialysis/adverse effects , Renal Replacement Therapy/methods , Shock, Septic/epidemiology , Shock, Septic/physiopathology
...