Effects of rifampin on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of milvexian, a potent, selective, oral small molecule factor XIa inhibitor.

Milvexian (BMS-986177/JNJ-70033093) is a potent, oral small molecule that inhibits the active form of factor XI with high affinity and selectivity. This study assessed the single-dose pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of milvexian co-administered with rifampin, an organic anion transport protein (OATP) inhibitor and potent cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A and P-glycoprotein (P-gp) inducer. In this open-label, nonrandomized, single-sequence study, healthy participants (N = 16) received single doses of milvexian on Day 1 (100 mg), milvexian and rifampin (600 mg) on Day 4, rifampin on Days 5-11, milvexian and rifampin on Day 12, and rifampin on Days 13-14. Pharmacokinetic data were summarized using descriptive statistics. Administration of milvexian, alone or in combination with rifampin, was generally safe and well tolerated. Single-dose co-administration of rifampin and milvexian demonstrated no meaningful changes in milvexian exposure versus milvexian alone (Cmax, 110%; AUC[0-T], 102%; AUC[INF], 101%). After multiple doses of rifampin and milvexian, peak and total milvexian exposure substantially decreased versus milvexian alone (Cmax, 22%; AUC[0-T], 15%; AUC[INF], 15%). Results were consistent with preclinical data, indicating that milvexian is a substrate for CYP3A4/5 and P-gp but not OATP. The implications of these results on the need for dose adjustment of milvexian will be further elucidated following the completion of phase 2 and 3 trials.Trial registration The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02959060; submitted 7/11/2016, first posted 8/11/2016).

Single-Dose Pharmacokinetics of Milvexian in Participants with Normal Renal Function and Participants with Moderate or Severe Renal Impairment.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the effect of moderate or severe renal impairment on the pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of milvexian. METHODS: This open-label, parallel-group study assessed the PK, safety, and tolerability of a single oral 60 mg dose of milvexian in participants with normal renal function (n = 8; estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] ≥ 90 mL/min/1.73 m2) and participants with moderate (n = 8; eGFR ≥ 30 to ≤ 59 mL/min/1.73 m2) or severe (n = 8; eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2) renal impairment. Regression analysis was performed using linear regression of log-transformed PK parameters versus eGFR. RESULTS: Milvexian was well tolerated, with no deaths, serious adverse events, or serious bleeding reported. The maximum milvexian concentration (Cmax) was similar for all groups. Based on a regression analysis of milvexian concentration versus eGFR, participants with eGFR values of 30 and 15 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively, had area under the curve (AUC) values that were 41% and 54% greater than in participants with normal renal function. Median time to maximum concentration (Tmax) was similar for the three groups (4.5-5.0 h). The half-life increased for participants with moderate (18.0 h) or severe (17.7 h) renal impairment compared with those with normal renal function (13.8 h). CONCLUSION: A single dose of milvexian 60 mg was safe and well tolerated in participants with normal renal function and moderate or severe renal impairment. There was a similar increase in milvexian exposure between the moderate and severe renal groups. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03196206, first posted 22 June 2017).

Effects of Itraconazole and Diltiazem on the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Milvexian, A Factor XIa Inhibitor.

INTRODUCTION: Modulation of Factor XIa (FXIa) may provide a novel mechanism for systemic anticoagulation with the potential to improve the risk-benefit profile observed with existing anticoagulants through greater efficacy or a safer bleeding profile. This study assessed the effects of co-administration with strong and moderate CYP3A inhibitors itraconazole and diltiazem, respectively, on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of milvexian, a Factor XIa inhibitor. METHODS: This was an open-label, non-randomized, two-period crossover study in healthy participants. In period 1, participants received a single oral dose of milvexian (30 mg) on day 1, followed by a washout on days 2 and 3. In period 2, participants received multiple oral doses of itraconazole (200 mg) or diltiazem (240 mg) with a single dose of milvexian. RESULTS: A total of 28 participants entered the treatment period. Following itraconazole co-administration, milvexian exposure was increased; AUC(0-T), AUC(INF), and C24 were 2.5-, 2.5-, and 3.8-fold higher, while mean Cmax was 28% higher versus milvexian alone. Diltiazem co-administration also increased milvexian exposure; AUC(0-T), AUC(INF), and C24 were 38, 38, and 64% higher, and mean Cmax was 9.6% higher versus milvexian alone. Prolongation of activated partial thromboplastin time was observed with milvexian in a concentration-dependent fashion irrespective of co-administration with itraconazole or diltiazem. Administration of a single dose of milvexian, alone or in combination with itraconazole or diltiazem, was generally safe and well tolerated; there were no deaths or serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: A moderate increase in milvexian exposure was observed following co-administration of itraconazole while a minimal increase was seen with diltiazem, consistent with the involvement of CYP3A metabolism and P-glycoprotein in drug absorption/elimination. Milvexian was generally safe and well tolerated in healthy participants. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02807909; submitted June 17, 2016).

Single-Dose Pharmacokinetics of Milvexian in Participants with Mild or Moderate Hepatic Impairment Compared with Healthy Participants.

BACKGROUND: Patients with hepatic impairment receiving antithrombotic agents metabolized primarily through the liver can be at risk for bleeding. Milvexian (BMS-986177/JNJ-70033093) is a small-molecule, active-site inhibitor of activated Factor XI (FXIa). Modulation of FXI may provide systemic anticoagulation without increased risk of clinically significant bleeding. OBJECTIVE: This open-label study evaluated the effects of mild or moderate hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of milvexian to assess their impact on safety and dosing. METHODS: Single doses of milvexian 60 mg were administered to participants with mild hepatic impairment (n = 9), moderate hepatic impairment (n = 8), and normal hepatic function (n = 9). Healthy participants were matched to participants with hepatic impairment by body weight, age, and sex. Analysis of variance was performed on natural log-transformed milvexian exposure parameters, with hepatic function group as a fixed effect. RESULTS: Single doses of milvexian 60 mg were generally well tolerated, with no serious adverse events (AEs), bleeding AEs, or discontinuations due to AEs. Geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval) for total milvexian maximum observed plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero extrapolated to infinite time were 1.180 (0.735-1.895) and 1.168 (0.725-1.882), respectively, for mild hepatic impairment versus normal hepatic function and 1.140 (0.699-1.857) and 0.996 (0.609-1.628), respectively, for moderate hepatic impairment versus normal hepatic function. Across groups, milvexian exposure-related increases were observed for activated partial thromboplastin time. CONCLUSION: Milvexian was well tolerated in participants with normal, mildly impaired, and moderately impaired hepatic function. Observed pharmacokinetic changes suggest it is unlikely that dose adjustments will be necessary in patients with mild or moderate hepatic impairment. Clinical Trial RegistrationClinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02982707.

Pharmacokinetics of Temsavir, the Active Moiety of the HIV-1 Attachment Inhibitor Prodrug, Fostemsavir, Coadministered with Cobicistat, Etravirine, Darunavir/Cobicistat, or Darunavir/Ritonavir with or without Etravirine in Healthy Participants.

Fostemsavir is a prodrug of temsavir, a first-in-class attachment inhibitor that binds directly to HIV-1 gp120, preventing initial viral attachment and entry into host CD4+ T cells with demonstrated efficacy in phase 2 and 3. Temsavir is a P-glycoprotein and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) substrate; its metabolism is mediated by esterase and CYP3A4 enzymes. Drugs that induce or inhibit CYP3A, P-glycoprotein, and BCRP may affect temsavir concentrations. Understanding potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) following fostemsavir coadministration with antiretrovirals approved for HIV-1-infected treatment-experienced patients, including darunavir plus cobicistat (DRV/c) or DRV plus low-dose ritonavir (DRV/r) and etravirine, is clinically relevant. Open-label, single-sequence, multiple-dose, multicohort DDI studies were conducted in healthy participants (n = 46; n = 32). The primary objective was to assess the effects of DRV/r, etravirine, DRV/r plus etravirine, cobicistat, and DRV/c on temsavir systemic exposures; safety was a secondary objective. Compared with fostemsavir alone, coadministration with DRV/r increased the temsavir maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax), area under the concentration-time curve in one dosing interval (AUCtau), and plasma trough concentration (Ctau) by 52%, 63%, and 88%, respectively, while etravirine decreased the temsavir Cmax, AUCtau, and Ctau by ∼50% each. DRV/r plus etravirine increased the temsavir Cmax, AUCtau, and Ctau by 53%, 34%, and 33%, respectively. Compared with fostemsavir alone, coadministration with cobicistat increased the temsavir Cmax, AUCtau, and Ctau by 71%, 93%, and 136%, respectively; DRV/c increased the temsavir Cmax, AUCtau, and Ctau by 79%, 97%, and 124%, respectively. Fostemsavir with all combinations was generally well tolerated. No dose adjustment is required for fostemsavir when coadministered with strong CYP3A inhibitors, P-glycoprotein inhibitors, and modest inducers, including regimens with DRV/r, DRV/c, cobicistat, etravirine, and DRV/r plus etravirine based on the therapeutic margin for temsavir (ClinicalTrials.gov registration no. NCT02063360 and NCT02277600).

Safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of milvexian in healthy Japanese participants.

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple ascending-dose study evaluated safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of multiple doses of milvexian, an oral small-molecule FXIa inhibitor, in healthy Japanese participants. Participants received oral milvexian daily under fasted (50 mg and 200 mg) or fed conditions (500 mg) or placebo over 14 days; 24 participants (8/cohort: 6 milvexian; 2 placebo) were planned. Due to an unblinding event, participants in one cohort (200 mg daily) were discontinued, and a second cohort enrolled; 32 participants were included in safety and pharmacodynamic analyses, and 24/32 in pharmacokinetic analyses. Milvexian up to 500 mg daily for 14 days was generally well tolerated, with no deaths, serious adverse events, or discontinuations due to adverse events. Milvexian exposure increased between 50-mg and 200-mg doses. Median Tmax was similar with 50-mg and 200-mg doses (2.5-3.0 h) and delayed under fed conditions (500 mg, 7.0-8.0 h). Median T1/2 was similar across doses (8.9-11.9 h). Multiple oral milvexian administrations resulted in concentration-related prolongation of aPTT and decreased FXI clotting activity. Milvexian was generally safe and well tolerated. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of milvexian demonstrates suitability for further clinical development in Japanese participants.

Methadone and buprenorphine pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics when coadministered with fostemsavir to opioid-dependent, human immunodeficiency virus seronegative participants.

AIMS: Regional human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) prevalence rates are high in people with history of injection drug use, including those managed with maintenance opioids. Fostemsavir (FTR) is an oral prodrug of temsavir, a first-in-class attachment inhibitor that binds HIV-1 gp120, preventing initial HIV attachment and entry into host immune cells. Here we determine the impact of FTR on the pharmacokinetics of opioids methadone (MET: R-, S- and total) or buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine (BUP and norBUP) when coadministered. METHODS: Study 206216 (NCT02666001) was a Phase I, open-label study, assessing the effect of FTR 600 mg (extended-release formulation) twice daily on pharmacokinetics of MET or BUP and norBUP, in non-HIV-infected participants on stable maintenance therapy with MET (40-120 mg; n = 16) or BUP plus naloxone (8-24 mg plus 2-6 mg; n = 16); pharmacodynamic response was assessed using standard opioid rating scales. RESULTS: Following coadministration with FTR, dose-normalized MET (R-, S- and total) exposures (maximum concentration in plasma, area under the plasma concentration-time curve over the dosing interval and concentration in plasma at 24 hours) increased 9-15% and BUP and norBUP exposures increased 24-39%. The 90% confidence interval ranges for MET (1.01-1.21) and BUP and norBUP (1.03-1.69) were within respective no-effect ranges (0.7-1.43 and 0.5-2.0). Opioid pharmacodynamic scores were similar with and without MET/BUP with no symptoms of withdrawal/overdose; no new safety signal for FTR when combined with a stable opioid regimen. CONCLUSIONS: FTR did not impact MET and had no clinically significant impact on BUP pharmacokinetics. Standardized assessments of opioid pharmacodynamics were unchanged throughout FTR administration with MET or BUP. FTR can be administered with MET or BUP without dose adjustment.

Use of a cocktail probe to assess potential drug interactions with cytochrome P450 after administration of belatacept, a costimulatory immunomodulator.

AIM: This open-label study investigated the effect of belatacept on cytokine levels and on the pharmacokinetics of caffeine, losartan, omeprazole, dextromethorphan and midazolam, as CYP probe substrates after oral administration of the Inje cocktail in healthy volunteers. METHODS: Twenty-two evaluable subjects received the Inje cocktail on Days 1, 4, 7 and 11 and belatacept infusion on Day 4. RESULTS: Since belatacept caused no major alterations to cytokine levels, there were no major effects on CYP-substrate pharmacokinetics, except for a slight (16-30%) increase in omeprazole exposure, which was probably due to omeprazole-mediated, time-dependent CYP inhibition. Belatacept did not cause major alterations in the pharmacokinetics, as measured by the geometric mean ratios and associated 90% confidence interval for area under the plasma concentration -time curve from time zero to infinity on Day 7 comparing administration with and without belatacept for caffeine (1.002 [0.914, 1.098]), dextromethorphan (1.031 [0.885, 1.200]), losartan (1.016 [0.938, 1.101)], midazolam (0.968 [0.892, 1.049]) or their respective metabolites. CONCLUSIONS: Therefore, no dose adjustments of CYP substrates are indicated with belatacept coadministration.

Lack of a Pharmacokinetic Interaction Between Saxagliptin and Dapagliflozin in Healthy Subjects: A Randomized Crossover Study.

PURPOSE: This single-dose, open-label, randomized, 3-period, 3-treatment crossover drug-drug interaction study was conducted to evaluate differences in the pharmacokinetic properties of saxagliptin and dapagliflozin when coadministered. METHODS: Healthy subjects (N = 42) were randomized to receive saxagliptin 5 mg alone, dapagliflozin 10 mg alone, or saxagliptin 5 mg plus dapagliflozin 10 mg coadministered; there was a washout period of ≥6 days between treatments. Serial blood samples for determining saxagliptin, 5-hydroxy saxagliptin (5-OH saxagliptin; major active metabolite) and dapagliflozin plasma concentrations and pharmacokinetic parameters were collected before and up to 60 hours after the dose. No interaction was to be concluded if the 90% CIs for the geometric mean ratios of the combination compared with each drug given alone for Cmax and AUCinf were within 0.80 to 1.25. FINDINGS: The results indicated that dapagliflozin had no effect on the pharmacokinetic properties of saxagliptin, 5-OH saxagliptin, or saxagliptin total active moiety and vice versa. The 90% CIs for Cmax and AUCinf for all comparisons were contained entirely within the 0.80 to 1.25 equivalence intervals. Other pharmacokinetic parameters (apparent oral clearance or half-life) of saxagliptin or dapagliflozin were similar when each medicine was administered alone or when coadministered. No safety profile or tolerability findings of concern were observed during the study. All adverse events were mild, and no serious adverse events were reported. IMPLICATIONS: These data indicate that coadministration of saxagliptin and dapagliflozin exhibits no pharmacokinetic interaction and is well tolerated. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01662999.

Fed and Fasted Single-dose Assessment of Bioequivalence of Dapagliflozin and Metformin Extended-release Fixed-dose Combination Tablets Relative to Single-component Dapagliflozin and Metformin Extended-release Tablets in Healthy Subjects.

PURPOSE: In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) of antihyperglycemic medications may provide complementary efficacy while reducing tablet burden and improving compliance. The aim of this study was to assess the bioequivalence and tolerability of 2 FDCs of dapagliflozin and metformin extended-release (XR) versus their individual component (IC) tablets. METHODS: An open-label, balanced, randomized, 2-way crossover, 4-arm study was conducted in 129 healthy Brazilian subjects (aged 18-55 years). Two oral doses of the FDCs (5 mg dapagliflozin and 500 mg metformin XR, and 10 mg dapagliflozin and 1000 mg metformin XR) were evaluated in fed and fasted states. FINDINGS: Under fed and fasted conditions the 5 mg dapagliflozin and 500 mg metformin XR FDC showed bioequivalence to its ICs. The 10 mg dapagliflozin and 1000 mg metformin XR FDC was bioequivalent to its ICs in fed subjects. Although AUC for the 10 mg dapagliflozin and 1000 mg metformin XR FDC was bioequivalent in fasted subjects, the Cmax for metformin was not bioequivalent to its ICs in fasted subjects (upper 90% CI was 127.5%, and thus outside the 80%-125% bioequivalence interval). The small increase in the fasted state is not considered clinically meaningful due to the small magnitude of the difference (9.2%), the lack of metformin Cmax being associated with efficacy or tolerability concerns, and the fasted state not being the recommended state for dosing of metformin XR. The safety profile and tolerability of the FDCs were similar to those of their ICs and no deaths or serious adverse events were reported. IMPLICATIONS: Both FDCs of dapagliflozin and metformin XR were bioequivalent to their ICs in fed and fasted subjects, except for the metformin Cmax from the 10 mg dapagliflozin and 1000 mg metformin XR FDC in fasted subjects. These data support the use of a dapagliflozin and metformin XR FDC in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Bioequivalence, Food Effect, and Steady-State Assessment of Dapagliflozin/Metformin Extended-release Fixed-dose Combination Tablets Relative to Single-component Dapagliflozin and Metformin Extended-release Tablets in Healthy Subjects.

PURPOSE: Simplification of therapeutic regimens for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus can provide convenience that leads to improved compliance. Dapagliflozin/metformin extended-release (XR) fixed-dose combination (FDC) tablets offer the convenience of once-daily dosing. Two pharmacokinetic (PK) studies were conducted to establish bioequivalence for 2 doses of dapagliflozin/metformin XR FDC versus the same dosage of the individual component (IC) tablets in healthy adults. METHODS: Two open-label, randomized, 4-period, 4-arm crossover studies were conducted to assess the bioequivalence and PK properties of dapagliflozin and metformin FDCs in healthy subjects under fed and fasting conditions. Participants received single oral doses or once-daily dosing of dapagliflozin/metformin XR (5 mg/500 mg [study 1] or 10 mg/1000 mg [study 2]) for 4 days in an FDC formulation or corresponding strengths of IC tablets. FINDINGS: For both of the studies, dapagliflozin and metformin 5 mg/500 mg or 10 mg/1000 mg FDC tablets were bioequivalent to the respective IC tablets. The 90% CIs of the ratio of the adjusted geometric means for all key PK parameters (Cmax, AUC0-T, and AUC0-∞) were contained within the predefined 0.80 to 1.25 range to conclude bioequivalence for both dapagliflozin and metformin. Once-daily dosing to steady state of each FDC tablet had no effect on the PK properties of dapagliflozin or metformin. When the FDCs were administered with a light-fat meal, there was no effect on metformin PK values and only a modest, nonclinically meaningful effect on dapagliflozin PK values. There were no safety or tolerability concerns. IMPLICATIONS: Bioequivalence of the FDCs of dapagliflozin/metformin XR and the ICs was established, and no safety issues of clinical concern were raised.