Change of glutamic acid decarboxylase antibody and protein tyrosine phosphatase antibody in Chinese patients with acute-onset type 1 diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND: Glutamic acid decarboxylase antibody (GADA) and protein tyrosine phosphatase antibody (IA-2A) are two major autoantibodies, which exert important roles in the process of type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D). Our study aimed to investigate the changes in positivity and titers of GADA and IA-2A during the course of Chinese acute-onset T1D patients and their relationships with clinical features. METHODS: Two hundreds and forty-seven Chinese newly diagnosed acute-onset T1D patients were consecutively recruited. GADA and IA-2A were detected at the time of diagnosis, one year later, 3-5 years later after diagnosis during the follow-up; all the clinical data were recorded and analyzed as well. RESULTS: During the course of acute-onset T1D, the majority of patients remained stable for GADA or IA-2A, however, a few patients changed from positivity to negativity and fewer patients converted from negativity to positivity. The prevalence of GADA was 56.3% at diagnosis, decreasing to 50.5% one year later, and 43.3% 3-5 years later while the corresponding prevalence of IA-2A were 32.8%, 31.0% and 23.3%, respectively. The median GADA titers were 0.0825 at diagnosis, declining to 0.0585 one year later and 0.0383 3-5 years later (P < 0.001), while the corresponding median titers were 0.0016, 0.0010, 0.0014 for IA-2A, respectively. Fasting C-peptide (FCP) and postprandial C-peptide 2 hours (PCP2h) levels of GADA or IA-2A negativity persistence patients were higher than those of positivity persistence and negativity conversion patients (P < 0.05) which indicated GADA or IA-2A negativity persistence T1D patients had a less loss of ß cell function. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that repeated detection of GADA and IA-2A are necessary for differential diagnosis of autoimmune diabetes and the indirect prediction of the ß cell function in Chinese patients.

[Value of zinc transporter 8 autoantibody in the diagnostic classification of acute-onset diabetics].

OBJECTIVE: to explore the application significance of zinc transporter 8 autoantibody (ZnT8A) in the diagnostic classification of acute-onset diabetics. METHODS: according to the status of glutamic acid decarboxylase antibody (GADA) and tyrosine phosphatase antibody (IA2-A), 453 acute-onset diabetics were divided into A+ subgroup (any antibody positive) and A- subgroup (both antibodies negative). A total of 555 type 2 diabetics and 405 healthy controls were recruited. The distribution and correlated factors of ZnT8A were analyzed in the acute-onset diabetic group and two subgroups (A+ and A-). The clinical characteristics were compared between the patients with ZnT8A positive alone and patients without any antibody. All these islet antibodies were measured by radioligand assay. RESULTS: the prevalence of ZnT8A in acute-onset diabetics was 24.3% and it was significantly higher than that in type 2 diabetics (1.8%) and healthy controls (1.0%) (both P < 0.01). The frequency of ZnT8A in A+ subgroup was much higher than A- subgroup (29.7% vs 15.8%, P < 0.01). The positive rates of ZnT8A were much higher in all the subgroups with age at onset of < 30 yr than those with ≥ 30 yr (0 - 9, 34.9%; 10 - 19, 26.7%; 20 - 29, 26.3% vs ≥ 30 yr, 18.3%; all P < 0.05); furthermore, the rates were also higher in BMI < 21.0 kg/m(2) and 21.0 - 25.0 kg/m(2) subgroups than in BMI > 25.0 kg/m(2) subgroup (25.5% and 25.9% vs 8.7%, both P < 0.05). The ZnT8A level was only positively correlated with IA2-A titer (r = 0.165, P = 0.01), but not related to such factors as GADA titer, age at onset, duration, body mass index, HbA1c and CP levels (all P > 0.05). As compared with Ab- patients, the patients with ZnT8A positive alone had much higher insulin injection dosage [(35.5 ± 9.3) U/d vs (29.8 ± 14.7) U/d, P < 0.05], and much lower systolic blood pressures [(107 ± 15) mm Hg vs (113 ± 16) mm Hg, P < 0.05] and diastolic blood pressures [(69 ± 12) mm Hg vs (73 ± 12) mm Hg, P < 0.05]. CONCLUSION: ZnT8A testing may be applied in the diagnostic classification of acute-onset diabetics, especially in those without an evidence of GADA and IA2-A since it helps to identify a clinical phenotype which is more similar to the classic type 1 diabetes.