Correction Method for Optical Scaling of Fundoscopy Images: Development, Validation, and First Implementation.

Purpose: Although fundus photography is extensively used in ophthalmology, refraction prevents accurate distance measurement on fundus images, as the resulting scaling differs between subjects due to varying ocular anatomy. We propose a PARaxial Optical fundus Scaling (PAROS) method to correct for this variation using commonly available clinical data. Methods: The complete optics of the eye and fundus camera were modeled using ray transfer matrix formalism to obtain fundus image magnification. The subject's ocular geometry was personalized using biometry, spherical equivalent of refraction (RSE), keratometry, and/or corneal topography data. The PAROS method was validated using 41 different eye phantoms and subsequently evaluated in 44 healthy phakic subjects (of whom 11 had phakic intraocular lenses [pIOLs]), 29 pseudophakic subjects, and 21 patients with uveal melanoma. Results: Validation of the PAROS method showed small differences between model and actual image magnification (maximum 3.3%). Relative to the average eye, large differences in fundus magnification were observed, ranging from 0.79 to 1.48. Magnification was strongly inversely related to RSE (R2 = 0.67). In phakic subjects, magnification was directly proportional to axial length (R2 = 0.34). The inverse relation was seen in pIOL (R2 = 0.79) and pseudophakic (R2 = 0.12) subjects. RSE was a strong contributor to magnification differences (1%-83%). As this effect is not considered in the commonly used Bennett-Littmann method, statistically significant differences up to 40% (mean absolute 9%) were observed compared to the PAROS method (P < 0.001). Conclusions: The significant differences in fundus image scaling observed among subjects can be accurately accounted for with the PAROS method, enabling more accurate quantitative assessment of fundus photography.

PRAME Expression: A Target for Cancer Immunotherapy and a Prognostic Factor in Uveal Melanoma.

Purpose: Uveal melanoma (UM) is a rare disease with a high mortality, and new therapeutic options are being investigated. Preferentially Expressed Antigen in Melanoma (PRAME) is a cancer testis antigen, expressed in the testis, but also in cancers, including uveal melanoma. PRAME is considered a target for immune therapy in several cancers, and PRAME-specific T cell clones have been shown to kill UM cells. Methods: We studied the literature on PRAME expression in hematological and solid malignancies, including UM, and its role as a target for immunotherapy. The distribution of tumor features was compared between PRAME-high and PRAME-low UM in a 64-patient cohort from the Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) and in the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohort of 80 cases and differential gene expression analysis was performed in the LUMC cohort. Results: PRAME is expressed in many malignancies, it is frequently associated with a negative prognosis, and can be the target of T cell receptor (TCR)-transduced T cells, a promising treatment option with high avidity and safety. In UM, PRAME is expressed in 26% to 45% of cases and is correlated with a worse prognosis. In the LUMC and the TCGA cohorts, high PRAME expression was associated with larger diameter, higher Tumor-Node-Metastasis (TNM) stage, more frequent gain of chromosome 8q, and an inflammatory phenotype. Conclusions: We confirm that PRAME is associated with poor prognosis in UM and has a strong connection with extra copies of 8q. We show that PRAME-specific immunotherapy in an adjuvant setting is promising in treatment of malignancies, including UM.

Time Trends in the Treatment and Survival of 5036 Uveal Melanoma Patients in The Netherlands over a 30-Year Period.

BACKGROUND: Uveal melanoma (UM) is a rare intraocular tumor with a dismal prognosis once metastasized. This study provides a nationwide overview and time trends of patients diagnosed with primary UM in the Netherlands between 1989 and 2019. METHODS: A retrospective population-based cohort study based on patients with primary UM from the database of the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR), linked with the national population registry Statistics Netherlands on inhabitants' cause of death. Two time periods (1989-2004, 2005-2019) were compared with descriptive statistics. Kaplan-Meier and (multivariate) Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess changes over time for overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). RESULTS: In total, 5036 patients were analyzed with a median age of 64.0 years at the time of diagnosis. The number of patients increased over time. In the first (1989-2004) and second (2005-2019) period, 32% versus 54% of the patients received radiotherapy (p < 0.001). The median FU time was 13.4 years. The median OS of the first and second periods was 9.5 (95% CI 8.7-10.3) versus 11.3 years (95% CI 10.3-12.3; p < 0.001). The median CSS was 30.0 years (95% CI NA) in the first period and not reached in the second period (p = 0.008). In multivariate analysis (MVA), female gender (HR 0.85; 95% CI 0.79-0.92, p < 0.001) and radiotherapy treatment (HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.64-0.83, p < 0.001) were associated with better OS. Radiotherapy treatment (HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.61-0.90, p = 0.002) was also associated with better CSS. The period of diagnosis was not associated with OS or CSS. CONCLUSIONS: In this study of patients with primary UM, there was a shift to the diagnosis of smaller tumors, possibly due to stage migration. There was also an increase in eye-preserving treatments over time. OS and CSS were modestly improved in the second time period; however, the time period was not associated with OS or CSS in multivariate analyses.

Peripheral visual field shifts after intraocular lens implantation.

PURPOSE: To assess whether intraocular lens (IOL) implantation induces shifts in the peripheral visual field. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands. DESIGN: Ray-tracing study. METHODS: Nonsequential ray-tracing simulations were performed with phakic and pseudophakic versions of the same eye model to assess potential shifts in the visual field after IOL implantation. 2 different IOL designs were evaluated and for each design 5 different axial positions and 7 different intrinsic powers were tested. The relation between the physical position of the light source and the location where the retina was illuminated was determined for each eye model. Subsequently, these relations were used to calculate whether the visual field shifts in pseudophakic eyes. RESULTS: The pseudophakic visual field shift was below 1 degree for central vision in all evaluated models. For peripheral vision, the light rays in the pseudophakic eyes were refracted to a more central retinal location compared with phakic eyes, resulting in a central shift of the peripheral visual field. The magnitude of the shift depended on the IOL design and its axial position, but could be as high as 5.4 degrees towards central vision. CONCLUSIONS: IOL implantation tends to have little effect on the central visual field but can induce an over 5 degrees shift in the peripheral visual field. Such a shift can affect the perception of peripheral visual complaints.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Clinical Care for Uveal Melanoma Patients-A Systematic Review from an Ophthalmic Perspective.

Conversely to most tumour types, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was rarely used for eye tumours. As recent technical advances have increased ocular MRI's diagnostic value, various clinical applications have been proposed. This systematic review provides an overview of the current status of MRI in the clinical care of uveal melanoma (UM) patients, the most common eye tumour in adults. In total, 158 articles were included. Two- and three-dimensional anatomical scans and functional scans, which assess the tumour micro-biology, can be obtained in routine clinical setting. The radiological characteristics of the most common intra-ocular masses have been described extensively, enabling MRI to contribute to diagnoses. Additionally, MRI's ability to non-invasively probe the tissue's biological properties enables early detection of therapy response and potentially differentiates between high- and low-risk UM. MRI-based tumour dimensions are generally in agreement with conventional ultrasound (median absolute difference 0.5 mm), but MRI is considered more accurate in a subgroup of anteriorly located tumours. Although multiple studies propose that MRI's 3D tumour visualisation can improve therapy planning, an evaluation of its clinical benefit is lacking. In conclusion, MRI is a complementary imaging modality for UM of which the clinical benefit has been shown by multiple studies.

Microphthalmia-Associated Transcription Factor: A Differentiation Marker in Uveal Melanoma.

Microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF) is an important regulator of melanogenesis and melanocyte development. In cutaneous melanoma, MITF loss has been linked to an increased expression of stem cell markers, a shift in epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT)-related factors, and increased inflammation. We explored the role of MITF in Uveal Melanoma (UM) using a cohort of 64 patients enucleated at the Leiden University Medical Center. We analysed the relation between MITF expression and clinical, histopathological and genetic features of UM, as well as survival. We performed differential gene expression and gene set enrichment analysis using mRNA microarray data, comparing MITF-low with MITF-high UM. MITF expression was lower in heavily pigmented UM than in lightly pigmented UM (p = 0.003), which we confirmed by immunohistochemistry. Furthermore, MITF was significantly lower in UM with monosomy 3/BAP1 loss than in those with disomy 3/no BAP1 loss (p < 0.001) and with 8q gain/amplification 8q (p = 0.02). Spearman correlation analysis showed that a low MITF expression was associated with an increase in inflammatory markers, hallmark pathways involved in inflammation, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Similar to the situation in cutaneous melanoma, we propose that MITF loss in UM is related to de-differentiation to a less favourable EMT profile and inflammation.

Increased Histological Tumor Pigmentation in Uveal Melanoma Is Related to Eye Color and Loss of Chromosome 3/BAP1.

Purpose: Heavy pigmentation is known to be a prognostic risk factor in uveal melanoma (UM). We analyzed whether genetic tumor parameters were associated with tumor pigmentation and whether pigmentation should be included in prognostic tests. Design: Retrospective comparison of clinical, histopathological, and genetic features and survival in UM with different pigmentation. Participants: A total of 1058 patients with UM from a White European population with diverse eye colors enucleated between 1972 and 2021. Methods: Cox regression and log-rank tests were used for survival analysis; the chi-square test and Mann-Whitney U test were used for correlation analysis. Main Outcome Measures: Uveal melanoma-related survival based on tumor pigmentation and chromosome status, correlation of tumor pigmentation with prognostic factors. Results: The 5-year UM-related mortality was 8% in patients with nonpigmented tumors (n = 54), 25% with lightly pigmented tumors (n = 489), 41% with moderately pigmented tumors (n = 333), and 33% with dark tumors (n = 178) (P < 0.001). The percentage of tumors with monosomy 3 (M3) or 8q gain increased with increasing pigmentation (31%, 46%, 62%, and 70% having M3 [P < 0.001], and 19%, 43%, 61%, and 63% having 8q gain [P < 0.001] in the 4 increasing pigment groups, respectively). BRCA-associated protein 1 (BAP1) loss (known for 204 cases) was associated with increased tumor pigmentation (P = 0.001). Cox regression analysis on survival showed that when chromosome status and pigmentation were both included, pigmentation was not an independent prognostic indicator. Preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma (PRAME) expression was a significant prognostic marker in light tumors (P = 0.02) but not in dark tumors (P = 0.85). Conclusions: Patients with moderately and heavily pigmented tumors showed a significantly higher UM-related mortality than patients with unpigmented and light tumors (P < 0.001), supporting prior reports on the relation between increased tumor pigmentation and a worse prognosis. Although we previously showed that a dark eye color was associated with tumor pigmentation, we now show that the tumor's genetic status (chromosome 3 and 8q/BAP1 status) is also related to tumor pigmentation. When pigmentation and chromosome 3 status are both included in a Cox regression analysis, pigmentation is not an independent prognostic factor. However, evidence from this and previous studies shows that chromosome changes and PRAME expression have a stronger association with survival when they occur in light tumors than in dark ones. Financial Disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

A view from the clinic - Perspectives from Dutch patients and professionals on high myopia care.

PURPOSE: To understand and compare perspectives of patients and professionals on current ophthalmologic care for high myopia, and to identify challenges and future opportunities. METHODS: Self-reported data were collected through two online questionnaires. Patient perspective was obtained from highly myopic members of a patient organisation based in the Netherlands using a 17-item questionnaire consisting of open and multiple-choice questions regarding personal experience with myopia care. The ophthalmologist perspective was obtained from practising Dutch ophthalmologists with a 12-item questionnaire of multiple-choice questions on work-related demographics, myopia care in daily practice and need for improvement. The response rate for patients was 27% (n = 136/500) and for ophthalmologists, 24% (n = 169/716). RESULTS: Patients were highly concerned about personal progressive loss of vision (69%) and feared their psychological well-being (82%) in case this would happen. The quality of performance of care provided by ophthalmologists was rated as excellent or satisfactory by 64% of the patients. These ratings for multidisciplinary care and insurance reimbursement were as low as 28% and 18% respectively. The mean concern among ophthalmologists about the rise in high myopia was 6.9 (SEM 0.1) on a 10-point scale. Sixty-nine per cent of the ophthalmologists reported that asymptomatic myopic patients should not be examined regularly at outpatient clinics. Ophthalmologists urged the development of clinical guidelines (74%), but did report (95%) that they informed patients about risk factors and complications. This contrasted with the view of patients, of whom 42% were discontent with information provided by ophthalmologists. CONCLUSIONS: These questionnaires demonstrated that the current clinical care delivered to highly myopic patients is in need of improvement. The expected higher demand for myopia care in the near future requires preferred practice patterns, professionals specifically trained to manage myopic pathology, accurate and comprehensive information exchange and collaboration of in- and out-of-hospital professionals across the full eye care chain.

Inter-Observer Variability in MR-Based Target Volume Delineation of Uveal Melanoma.

Purpose: Several efforts are being undertaken toward MRI-based treatment planning for ocular proton therapy for uveal melanoma (UM). The interobserver variability of the gross target volume (GTV) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is one of the important parameters to design safety margins for a reliable treatment. Therefore, this study assessed the interobserver variation in GTV delineation of UM on MRI. Methods and Materials: Six observers delineated the GTV in 10 different patients using the Big Brother contouring software. Patients were scanned at 3T MRI with a surface coil, and tumors were delineated separately on contrast enhanced 3DT1 (T1gd) and 3DT2-weighted scans with an isotropic acquisition resolution of 0.8 mm. Volume difference and overall local variation (median standard deviation of the distance between the delineated contours and the median contour) were analyzed for each GTV. Additionally, the local variation was analyzed for 4 interfaces: sclera, vitreous, retinal detachment, and tumor-choroid interface. Results: The average GTV was significantly larger on T1gd (0.57cm3) compared with T2 (0.51cm3, P = .01). A not significant higher interobserver variation was found on T1gd (0.41 mm) compared with T2 (0.35 mm). The largest variations were found at the tumor-choroid interface due to peritumoral enhancement (T1gd, 0.62 mm; T2, 0.52 mm). As a result, a larger part of this tumor-choroid interface appeared to be included on T1gd-based GTVs compared with T2, explaining the smaller volumes on T2. Conclusions: The interobserver variation of 0.4 mm on MRI are low with respect to the voxel size of 0.8 mm, enabling small treatment margins. We recommend delineation based on the T1gd-weighted scans, as choroidal tumor extensions might be missed.

Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based and Conventional Measurements for Proton Beam Therapy of Uveal Melanoma.

OBJECTIVE: Conventionally, ocular proton therapy (PT) is planned using measurements obtained by an ophthalmologist using ultrasound, fundoscopy, biometry, and intraoperative assessments. Owing to the recent advances in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of uveal melanoma (UM), it is possible to acquire high-resolution 3-dimensional images of the eye, providing the opportunity to incorporate MRI in ocular PT planning. In this study, we described how these measurements can be obtained using MRI, compared the MRI-based measurements with conventional ophthalmic measurements, and identified potential pitfalls for both modalities. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SUBJECTS: Data from 23 consecutive patients with UM treated with PT were retrospectively evaluated. METHODS: Magnetic resonance imaging-based measurements of axial length, tumor height and basal diameter, and marker-tumor distances were compared with the conventional ophthalmic measurements, and discrepancies were evaluated in a multidisciplinary setting. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Tumor prominence and basal diameters on MRI and ultrasound, axial length on MRI and biometry, tumor-marker distances on MRI and measured intraoperatively. RESULTS: The mean absolute differences of the tumor height and basal diameter measurements between ultrasound and MRI were 0.57 mm and 1.44 mm, respectively. Larger absolute differences in height and basal diameter were observed when the full tumor extent was not visible on ultrasound (0.92 mm and 1.67 mm, respectively) compared with when the full tumor extent was visible (0.44 mm and 1.15 mm, respectively). When the full tumor was not visible on ultrasound, MRI was considered more reliable. Tumor-marker distances measured using MRI and intraoperative techniques differed < 1 mm in 55% of the markers. For anteriorly located and mushroom-shaped tumors (25% of the markers), MRI provided more accurate measurements. In flat UM (15% of the markers), however, it was difficult to delineate the tumor on MRI. The mean absolute difference in axial length between optical biometry and MRI was 0.50 mm. The presence of the tumor was found to influence optical biometry in 15 of 22 patients; the remaining patients showed a better agreement (0.30 mm). Magnetic resonance imaging-based biometry was considered more reliable in patients with UM. CONCLUSIONS: Magnetic resonance imaging allowed for the 3-dimensional assessment of the tumor and surrounding tissue. In specific patients, it provided a more reliable measurement of axial length, tumor dimensions, and marker-tumor distances and could contribute to a more accurate treatment planning. Nevertheless, a combined evaluation remains advised, especially for flat UM.

Automatic Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance-based measurements of tumour prominence and basal diameter for treatment planning of uveal melanoma.

Background and Purpose: Three-dimensional (3D) Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is increasingly used to complement conventional two-dimensional ultrasound in the assessment of tumour dimension measurement of uveal melanoma. However, the lack of definitions of the 3D measurements of these tumour dimensions hinders further adaptation of MRI in ocular radiotherapy planning. In this study, we composed 3D MR-based definitions of tumour prominence and basal diameter and compared them to conventional ultrasound. Materials and methods: Tumours were delineated on 3DT2 and contrast-enhanced 3DT1 (T1gd) MRI for 25 patients. 3D definitions of tumour prominence and diameter were composed and evaluated automatically on the T1gd and T2 contours. Automatic T1gd measurements were compared to manual MRI measurements, to automatic T2 measurements and to manual ultrasound measurements. Results: Prominence measurements were similar for all modalities (median absolute difference 0.3 mm). Automatic T1gd diameter measurements were generally larger than manual MRI, automatic T2 and manual ultrasound measurements (median absolute differences of 0.5, 1.6 and 1.1 mm respectively), mainly due to difficulty defining the axis of the largest diameter. Largest differences between ultrasound and MRI for both prominence and diameter were found in anteriorly located tumours (up to 1.6 and 4.5 mm respectively), for which the tumour extent could not entirely be visualized with ultrasound. Conclusions: The proposed 3D definitions for tumour prominence and diameter agreed well with ultrasound measurements for tumours for which the extent was visible on ultrasound. 3D MRI measurements generally provided larger diameter measurements than ultrasound. In anteriorly located tumours, the MRI measurements were considered more accurate than conventional ultrasound.

Effect of anatomical differences and intraocular lens design on negative dysphotopsia.

PURPOSE: To assess the effect of ocular anatomy and intraocular lens (IOL) design on negative dysphotopsia (ND). SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands. DESIGN: Ray-tracing study based on clinical data. METHODS: Ray-tracing simulations were performed to assess the effect of anatomical differences and differences in IOL design on the peripheral retinal illumination. To that end, eye models that incorporate clinically measured anatomical differences between eyes of patients with ND and eyes of pseudophakic controls were created. The anatomical differences included pupil size, pupil centration, and iris tilt. The simulations were performed with different IOL designs, including a simple biconvex IOL design and a more complex clinical IOL design with a convex-concave anterior surface. Both IOL designs were analyzed using a clear edge and a frosted edge. As ND is generally considered to be caused by a discontinuity in peripheral retinal illumination, this illumination profile was determined for each eye model and the severity of the discontinuity was compared between eye models. RESULTS: The peripheral retinal illumination consistently showed a more severe discontinuity in illumination with ND-specific anatomy. This difference was the least pronounced, 8%, with the frosted edge clinical IOL and the most pronounced, 18%, with the clear edge biconvex IOL. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that small differences in the ocular anatomy or IOL design affect the peripheral retinal illumination. Therewith, they can increase the severity of ND by up to 18%.

Tumor-Infiltrating T Cells Can Be Expanded Successfully from Primary Uveal Melanoma after Separation from Their Tumor Environment.

Purpose: To evaluate whether expanded tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) can be obtained from primary uveal melanoma (UM) for potential use as adjuvant treatment in patients at risk of developing metastatic disease. Design: Experimental research study. Participants: Freshly obtained primary UM from 30 patients. Methods: Three different methods were used to expand TILs: (1) direct culture from small fragments of fresh tumor tissue, (2) single-cell tissue preparation by enzymatic digestion and subsequent enrichment of mononuclear cells, and (3) selection of CD3+ T cells using magnetic beads. Surface expression of costimulatory and inhibitory T-cell markers and T-cell reactivity against autologous tumor cells was assessed. Clinical, histopathologic, genetic, and immunologic characteristics of the tumors were compared with the capacity to expand TILs and with their reactivity against autologous tumor cells. Main Outcome Measures: The feasibility of expanding TILs from primary UM, testing their reactivity to autologous UM cells, and evaluating the impact of an immunomodulatory environment. Results: Direct culture of tumor parts led to successful TIL culture in 4 of 22 tumors (18%), enrichment of mononuclear cells gave rise to TILs in 5 of 12 tumors (42%), while preselection of CD3+ T cells with magnetic beads resulted in TIL expansion in 17 of 25 tumors (68%). In 8 of 17 tumors (47%), the TIL cultures comprised UM-reactive T cells. The presence of UM-reactive T cells among TILs was not related to clinical, histologic, genetic, or immunological tumor characteristics. Interestingly, RNA-Seq analysis showed that approximately half of the UM tumors displayed an increased expression of immunomodulatory molecules related to T-cell suppression, such as galectin 3, programmed death-ligand 1, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4, indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1, and lymphocyte activating 3, potentially explaining why T cells require optimal removal of tumor components for expansion. Conclusions: The need to separate TILs from their tumor microenvironment for their successful expansion and the presence of UM-reactive T cells among TILs suggests that these UM-reactive T cells are strongly suppressed in vivo and that UM is immunogenic. These findings indicate that adoptive TIL therapy could be an option as an adjuvant treatment in primary UM patients at high risk of developing metastatic disease.

The Value of Static Perimetry in the Diagnosis and Follow-up of Negative Dysphotopsia.

SIGNIFICANCE: There is a clinical need for a quantitative test to objectively diagnose negative dysphotopsia, especially because the diagnosis is generally assessed using patients' subjective descriptions. In the search of a clinical test to objectify the shadow experienced in negative dysphotopsia, this study excludes static perimetry as suitable evaluation method. PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the value of static perimetry in the objective assessment and follow-up of negative dysphotopsia. METHODS: Peripheral 60-4 full-threshold visual field tests were performed in 27 patients with negative dysphotopsia and 33 pseudophakic controls. In addition, 11 patients with negative dysphotopsia repeated the test after an intraocular lens exchange. Both the total peripheral visual field and the averaged peripheral visual field from 50 to 60° eccentricity were compared between patients and controls, and pre-operatively and post-operatively in patients who had an intraocular lens exchange. RESULTS: The peripheral visual fields from 30 to 60° did not show significant differences between patients with negative dysphotopsia and pseudophakic controls. Analysis of the peripheral visual field from 50 to 60° showed a median [Q1, Q3] of 20.0 [17.1, 22.5] dB in the negative dysphotopsia group compared with 20.1 [15.5, 21.3] dB in the control group (P = .43). Although 82% of patients treated with an intraocular lens exchange subjectively reported improvement of their negative dysphotopsia complaints post-operatively, there were no significant differences in their total peripheral visual field or averaged peripheral visual field from 50 to 60° (P = .92). CONCLUSIONS: Full-threshold static perimetry with a Goldmann size III stimulus up to 60° eccentricity does not show significant differences between patients with negative dysphotopsia and pseudophakic controls or between measurements before and after intraocular lens exchange. Therefore, this type of static perimetry cannot be used as a quantitative objective test for diagnosis or follow-up of patients with negative dysphotopsia.

Patients presenting with metastases: stage IV uveal melanoma, an international study.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse ocular and systemic findings of patients presenting with systemic metastasis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: It is an international, multicentre, internet-enabled, registry-based retrospective data analysis. Patients were diagnosed between 2001 and 2011. Data included: primary tumour dimensions, extrascleral extension, ciliary body involvement, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC)-tumour, node, metastasis staging, characteristics of metastases. RESULTS: Of 3610 patients with uveal melanoma, 69 (1.9%; 95% CI 1.5 to 2.4) presented with clinical metastasis (stage IV). These melanomas originated in the iris, ciliary body and choroid in 4%, 16% and 80% of eyes, respectively. Using eighth edition AJCC, 8 (11%), 20 (29%), 24 (35%), and 17 (25%) belonged to AJCC T-categories T1-T4. Risk of synchronous metastases increased from 0.7% (T1) to 1.5% (T2), 2.6% (T3) and 7.9% (T4). Regional lymph node metastases (N1a) were detected in 9 (13%) patients of whom 6 (67%) had extrascleral extension. Stage of systemic metastases (known for 40 (59%) stage IV patients) revealed 14 (35%), 25 (63%) and 1 (2%) had small (M1a), medium-sized (M1b) and large-sized (M1c) metastases, respectively. Location of metastases in stage IV patients were liver (91%), lung (16%), bone (9%), brain (6%), subcutaneous tissue (4%) and others (5%). Multiple sites of metastases were noted in 24%. Compared with the 98.1% of patients who did not present with metastases, those with synchronous metastases had larger intraocular tumours, more frequent extrascleral extension, ciliary body involvement and thus a higher AJCC T-category. CONCLUSIONS: Though higher AJCC T-stage was associated with risk for metastases at diagnosis, even small T1 tumours were stage IV at initial presentation. The liver was the most common site of metastases; however, frequent multiorgan involvement supports initial whole-body staging.

A Comparison of 3 T and 7 T MRI for the Clinical Evaluation of Uveal Melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly being used in the diagnosis and treatment planning of uveal melanoma (UM), the most common primary intraocular tumor. Initially, 7 T MRI was primarily used, but more recently these techniques have been translated to 3 T, as it is more commonly available. PURPOSE: Compare the diagnostic performance of 3 T and 7 T MRI of UM. STUDY TYPE: Prospective. POPULATION: Twenty-seven UM patients (19% female). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3 T: T1- and T2-weighted three-dimensional (3D) spin echo (SE) and multi-slice (MS) SE, 7 T: T1-weighted 3D gradient echo (GE), T2-weighted 3D SE and MS SE, 3 T and 7 T GE dynamic contrast-enhanced. T1 weighted images: acquired before and after Gadolinium (Gd) administration. ASSESSMENT: For all sequences, scan and diagnostic quality was quantified using a 5-point Likert scale. Signal intensities on T1 and T2 relative to choroid and eye muscle respectively were assessed as well as the tumor prominence. Finally, the perfusion time-intensity curves (TICs) were classified as plateau, progressive, or wash-out. STATISTICAL TESTS: Image quality scores were compared between both field strengths using Wilcoxon signed-rank and McNemar tests. Paired t-tests and Bland-Altman were used for comparing tumor prominences. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Image quality was comparable between 3 T and 7 T, for 3DT1, 3DT2, 3DT1Gd (P = 0.86; P = 0.34; P = 0.78, respectively) and measuring tumor dimensions (P = 0.40). 2DT1 and 2DT2 image quality were rated better on 3 T compared to 7 T. Most UM had the same relative signal intensities at 3 T and 7 T on T1 (17/21) and T2 (13/17), and 16/18 diagnostic TICs received the same classification. Tumor prominence measurements were similar between field strengths (95% confidence interval: -0.37 mm to 0.03 mm, P = 0.097). DATA CONCLUSION: Diagnostic performance of the evaluated 3 T protocol proved to be as capable as 7 T, with the addition of 3 T being superior in assessing tumor growth into nearby anatomical structures compared to 7 T. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 3.

Two-year results after combined phacoemulsification and iris-fixated phakic intraocular lens removal.

PURPOSE: To describe and present results after a technique for cataract surgery combined with explantation of an iris-fixated phakic intraocular lens (IF-pIOL). METHODS: The medical records of all patients, who had undergone cataract surgery combined with IF-pIOL explantation and subsequent implantation of a posterior chamber IOL by the Single Incision Technique (SIT), were reviewed. Data collection included preoperative and postoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), manifest refraction, and endothelial cell density (ECD) up to a follow-up time of 24 months. RESULTS: Fifty myopic eyes (34 patients) and 9 hyperopic eyes (6 patients) had undergone a SIT procedure mainly because of cataract (67%). Postoperative CDVA improved in both the myopic eyes to 0.16 ± 0.37 logMAR, as in the hyperopic eyes to - 0.10 ± 0.55 logMAR with no eyes having loss of Snellen lines. Mean postoperative spherical equivalent was - 0.34 ± 0.72 D and - 0.10 ± 0.55 D, respectively. ECD loss 6 months after surgery was 5% and remained stable thereafter. CONCLUSION: SIT for combined phacoemulsification and IF-pIOL removal yields good visual and refractive results and is a safe procedure in regard to ECD loss. The technique has advantages over the conventional procedure and is easy to perform.

Eye-specific quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI analysis for patients with intraocular masses.

OBJECTIVE: Dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE)-MRI is currently not generally used for intraocular masses as lesions are small, have an inhomogeneous T1 and the eye is prone to motion. The aim of this paper is to address these eye-specific challenges, enabling accurate ocular DCE-MRI. MATERIALS & METHODS: DCE-MRI of 19 uveal melanoma (UM) patients was acquired using a fat-suppressed 3D spoiled gradient echo sequence with TWIST (time-resolved angiography with stochastic trajectories sequence). The analysis consisted of a two-step registration method to correct for both head and eye motion. A T1 map was calculated to convert signal intensities to concentrations. Subsequently, the Tofts model was fitted voxel wise to obtain Ktrans and ve. RESULTS: Registration significantly improved the concentration curve quality (p < 0.001). The T1 of melanotic lesions was significantly lower than amelanotic lesions (888 ms vs 1350 ms, p = 0.03). The average achieved B1+ in the lesions was 91%. The average Ktrans was 0.46 min-1 (range 0.13-1.0) and the average ve was 0.22 (range 0.10-0.51). CONCLUSION: Using this eye-specific analysis, DCE of intraocular masses is possible which might aid in the diagnosis, prognosis and follow-up of UM.

MR imaging characteristics of uveal melanoma with histopathological validation.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics of uveal melanoma (UM), to compare them with fundoscopy and ultrasound (US), and to validate them with histopathology. METHODS: MR images from 42 UM were compared with US and fundoscopy, and on 14 enucleated cases with histopathology. RESULTS: A significant relationship between the signal intensity on T1 and pigmentation on histopathology was found (p=0.024). T1 hyperintense UM were always moderately or strongly pigmented on histopathology, while T1-hypointense UM were either pigmented or non-pigmented. Mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of the UM was 1.16 ± 0.26 × 10-3 mm2/s. Two-thirds of the UM had a wash-out and the remaining a plateau perfusion time-intensity curve (TIC). MRI was limited in evaluating the basal diameter of flat tumors. US tends to show larger tumor prominence (0.5mm larger, p=0.008) and largest basal diameter (1.4mm larger, p<0.001). MRI was good in diagnosing ciliary body involvement, extrascleral extension, and optic nerve invasion, but limited on identifying scleral invasion. An increase of tumor prominence was associated with lower ADC values (p=0.030) and favored a wash-out TIC (p=0.028). An increase of tumor ADC correlated with a plateau TIC (p=0.011). CONCLUSIONS: The anatomical and functional MRI characteristics of UM were comprehensively assessed. Knowing the MRI characteristics of UM is important in order to confirm the diagnosis and to differentiate UM from other intra-ocular lesions and because it has implications for treatment planning. MRI is a good technique to evaluate UM, being only limited in case of flat tumors or on identifying scleral invasion.

Chromosome 3 and 8q Aberrations in Uveal Melanoma Show Greater Impact on Survival in Patients with Light Iris versus Dark Iris Color.

PURPOSE: Individuals with gray, blue, or green eyes have a higher chance of developing uveal melanoma (UM) than those with brown eyes. We wondered whether iris pigmentation might be related not only to predisposition to UM but also to its behavior; therefore, we compared the clinical, histopathologic, and genetic characteristics of UM between eyes with different colors. DESIGN: We determined iris color in a large cohort of patients enucleated for UM. Clinical and histopathologic tumor characteristics, chromosome status, and survival were compared among 3 groups on the basis of iris color. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 412 patients with choroidal/ciliary body UM, who had undergone primary enucleation at the Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands, between 1993 and 2019, were divided into 3 groups based on iris color: gray/blue, green/hazel, and brown. The validation cohort included 934 patients with choroidal/ciliary body UM treated at Wills Eye Hospital (WEH). METHODS: Comparison of clinical, histopathologic, and genetic characteristics of UM in patients with different iris colors. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Melanoma-related survival in UM patients, divided over 3 iris color groups, in relation to the tumor's chromosome 3 and 8q status. RESULTS: Moderate and heavy tumor pigmentations were especially seen in eyes with a brown iris (P < 0.001). Survival did not differ between patients with different iris colors (P = 0.27); however, in patients with a light iris, copy number changes in chromosome 3 and 8q had a greater influence on survival than in patients with a dark iris. Likewise, chromosome 3 and chromosome 8q status affected survival more among patients with lightly pigmented tumors than in patients with heavily pigmented tumors. The WEH cohort similarly showed a greater influence of chromosome aberrations in light-eyed individuals. CONCLUSIONS: Although iris color by itself did not relate to UM-related survival, chromosome 3 and 8q aberrations had a larger influence on survival in patients with a light iris than those with a brown iris. This suggests a synergistic effect of iris pigmentation and chromosome status in the regulation of oncogenic behavior of UM. Iris color should be taken into consideration when calculating a patient's risk for developing metastases.