Prevalence and risk factors of gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms among adolescents, the HUNT study.

BACKGROUND: Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is recognized by symptoms of heartburn and acid regurgitation. These gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms (GORS) are common in adults, but data from adolescents are sparse. This study aimed to assess the prevalence and risk factors of GORS among adolescents in a large and unselected population. METHODS: This study was based on the Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT), a longitudinal series of population-based health surveys conducted in Nord-Trøndelag County, Norway. This study included data from Young-HUNT4 performed in 2017-2019, where all inhabitants aged 13-19 years were invited and 8066 (76.0%) participated. The presence of GORS (any or frequent) during the past 12 months and tobacco smoking status were reported through self-administrated questionnaires, whereas body mass index (BMI) was objectively measured. RESULTS: Among 7620 participating adolescents reporting on the presence of GORS, the prevalence of any GORS and frequent GORS was 33.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 32.2 - 34.3%) and 3.6% (95% CI 3.2 - 4.0%), respectively. The risk of frequent GORS was lower among boys compared to girls (OR 0.61; 95% CI 0.46 - 0.79), higher in current smokers compared to never smokers (OR 1.80; 95% CI 1.10 - 2.93) and higher among obese compared to underweight/normal weight adolescents (OR 2.50; 95% CI 1.70 - 3.66). CONCLUSION: A considerable proportion of adolescents had GORS in this population-based study, particularly girls, tobacco smokers, and individuals with obesity, but frequent GORS was relatively uncommon. Measures to avoid tobacco smoking and obesity in adolescents may prevent GORS.

The effect of non-pooled multi-donor faecal microbiota transplantation for inducing clinical remission in patients with chronic pouchitis: Results from a multicentre randomised double-blinded placebo-controlled trial (MicroPouch).

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: To investigate if treatment with non-pooled multi-donor faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) for four weeks was superior to placebo to induce clinical remission in patients with chronic pouchitis. METHODS: The study was a randomised double-blinded placebo-controlled study with a 4-week intervention period and 12-month follow-up. Eligible patients with chronic pouchitis were recruited from five Danish hospitals. Participants were randomised to non-pooled multi-donor FMT derived from four faecal donors, or placebo. Treatment was delivered daily by enema for two weeks followed by every second day for two weeks. Disease severity was accessed at inclusion and 30-day follow-up, using the Pouchitis Disease Activity Index (PDAI); PDAI <7 was considered equivalent to clinical remission. Faecal samples from participants and donors were analysed by shotgun metagenomic sequencing. RESULTS: Inclusion was stopped after inclusion of 30 participants who were randomised 1:1 for treatment with FMT or placebo. There was no difference in participants achieving clinical remission between the two groups at 30-day follow-up, relative risk 1.0 (95%CI(0.55;1.81)). Treatment with FMT resulted in a clinically relevant increase in adverse events compared to placebo, incidence rate ratio 1.67 (95%CI(1.10;2.52)); no serious adverse events within either group. Faecal microbiota transplantation statistically significantly increased the similarity of participant faecal microbiome to the faecal donor microbiome at 30-days follow-up (p=0.01), which was not seen after placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Non-pooled multi-donor FMT was comparable to placebo in inducing clinical remission in patients with chronic pouchitis but showed a clinically relevant increase in adverse events compared to placebo.

A model to predict the risk of aspirin/non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs-related upper gastrointestinal bleeding for the individual patient.

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding is a feared complication of using non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or aspirin. Studies predicting the incidence rate for individuals with a given set of characteristics are lacking. The aim of this study was to develop a risk model to predict the incidence rate of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) in users of aspirin/NSAID based on presence of well-defined risk factors for the individual patient. METHODS: The model was developed from data from a case-control study, sampled from a well-defined source population, residents of the Funen County 1995-2006. All cases and controls were characterized in terms of factors known to affect the risk of UGIB. By using census data, we rescaled the control group, so their composition accurately reflected age and sex distribution of the source population. Only persons using NSAIDs or/and aspirin and no PPI were included in the analysis. As reference group, we chose 80- to 89-year-old women with no ulcer history, using NSAID, but neither aspirin, other platelet inhibitors, vitamin K antagonists, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors nor corticosteroids. RESULTS: We identified 1388 cases among non-users of PPIs. We found a modelled baseline incidence rate of 10.7 per 1000 person-years for the reference group. The strongest associations were found for ADP inhibitors (OR 5.80), followed by anticoagulants treatment (OR 2.62) and prior ulcer (OR 2.68). The model performed well in terms of calibration and discriminatory power. CONCLUSION: This study is the first to describe a model, which estimates the incidence rate of UGIB for patients using aspirin/NSAID, based on the specific combination of risk factors. Risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding for a given patient can be accurately estimated using this model.

Risk factors on the development of new-onset gastroesophageal reflux symptoms. A population-based prospective cohort study: the HUNT study.

OBJECTIVES: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a highly prevalent disorder. This study assessed the risk factors of new-onset gastroesophageal reflux symptoms (GERS). METHODS: The study was based on the HUNT study, a prospective population-based cohort study conducted in 1995-1997 and 2006-2009 in Nord-Trøndelag County, Norway. All inhabitants from 20 years of age were invited. Risk factors of new-onset heartburn or acid regurgitation were examined using logistic regression, providing odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: A total of 29,610 individuals were included (61% response rate). Participants reporting no GERS at baseline and severe GERS at follow-up (new-onset GERS; n=510) were compared with participants reporting no complaints at both times (n=14,406). Increasing age (OR 1.01 per year, 95% CI 1.00-1.02) was positively associated, whereas male sex (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.66-0.98) and higher education (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.56-0.86) were negatively associated with new-onset GERS. Gain in body mass index (BMI) was dose-dependently associated with new-onset GERS (OR 1.30 per unit increase in BMI, 95% CI 1.25-1.35), irrespective of baseline BMI. Previous and current tobacco smoking were associated with new-onset GERS (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.07-1.76 and OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.00-1.67, respectively). Tobacco smoking cessation was associated with new-onset GERS among those with gain in BMI upon quitting (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.31-3.16, with >3.5 BMI units increase). CONCLUSIONS: New-onset GERS were associated with increasing age, female sex, lower education, gain in BMI, and ever tobacco smoking. Tobacco smoking cessation was associated with new-onset GERS among those who gained weight upon quitting.

Helicobacter pylori and risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding among users of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: A number of studies have reported a possible association between use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serious upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGB). We conducted this case-control study to assess if Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) potentiates the risk of serious UGB in SSRI users. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A population-based case-control study was conducted in the county of Funen, Denmark. Cases were 53 SSRI users with serious UGB whose H. pylori status on their bleeding date could be established. Controls (n = 723) were selected among subjects who participated in a population H. pylori screening study, and who were users of SSRIs. Data on drug exposure and medical history were retrieved from a prescription database and the county's patient register. Confounders were controlled for by unconditional logistic regression. RESULTS: H. pylori infection increased the risk of serious UGB in patients using SSRI with an adjusted odds ratio (OR) of 2.73 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.17-6.36). The adjusted OR for serious UGB among users of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) were 3.91 (95% CI, 2.03-7.52) and 3.00 (95% CI, 0.94-9.54), respectively. CONCLUSION: H. pylori infection increases the risk of SSRI-related serious UGB.

Rates of dyspepsia one year after Helicobacter pylori screening and eradication in a Danish population.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Helicobacter pylori (Hp) is strongly correlated with peptic ulcer and is a risk factor for gastric cancer. The aim of this study was to assess whether screening and eradication of Hp in a general population would reduce the prevalence of dyspepsia and the incidence of peptic ulcer and thus save health care resources and improve quality of life. METHODS: Twenty thousand individuals aged 40 to 65 years were randomized to screening and eradication for Hp or to the control group. Hp status was assessed by a whole blood Hp test, a positive result confirmed by a (13)C-urea breath test. Hp-positive individuals were offered Hp eradication therapy. The prevalence of dyspepsia and the quality of life were assessed through a mailed questionnaire. Information on the use of endoscopies and the use of prescription medication was obtained from registers. RESULTS: The response rate was 62.6%. The prevalence of Hp was 17.5%. The Hp eradication rate was 95%. In the intervention group, the prevalence of dyspepsia decreased from 24.3% at inclusion to 20.5% at 1-year follow-up. The reduction was similar in Hp-negative and Hp-positive persons. In the control group, dyspepsia increased from 20.3% to 21.5%. Gastroesophageal reflux symptoms improved slightly in Hp-eradicated participants. Except for a decreased consultation rate for dyspepsia, there were no visible savings in health care. CONCLUSIONS: Dyspepsia was modestly reduced after the screening and treatment procedure, and the result was not sufficiently extensive to have an effect on the use of health care or to improve quality of life.