Epidemiological and clinical outcome comparison of indirect ('strain') versus direct ('contusion') anterior and posterior thigh muscle injuries in male elite football players: UEFA Elite League study of 2287 thigh injuries (2001-2013).

BACKGROUND: Data regarding direct athletic muscle injuries (caused by a direct blunt or sharp external force) compared to indirect ones (without the influence of a direct external trauma) are missing in the current literature--this distinction has clinical implications. AIM: To compare incidence, duration of absence and characteristics of indirect and direct anterior (quadriceps) and posterior thigh (hamstring) muscle injuries. METHODS: 30 football teams and 1981 players were followed prospectively from 2001 until 2013. The team medical staff recorded individual player exposure and time-loss injuries. Muscle injuries were defined as indirect or direct according to their injury mechanism. RESULTS: In total, 2287 thigh muscle injuries were found, representing 25% of all injuries. Two thousand and three were valid for further analysis, of which 88% were indirect and 12% direct. The incidence was eight times higher for indirect injuries (1.48/1000 h) compared to direct muscle injuries (0.19/1000 h) (p<0.01). Indirect muscle injuries caused 19% of total absence, and direct injuries 1%. The mean lay-off time for indirect injuries amounted to 18.5 days and differed significantly from direct injuries which accounted for 7 days (p<0.001). 60% of indirect injuries and 76% of direct injuries occurred in match situations. Foul play was involved in 7% of all thigh muscle injuries, as well as in 2% of indirect injuries and 42% of direct injuries. SUMMARY: Muscle anterior and posterior thigh injuries in elite football are more frequent than have been previously described. Direct injuries causing time loss are less frequent than indirect ones, and players can usually return to full activity in under half the average time for an indirect injury. Foul play is involved in 7.5% of all thigh muscle injuries.

Suture anchor repair of proximal rectus femoris avulsions in elite football players.

PURPOSE: To report the results of suture anchor repair of proximal rectus femoris avulsions in elite football players. METHODS: Four professional football players (first-team regulars of European first division football clubs) underwent suture anchor repair of complete proximal rectus femoris avulsions with significant tendon retraction. The following parameters were analysed: demographic data, mechanism of injury, type of injury, classification according to the Munich consensus statement, time between injury and surgery, time between surgery and full participation in training and availability for match and/or competition selection (return to play/RTP), and time between surgery and the comeback to the first official league match (return to competition/RTC). Radiographic evaluation was performed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) obtained pre-operatively and at 6 and 12 weeks post-operatively. All players were followed for at least 24 months after return to play to exclude recurrence. RESULTS: Mean age at surgery was 30 ± 2 years. All injuries occurred while kicking a ball, with the dominant leg affected in all patients. The injury was considered acute in three cases and chronic in one case. According to the Munich classification, all injures were type 4. Mean time to surgery was 60 ± 88 days (range, 8-191), mean time to RTP was 111 ± 15 days (range, 100-134), and mean time to RTC was 140 ± 23 days (range, 114-166). Follow-up MRIs demonstrated anatomically reinserted tendons with decreasing signal intensity over time in all cases. After a mean follow-up of 35 ± 6 months, all players were still competing at the same level as before the injury without re-injury. CONCLUSION: Suture anchor repair of proximal rectus femoris avulsions allows unrestricted return to play in professional elite football players. Return to play can be expected at approximately 16 weeks post-operatively.