Multiarterial vs Single-Arterial Coronary Surgery: 10-Year Follow-up of 1 Million Patients.

BACKGROUND: Although many options exist for multivessel coronary revascularization, controversy persists over whether multiarterial grafting (MAG) confers a survival advantage over single-arterial grafting (SAG) with saphenous vein in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). This study sought to compare longitudinal survival between patients undergoing MAG and those undergoing SAG. METHODS: All patients undergoing isolated CABG with ≥2 bypass grafts in The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database (2008-2019) were linked to the National Death Index. Risk adjustment was performed using inverse probability weighting and multivariable modeling. The primary end point was longitudinal survival. Subpopulation analyses were performed and volume thresholds were analyzed to determine optimal benefit. RESULTS: A total of 1,021,632 patients underwent isolated CABG at 1108 programs (100,419 MAG [9.83%]; 920,943 SAG [90.17%]). Median follow-up was 5.30 years (range, 0-12 years). After risk adjustment, all characteristics were well balanced. At 10 years, MAG was associated with improved unadjusted (hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% CI 0.58-0.61) and adjusted (hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.85-0.88) 10-year survival. Center volume of ≥10 MAG cases/year was associated with benefit. MAG was associated with an overall survival advantage over SAG in all subgroups, including stable coronary disease, acute coronary syndrome, and acute infarction. Survival was equivalent to that with SAG for patients age ≥80 years and those with severe heart failure, renal failure, peripheral vascular disease, or obesity. Only patients with a body mass index ≥40 kg/m2 had superior survival with SAG. CONCLUSIONS: Multiarterial CABG is associated with superior long-term survival and should be the surgical multivessel revascularization strategy of choice for patients with a body mass index of less than 40 kg/m2.

Survival After Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients: A Contemporary Trial Benchmark.

BACKGROUND: The use of transcatheter aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis in low-risk patients necessitates an evaluation of contemporary long-term, real-world outcomes of similar patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in a national cohort. METHODS: All patients undergoing primary, isolated SAVR in The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) database between 2011 and 2019 were examined. The study population of 42,586 adhered to the inclusion/exclusion criteria of the Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves (PARTNER) 3 and Evolut Low Risk randomized trials. Patients were further stratified by STS predicted risk of mortality (PROM), age, and left ventricular ejection fraction. The primary end-point was all-cause National Death Index mortality. Unadjusted survival to 8 years was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Mean age was 74.3 ± 5.7 years and mean STS PROM was 1.9% ± 0.8%. The overall Kaplan-Meier time to event analysis for all-cause mortality at 1, 3, 5, and 8 years was 2.6%, 4.5%, 7.1%, and 12.4%, respectively. In subset analyses, survival was significantly better for (1) lower STS PROM (P < .001), (2) younger vs older age (P < .001), and (3) higher vs lower left ventricular ejection fraction (P < .001). When STS PROM was below 1% or the patient age was below age 75 years, the 8-year survival after SAVR was 95%. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this national study confirm that long-term survival after SAVR remains excellent, at 92.9% at 5 years. These contemporary longitudinal data serve to aid in the balanced interpretation of current and future trials comparing SAVR and transcatheter aortic valve replacement and may assist in the clinical decision-making process for patients of lower surgical risk.

Post-Myocardial Infarction Free-Wall Rupture: Rapid Diagnosis and Management.

We present a case of post-myocardial infarction free-wall rupture in a critically ill patient presenting to the emergency department. Through our case we highlight the prompt evaluation, diagnosis, and management necessary to improve survival in a patient with this life-threatening condition. (Level of Difficulty: Beginner.).

2022 ACC/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and management of aortic disease: A report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.

AIM: The "2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the diagnosis, genetic evaluation and family screening, medical therapy, endovascular and surgical treatment, and long-term surveillance of patients with aortic disease across its multiple clinical presentation subsets (ie, asymptomatic, stable symptomatic, and acute aortic syndromes). METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted from January 2021 to April 2021, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINHL Complete, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through June 2022 during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee, where appropriate. STRUCTURE: Recommendations from previously published AHA/ACC guidelines on thoracic aortic disease, peripheral artery disease, and bicuspid aortic valve disease have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing comprehensive care for patients with aortic disease have been developed. There is added emphasis on the role of shared decision making, especially in the management of patients with aortic disease both before and during pregnancy. The is also an increased emphasis on the importance of institutional interventional volume and multidisciplinary aortic team expertise in the care of patients with aortic disease.

Pulmonary Artery Dual-Lumen Cannulation Versus Two Cannula Percutaneous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Configuration in Right Ventricular Failure.

Refractory right ventricular failure has significant morbidity and mortality. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is indicated when medical interventions are deemed ineffective. However, it is still being determined if one configuration is better. We conducted a retrospective analysis of our institutional experience comparing the peripheral veno-pulmonary artery (V-PA) configuration versus the dual-lumen cannula with the tip in the pulmonary artery (C-PA). The analysis of a cohort of 24 patients (12 patients in each group). There was no difference in survival after hospital discharge (58.3% in the C-PA group compared to 41.7% in the V-PA group, p = 0.4). Among the C-PA group, there was a statistically significant shorter ICU length of stay (23.5 days [interquartile range {IQR} = 19-38.5] vs. 43 days [IQR = 30-50], p = 0.043) and duration of mechanical ventilation (7.5 days [IQR = 4.5-9.5] compared to (16.5 days [IQR = 9.5-22.5], p = 0.006) in the V-PA group. In the C-PA group, there were lower incidents of bleeding (33.33% vs. 83.33%, p =0.036) and combined ischemic events (0 vs. 41.67%, p = 0.037). In our single-center experience, the C-PA configuration might have a better outcome than the V-PA one. Further studies are needed to confirm our findings.

Surgical Management and Mechanical Circulatory Support in High-Risk Pulmonary Embolisms: Historical Context, Current Status, and Future Directions: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Acute pulmonary embolism is the third leading cause of cardiovascular death, with most pulmonary embolism-related mortality associated with acute right ventricular failure. Although there has recently been increased clinical attention to acute pulmonary embolism with the adoption of multidisciplinary pulmonary embolism response teams, mortality of patients with pulmonary embolism who present with hemodynamic compromise remains high when current guideline-directed therapy is followed. Because historical data and practice patterns affect current consensus treatment recommendations, surgical embolectomy has largely been relegated to patients who have contraindications to other treatments or when other treatment modalities fail. Despite a selection bias toward patients with greater illness, a growing body of literature describes the safety and efficacy of the surgical management of acute pulmonary embolism, especially in the hemodynamically compromised population. The purpose of this document is to describe modern techniques, strategies, and outcomes of surgical embolectomy and venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and to suggest strategies to better understand the role of surgery in the management of pulmonary embolisms.

Primary cardiac sarcomas: Treatment strategies.

OBJECTIVE: Our multidisciplinary cardiac tumor team now has an experience of operating on 122 cases of primary cardiac sarcoma over a 23-year period. The purpose of this study is to present our short- and long-term outcomes for cardiac sarcoma. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of a prospectively collected Institutional Review Board-approved cardiac tumor database for cardiac sarcoma. Patient characteristics, surgical factors, and patient outcomes were analyzed. Perioperative data were collected from direct patient communication and all available medical records. The primary end point was all-cause mortality at 1, 3, and 5 years from the time of our surgery and 1, 3, and 5 years from the initial diagnosis. The secondary end point was all-cause mortality between the first and second halves of the study. RESULTS: From October 1998 to April 2021, we operated on 122 patients with a primary cardiac sarcoma. The mean age was 45.3 years old, and 52.5% were male. Tumors were most frequently found in the left atrium (40.2%) and right atrium (32.0%). The most common type of tumor histologically was an angiosarcoma (38.5%), followed by high-grade sarcoma (14.8%). Survival from initial diagnosis at 1, 3, and 5 years was 88.4%, 43.15%, and 27.8%, respectively. Survival from surgery at our institution at 1 and 3 years was 57.1% and 24.5%, respectively. When comparing outcomes from different time periods, we found no significant difference in survival between the previous era (1998-2011) and the current era (2011-2021). CONCLUSIONS: Management of these complex patients can show reasonable outcomes in centers with a multidisciplinary cardiac tumor team. Mortality has not improved with time and is likely related to the systemic nature of this disease.

Surgical Management of Primary Pulmonary Artery Sarcoma.

Primary pulmonary artery sarcoma is a rare cardiac tumor with a dismal prognosis without surgical therapy. It is often confused with the more common chronic pulmonary emboli which may delay the appropriate diagnosis or lead to suboptimal surgery. The objective of this study was to evaluate the short and long-term survival and local recurrence rate of pulmonary artery sarcoma cases operated on at our institution using an anatomic resection approach for the pulmonary trunk and main pulmonary arteries rather than endarterectomy. We searched our prospectively collected cardiac tumor database for cases of primary pulmonary sarcoma operated at our institution between June 2000 and September 2018 and followed until January 3, 2021. We used an anatomic resection and replacement technique for involved pulmonary root and main pulmonary arteries with endarterectomy used only for disease distal to the first arterial branch when lung preservation was possible. The primary endpoints for our study were survival from the time of initial diagnosis and survival from the time of our surgery. Secondary endpoints were operative 30-day mortality and incidence of local recurrence or metastatic disease. We identified 20 consecutive cases of surgical resection of primary pulmonary sarcoma. The median age at surgery was 52.5 years (IQR 43.5-60.5). Complete pulmonary root resection and reconstruction using a pulmonary homograft were needed in 16/20 (80%) of cases. All resections employed cardiopulmonary bypass with cardioplegic arrest. A pneumonectomy was needed in 7/20 (35%) of patients. A negative margin (R0) resection was achieved in 9 patients (45%) and margins were microscopically positive (R1) on final pathology in 9 patients (45%). Two patients (10%) had gross tumor (R2) at the resection margin. Operative mortality was 2/20 (10%). Median survival was 2.8 years from diagnosis (95% CI 1.3-8.8) and 2.7 years from surgery by our team (95% CI 0.8-5.9). Survival from first initial diagnosis at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years was 85.0%, 49.1%, 49.1%, and 16.4%. Survival from our surgery by our team at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years was 70%, 48.8%, 41.8%, and 8.4%. Surgical resection of primary pulmonary artery sarcoma with an approach utilizing an anatomic resection of the pulmonary root and main pulmonary arteries when involved and pneumonectomy or endarterectomy when there is disease distal to the first branch artery can be done with a reasonable operative risk and long-term survival when compared to the natural history of the disease.

Atypical Presentation of Right Ventricular Cardiac Hamartoma in a Young Man.

Cardiac tumors in adults are exceedingly rare and usually benign. We describe a 29-year-old man with a previous diagnosis of interventricular septal hypertrophy who presented with increasing severity of dyspnea and fatigue. Work-up revealed a 4.9 × 3.7 cm mass at the base of the interventricular septum. Biopsy revealed a benign cardiac hamartoma atypically located in the right ventricle, and the mass was resected via right ventriculotomy.

PFO Closure after Pulmonary Valve Intervention in Patients with Hypoxemia Due to Right-to-Left Intracardiac Shunt.

Four patients with pulmonary valve (PV) disease and patent foramen ovale (PFO) presented with dyspnea on exertion. Work-up revealed hypoxemia secondary to right-to-left intracardiac shunt. We demonstrate that correction of the primary culprit right heart overload lesion via PV replacement enabled safe PFO repair and resolution of hypoxemia.

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for COVID-19: Collaborative Experience From the Texas Medical Center in Houston With 2 Years Follow-Up.

Patients with severe refractory hypoxemic respiratory failure may benefit from extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for salvage therapy. The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic offered three high-volume independent ECMO programs at a large medical center the chance to collaborate to optimize ECMO care at the beginning of the pandemic in Spring 2020. Between March 15, 2020, and May 30, 2020, 3,615 inpatients with COVID-19 were treated at the Texas Medical Center. During this time, 35 COVID-19 patients were cannulated for ECMO, all but one in a veno-venous configuration. At hospital discharge, 23 (66%) of the 35 patients were alive. Twelve patients died of vasodilatory shock (n = 9), intracranial hemorrhage (n = 2), and cannulation-related bleeding and multiorgan dysfunction (n = 1). The average duration of ECMO was 13.6 days in survivors and 25.0 days in nonsurvivors ( p < 0.04). At 1 year follow-up, all 23 discharged patients were still alive, making the 1 year survival rate 66% (23/35). At 2 years follow-up, the overall rate of survival was 63% (22/35). Of those patients who survived 2 years, all were at home and alive and well at follow-up.

Evaluation of a Novel System for RFID Intraoperative Cardiovascular Analytics.

Objective: To evaluate a novel technology for real time tracking of RF-Identified (RFID) surgical tools (Biotic System), providing intraoperative data analytics during simulated cardiovascular procedures. Ineffective asset management in the Operating Room (OR) leads to inefficient utilization of resources and contributes to prolonged operative times and increased costs. Analysis of captured data can assist in quantifying instrument utilization, procedure flow, performance and prevention of retained instruments. Methods & Results: Five surgeons performed thirteen simulated surgical cases on three human cadavers. Procedures included (i) two abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repairs, (ii) three carotid endarterectomies (CE), (iii) two femoropopliteal (fem-pop) bypasses, (iv) thoracic aortic aneurysm repair, (v) coronary artery bypass graft, (vi) aortic valve replacement, (vii) ascending aortic aneurysm repair, (viii) heart transplants, and (ix) mitral valve replacement. For each case an average of 139 surgical instruments were RFID-tagged and tracked intraoperatively. Data was captured and analyzed retrospectively. Of the 139 instruments tracked across each of the 13 cases, 55 instruments (39.5%) were actually used, demonstrating a high level of redundancy. For repeat cases (i.e. CE/AAA/fem-pop): (i) average instrument usage was 41 ± 3.6 (8.8% variation) for CE (n=3); (ii) average instrument usage was 69 ± 4.0 (5.8% variation) for AAA (n=2); and (iii) average instrument usage was 48 ± 2.5 (5.3% variation) for fem- pop (n=2). Results also showed a reduction in end-of-procedure instrument counting times of 58-87%. Conclusions: We report on a method for collecting intraoperative data analytics regarding instrument usage via RFID technology. This system will help refine instrument selection, quantitate instrument utilization and prevent inadvertent retention in a patient. This should help increase efficiency in packaging and sterilization and let surgeons make objective decisions in the composition of surgical trays. Clinical and Translational Impact Statement-Intraoperative analytics of surgical tools and associated equipment may ultimately lead to safer more efficient surgeries that increase patient outcomes while decreasing the cost of care.