Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 2 de 2
1.
Front Hum Neurosci ; 17: 1247104, 2023.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37645690

Over the past decades, among all the non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques, those aiming for neuromodulatory protocols have gained special attention. The traditional neurophysiological outcome to estimate the neuromodulatory effect is the motor evoked potential (MEP), the impact of NIBS techniques is commonly estimated as the change in MEP amplitude. This approach has several limitations: first, the use of MEP limits the evaluation of stimulation to the motor cortex excluding all the other brain areas. Second, MEP is an indirect measure of brain activity and is influenced by several factors. To overcome these limitations several studies have used new outcomes to measure brain changes after neuromodulation techniques with the concurrent use of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and electroencephalogram (EEG). In the present review, we examine studies that use TMS-EEG before and after a single session of neuromodulatory TMS. Then, we focused our literature research on the description of the different metrics derived from TMS-EEG to measure the effect of neuromodulation.

2.
Neurobiol Dis ; 180: 106073, 2023 05.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36906073

Motor fatigue is one of the most common symptoms in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. Previous studies suggested that increased motor fatigue in MS may arise at the central nervous system level. However, the mechanisms underlying central motor fatigue in MS are still unclear. This paper investigated whether central motor fatigue in MS reflects impaired corticospinal transmission or suboptimal primary motor cortex (M1) output (supraspinal fatigue). Furthermore, we sought to identify whether central motor fatigue is associated with abnormal M1 excitability and connectivity within the sensorimotor network. Twenty-two patients affected by relapsing-remitting MS and 15 healthy controls (HCs) performed repeated blocks of contraction at different percentages of maximal voluntary contraction with the right first dorsal interosseus muscle until exhaustion. Peripheral, central, and supraspinal components of motor fatigue were quantified by a neuromuscular assessment based on the superimposed twitch evoked by peripheral nerve and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Corticospinal transmission, excitability and inhibition during the task were tested by measurement of motor evoked potential (MEP) latency, amplitude, and cortical silent period (CSP). M1 excitability and connectivity was measured by TMS-evoked electroencephalography (EEG) potentials (TEPs) elicited by M1 stimulation before and after the task. Patients completed fewer blocks of contraction and showed higher values of central and supraspinal fatigue than HCs. We found no MEP or CSP differences between MS patients and HCs. Patients showed a post-fatigue increase in TEPs propagation from M1 to the rest of the cortex and in source-reconstructed activity within the sensorimotor network, in contrast to the reduction observed in HCs. Post-fatigue increase in source-reconstructed TEPs correlated with supraspinal fatigue values. To conclude, MS-related motor fatigue is caused by central mechanisms related explicitly to suboptimal M1 output rather than impaired corticospinal transmission. Furthermore, by adopting a TMS-EEG approach, we proved that suboptimal M1 output in MS patients is associated with abnormal task-related modulation of M1 connectivity within the sensorimotor network. Our findings shed new light on the central mechanisms of motor fatigue in MS by highlighting a possible role of abnormal sensorimotor network dynamics. These novel results may point to new therapeutical targets for fatigue in MS.


Multiple Sclerosis , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , Humans , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation/methods , Multiple Sclerosis/complications , Electroencephalography , Evoked Potentials , Evoked Potentials, Motor
...