No place for routine use of modified-release opioids in postoperative pain management.

Modified-release opioid tablets were introduced into surgical practice in the belief that they provided superior pain relief and reduced nursing workload, and they rapidly became embedded into many perioperative pathways. Although national and international guidelines for the management of postoperative pain now advise against the use of modified-release opioids, they continue to be prescribed in many centres. Recognition that modified-release opioids show lack of benefit and increased risk of harm compared with immediate-release opioids in the acute, postoperative setting has become clear. Their slow onset and offset make rapid and safe titration of these opioids impossible, including down-titration as the patient recovers; pain relief may be less effective; they have been associated with an increased incidence of opioid-related adverse drug events, increased length of hospital stay, and higher readmission rates; and they lead to higher rates of opioid-induced ventilatory impairment and persistent postoperative opioid use. Evidence indicates that modified-release opioids should not be used routinely in the postoperative period.

Current Issues in the Use of Opioids for the Management of Postoperative Pain: A Review.

Importance: Uncontrolled and indiscriminate prescribing of opioids has led to an opioid crisis that started in North America and spread throughout high-income countries. The aim of this narrative review was to explore some of the current issues surrounding the use of opioids in the perioperative period, focusing on drivers that led to escalation of use, patient harms, the move away from using self-reported pain scores alone to assess adequacy of analgesia, concerns about the routine use of controlled-release opioids for the management of acute pain, opioid-free anesthesia and analgesia, and prescription of opioids on discharge from hospital. Observations: The origins of the opioid crisis are multifactorial and may include good intentions to keep patients pain free in the postoperative period. Assessment of patient function may be better than unidimensional numerical pain scores to help guide postoperative analgesia. Immediate-release opioids can be titrated more easily to match analgesic requirements. There is currently no good evidence to show that opioid-free anesthesia and analgesia affects opioid prescribing practices or the risk of persistent postoperative opioid use. Attention should be paid to discharge opioid prescribing as repeat and refill prescriptions are risk-factors for persistent postoperative opioid use. Opioid stewardship is paramount, and many governments are passing legislation, while statutory bodies and professional societies are providing advice and guidance to help mitigate the harm caused by opioids. Conclusions and Relevance: Opioids remain a crucial part of many patients' journey from surgery to full recovery. The last few decades have shown that unfettered opioid use puts patients and societies at risk, so caution is needed to mitigate those dangers. Opioid stewardship provides a multilayered structure to allow continued safe use of opioids as part of broad pain management strategies for those patients who benefit from them most.

The opioid epidemic from the acute care hospital front line.

Prescription opioid use has risen steeply for over two decades, driven primarily by advocacy for better management of chronic non-cancer pain, but also by poor opioid stewardship in the management of acute pain. Inappropriate prescribing, among other things, contributed to the opioid 'epidemic' and striking increases in patient harm. It has also seen a greater proportion of opioid-tolerant patients presenting to acute care hospitals. Effective and safe management of acute pain in opioid-tolerant patients can be challenging, with higher risks of opioid-induced ventilatory impairment and persistent post-discharge opioid use compared with opioid-naive patients. There are also increased risks of some less well known adverse postoperative outcomes including infection, earlier revision rates after major joint arthroplasty and spinal fusion, longer hospital stays, higher re-admission rates and increased healthcare costs. Increasingly, opioid-free/opioid-sparing techniques have been advocated as ways to reduce patient harm. However, good evidence for these remains lacking and opioids will continue to play an important role in the management of acute pain in many patients.Better opioid stewardship with consideration of preoperative opioid weaning in some patients, assessment of patient function rather than relying on pain scores alone to assess adequacy of analgesia, prescription of immediate release opioids only and evidence-based use of analgesic adjuvants are important. Post-discharge opioid prescribing should be contingent on an assessment of patient risk, with short-term only use of opioids. In partnership with pharmacists, nursing staff, other medical specialists, general practitioners and patients, anaesthetists remain ideally positioned to be involved in opioid stewardship in the acute care setting.

Management of Opioid-Tolerant Patients with Acute Pain: Approaching the Challenges.

For over two decades, dramatic increases in opioid prescriptions in the developed world, especially for long-term management of chronic noncancer pain, were accompanied by increases in patient harm. In recent years in the USA, opioid-related deaths rates have continued to increase despite falls in prescribing rates and deaths associated with prescription opioids. In large part, this is attributed to the growing availability of illicitly manufactured fentanyl. Increased opioid use, for medical and nonmedical reasons, has led to more opioid-tolerant patients requiring management of acute pain. The potential harms associated with long-term opioid use are now well known. What may be less well understood is that preoperative long-term opioid use is associated with increased perioperative complications including infection, readmissions, and greater healthcare utilisation and costs. Minimizing opioid use prior to surgery is a modifiable risk factor that could benefit both patient and healthcare system. Management of acute pain should include simple analgesics and adjuvants, with short-term opioid dose increases if needed and use of non-pharmacological strategies. Reported pain intensities may be high and titration of analgesia to function rather than pain scores is appropriate. Importantly, compared with opioid-naïve patients, opioid-tolerant patients may be at higher risk of opioid-induced ventilatory impairment when additional opioids are administered to manage new acute pain. For some patients, perioperative care may be best coordinated by a perioperative or post-discharge service with referral to multidisciplinary pain and addiction medicine services as indicated. Carefully planned and communicated discharge prescribing, with a weaning plan for additional opioids, is essential.

Advances in analgesia in the older patient.

The average age of the world's population is increasing rapidly, with those over 80 years of age the fastest growing subsection of older persons. Consequently, a higher proportion of those presenting for surgery in the future will be older, including greater numbers aged over 100 years. Management of postoperative pain in these patients can be complicated by factors such as age and disease-related changes in physiology, and disease-drug and drug-drug interactions. There are also variations in pain perception and ways in which pain should be assessed, including in patients with cognitive impairment. Alterations in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics may influence drugs and techniques used for pain relief. The evidence-base for postoperative pain management in the older population remains limited. However, most commonly used analgesic regimens are suitable for older patients if adapted and titrated appropriately.

The scientific evidence for acute pain treatment.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The quantity and quality of evidence available for the management of acute pain has grown rapidly over the last 20 years. Rather than listing current evidence related to specific acute pain treatments, the purpose of this review is to look at recent evidence in terms of its availability and ease of access, synthesis and incorporation into clinical practice as well as some of its limitations. RECENT FINDINGS: An increasing number of evidence-based medicine tools are available to assist clinicians in the provision of acute pain treatments. However, integration of this population-based evidence with clinical expertise, different patient factors and resource availability in different practice settings is still required if the best outcome is to be achieved for each patient. SUMMARY: It is difficult for clinicians to remain updated and synthesize all the evidence available relating to the treatment of acute pain. Assistance is available, but there may be limitations to some of the evidence presented and its application to different aspects of clinical practice and different patient groups.

Pharmacokinetics of fentanyl after subcutaneous administration in volunteers.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Pain relief using intermittent subcutaneous injections of an opioid (e.g. morphine) avoids the need for venous access and does not require complex or expensive pumps and devices. Although data on the pharmacokinetics of subcutaneous morphine exist, there are no comparable data for fentanyl in healthy volunteers. Therefore, the aim of this study was to characterize the pharmacokinetics of 200 microg fentanyl administered as a single bolus dose via the subcutaneous route in healthy opioid-naive volunteers. METHODS: Nine healthy male volunteers were given 200 microg of subcutaneous fentanyl for more than 30 s. Opioid effects were blocked by administration of naltrexone. Venous blood samples taken at intervals from 5 min to 10 h after the dose were assayed using a liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry method. Pharmacokinetic data were analysed using a noncompartmental analysis approach. RESULTS: After subcutaneous bolus dose administration, the median maximum concentration of fentanyl was 0.55 ng ml(-1) (range 0.28-0.87 ng ml(-1)), reached at a median time of 15 min (range 10-30 min). The terminal half-life was 10.00 h (range 5.48-16.37 h). CONCLUSION: Absorption of subcutaneous fentanyl was relatively rapid and similar to the rate of absorption previously reported for subcutaneous morphine; the terminal half-life for fentanyl was substantially longer (10 h) than that of morphine (2.1 h), and blood concentrations were no more variable than that after administration by other nonintravenous routes.

Acute pain management: the evidence grows.

An Australian document now has an important role in acute pain management worldwide.

Intravenous patient-controlled analgesia: one size does not fit all.

Patient-controlled analgesia was introduced as a technique that would allow greater flexibility in opioid delivery for the management of acute pain. However, so far, any benefit compared with conventional methods of pain relief appears to be small. This article reviews some of the factors that could limit the usefulness of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia in the clinical setting and what strategies might allow patient-controlled analgesia to become more effective.