Adult hepatitis B vaccination using a novel triple antigen recombinant vaccine.

Present hepatitis B vaccines use multidose prolonged regimens, which even healthcare workers at risk do not always complete. Moreover, when vaccination is completed there remain some who fail to achieve adequate protection. The protection of adults at risk could be improved if there were a more potent vaccine and/or a shorter vaccination regimen available. Vaccine-naive adults were randomized to vaccination with either Engerix-B (SmithKline Biologicals, Rixensart, Belgium) or a novel triple antigen (S, pre-S1, and pre-S2) recombinant vaccine (Hepacare; Medeva Pharma Plc, Speke, UK). The primary efficacy parameter was the degree of seroprotection 6 or 7 months (26 +/- 2 weeks) after beginning vaccination. A total of 304 adults entered the study. Of these, 16 failed to complete the study (9 on Hepacare and 7 on Engerix-B). With the Engerix-B standard (0, 1, 6) regimen, 88% of subjects were protected by month 7, whereas with the triple antigen vaccine a 2-dose regimen (0, 1) provided equivalent protection (91%) within 6 months and a 3-dose (0, 1, 6) regimen was significantly superior (98% seroprotected by 7 months after starting vaccination P <.001). With adults at risk for a suboptimal response (i.e., older adults, the obese, men, and smokers) the triple antigen vaccine produced a greater degree of protection. The vaccines had similar safety profiles. Both vaccines were well tolerated. In healthy normal adults, a triple antigen hepatitis B vaccine containing S and pre-S antigens produced an enhanced immunologic response and was as effective as a 2- and 3-dose regimen.

Comparison of a triple antigen and a single antigen recombinant vaccine for adult hepatitis B vaccination.

Hepatitis B and its sequelae are a major public health problem. Vaccines have been available for almost 20 years; however the disease still remains a global problem. Many factors contribute to the failure to control hepatitis B, including the limited nature of the vaccination programs implemented initially. Only relatively recently has mass childhood vaccination begun to be implemented and vaccination of high-risk groups, other than healthcare workers, is still not general policy. Additional factors contributing to continued persistence of hepatitis B in the developed world are that the present vaccines are not fully used by those recommended to be vaccinated and even when vaccination is carried out appropriately, there remain some who fail to achieve adequate protection. Clearly, the protection of at-risk groups who have inadequate response to current vaccines, and those who are unwilling or unable to comply with protracted multi-dose vaccine regimens, could be improved if there were a more potent vaccine and/or a shorter vaccination regimen available. Adults who had never been vaccinated against hepatitis B were randomised to receive a vaccination course of either a present single antigen (S) vaccine (Recombivax-HB) or a novel triple antigen (S, pre-S1, and pre-S2) recombinant vaccine (Hepacare Medeva Pharma plc). Doses were given at baseline and 1 month and 6 months later. Hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs) levels were measured at 2, 4, 6, and 7 months after beginning vaccination. The primary efficacy parameter was the degree of protection, measured as the percentage of subjects with anti-HBs titres > or = 10 IU/L, 6 or 7 months (26 +/- 2 weeks) after beginning vaccination. A total of 303 adult subjects entered the study and were vaccinated. Of these, 11 failed to complete the study (4 on Hepacare and 7 on Recombivax-HB); however all but 2 (1 to receive the triple antigen vaccine and 1 to receive Recombivax-HB) were included in the intent-to-treat population for efficacy evaluation. Treatment randomisation was stratified at entry based on age (above and below 40 years old) and gender. The standard three-dose/6-month vaccination regimen of the single antigen vaccine protected 83% of subjects by 7 months after starting vaccination whereas the triple antigen vaccine as a two-dose/1-month regimen protected 88% within 6 months and as a three-dose/6-month regimen protected 97% by 7 months after starting vaccination. Thus the protection rate provided by the shortened (0, 1) regimen of the novel vaccine was "essentially equivalent" (i.e., not statistically inferior) to that provided by the full (0, 1, and 6) regimen of today's vaccine (88% vs. 81%, P < 0.001), and the protection rate provided by a three-dose/6-month (0, 1, and 6) regimen of the new vaccine was significantly superior to that provided by present vaccines (97% vs. 83% P < 0.001). The percentage of subjects protected increases with time after beginning vaccination and at all time points up to and including 6 months was significantly greater with the two-dose regimen of the triple antigen vaccine than with the single antigen vaccine regimen. In adults at risk for a reduced response to hepatitis B vaccination [i.e., older adults (>/=40), the obese, males, and smokers], the triple antigen vaccine produced a significantly greater percentage of protected subjects (P < 0.001) and higher geometric mean titre (P < 0.001). Indeed as a three-dose/6 month regimen, the triple antigen vaccine raised the level of protection in these vulnerable subgroups to that seen when a single antigen vaccine is used in the optimal younger adult group. Both vaccines were well tolerated and had similar safety profiles. The most frequently (> or = 10%) reported adverse events with the use of either vaccine were pain at the site of injection (38% vs. 41% vs. 20% for the two-dose Hepacare regimen, the three-dose Hepacare regimen, and the three-dose Recombivax-HB regimen, respectively), infections at the site of injection (1% vs. 14% vs. 9%), headache (9% vs. 13% vs. 11%), and nausea (7% vs. 11% vs. 3%). It is concluded that in healthy normal adults, a triple antigen hepatitis B vaccine that contained S and pre-S antigens produced an enhanced immunological response. This was exemplified by the novel vaccine's ability to overcome factors such as advancing age (> or = 40 years), obesity, and smoking, each of which is known to reduce the potential for protection with present recombinant S only vaccines. A two-dose/1-month (0 and 1) regimen of this triple antigen vaccine was as effective as the standard three-dose/6 month (0, 1, and 6) regimen of present single antigen vaccines. (c) 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

A multi-center controlled study of rapid hepatitis B vaccination using a novel triple antigen recombinant vaccine.

Hepatitis B vaccines have been available for 20 years, however, the disease still remains a global problem. Clearly, the protection of at-risk groups could be improved if a more potent vaccine with a shorter vaccination regimen were available. Hepacare is new recombinant vaccine, which contains three of the surface antigens of the HB virus and has higher immunogenicity than present single antigen (HBsAg only) vaccines. This study evaluates the potential for developing seroprotection rapidly and the viability of a 1 month/two dose regimen. A total of 400 adult subjects were vaccinated using either the present accelerated 2 month/three dose regimen of Engerix-B or a 1 month/two dose regimen of a novel triple antigen vaccine (Hepacare). Both vaccines were well tolerated. Four weeks after a single dose, the seroprotective rates for Engerix-B and the triple antigen vaccine were 5 and 17%, respectively. By month 2, 4 weeks after two doses of vaccine, it was 38 and 61%. Finally by month 3, 4 weeks after a third dose of Engerix-B or placebo, respectively, the seroprotection rates were 71 and 82%. The geometric mean titres (GMTs), of these responders was then 119 and 120 IU/l, respectively. Both vaccines were well tolerated. At all points up to and including 3 months after beginning vaccination, the novel 1 month/two dose regimen of Hepacare was significantly more effective in producing seroporotective titres than the 2 month/three dose regimen of Engerix-B (P = 0.001).

Hepatitis B--an important public health issue.

Hepatitis B is one of the most common infectious diseases in the world. It has been estimated that 350 million people worldwide are chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) carriers. The global prevalence of chronic HBV infection varies widely, from high ( > 8%, e.g., Africa, Asia and the Western Pacific) to intermediate (2-7% e.g., Southern and Eastern Europe) and low (< 2%, e.g., Western Europe, North America and Australia). The predominant routes of transmission vary according to the endemicity of the HBV infection. In areas of high endemicity, perinatal transmission is the main route of transmission, whereas in areas of low endemicity, sexual contact amongst high-risk adults is predominant. Between one-third and one-quarter of people infected chronically with HBV are expected to develop progressive liver disease (including cirrhosis and primary liver cancer). Although mass vaccination programs have begun to control the spread of HBV infection, therapeutic intervention is the only option for those with established chronic HBV-associated liver disease. Until recently, the only treatment for chronic hepatitis B was the immune modulator, interferon (IFN) alpha. However, IFN alpha treatment has several disadvantages; it is expensive, it must be administered by injection, there are side-effects, and IFN alpha is poorly tolerated. Lamivudine, a nucleoside analogue, is the first effective, and well tolerated, oral treatment for chronic hepatitis B. In conclusion, although we are still some way from eradicating or curing chronic hepatitis B, the advent of lamivudine allows new populations to benefit from therapy and helps to address the global public health problem of hepatitis B.

Hepatitis B: an important public health issue.

Hepatitis B is one of the most common infectious diseases in the world. It has been estimated that 350 million people world-wide are chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) carriers. The global prevalence of chronic HBV infection varies widely, from high (>/=8%, e.g., Africa, Asia and the Western Pacific) to intermediate (2-7% e.g., Southern and Eastern Europe) and low (<2%, e.g., Western Europe, North America and Australia). The predominant routes of transmission vary according to the endemicity of the HBV infection. In areas of high endemicity, perinatal transmission is the main route of transmission, whereas in areas of low endemicity, sexual contact amongst high-risk adults is the predominant route. Between one-third and one-quarter of people infected chronically with HBV are expected to develop progressive liver disease (including cirrhosis and primary liver cancer). Although mass vaccination programmes have begun to control the spread of HBV infection, therapeutic intervention is the only option for those with established chronic HBV-associated liver disease. Until recently, the only treatment for chronic hepatitis B was the immune modulator, interferon (IFN) alpha. IFN alpha treatment has several disadvantages; it is expensive, it must be administered by injection, there are side effects, and IFN alpha is poorly tolerated. Lamivudine, a nucleoside analogue, is the first effective, and well tolerated, oral treatment for chronic hepatitis B. In conclusion, although we are still some way from eradicating or curing chronic hepatitis B, the advent of lamivudine allows new populations to benefit from therapy and helps to address the global public health problem of hepatitis B.

A model for a managed care education approach to increase hepatitis awareness: Part I.

Morbidity and mortality associated with viral hepatitis, especially hepatitis C, are expected to increase rapidly over the next 2 decades. Many MCOs view hepatitis as a high-cost disease with a relatively low incidence; the incentive to develop education or awareness programs for hepatitis is correspondingly low. The American Gastroenterological Association, the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, and the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases have, through the American Digestive Health Foundation, developed a unique, proactive, and flexible educational initiative for managed care. After providing an overview of hepatitis, this paper describes the four phases of this program designed to increase hepatitis awareness among managed care providers and members.

Alcohol-induced liver disease.

Hepatic changes resulting from the regular ingestion of alcohol are many and include fat infiltration, alcoholic hepatitis, and cirrhosis. Only 10% to 15% of chronic alcoholics develop liver disease. Women are more susceptible. An area of considerable importance is the high prevalence of concomitant infection with hepatitis C virus in chronic alcoholics. Patients who have hepatitis C and alcohol-induced liver injury are much more likely to develop progressive liver disease and cirrhosis. Corticosteroid therapy has proven useful in the treatment of patients with severe acute alcoholic hepatitis.

A model for a managed care education approach to increase hepatitis awareness: Part. II.

In last month's issue, the authors described a unique partnership that led to the development of an educational program on hepatitis C for managed health care plans. Part II and the conclusion addresses the implementation of the program in managed health plans.

The hepatic safety and tolerability of the novel cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor celecoxib.

Celecoxib is a cyclooxygenase- (COX)-1-sparing inhibitor of COX-2 that is indicated for the treatment of osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Many agents used for treating these diseases, both symptom-modifying and disease-modifying, are associated with the potential for hepatotoxicity. This article presents an analysis of the hepatic effects of celecoxib in 14 controlled studies of patients with arthritis (2 to 24 weeks' duration), in a long-term, open-label safety study (as long as 2 years), in 11 studies of patients receiving treatment for pain after oral or orthopedic surgery (up to 5 days' duration), and in five pharmacology studies. The overall incidence of hepatic adverse events in arthritis patients receiving celecoxib was similar to that for placebo but significantly lower than in the combined group of patients receiving nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). The most commonly reported hepatic adverse events were elevations in liver transaminase levels, most of which occurred in patients receiving diclofenac. Similarly, clinically significant elevations of transaminase levels occurred more frequently with NSAIDs than with celecoxib. A pharmacology study performed in patients with mild or moderate hepatic impairment showed that celecoxib did not produce any clinically relevant changes from baseline in creatinine clearance, alanine aminotransferase, or bilirubin values in these settings. In the four interaction studies performed with drugs metabolized in the liver, none of the adverse events was hepatic in nature, and no clinically relevant liver function test abnormalities occurred. In conclusion, this analysis suggests that celecoxib has a very low potential for hepatic toxicity, even after exposures of as long as 2 years at therapeutic doses.

The effect of ursodeoxycholic acid on the florid duct lesion of primary biliary cirrhosis.

The frequency with which florid duct lesions are seen in needle-biopsy specimens of the liver was assessed in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) enrolled in a 2-year randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) versus placebo. Paired biopsy specimens obtained at entry and after 2 years on medication were reviewed blindly and mostly simultaneously by a panel of 5 hepatopathologists who, earlier, had characterized the florid duct lesion, which has been well described in the pathology literature. Florid duct lesions at entry were identified in approximately 36%. Patients with earlier disease showed florid duct lesions much more frequently than those with more advanced disease. The prevalence of florid duct lesions in 60 patients receiving placebo medication fell from 38.3% to 21.7%, P =. 025, over the period of 2 years. The prevalence of florid duct lesions also decreased in the 55 patients receiving UDCA, from 32.7% to 18.2%, P =.046. The prevalences of these lesions in the placebo and UDCA patients at entry and at 2 years were not significantly different from each other. The findings suggest that UDCA does not prevent ongoing bile duct destruction in patients with PBC. Instead, they support the impression that UDCA exerts its beneficial effects by protecting against the consequences of bile duct destruction.

Safety of combination interferon alfa-2b/ribavirin therapy in chronic hepatitis C-relapsed and treatment-naive patients.

The coadministration of ribavirin with recombinant interferon alfa-2b (rIFN-alpha 2b) compared with rIFN-alpha 2b alone markedly enhanced sustained virologic response rates in relapsed and treatment-naive chronic hepatitis C patients. The potential for ribavirin to likewise exacerbate the adverse events associated with the alpha interferons is reviewed. The overall safety and tolerability of combination rIFN-alpha 2b/ribavirin therapy was evaluated in 2,089 patients treated in phase III clinical studies conducted in the United States and internationally. Serious adverse events were also evaluated on an interim basis in > 25,000 patients--a majority of whom were treated with combination therapy (open label)--treated worldwide in investigator-initiated studies. Patients in the phase III studies received 3 million International Units rIFN-alpha 2b three times per week by subcutaneous injection plus either ribavirin or placebo orally in divided daily doses of 1,000 or 1,200 mg for patients weighing < or = 75 or > 75 kg, respectively. Adverse event frequency and severity and dose modifications were recorded throughout the 24-week (relapse) or 48-week (naive) treatment period and 24-week follow-up period. Clinically significant adverse events included anemia and depression. There was no evidence that the adverse effects of alpha interferon (e.g., fatigue, depression, neutropenia) were exacerbated by ribavirin. Severe adverse events were limited due to strict adherence to dose-modification criteria; approximately 6% to 9% of patients discontinued combination therapy because of an adverse event. Clinically serious adverse events, dose reductions and discontinuations, and potential mechanisms of toxicity associated with rIFN-alpha 2b and ribavirin are examined.

Biliary bile acids in primary biliary cirrhosis: effect of ursodeoxycholic acid.

Bile acid composition in fasting duodenal bile was assessed at entry and at 2 years in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) (10-12 mg/kg/d) taken as a single bedtime dose. Specimens were analyzed by a high-pressure liquid chromatography method that had been validated against gas chromatography. Percent composition in bile (mean +/- SD) for 98 patients at entry for cholic (CA), chenodeoxycholic (CDCA), deoxycholic (DCA), lithocholic (LCA), and ursodeoxycholic (UDCA) acids, respectively, were 57.4 +/- 18.6, 31.5 +/- 15.5, 8.0 +/- 9.3, 0.3 +/- 1.0, and 0.6 +/- 0.9. Values for CA were increased, whereas those for CDCA, DCA, LCA, and UDCA were decreased when compared with values in normal persons. Bile acid composition of the major bile acids did not change after 2 years on placebo medication. By contrast, in patients receiving UDCA for 2 years, bile became enriched with UDCA on average to 40.1%, and significant decreases were noted for CA (to 32.2%) and CDCA (to 19.5%). No change in percent composition was observed for DCA and LCA. Percent composition at entry and changes in composition after 2 years on UDCA were similar in patients with varying severity of PBC. In patients whose bile was not enriched in UDCA (entry and placebo-treated specimens), CA, CDCA, DCA, and the small amount of UDCA found in some of these specimens were conjugated to a greater extent with glycine (52%-64%) than with taurine (36%-48%). Treatment with UDCA caused the proportion of all endogenous bile acids conjugated with glycine to increase to 69% to 78%, while the proportion conjugated with taurine (22%-31%) fell (P <.05). Administered UDCA was also conjugated predominantly with glycine (87%).

Interferon-alpha2b therapy is efficacious in Asian-Americans with chronic hepatitis B infection: a prospective controlled trial.

Chronic hepatitis B virus infection is endemic in Asian communities in the United States. The purpose of the current study was to compare the antiviral efficacy of interferon-alpha2b in a group of adult Asian patients chronically infected with hepatitis B with active replication compared to a control group of Caucasian patients treated with the same regimen. Patients with entry aminotransferase (ALT) levels greater than three times the upper limit of normal received interferon-alpha2b, 5 million units, subcutaneously daily for 16 weeks. Patients with pretreatment ALT levels 1.5-3 times the upper limit of normal received prednisone for a total of six weeks prior to interferon starting at 60 mg daily with reduction in dosage by 20 mg every two weeks with a two-week period between finishing prednisone and starting interferon-alpha2b. Eight (62%) of the 13 Asians and six (60%) of the 10 Caucasians cleared HBeAg and HBV DNA from serum (NS). By the end of one year of follow-up after therapy, four (67%) of six Caucasian responders but none of the Asian responders had cleared hepatitis B surface antigen from serum (P < 0.05). Loss of serum markers of active replication appeared less durable in the Asian responders compared to the Caucasians with reappearance of serum HBeAg in two (25%) of eight of the former but only one (17%) of the latter group. Three other Asian patients subsequently redeveloped HBeAg in serum. It is concluded that adult Asian-Americans have an identical initial response rate to antiviral therapy with interferon-alpha2b; however, the response may be less durable and does not usually lead to loss of HBsAg.

Containing hepatitis C.

Screening of donated blood has eliminated a major transmission route for hepatitis C, the accuracy of diagnostic tests has improved, and longer regimens of interferon have improved therapeutic response. Nevertheless, millions are infected, and other transmission routes remain open. Treatment is often unsuccessful, but it may offer the only check to slow destruction of the liver.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ursodeoxycholic acid in primary biliary cirrhosis.

One hundred fifty-one patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) grouped into four strata based on entry serum bilirubin ( < 2 mg/dL vs. 2 md/dL or greater) and liver histology (stages I, II vs. stages III, IV-Ludwig criteria) were randomized within each stratum to ursodiol or placebo given in a single dose of 10 to 12 mg/kg at bedtime for 2 years. Placebo- (n = 74) and ursodiol- treated (n = 77) patients were well matched at baseline for demographic and prognostic factors. Ursodiol induced major improvements in biochemical tests of the liver in strata 1 and 2 (entry bilirubin < 2), but had less effect on laboratory tests in patients with entry serum bilirubin of > or +2 (strata 3 and 4). Histology was favorably affected by ursodiol in patients in strata 1 and 2 but not in strata 3 and 4. Ursodiol enrichment in fasting bile obtained at the conclusion of the trail was approximately 40% and comparable in all strata. Thus, differences in ursodiol enrichment of the bile acid pool do not explain better responses of laboratory tests and histology found in patients with less advanced PBC. Patients treated will ursodiol tended to develop a treatment failure less frequently that those who received placebo, particularly in strata 1 and 2 (ursodiol 42%, placebo 60%, P = .078). Development of severe symptoms (fatigue/pruritus) and doubling of serum bilirubin were reduced significantly in ursodiol-treated patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Acetaminophen (paracetamol) hepatotoxicity with regular intake of alcohol: analysis of instances of therapeutic misadventure.

Hepatic injury in alcoholics due to intake of acetaminophen (APAP or acetylparaaminophenol) with therapeutic intent has been reported, but the extent of the phenomenon is not clear, pertinent details of the association remain insufficiently clarified, and the importance of the phenomenon is not widely appreciated. The present report describes 67 patients who developed hepatic injury after ingestion of APAP with therapeutic intent. All were regular users of alcohol. Sixty-four percent of the patients were considered to be "alcoholic" or reported intakes greater than 80 g/d, 35% took 60 g/d or less, and the remainder were vague in their reporting. Doses of APAP were in the "nontoxic" range ( < 6 g/d) in 60% of the group, within the recommended range ( < 4 g/d) in 40%, and at 4.1 to 6 g/d in 20%. Characteristic feature was the towering level reached by aspartate transaminase (AST) with figures ranging from 3,000 to 48,000 IU in more than 90% of cases. Almost 20% of the patients died. The data on these patients were similar to 94 cases of injury from APAP taken with therapeutic intent reported in the literature. This study provides further evidence of hepatic injury in regular uses of alcohol, especially chronic alcoholics, who take APAP with therapeutic intent. Susceptibility is presumably caused by induction of cytochrome P-4502EI by ethanol and by depletion of glutathione (GSH) because of the effects of alcohol, the malnutrition often associated with alcoholism, and the depletion associated with chronic use of APAP and impaired glucuronidation caused by fasting perhaps as well. The syndrome of liver injury is distinctive, marked by uniquely elevated levels of AST, and poses a significant threat.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)