A phase II trial of abiraterone acetate plus prednisone in patients with triple-negative androgen receptor positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (UCBG 12-1).

BACKGROUND: Several expression array studies identified molecular apocrine breast cancer (BC) as a subtype that expresses androgen receptor (AR) but not estrogen receptor α. We carried out a multicentre single-arm phase II trial in women with AR-positive, estrogen, progesterone receptor and HER2-negative (triple-negative) metastatic or inoperable locally advanced BC to assess the efficacy and safety of abiraterone acetate (AA) plus prednisone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with a metastatic or locally advanced, centrally reviewed, triple-negative and AR-positive (≥10% by immunohistochemistry, IHC) BC were eligible. Any number of previous lines of chemotherapy was allowed. AA (1000 mg) was administered once a day with prednisone (5 mg) twice a day until disease progression or intolerance. The primary end point was clinical benefit rate (CBR) at 6 months defined as the proportion of patients presenting a complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) ≥6 months. Secondary end points were objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-six patients from 27 centres consented for IHC central review. Of the 138 patients with sufficient tissue available, 53 (37.6%) were AR-positive and triple-negative, and 34 of them were included from July 2013 to December 2014. Thirty patients were eligible and evaluable for the primary end point. The 6-month CBR was 20.0% [95% confidence interval (CI) 7.7%-38.6%], including 1 CR and 5 SD ≥6 months, 5 of them still being under treatment at the time of analysis (6.4+, 9.2+, 14.5+, 17.6+, 23.4+ months). The ORR was 6.7% (95% CI 0.8%-22.1%). The median PFS was 2.8 months (95% CI 1.7%-5.4%). Fatigue, hypertension, hypokalaemia and nausea were the most common drug-related adverse events; the majority of them being grade 1 or 2. CONCLUSIONS: AA plus prednisone treatment is beneficial for some patients with molecular apocrine tumours and five patients are still on treatment. CLINICALTRIALSGOV: NCT01842321.

Efficacy and tolerance of everolimus in 123 consecutive advanced ER positive, HER2 negative breast cancer patients. A two center retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Since the publication of the Bolero-2 trial, everolimus has entered the routine care for advanced endocrine resistant luminal breast cancer (BC). We evaluated our practice 2 years after the French marketing authorization (July 2012). METHODS: One hundred and twenty three consecutive patients were treated with everolimus combined with endocrine treatment in two French Cancer Centers. All patients had luminal (ER positive, HER2 negative) BC and had been previously treated with endocrine therapy for advanced disease. RESULTS: Median age at initiation of everolimus was 63 y (36-84). Median delay from cancer diagnosis to everolimus was 12.6 y (1.3-34.8). Grade 2 or 3 side effects were experienced by 49.6% and 32.5% of the patients, respectively. Most frequent side effects were grade 2/3 mucositis (32.6%/11.2%), grade 1/2 decreased appetite (24.4%/13.8%), and grade 1/2 rash (28.5%/13.8%). At a median follow up of 10 months, median progression free survival was 9 months (0.4-26+), and median overall survival was 21 months (0.4-26+). CONCLUSIONS: In routine practice everolimus efficacy appears very close to the Bolero-2 results, although in more heavily pretreated patients. Everolimus based therapy appears feasible and side effects are similar to those previously reported. These data support the use of everolimus in daily practice.

Docetaxel rechallenge after a first response in non-resistant metastatic breast cancer: significant activity with manageable toxicity.

Docetaxel is a major drug in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) treatment. At progression, rechallenge with docetaxel can be discussed, according to previous efficacy and tolerance, as long as it was stopped for reasons other than progression. Currently, no data are available outlining outcomes after this pragmatic approach in MBC. We retrospectively identified 72 patients with the following criteria: (i) objective response or stable disease with a previous line of treatment with docetaxel in the metastatic setting, (ii) discontinuation for a reason other than progression, (iii) rechallenge with docetaxel after a minimal docetaxel-free interval of 3 months. The main objectives were to evaluate overall response (ORR), time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS) and toxicity at reintroduction of docetaxel. Median patient age was 57 years (range: 34-84). Docetaxel was reintroduced as a 2nd, 3rd, or ≥4th line of chemotherapy in the metastatic setting in 21, 46 and 33% of cases, respectively. Previous agents used included capecitabine, anthracycline, and vinorelbine in 54, 40 and 21% of cases, respectively. The median number of docetaxel cycles was 6 (range: 1-18). Among the 33 patients with disease assessed according to RECIST criteria, 14 (42.5%) had a partial response and 11 (33.5%) a stable disease>6 weeks. Among the 46 patients with an initial CA 15-3 increase, 34 (74%) had a ≥50% decrease of the value. Globally, 55 patients (76%) obtained a benefit from the treatment. The median TTP and OS were 5.7 months (95% CI: 5.0-6.3) and 10.2 months (95% CI: 8.6-11.8), respectively. Forty-six patients (64%) reported grade 1/2 toxicity, 23 patients (32%) experienced grade 3/4 toxicity, mostly neutropenia (17%) and fluid retention (10%). There was no difference in median TTP after subsequent docetaxel in subgroup analyses. This retrospective analysis supports the pragmatic strategy to retreat patients with MBC with docetaxel when this drug has shown previous activity and was stopped for other causes than progression.

Does chemotherapy-induced neutropaenia result in a postponement of adjuvant or neoadjuvant regimens in breast cancer patients? Results of a retrospective analysis.

In 2005, 224 patients received adjuvant/neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer in a single institution according to daily practices. Regimens consisted of epirubicin-based chemotherapy (FEC100, four or six cycles), or three cycles of FEC100 followed by three cycles of docetaxel. An absolute blood count was carried out every 3 weeks, 1-3 days before planned chemotherapy cycle. Overall, 1238 cycles were delivered. An absolute neutrophil count (ANC) <1.5 x 10(9) l(-1) before planned chemotherapy was found in 171 cycles. Of these, 130 cycles (76%) were delivered as planned regardless of whether ANC levels recovered, and 41 (24%) were delayed. None of these patients developed a febrile neutropaenia. Haematopoietic support (granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)) was required in 12 cycles. We found that the majority of patients with an ANC <1.5 x 10(9) l(-1) before planned chemotherapy received planned doses, without complications and need for G-CSF.