Surgical treatment of therapy-resistant reflux after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. A case series of the modified Nissen fundoplication.

Introduction: Patients with intractable reflux after RYGB have limited treatment options. Here a modified Nissen fundoplication (MNF) as described by N. Kawahara might be the answer.Methods: In this retrospective case study we identified six patients with therapy-resistant GERD after RYGB. All six were treated with a MNF, using the remnant stomach to construct the fundoplication. Short term follow-up 1 month and 6-12 months postoperatively was conducted to inquire about GERD symptoms.Results: Six patients underwent a MNF. Three out of six patients had had a gastric band in their medical history. Upper GI barium swallow test revealed herniation of the gastric pouch in 4/6 patients. After surgery all patients were symptom free and 4/6 completely stopped PPI treatment.Discussion: Mechanisms of new onset or deteriorating GERD after RYGB are herniation of gastric pouch and destruction of the lower esophageal sphincter after banding. Both problems are tackled when constructing a MNF.Conclusion: Complete symptom relief was seen 1 month after MNF. The procedure seems safe, feasible and effective. The study is limited by small sample size and short follow-up yet shows clear improvement of symptoms. Larger trials are needed to establish validity of the MNF.

Comparable results with 3-year follow-up for large-pore versus small-pore meshes in open incisional hernia repair.

BACKGROUND: Decreasing the amount of polypropylene by increasing pore size produces a lighter weight mesh that may improve tissue ingrowth and, functional properties of the abdominal wall and diminish mesh-related complications. It was the aim of this prospective observational cohort study to analyze the outcome of incisional hernia repair using small-pore versus large-pore meshes and using a standardized, open, retromuscular surgical technique. METHODS: Across a 6-year period we analyzed 205 patients treated with a heavyweight mesh (group I) and 235 patients treated with a large-pore mesh (group II) for incisional hernias. Patients with a body mass index greater than 40 kg/m(2) and patients with hernias with a transverse diameter of more than 10 cm were not treated by a retromuscular mesh repair and are not included in this analysis. Recurrent incisional hernias also were not included. Both groups had 3 years of follow-up. Patients were evaluated for pain, discomfort, feeling of foreign material, and recurrences. RESULTS: Pre-operative characteristics were comparable between the groups, including body mass index, diabetes, and smoking. The mean total hernia surface was 56 cm(2) for group I versus 48 cm(2) in group II. The mesh surface area was 448 cm(2) for group I and 425 cm(2) for group II. Considering pain scores, there was only a minor difference between the 2 groups at 1-month follow-up, at which time, the Visual Analogue Scale was 5.8 in group I and 4.9 in group II (P = .16). All other scores were comparable between the groups. In group I, 7 recurrences (3.4%) were recorded after 3 years, of which 6 were already apparent 1 year after initial repair. In group II, 9 recurrences (3.8%) were diagnosed, again 6 within the first year after repair. CONCLUSION: Large-pore meshes can be used safely for open primary incisional hernia repair with an equal outcome compared with small-pore meshes in nonobese patients with defects smaller than 10 cm in width, in regard to both recurrence rates and chronic discomfort.

Transinguinal preperitoneal memory ring patch versus Lichtenstein repair for unilateral inguinal hernias.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the transinguinal preperitoneal technique (TIPP) using a memory ring patch versus the Lichtenstein technique in relation to acute and chronic pain, post-operative complications and recurrence rates. METHODS: During an 18-month period, all adult patients that needed treatment for a unilateral inguinal or femoral hernia were treated by the TIPP repair using the Polysoft mesh. This group was retrospectively compared with a historical cohort of patients treated by the Lichtenstein technique. Our policy concerning type of anaesthesia, post-operative pain management and visual analogue scale measurements did not change over the study period. For post-operative pain evaluation, the visual analogue scale was used (0-10) and scores were measured after 6 h, 24 h, 1 week, 1 month, 1 year and yearly thereafter. Recurrence rates were evaluated at time of clinical examinations. RESULTS: In total, 142 patients have been analysed with the TIPP technique (group I) versus 136 patients operated in the previous 2 years with a Lichtenstein repair (group II). In group I, 112 patients (78.9%) received a medium size patch of 14 x 7.5 cm and 30 patients (21.1%) had a large patch (16 x 9 cm). The mean operative time for a TIPP procedure was statistically shorter than for a Lichtenstein repair, 33 versus 44 min, respectively (p = 0.04). After 24 h, 1 week and 1 month post-surgery, there was significantly less post-operative pain observed in the TIPP group than in the Lichtenstein group. In total, four recurrences were observed in the TIPP group (2.8%), of which one laterally and three medially. In group II, seven recurrences were observed in total (5.1%), of which five were detected within 2 years of follow-up (3.7%). CONCLUSION: For surgeons performing the Lichtenstein repair but looking for modifications concerning pain relief and a quicker procedure, the TIPP approach is a feasible alternative that seems to be associated with less post-operative pain.