Prospective comparative study of the treatment of Helicobacter pylori with antibiotic susceptibility testing-guided triple therapy compared to quadruple therapy with bismuth-metronidazole-tetracycline subcitrate.

INTRODUCTION: the current indicated first-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is the quadruple therapy with bismuth (Pylera®), or the quadruple concomitant therapy without bismuth. The triple therapy was abandoned due to its low eradication rates, partly derived from an increase in antibiotic resistance. The aim of this study was to compare the H. pylori eradication rates guided by antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) versus Pylera®. METHODS: a specimen was taken prospectively for culture and antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) from all patients diagnosed with H. pylori infection using gastroscopy, and they were randomized to receive triple therapy depending on the results of the AST, or quadruple therapy with Pylera®. The eradication rates of both groups were analyzed using fecal antigen. The adherence and side effects of the treatment were also analyzed. RESULTS: of the 108 patients with H. pylori infection, 55 received Pylera® and 53 AST-guided triple therapy. The eradication rates were 92.7 % with Pylera® and 90.6 % in the AST-guided group, and the difference was statistically significant. There were also no differences found in adherence or side effects. CONCLUSIONS: the treatment of H. pylori with AST-guided triple therapy is effective, especially in regions with high rates of antibiotic resistance.

Complicaciones cardio-respiratorias graves derivadas de la sedación con propofol controlado por endoscopista / Severe cardiorespiratory complications derived from propofol sedation monitored by an endoscopist

Introducción: la sedación profunda con propofol controlada por endoscopista en las diferentes unidades de endoscopia ha sido un tema de continua controversia a lo largo de los últimos años, origen de conflictos de intereses entre las distintas sociedades científicas de Anestesiología y Gastroenterología. Numerosos estudios han demostrado ya la eficacia, eficiencia y escasa aparición de complicaciones en la sedación controlada por un endoscopista formado frente al anestesiólogo. Material y métodos: hemos revisado en nuestra base de datos el porcentaje de complicaciones cardio-respiratorias graves en nuestra unidad, en el periodo comprendido entre 2011 y 2016, en las distintas exploraciones endoscópicas que realizamos (gastroscopia, colonoscopia, colangiopancreatografía retrógrada endoscópica [CPRE] y ecoendoscopia [USE]) y cuya sedación es controlada por un endoscopista. Resultados: se llevó a cabo el análisis de 33.195 exploraciones durante el periodo de estudio. Obtuvimos un 0,13% de complicaciones cardio-respiratorias, la mayor parte de ellas desaturaciones graves (la mayoría respondieron a la apertura de la vía aérea asociada a la interrupción de la infusión del fármaco, precisando la necesidad de ambú en contadas ocasiones). No existieron diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre los diferentes grupos excepto en edad media, riesgo por tipo de exploración y riesgo ASA, donde la CPRE presentó una p < 0,01 frente al resto de exploraciones. Conclusión: con los datos de los que disponemos hasta la actualidad, existen numerosas evidencias en la literatura científica para divulgar que la sedación de las endoscopias controlada por un endoscopista formado es segura, eficaz y eficiente. No obstante, deben realizarse más estudios prospectivos que confirmen estas suposiciones, ya que hasta el momento la mayoría de los estudios son retrospectivos

Introduction: deep sedation with propofol monitored by an endoscopist in different endoscopy units is a controversial subject and the source of conflicts of interest between the various scientific societies of Anesthesiology and Gastroenterology. Many studies have already demonstrated the efficacy, efficiency and low incidence of complications associated with sedation when under the control of a trained endoscopist vs an anesthesiologist. Material and methods: the rate of severe cardiorespiratory complications during various endoscopic examinations (gastroscopy, colonoscopy, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography [ERCP] and endoscopic ultrasound [EUS]) where sedation was controlled by an endoscopist within our unit, from 2011 to 2016, was reviewed. Results: during the study period, 33,195 examinations were analyzed. The rate of cardiorespiratory complications was 0.13% and the majority were severe desaturations. Most cases responded to an opening in the airway associated with the interruption of drug infusion and an ambu bag was required in a few cases. There were no statistically significant differences between the different groups, except for mean age, risk by type of examination and ASA risk, where the difference between ERCP and the rest of examinations was statistically significant. Conclusion: there is a high level of evidence in the scientific literature suggesting that sedation controlled by a trained endoscopist is safe, effective and efficient. However, further prospective studies are required in order to confirm this conclusion due to the fact that the majority of studies to date are retrospective

Severe cardiorespiratory complications derived from propofol sedation monitored by an endoscopist.

INTRODUCTION: deep sedation with propofol monitored by an endoscopist in different endoscopy units is a controversial subject and the source of conflicts of interest between the various scientific societies of Anesthesiology and Gastroenterology. Many studies have already demonstrated the efficacy, efficiency and low incidence of complications associated with sedation when under the control of a trained endoscopist vs an anesthesiologist. MATERIAL AND METHODS: the rate of severe cardiorespiratory complications during various endoscopic examinations (gastroscopy, colonoscopy, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography [ERCP] and endoscopic ultrasound [EUS]) where sedation was controlled by an endoscopist within our unit, from 2011 to 2016, was reviewed. RESULTS: during the study period, 33,195 examinations were analyzed. The rate of cardiorespiratory complications was 0.13% and the majority were severe desaturations. Most cases responded to an opening in the airway associated with the interruption of drug infusion and an ambu bag was required in a few cases. There were no statistically significant differences between the different groups, except for mean age, risk by type of examination and ASA risk, where the difference between ERCP and the rest of examinations was statistically significant. CONCLUSION: there is a high level of evidence in the scientific literature suggesting that sedation controlled by a trained endoscopist is safe, effective and efficient. However, further prospective studies are required in order to confirm this conclusion due to the fact that the majority of studies to date are retrospective.

Diverticulotomía endoscópica utilizando Ligasure™ / Endoscopic diverticulotomy using Ligasure™

INTRODUCCIÓN: El tratamiento endoscópico del divertículo de Zenker es considerado viable, efectivo y seguro. La utilización de la técnica sellado-sección mediante Ligasure™ proporciona una adecuada y rápida disección del tejido, logrando una hemostasia efectiva. PACIENTES Y MÉTODOS: Estudio retrospectivo, descriptivo, de todos los pacientes con divertículo de Zenker que fueron tratados a través de una diverticulotomía endoscópica utilizando el Ligasure ™. El procedimiento se realizó en la unidad de endoscopias, bajo sedación profunda controlada por el endoscopista. Posteriormente, los pacientes ingresaron para observación y, después del alta, se realizó un seguimiento por consultas externas. RESULTADOS: Ocho pacientes, 5 mujeres y 3 hombres, edad media: 78 ±15 años; 25% ASA I; 36% ASA II; 14% ASA III, y 25% ASA IV. Síntoma principal: disfagia. Tamaño de los divertículos: 1 a 7 cm. Éxito técnico: 100%. Complicaciones: un paciente con HDA. Estancia media: 24h. Siete pacientes: asintomáticos; un paciente con mejoría parcial, necesitando reintervención endoscópica. Cirugía y morbimortalidad: 0%. CONCLUSIÓN: El tratamiento del divertículo de Zenker mediante diverticulotomía endoscópica con Ligasure™ proporciona una gran eficacia, rapidez y seguridad, por lo que podría plantearse como primera elección de tratamiento

INTRODUCTION: Endoscopic treatment of Zenker diverticulum is considered feasible, effective and safe. The use of the Ligasure ™ vessel sealer provides adequate and quick dissection of tissue, achieving effective haemostasis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective, descriptive study of all patients with Zenker diverticulum who were treated by endoscopic diverticulotomy using Ligasure™. The procedure was performed in the endoscopy unit under deep sedation controlled by the endoscopist. Patients were subsequently admitted for observation and, after discharge, were followed-up in the outpatient clinic. RESULTS: Eight patients, 5 women and 3 men, mean age 78 ±15 years, 25% ASA I, 36% ASA II, 14% ASA III and 25% ASA IV. Main symptom: dysphagia. Diverticula size: 1-7 cm. Technical success: 100%. Complications: one patient with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Average stay: 24 h. Seven patients: asymptomatic; one patient with partial improvement, requiring repeat endoscopic intervention. Surgery and morbidity and mortality: 0%. CONCLUSION: The treatment of Zenker diverticulum by endoscopic diverticulotomy using the Ligasure ™ vessel sealer is highly effective, fast and safe, and could be considered the treatment of choice

Endoscopic diverticulotomy using Ligasure™. / Diverticulotomía endoscópica utilizando Ligasure™.

INTRODUCTION: Endoscopic treatment of Zenker diverticulum is considered feasible, effective and safe. The use of the Ligasure™ vessel sealer provides adequate and quick dissection of tissue, achieving effective haemostasis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective, descriptive study of all patients with Zenker diverticulum who were treated by endoscopic diverticulotomy using Ligasure™. The procedure was performed in the endoscopy unit under deep sedation controlled by the endoscopist. Patients were subsequently admitted for observation and, after discharge, were followed-up in the outpatient clinic. RESULTS: Eight patients, 5 women and 3 men, mean age 78±15 years, 25% ASA I, 36% ASA II, 14% ASA III and 25% ASA IV. Main symptom: dysphagia. Diverticula size: 1-7cm. Technical success: 100%. COMPLICATIONS: one patient with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Average stay: 24h. Seven patients: asymptomatic; one patient with partial improvement, requiring repeat endoscopic intervention. Surgery and morbidity and mortality: 0%. CONCLUSION: The treatment of Zenker diverticulum by endoscopic diverticulotomy using the Ligasure™ vessel sealer is highly effective, fast and safe, and could be considered the treatment of choice.