Post-infarction ventricular septal defect surgery in Portugal.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: We performed a collective analysis of a dedicated national post-myocardial infarction ventricular septal defect (VSD) registry to further elucidate controversial areas of this clinical entity's surgical treatment. METHODS: A descriptive statistical analysis was carried out and cumulative survival using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariate logistic regression of risk factors for 30-day mortality are presented. RESULTS: Median survival of the cohort (n=76) was 72 months (95% CI 4-144 months). Better cumulative survival was observed in patients who underwent VSD closure more than 10 days after myocardial infarction (log-rank p=0.036). Concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), different closure techniques, location of the VSD, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as bridge to closure, or intra-aortic balloon pump as bridge to closure showed no statistically significant differences at Kaplan-Meier analysis. Multivariate binary logistic regression for independent factors affecting status at 30 days showed a statistically significant effect of age (OR 1.08; 95% CI 1.01-1.15) and concomitant CABG (OR 0.23; 95% CI 0.06-0.90). CONCLUSIONS: Our results are comparable with previous reports regarding mortality, risk factors and concomitant procedures. Timing of surgery remains a controversial issue. Later closure seems to be advantageous, however, there is significant observational bias.

What is the role of septal myectomy in aortic stenosis?

Asymmetric basal septal hypertrophy is present in 10% of patients with hemodynamic significant aortic valve stenosis. From the surgeon's standpoint, it represents a dilemma as it may be implicated in suboptimal short and long-term results after aortic valve replacement (AVR), but also heighten unwarranted complications at the time of surgical correction. To provide insight about the usefulness and safety of concomitant septal myectomy in this setting, we performed a literature review searching Medline from its inception to November 2020 using the Pubmed interface. Only five low evidence retrospective analyses, comprising a total of <200 patients undergoing AVR with concomitant septal myectomy, were found in the literature. In summary, routine myectomy, in the presence of suspected or directly visualized asymmetric septal hypertrophy on echocardiogram during AVR, seems to be a safe procedure, with all authors reporting a low rate or absence of complications. Overall, myectomy in this setting is associated with superior echocardiographic results concerning surrogates of LV remodelling (LVM; LVM index; LVM/height) and diastolic function (E/E'), suggesting some benefit for hemodynamic outcomes. However, to what extent hemodynamic improvement is exclusively attributable to myectomy is uncertain, as is, the clinical significance of such an improvement, with similar short and mid-term survival rates being reported.

In low-risk patients aged >70-75 with severe aortic stenosis, is transcatheter superior to surgical aortic valve replacement in terms of reported cardiovascular composite outcomes and survival?

A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was: In low-risk patients aged >70-75 with severe aortic stenosis, is transcatheter superior to surgical aortic valve replacement in terms of reported composite outcomes and survival? More than 73 papers were found using the reported search, of which 8 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers were tabulated. The only low-risk randomized control trial to date [Nordic Aortic Valve Intervention (NOTION)] regarding an elderly population did not show a statistically significant difference between the 2 approaches regarding the composite endpoint of death, stroke or myocardial infarction. A subgroup analysis of elderly patients in the 2 main low-risk randomized control trials did not yield statistically different results from those of the overall population; the results indicated the superiority of transcatheter aortic valve implantation regarding the composite of death, stroke or rehospitalization at 1 year [The Safety and Effectiveness of the SAPIEN 3 Transcatheter Heart Valve in Low Risk Patients With Aortic Stenosis (PARTNER 3)] and non-inferiority regarding a composite of death or stroke at 2 years [Medtronic Evolut Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients (Evolut LR)]. The results from lower evidence studies are largely consistent with these findings. Overall, there is no compelling evidence indicating that older age should be an isolated criterion for the choice between transcatheter aortic valve replacement and surgical aortic valve replacement in otherwise low-risk patients. The superiority of either technique regarding the aforementioned composite short-term outcomes in this particular subgroup of patients is unclear.

Are NOACs as safe and efficient as VKA regarding thromboembolic prophylaxis and major bleeding in patients with surgical bioprosthesis and atrial fibrillation within 3 months of surgery?

A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was: 'Are NOACs as safe and efficient as vitamin K antagonist regarding thromboembolic prophylaxis and major bleeding in patients with surgical bioprosthesis and atrial fibrillation within 3 months of surgery?' Altogether more than 324 papers were found using the reported search, of which 6 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. The RIVER and ENAVLE trials showed non-inferiority of rivaroxaban (regarding mean time free from composite of death, major cardiovascular events or major bleeding at 12 months) and edoxaban (composite of death, clinical thromboembolic events or asymptomatic intracardiac thrombosis; and major bleeding) when compared with vitamin K antagonist. These studies include a low number of patients within 3 months of index surgery and overall low statistical power regarding this particular subgroup of patients. Data derived from lower evidence studies are compatible with the aforementioned findings. The available evidence suggests that non-vitamin K antagonist anticoagulants are as safe and as efficient as vitamin K antagonist regarding thromboembolic prophylaxis and bleeding event rates in patients with surgical bioprosthesis and atrial fibrillation within 3 months of bioprosthesis implantation. However, this evidence is derived from a limited number of studies with important methodological limitations. Expanding non-vitamin K antagonist anticoagulant recommendation to the early postoperative period warrants more confirmatory research.

Coronary artery bypass grafting in a child with Kawasaki disease.

Kawasaki disease (KD) with cardiac involvement can result in the development of coronary aneurysm, stenosis or thrombosis with significant cardiovascular implications. We report the case of a 23-month-old male with a late diagnosis of KD, in whom intravenous immunoglobulin treatment was not feasible. The patient's course was assessed by routine echocardiography. At the age of five years, angiographic assessment revealed an aneurysm of the anterior descending coronary artery measuring 17 mm×7 mm involving the first diagonal branch, 90% post-aneurysmal stenosis, and an aneurysm of the right coronary artery measuring 32 mm×6 mm. Due to the critical anatomy of the anterior descending artery the revascularization method of choice was coronary artery bypass surgery with an internal mammary artery graft, under cardiopulmonary bypass. There were no significant intraoperative or postoperative complications. This confirms coronary artery bypass grafting as a reliable treatment option for patients who present with coronary sequelae from KD, even at a very young age.

Does routine topical antimicrobial administration prevent sternal wound infection after cardiac surgery?

A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was 'Does routine topical antimicrobial administration prevent sternal wound infection (SWI) after cardiac surgery? Altogether >238 papers were found using the reported search, of which 11 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. Several different antimicrobial agents, dosages and application protocols were found in the literature. Regarding topical vancomycin use, a meta-analysis by Kowalewski et al. demonstrated a 76% risk reduction in any SWI. Collagen-gentamicin sponge application was associated with a 38% risk reduction in SWI in another meta-analysis by Kowalewski et al., which included 4 randomized control trials and >23 000 patients. Lower evidence observational studies found benefit in the use of different regimes, including: combination of vancomycin paste and subcutaneous gentamycin; combined cefazoline and gentamicin spray; isolated cefazolin; bacitracin ointment; and rifampicin irrigation. We conclude that, in light of the body of evidence available, topical antibiotic application prevents SWI, including both superficial and deep SWI. The strongest evidence, derived from 2 meta-analyses, is related to the use of gentamicin-collagen sponges and topical vancomycin. Heterogeneity throughout studies regarding antibiotic agents, dosages, application protocols and SWI definition makes providing general recommendations challenging.

Analysis of a 10-year period of lead removal in a referral centre.

OBJECTIVES: Our goal was to analyse all lead extraction procedures (transvenous or open surgery) performed in our centre and the short- and long-term follow-up data from these patients. METHODS: All lead extractions performed from 2008 to 2017 were retrospectively reviewed for patient characteristics and indications for device implantation; indications for lead extraction; techniques used; peri- and postprocedural complications and short- and long-term follow-up data. RESULTS: A total of 159 patients (282 leads) were included [age 70 (62-78) years; 72% men]. The median follow-up time was 57 (25-90) months. Patients with lead explants were excluded. The most common indication for lead removal was infection (77%). A surgical approach was necessary in 14 patients (9%) owing to unsuccessful transvenous removal (n = 3), large vegetation in the lead (n = 4), concomitant valvular endocarditis (n = 2), other indications for open surgery (n = 4) and complicated transvenous removal (n = 1). Removal was tried for 282 leads. Of those, 256 were completely removed. Clinical success was achieved in 155 individual patients (98%). Complications occurred in 6 patients: 3 persistent infections, 1 stroke and 2 blood vessel ruptures. The procedure-related mortality rate was 2% (n = 3). CONCLUSIONS: Lead removal was associated with a high success rate and low all-cause complication and mortality rates. Emergency surgery because of acute complications was rare, and open-heart surgery was most frequently elective and not associated with a worse outcome.

Cold Agglutinins and Cardiac Surgey: a Case Report.

Cold agglutinins (CA) are autoantibodies whose clinical significance depends upon titer and thermal amplitude. Patients, which undergo cardio-pulmonary bypass and especially hypothermic cardioplegia myocardial protection, represent a challenge regarding operative management, as tissue temperature should be maintained above the threshold of agglutination. We report on a case in which the presence of CA was discovered during elective aortic valve replacement surgery, and managed with normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass and continuous retrograde warm blood cardioplegia administration.

Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Left Main or Multivessel Coronary Disease.

Current recommendations on the optimal revascularization strategy in Non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) with left main (LM) or multivessel coronary disease (MVD) are based upon randomized clinical trials conducted in stable coronary artery disease. In a real-world contemporary observational registry, we compared the long-term outcome of NSTEMI patients with LM/MVD (n = 1,104) submitted to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), or optimized medical therapy (OMT). The primary end point was 5-year all-cause mortality. Results were assessed in the entire population (CABG 289, PCI 399, and OMT 416) and in a propensity score-matched cohort of CABG (n = 159) and PCI (n = 159). Crude 5-year mortality rates in CABG and PCI were 25.3% versus 29.6%, respectively (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.2; 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.9 to 1.6; p = 0.212); OMT, however, was associated with a twofold higher risk of mortality when compared with any revascularization strategy (unadjusted HR 2.0; 95% CI 1.7 to 2.5; p < 0.001). After propensity score-matching and multivariate analysis, there was a trend toward a higher incidence of the primary end point in patients who underwent PCI versus CABG (31% vs 21%; adjusted HR 1.52; 95% CI 0.93 to 2.50; p = 0.094). This was a consistent finding over subgroups deemed clinically relevant, such as in patients with LM or proximal left anterior descending disease, SYNergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with TAXus ≥23 and left ventricle ejection fraction <40%. In conclusion, in a real-world cohort of NSTEMI patients with LM/MVD, those selected for OMT had a dire outcome. Although adjusted 5-year mortality was statistically similar between revascularization strategies, there was a trend favoring CABG, which might be the preferred option in LM, proximal LAD, SYNergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with TAXus ≥23, and left ventricle ejection fraction <40% subgroups.

CABG: To CBP or Not To CBP - A Propensity Score Matched Survival.

INTRODUCTION: Over the past 3 decades two main strategies have been employed for surgical coronary revascularization (CABG): on- pump CABG with cardioplegia (ONCAB) and off-pump CABG (OPCAB). The objective of this study is to evaluate the short-term and long-term survival of the two strategies. METHODS: This study consists of 8-year cohort, retrospective single-center analysis with an intention-to-treat design. 2954 patients underwent CABG (OPCAB n=2123; ONCAB= 831) for CAD. As these two groups were statistically different regarding several parameters, a propensity score model was applied and a more homogeneous cohort (n= 1441; OPCAB= 885; ONCAB=556) was analyzed. Univariate analysis, Kaplan-Meier curves and when appropriate a multivariate analysis was applied to the overall group and 6 subgroups: 2 vessel disease, 3 vessel disease, left stem disease, diabetic patients; patients with creatinin clearance bellow 50ml/min; and patients with body mass index above 30 kg/m2. RESULTS: Our study show: No difference in 30-days mortality, long-term survival (mean 71 months follow-up), AKY and stroke rates; Higher rates of bypass per patient (2.3% vs 2.8%, p<0,001) and complete revascularization (76% vs 83%) in the ONCAB group; Fewer re-operation for bleeding (0.8 vs 3.8%, p<0.001), fewer peak troponin>19mg/ dl (4.7% vs 9.9%, p<0,001), and fewer IABP use (1.5% vs 3.3%, p=0,027) in the OPCAB group. Sub-group analysis showed no difference between the two groups with exception of a higher rate of troponin peak >19mg/dl adjusted for CAD extension in the left-main stem disease group undergoing ONCAB (OR=2,3 +-0.8 p=0,018). CONCLUSION: The major randomized controlled trials comparing the two strategies show: No difference in 30-days mortality, 1-year survival, AKY and stroke rates; Less re-revascularization rates and higher bypass per patient and bypass patency with ONCAB. Despite the large volume of evidence generated around both on-pump and off-pump CABG strategies, studies fail to demonstrate clear benefit of either strategy regarding mortality and most common complications. Our results are similar of those found in the literature as neither strategy has unequivocal superior results. ONCAB shows consistently higher rates of complete revascularization and higher number of grafts. OPCAB shows lesser troponin levels suggestive of less myocardial damage. Major limitations include: analysis not matched for surgeon performance; cardiac related events, re-revascularization need and graft patency not evaluated; isolated use of troponin levels for evaluation myocardial damage.