RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To examine whether meeting vs not meeting movement/non-movement guidelines (moderate-to-vigorous physical activity [MVPA], screen time, sleep duration), and combinations of these recommendations, are associated with health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in children from 12 countries in five major geographic regions of the world and explore whether the associations vary by study site. STUDY DESIGN: Observational, multinational cross-sectional study. METHODS: This study included 6106 children aged 9-11 years from sites in Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Colombia, Finland, India, Kenya, Portugal, South Africa, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Participants completed the KIDSCREEN-10 to provide a global measure of their HRQoL. Sleep duration and MVPA were assessed using 24-h accelerometry. Screen time was assessed through self-report. Meeting the recommendations was defined as ≥60 min/day for MVPA, ≤2 h/day for screen time, and between 9 and 11 h/night for sleep duration. Age, sex, highest parental education, unhealthy diet pattern score, and body mass index z-score were included as covariates in statistical models. RESULTS: In the full sample, children meeting the screen time recommendation, the screen time + sleep recommendation, and all three recommendations had significantly better HRQoL than children not meeting any of these guidelines. Differences in HRQoL scores between sites were also found within combinations of movement/non-movement behaviors. For example, while children in Australia, Canada, and USA self-reported better HRQoL when meeting all three recommendations, children in Kenya and Portugal reported significantly lower HRQoL when meeting all three recommendations (relative to not meeting any). CONCLUSIONS: Self-reported HRQoL is generally higher when children meet established movement/non-movement recommendations. However, differences between study sites also suggest that interventions aimed at improving lifestyle behaviors and HRQoL should be locally and culturally adapted.
Asunto(s)
Ejercicio Físico , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Guías como Asunto , Estado de Salud , Calidad de Vida , Australia , Brasil , Canadá , Niño , China , Colombia , Estudios Transversales , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Humanos , India , Kenia , Masculino , Autoinforme , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Within the global context of the nutrition and physical activity transition it is important to determine the relationship between adiposity and active school transport (AST) across different environmental and socio-cultural settings. The present study assessed the association between adiposity (that is, body mass index z-score (BMIz), obesity, percentage body fat (PBF), waist circumference) and AST in 12 country sites, in the International Study of Childhood Obesity, Lifestyle and the Environment (ISCOLE). METHODS: The analytical sample included 6797 children aged 9-11 years. Adiposity indicators included, BMIz calculated using reference data from the World Health Organization, obesity (BMIz ⩾+2 s.d.), PBF measured using bioelectrical impedance and waist circumference. School travel mode was assessed by questionnaire and categorized as active travel versus motorized travel. Multilevel linear and non-linear models were used to estimate the magnitude of the associations between adiposity indicators and AST by country site and sex. RESULTS: After adjusting for age, sex, parental education and motorized vehicle availability, children who reported AST were less likely to be obese (odds ratio=0.72, 95% confidence interval (0.60-0.87), P<0.001) and had a lower BMIz (-0.09, s.e.m.=0.04, P=0.013), PBF (least square means (LSM) 20.57 versus 21.23% difference -0.66, s.e.m.=0.22, P=0.002) and waist circumference (LSM 63.73 cm versus 64.63 cm difference -0.90, s.e.m.=0.26, P=0.001) compared with those who reported motorized travel. Overall, associations between obesity and AST did not differ by country (P=0.279) or by sex (P=0.571). CONCLUSIONS: AST was associated with lower measures of adiposity in this multinational sample of children. Such findings could inform global efforts to prevent obesity among school-age children.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Heritability and population-specific lifestyle factors are considered to significantly contribute to chronic low back pain (LBP), but traditional population studies fail to (1) adjust for genetics; and (2) use standard and validated definitions for LBP and for lifestyle factors. METHODS: Using a classical and a co-twin control study design and validated definitions for chronic LBP and lifestyle variables, we explored the relative contribution of genetics and environment on the prevalence of chronic LBP in a sample of adult Australian twins. RESULTS: Data from 105 twin pairs showed that the prevalence of chronic LBP is significantly determined by genetic factors (heritability = 32%). Additionally, monozygotic twins were five times more likely to have chronic LBP than dizygotic twins when one of the siblings of the pair was affected. In a case-control analysis (n = 38 twin pairs), an exploratory analysis showed higher prevalence of chronic LBP associated with light walking exercises and vigorous gardening or heavy work around the house. Daily time spent in sitting was also positively associated with chronic LBP, but not moderate physical activities such as jogging, cycling and gentle swimming. In the final multivariate model, only time spent in vigorous gardening or heavy work around the house remained associated with chronic LBP (odds ratio 6.5; 95% confidence interval 1.47-28.8). CONCLUSIONS: The type, frequency and duration of physical activity may be important to understand risk factors for chronic LBP. The causation path between chronic LBP and people's engagement in activities involving frequent bending and twisting such as gardening and housework should be further investigated.
Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico/genética , Estilo de Vida , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/genética , Gemelos Dicigóticos/genética , Gemelos Monocigóticos/genética , Adulto , Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/epidemiología , Australia/epidemiología , Dolor Crónico/epidemiología , Femenino , Jardinería/estadística & datos numéricos , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Tareas del Hogar/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Fumar/epidemiología , Gemelos Dicigóticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Gemelos Monocigóticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Caminata/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Physical deconditioning in combination with societal and emotional factors has been hypothesized to compromise complete recovery from low back pain (LBP). However, there is a lack of longitudinal studies designed to specifically investigate physical activity as an independent prognostic factor. We conducted a prognostic study to investigate whether levels of leisure time physical activity are independently associated with clinical outcomes in people seeking care for chronic and persistent LBP. METHODS: A total of 815 consecutive patients presenting with LBP to an outpatient spine centre in secondary care were recruited. Separate multivariate linear regression analyses were performed to investigate whether levels of leisure time physical activity (i.e., sedentary, light and moderate-to-vigorous leisure time physical activity levels) predict pain and disability at 12-month follow-up, after adjusting for age, pain, episode duration, disability, neurological symptoms, depression and fear of movement. RESULTS: Final models showed evidence of an association between baseline physical activity and 12-month outcomes (p < 0.001). In both models, the moderate-to-vigorous physical activity group reported less pain and disability compared with the sedentary group. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that physical activity levels may have a role in the prognosis of LBP. Specific domains of physical activity warrant further investigation to better understand this association.
Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico/diagnóstico , Ejercicio Físico/fisiología , Actividades Recreativas , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/diagnóstico , Adulto , Dolor Crónico/fisiopatología , Dolor Crónico/psicología , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Personas con Discapacidad , Ejercicio Físico/psicología , Miedo/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/fisiopatología , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/psicología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Autoinforme , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Self-report outcome measures (questionnaires) are widely used by physiotherapists for measuring patient's health status or treatment outcomes. Most of these measurement tools were developed in English and their usefulness is very limited in non-English speaking countries such as Brazil. The only way to solve this problem is to properly adapt the relevant questionnaires into a target language and culture (e.g. Brazilian-Portuguese) and then test the instrument by checking its psychometric (clinimetric) characteristics. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this paper was to present relevant issues in the process of cross-cultural adaptations and clinimetric testing for self-report outcome measurements. Advice on how to perform a cross-cultural adaptation, how to properly check the clinimetric properties, how to select a relevant questionnaire and how to evaluate the quality of an adapted questionnaire are provided. Additionally we present all Brazilian-Portuguese cross-cultural adaptations of low back pain measurements that we know of. CONCLUSIONS: There is a clear need for more effort in the field of cross-cultural adaptation and clinimetrics, without proper instruments, the management of patients from non-English speaking countries is compromised.
INTRODUÇÃO: Questionários vem sendo amplamente utilizados por fisioterapeutas para medir a condição de saúde do paciente ou dos resultados de tratamento. A maioria desses instrumentos para avaliação foi desenvolvida em inglês, sendo seu uso bastante limitado em países que não usam o inglês como língua nativa, a exemplo do Brasil. A única forma de resolver esse problema é através de uma adaptação apropriada dos questionários relevantes para um alvo lingüístico e cultural (por exemplo, português do Brasil) e então testar suas características psicométricas (clinimétricas). OBJETIVO: A finalidade deste artigo foi a apresentar os tópicos relevantes no processo das adaptações transculturais de questionários e os seus respectivos testes clinimétricos. São fornecidas propostas sobre como realizar uma adaptação transcultural, como avaliar adequadamente as propriedades clinimétricas, como selecionar um questionário relevante e como avaliar a qualidade de um questionário adaptado. Além disso, são também apresentadas as adaptações conhecidas, para português do Brasil, dos questionários para avaliação de dor lombar. CONCLUSÃO: Existe uma clara necessidade de mais esforços na área de adaptação transcultural e clinimetria. Sem os instrumentos adequados, o gerenciamento no cuidado de pacientes nos países onde o inglês não é a língua nativa torna-se comprometido.