Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Can Assoc Radiol J ; : 8465371241243271, 2024 Apr 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38581354

RESUMEN

While hydrocelectomy is the gold-standard for treating hydroceles, it poses an increased risk to patients and a greater burden to the healthcare system. Sclerotherapy is an alternative treatment for hydroceles that involves injecting a sclerosant into the hydrocele under ultrasound guidance. This literature review aimed to assess the types of sclerosants used and how sclerotherapy compares to hydrocelectomy. A literature search was conducted of MEDLINE and EMBASE using the terms "sclerotherapy" and "hydrocelectomy," which yielded 1058 studies, of which 29 met the inclusion criteria. Only studies published after 2000 were included to ensure the most recent information was reviewed. The results showed hydrocele sclerotherapy is done using a variety of sclerosants. The most used agents are polidocanol, phenol, and STS. Of these, phenol had the highest clinical success rate of 96.5%. There was evidence for the use of atypical agents, such as tetracycline antibiotics, which yielded cure rates up to 93%, and alcohol, which was found to be especially useful for treating multiseptated hydroceles. The results comparing sclerotherapy to hydrocelectomy indicated hydrocelectomy to be a more effective method in completely curing hydroceles. However, this came at the cost of more complications. Additionally, sclerotherapy was found to be more advantageous for secondary outcomes, such as healthcare costs and burden to patients. In conclusion, this review shows that while hydrocelectomy is more effective, sclerotherapy is a valuable alternative for treating hydroceles. Due to the lack of standardization among studies, a definitive conclusion cannot be made regarding which sclerosant is best to use.

2.
BJR Case Rep ; 8(4): 20210239, 2022 Jul 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36451912

RESUMEN

Urinary bladder fistula formation is a complication of significant morbidity and mortality following pelvic surgery or radiotherapy. Surgical treatment is the definitive management, but it may be contraindicated in patients with significant comorbidities. The alternative approach is to divert urine away from the fistula with stents and catheters, and allow time for healing. The case illustrated herein describes the use of alcohol to accelerate the fibrotic healing of a urinary bladder fistula, based on the premise that sclerosing agents have been effective in the treatment of pancreatic fistulas and renal cysts. A Foley catheter is inserted through the external fistula orifice and passed along the fistula tract into the urinary bladder. The Foley catheter balloon is inflated and pulled back to occlude the fistula. Following this, a vascular sheath is placed alongside the catheter and ethanol is injected into the tract. The alcohol is left to dwell in the fistula for a few minutes, after which time the catheter and sheath are removed. The sclerosant effect of the ethanol aims to induce fibrosis, and therefore occlusion, of the fistula.

3.
BMJ Case Rep ; 20142014 Nov 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25425248

RESUMEN

A 30-year-old woman with no significant medical or family history presented with epigastric pain radiating to the right shoulder tip. She had an acute drop of haemoglobin within 6 h of admission. She was found to be actively bleeding from a ruptured simple ovarian cyst with no other pathology found. Bleeding was stopped by diathermy.


Asunto(s)
Hemoperitoneo/etiología , Quistes Ováricos/complicaciones , Dolor Abdominal/etiología , Adulto , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Electrocoagulación , Femenino , Hemoperitoneo/diagnóstico , Hemoperitoneo/cirugía , Humanos , Rotura Espontánea/complicaciones
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...