Management of women with abnormal uterine bleeding: Clinical practice guidelines of the French National College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF).

OBJECTIVE: To provide French guidelines for the management of women with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB). DESIGN: A consensus committee of 26 experts was formed. A formal conflict-of-interest policy was developed at the beginning of the process and enforced throughout. The entire guidelines process was conducted independently of any industry funding (i.e. pharmaceutical or medical device companies). The authors were advised to follow the rules of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE®) system to guide assessment of quality of evidence. The potential drawbacks of making strong recommendations in the presence of low-quality evidence were emphasized. METHODS: The last guidelines from the Collège National des Gynécologues et Obstétriciens Français on the management of women with AUB were published in 2008. The literature seems now sufficient for an update. The committee studied questions within 7 fields (diagnosis; adolescents; idiopathic AUB; endometrial hyperplasia and polyps; type 0-2 fibroids; type 3 or higher fibroids; and adenomyosis). Each question was formulated in a PICO (Patients, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) format and evidence profiles were compiled. The GRADE® methodology was applied to the literature review and the formulation of recommendations. RESULTS: The experts' synthesis work and the application of the GRADE method resulted in 36 recommendations. Among the formalized recommendations, 19 are strong and 17 weak. No response was found in the literature for 14 questions. We chose to abstain from recommendations rather than providing advice based solely on expert clinical experience. CONCLUSIONS: The 36 recommendations make it possible to specify the diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for various clinical situations practitioners encounter, from the simplest to the most complex.

Severe pelvic pain is associated with sexual abuse experienced during childhood and/or adolescence irrespective of the presence of endometriosis.

STUDY QUESTION: Is endometriosis associated with childhood and/or adolescent sexual abuse? SUMMARY ANSWER: Endometriosis is not associated with a history of sexual abuse, unlike the presence of severe pelvic pain. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Several studies have highlighted a link between pelvic pain and sexual abuse during childhood/adolescence. Moreover, an inflammatory state has been described in patients with a history of childhood maltreatment. Given that inflammation and pelvic pain are two entities often encountered with endometriosis, several teams have investigated whether endometriosis is associated with abuse during childhood/adolescence. However, the results are conflicting, and the link between sexual abuse and the presence of endometriosis and/or pain is hard to disentangle. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A survey nested in a cohort study of women surgically explored for benign gynecological indications at our institution between January 2013 and January 2017. For each patient, a standardized questionnaire was completed during a face-to-face interview with the surgeon in the month preceding the surgery. Pelvic pain symptoms (dysmenorrhea, deep dyspareunia, non-cyclic chronic pelvic pain, and gastrointestinal or lower urinary tract symptoms) and their intensities were assessed with a 10 cm visual analog scale (VAS). Pain was considered to be severe when the VAS score was ≥7. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: A 52-question survey was sent in September of 2017 to evaluate abuses, especially sexual abuse during childhood and/or adolescence, and the psychological state during childhood and adolescence. The survey was structured to cover the following sections: (i) abuses and other life events during childhood and adolescence; (ii) puberty and body changes; (iii) onset of sexuality; and (iv) family relationships during childhood and adolescence. The patients were divided into groups according to whether or not they exhibited histologically proven endometriosis. Statistical analyses were conducted using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Two hundred and seventy-one patients answered all the questions of the survey: 168 with (endometriosis group) and 103 without endometriosis (control group). The mean ± SD overall population age was 32.2 ± 5.1 years. There were 136 (80.9%) and 48 (46.6%) women who experienced at least one severe pelvic pain symptom in the endometriosis and the control groups, respectively (P < 0.001). No differences were found between the two study groups regarding the following characteristics: (i) a history of sexual, physical, or emotional abuse; (ii) a history of abandonment or bereavement; (iii) the psychological state regarding puberty; and (iv) the family relationships. After multivariable analysis, we found no significant association between endometriosis and a history of sexual abuse during childhood and/or adolescence (P = 0.550). However, the presence of at least one severe pelvic pain symptom was independently associated with a history of sexual abuse (odds ratio = 3.6, 95% CI (1.2-10.4)). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Evaluation of the psychological state during childhood and/or adolescence can be subject to recall bias. In addition, selection bias is also a possibility given that some of the patients surveyed did not return the questionnaire. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Severe gynecological painful symptoms in women with or without histologically proven endometriosis may be linked to sexual abuse experienced during childhood and/or adolescence. Patient questioning about painful symptoms and abuses is important to provide comprehensive care to the patients, from a psychological to a somatic point of view. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No funding or competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Management of postmenopausal women: Collège National des Gynécologues et Obstétriciens Français (CNGOF) and Groupe d'Etude sur la Ménopause et le Vieillissement (GEMVi) Clinical Practice Guidelines.

AIM: The aim of these recommendations is to set forth an individualized approach to the management of early postmenopausal women (i.e., within the first 10 years after natural menopause) covering all aspects of lifestyle and therapeutic management, with or without menopause hormone therapy (MHT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Literature review and consensus of French expert opinion. Recommendations were graded according to the HAS methodology and levels of evidence derived from the international literature, except when there was no good-quality evidence. SUMMARY RECOMMENDATIONS: The beginning of menopause is an ideal time for each woman to evaluate her health status by assessing her bone, cardiovascular, and cancer-related risk factors that may be amplified by postmenopausal estrogen deficiency and by reviewing her lifestyle habits. Improving lifestyle, including nutrition and physical activity, and avoiding risk factors (notably smoking), should be recommended to all women. MHT remains the most effective treatment for vasomotor symptoms but it could be also recommended as first-line treatment for the prevention of osteoporosis in early postmenopausal women at low to moderate risk for fracture. The risks of MHT differ depending on its type, dose, duration of use, route of administration, timing of initiation, and whether a progestogen is used. There is reasonable evidence that using transdermal estradiol in association with micronized progesterone or dydrogesterone may limit both the venous thromboembolic risk associated with oral estrogens and the risk of breast cancer associated with synthetic progestins. Treatment should be individualized to each woman, by using the best available evidence to maximize benefits and minimize risks, with periodic reevaluation of its benefit-risk balance. For bothersome genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) symptoms, vaginal treatment with lubricants and moisturizers is recommended as first-line treatment together with low-dose vaginal estrogen therapy, depending on the clinical course. No recommendation of an optimal duration of MHT can be made, but it must take into consideration the initial indication for MHT as well as each woman's benefit-risk balance. Management of gynecological side-effects of MHT is also examined. These recommendations are endorsed by the Groupe d'Etude sur la Ménopause et le Vieillissement hormonal (GEMVI) and the Collège National des Gynécologues-Obstétriciens Français (CNGOF).

Presence of adenomyosis at MRI reduces live birth rates in ART cycles for endometriosis.

STUDY QUESTION: What is the impact of adenomyosis on the live birth rate (LBR) in women affected by endometriosis women undergoing ART? SUMMARY ANSWER: For women undergoing ART, the presence of adenomyosis at MRI, especially T2 high-signal intensity spots within the myometrium, has a negative impact on the LBR. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Adenomyosis is a common gynecological disease. The development of imaging techniques for the diagnosis has led to several adenomyosis phenotypes being described, and fertility issues appear to vary according to the characteristics of the lesions. What makes assessment of the impact of adenomyosis on fertility issues even more difficult is its frequent association with endometriosis, which is another known risk factor of infertility. Although data suggest that adenomyosis may worsen the ART prognosis, there is no clear consensus regarding the impact of adenomyosis on ART outcomes in women affected by endometriosis. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This was an observational study that included phenotyped patients with endometriosis, aged between 18 and 42 years, who underwent IVF/ICSI treatment in a tertiary care center between June 2015 and July 2018. Only women who had undergone a pelvic MRI during the pre-therapeutic ART workup were retained for this study. The MRI data were interpreted by radiologists who had expertise in gynecological MRI. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: A continuous series of 202 women affected by endometriosis was included. The women were monitored until four ART cycles had been completed, until delivery, or until discontinuation of treatment before the completion of four cycles. The primary outcome was the delivery of at least one live infant after up to four IVF/ICSI cycles. The patient and the MRI characteristics were compared between the women who achieved a live birth versus those who did not. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The patients' mean age was 32.5 ± 3.7 years. Deep infiltrating endometriosis was present in 90.1% (182/202) of the included population. Adenomyosis (lesions of the internal and/or the external myometrium) was found in 71.8% (145/202) of the included women. The cumulative LBR was 57.4% (116/202). The women who gave birth were significantly younger (32.0 ± 3.3 versus 33.3 ± 4.1, P = 0.026) and had significantly better ovarian reserve parameters (anti-Müllerian hormone levels, antral follicle count) than those who did not. The presence of adenomyosis, irrespective of the phenotype (76/116 (65.5%) versus 69/86 (80.2%), respectively, P = 0.022) and the presence of T2 high-signal intensity myometrial spots (27/116 (23.3%) and 37/86 (43.0%), respectively, P = 0.003) was significantly less frequent in the group of women who gave birth versus those who did not. After multivariate analysis, the presence of adenomyosis (odds ratio (OR): 0.48, 95% CI (0.29-0.99), P = 0.048) and the presence of T2 high-signal intensity myometrial spots (OR: 0.43, 95% CI (0.22-0.86), P = 0.018) were independently found to be associated with a decrease in the cumulative chance of live birth. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The inclusion of patients from a referral center specialized in the management of women affected by endometriosis could constitute a selection bias, as these women may have had particularly severe forms of adenomyosis and/or endometriosis. A sensitive issue is that there is no consensual classification of adenomyosis and several lesions of adenomyosis can co-exist. Therefore, a comparison of fertility outcomes between women with and without adenomyosis is difficult to perform in practice. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: In women exhibiting endometriosis, the practitioner should perform an appropriate imaging workup to search for adenomyosis, identify prognostic factors, and personalize the patient management strategy in the setting of ART. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No funding was obtained and there were no conflicts of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

[Management of women with abnormal uterine bleeding: Clinical practice guidelines of the French National College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF)]. / Prise en charge des ménorragies : recommandations pour la pratique clinique du Collège national des gynécologues et obstétriciens français (CNGOF).

OBJECTIVE: To provide French guidelines for the management of women with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB). DESIGN: A consensus committee of 26 experts was formed. A formal conflict-of-interest (COI) policy was developed at the beginning of the process and enforced throughout. The entire guidelines process was conducted independently of any industrial funding (i.e. pharmaceutical, or medical devices). The authors were advised to follow the rules of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE®) system to guide assessment of quality of evidence. The potential drawbacks of making strong recommendations in the presence of low-quality evidence were emphasized. METHODS: The last guidelines from the Collège national des gynécologues et obstétriciens français (CNGOF) on the management of women with AUB was published in 2008. The literature seems now sufficient for an update. The committee studied questions within 7 fields (diagnosis; adolescent; idiopathic AUB; endometrial hyperplasia and polyps; fibroids type 0 to 2; fibroids type 3 and more; adenomyosis). Each question was formulated in a PICO (Patients, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) format and the evidence profiles were produced. The literature review and recommendations were made according to the GRADE® methodology. RESULTS: The experts' synthesis work and the application of the GRADE method resulted in 36 recommendations. Among the formalized recommendations, 19 present a strong agreement and 17 a weak agreement. Fourteen questions did not find any response in the literature. We preferred to abstain from recommending instead of providing expert advice. CONCLUSIONS: The 36 recommendations made it possible to specify the diagnostic and therapeutic strategies of various clinical situations managed by the practitioner, from the simplest to the most complex.

[Adenomyosis pathophysiology: An unresolved enigma]. / Physiopathologie de l'adénomyose : une énigme non résolue.

Adenomyosis is a chronic benign uterine disease characterized by the presence of endometrial glands and stroma within the myometrium. It is a heterogeneous disease, presenting various clinical forms, depending on the location of the ectopic lesions within the myometrium. Adenomyosis can be responsible for several symptoms such as dysmenorrhea, abnormal uterine bleeding and/or infertility. Its pathophysiology is a real conundrum and several theories have been proposed: development of adenomyosis lesion could initiate de novo from Mullerian rests or from stem cells. Moreover, multiple factors could be involved in initiating lesions, including specific hormonal, immune and/or genetic changes. The objective of this review is to provide an update on adenomyosis pathophysiology, in particular on the various theories proposed concerning the invasion of the myometrium by endometrial cells and the inducing mechanisms, and to study the link between the physiopathology, the symptoms and the medical treatments.

[Differential diagnosis of vasomotor symptoms. Postmenopausal women management: CNGOF and GEMVi clinical practice guidelines]. / Diagnostics différentiels des bouffées vasomotrices post-ménopausiques. RPC Les femmes ménopausées de CNGOF et du GEMVi.

Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) significantly decreases the frequency and intensity of vasomotor symptoms (VMS). It is recommended to evaluate clinical efficacy of HRT on VMS. The absence of reduction in VMS after adaptation of the modalities of the HRT suggests the possibility of atypical VMS. They should be evoked in the following clinical circumstances: when they do not give way with an adapted HRT (compliance and good use); when they appear or reappear long after menopause; when there are changes to the usual VMS; when they are associated with other functional signs. A first and second-line assessment is offered, after an interview and a detailed clinical examination, which will guide further explorations. The treatment is above all etiological when the results are positive. When the results are negative, an adaptation of the HRT can be proposed.

Adenomyosis of the inner and outer myometrium are associated with different clinical profiles.

STUDY QUESTION: Do adenomyosis phenotypes such as external or internal adenomyosis, as diagnosed by MRI, have the same clinical characteristics? SUMMARY ANSWER: External adenomyosis was found more often in young and nulliparous women and was associated with deep infiltrating endometriosis, whereas, in contrast, internal adenomyosis was more often associated with heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) but no differences were noted in terms of pain symptoms. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Adenomyosis is characterized by the presence of endometrial glands and stroma deep within the myometrium, giving rise to dysmenorrhea, pelvic pain and menorrhagia. Various forms have been described, including adenomyosis of the outer myometrium (external adenomyosis), which corresponds to lesions separated from the junctional zone (JZ), and adenomyosis of the inner myometrium (internal adenomyosis), which is mostly characterized by endometrial implants scattered throughout the myometrium and enlargement of the JZ. Although the pathogenesis of adenomyosis is not clearly understood, several lines of evidence suggest that these two phenotypes could have distinct origins. The clinical presentation of different forms of adenomyosis in patients warrants further investigation. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This was an observational study that used data collected prospectively in non-pregnant patients aged between 18 and 42 years who had undergone surgical exploration for benign gynecological conditions at our institution between May 2005 and May 2018. Only women with a pelvic MRI performed by a senior radiologist during the preoperative work-up were retained for this study. For each patient, a standardized questionnaire was completed during a face-to-face interview conducted by the surgeon in the month preceding the surgery. The women's histories (notably their age, gravidity, history of surgery and associated endometriosis), as well as clinical symptoms such as the pain intensity, presence of menorrhagia and infertility, were noted. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: A pelvic MRI was performed in 496 women operated at our center for a benign gynecological disease who had provided signed informed consent. Of these, 248 women had a radiological diagnosis of adenomyosis. Based on the MRI findings, the women were diagnosed as having external and/or internal adenomyosis. The women were allocated to two groups according to the adenomyosis phenotype (only external adenomyosis vs only internal adenomyosis). Women exhibiting an association of both adenomyosis forms were analyzed separately. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: In all, following the MRI findings, 109 women (44.0%) exhibited only external adenomyosis, while 78 (31.5%) had only internal adenomyosis. The women with external adenomyosis were significantly younger (mean ± SD; 31.9 ± 4.6 vs 33.8 ± 5.2 years; P = 0.006), more often nulligravid (P ≤ 0.001) and more likely to exhibit an associated endometriosis (P < 0.001) compared to the women in the internal adenomyosis group. Moreover, the women exhibiting internal adenomyosis significantly more often had a history of previous uterine surgery (P = 0.002) and HMB (62 (80%) vs 58 (53.2%), P < 0.001) compared to the women with external adenomyosis. No differences in the pain scores (i.e. dysmenorrhea, non-cyclic pelvic pain and dyspareunia) were observed between the two groups. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The exclusive inclusion of surgical patients could constitute a possible selection bias, as the women referred to our center may have suffered from particularly severe clinical symptoms. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Further studies are needed to explore the pathogenesis by which these types of adenomyosis occur. This could help with the development of new treatment strategies specific for each entity. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): none. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Migraine, hormones and the menopausal transition.

Migraine is a common, disabling and incapacitating headache disorder that may be triggered by many factors, such as hormones especially during the perimenopausal period, where large alterations in estradiol levels can occur. The evidence implies that hormonal fluctuations are one of the important triggers of migraine. During reproductive life and during hormonal contraception, the course of migraine can be impacted. Different types of migraine with and without aura can be variously influenced by hormones. Migraine can constitute a risk factor for stroke and this must be taken in account for menopause hormone therapy. Hormone therapy is a possible approach to prevent migraine that happens during the menopause transition. Scarce data on the various regimens and types of hormone therapy are available. Transdermal estradiol displays a more favorable profile on migraine than oral estrogens because it may provide more constant levels of estrogens.

Should women suffering from migraine with aura be screened for biological thrombophilia?: results from a cross-sectional French study.

INTRODUCTION: Migraine, particularly migraine with aura (MA), is associated with a higher risk for ischemic stroke (IS). A procoagulant state may predispose to IS. Whether inherited biological thrombophilia are associated with migraine risk remains controversial. OBJECTIVE: To assess the risk of migraine without or with aura related to inherited biological thrombophilia adjusted for the main potential confounders. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in 1456 French women aged 18 to 56years, referred for biological coagulation check-up because of personal or familial venous thrombosis history. Between April 2007 and December 2008, all women answered a self-administered questionnaire to determine whether they had headache. RESULTS: There were 294 (20%) migrainous sufferers (including 71 [5%] with MA), 975 (67%) non migrainous women and 187 (13%) non migrainous headache women. Inherited thrombophilia were detected in 576 (40%) women, including 389 (40%) non migrainous women, 90 (40%) migraine without aura (MWA), 33 (46%) MA women and 64 (34%) non migrainous headache women. Factor V Leiden (FVL) i.e. F5rs6025 or Factor II G20210A (FIIL) i.e. F2rs1799963 mutation was detected in 296 (30%) non migrainous women and in 100 (34%) migrainous women of which 27 had MA. There was a significant association between MA and FVL or FIIL mutations (adjusted OR=1.76 [95% CI 1.02-3.06] p=0.04) whereas this association in MWA and in non migrainous headache women was not significant. There was no significant association between migraine and other biological thrombophilia. CONCLUSION: FVL or FIIL mutations were more likely among patients suffering from MA. Whether biological thrombophilia screening should be systematically performed in women suffering from MA remains to be determined.