Effect of prophylactic corticosteroids on postoperative neurocognitive dysfunction in the adult population: An updated systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Background and Aims: Postoperative neurocognitive dysfunction (PNCD) commonly occurs after surgery and prolongs hospital stays. Both direct noxious stimuli to the central nervous system and systemic inflammation have been implicated. Due to their potent anti-inflammatory effects, corticosteroids have been utilised to attenuate the incidence and severity of PNCD. This systematic review and meta-analysis strived to evaluate the prophylactic role of perioperative corticosteroids for PNCD. Methods: A search was run in pre-defined databases for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the role of corticosteroids in preventing PNCD. The incidence of PNCD within 1 month was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included the use of antipsychotic medications for the treatment, postoperative infection, and hospital length of stay. The results are exhibited as odds ratio (OR) and the mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: Fifteen RCTs comprising 15,398 patients were included. The incidence of PNCD was significantly lower in the corticosteroid group than in the control group, with a pooled OR of 0.75 (95% CI 0.58, 0.96; P = 0.02; I2 = 66%). Trial sequential analysis showed the clinical benefit of corticosteroids in preventing PNCD; however, the requisite information size is still inadequate. The sub-group analysis supported the prophylactic effect of corticosteroids on delirium prevention but not on delayed neurocognitive recovery. Conclusions: Our meta-analysis revealed statistically significant protective effects of corticosteroids on the incidence of PNCD. However, further studies are still needed to confirm the protective role of this commonly used and relatively safe strategy for preventing PNCD.

Prophylactic dexamethasone for rebound pain after peripheral nerve block in adult surgical patients: systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis of randomised controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Rebound pain occurs after the resolution of peripheral nerve block and hampers patient recovery in the postoperative period. We sought to synthesise available data from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy of prophylactic dexamethasone for rebound pain in adult patients undergoing surgery with a peripheral nerve block. METHODS: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, RCTs reporting rebound pain and use of dexamethasone in the context of a peripheral nerve block were searched in various databases and updated in May 2023. The primary outcome was the incidence of rebound pain; secondary outcomes included the severity and time to onset of rebound pain, patient satisfaction with pain control, sleep disturbance because of pain, and adverse effects of dexamethasone. Subgroup analysis was conducted based on the effect of route of administration (intravenous or perineural) on the incidence of rebound pain. Trial sequential analysis was performed to rule out the possibility of a false positive result. RESULTS: Seven RCTs comprising 574 patients were included in this review. The dexamethasone group was associated with a reduction in the incidence of rebound pain with an odds ratio of 0.16 (95% confidence interval 0.10-0.27, P=0.00, I2=0%) compared with the control group. Trial sequential analysis confirmed the adequate information size for the beneficial effect of dexamethasone. Subgroup analysis showed that both intravenous and perineural administration were associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of rebound pain. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence suggests that both intravenous and perineural dexamethasone reduce the incidence of rebound pain after a peripheral nerve block provided for postoperative analgesia. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOL: PROSPERO CRD42023424031.

Efficacy of Different Approaches of Quadratus Lumborum Block for Postoperative Analgesia After Cesarean Delivery: A Bayesian Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

OBJECTIVES: Various approaches to quadratus lumborum block (QLB) have been found to be an effective analgesic modality after cesarean delivery (CD). However, the evidence for the superiority of any individual approach still needs to be demonstrated. Therefore, we conducted this network meta-analysis to compare and rank the different injection sites for QLB for pain-related outcomes after CD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and the Cochrane Central Registers of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the role of any approach of QLB with placebo/no block for post-CD pain. The primary outcome was parenteral consumption of morphine milligram equivalents in 24 postoperative hours. The secondary end points were early pain scores (4 to 6 h), late pain scores (24 h), adverse effects, and block-related complications. We used the surface under cumulative ranking probabilities to order approaches. The analysis was performed using Bayesian statistics (random-effects model). RESULTS: Thirteen trials enrolling 890 patients were included. The surface under cumulative ranking probability for parenteral morphine equivalent consumption in 24 hours was the highest (87%) for the lateral approach, followed by the posterior and anterior approaches. The probability of reducing pain scores at all intervals was highest with the anterior approach. The anterior approach also ranked high for postoperative nausea and vomiting reduction, the only consistent reported side effect. DISCUSSION: The anterior approach QLB had a superior probability for most patient-centric outcomes for patients undergoing CD. The findings should be confirmed through large RCTs.

Cross-cultural Adaptation and Validation of Hindi Version of Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire for Chronic Low Back Pain in Indian Population.

STUDY DESIGN: A cross-cultural adaptation, validation, and psychometric analysis. OBJECTIVE: The main aim was to assess the validity and reliability of the Hindi version of the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (Hi-RMDQ) for chronic low back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire is a standardized, self-administered tool for disability assessment in patients with chronic low back pain. However, its Hindi version has not been validated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cognitive debriefing was carried out with 10 patients to ensure the comprehensibility of the Hi-RMDQ. Following this, 120 patients were asked to complete the finalized questionnaire along with the modified Oswestry Disability Index Questionnaire, Quebec Back Pain Disability Score, and the Verbal Numeric Rating Scale. The patients were then asked to again fill out the finalized questionnaire after 72 hours. The internal consistency and retest reliability of the Hindi translated version of the questionnaire was tested. Its correlation with the other scores was also analyzed. RESULTS: The translated questionnaire showed excellent internal consistency (Cronbach α=0.989) and excellent retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.978). There was a positive and statistically significant association between the Hi-RMDQ, modified Oswestry Disability Index Questionnaire ( r =0.807; P <0.01), Quebec Back Pain Disability Score ( r =0.839; P <0.01), and Verbal Numeric Rating Scale ( r =0.713; P <0.01). CONCLUSION: The Hi-RMDQ version is an easy-to-use, acceptable, reliable, and valid tool to measure disability in the Indian population with nonspecific back pain with or without leg pain. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Hindi Version of EuroQol (EQ-5D-3L) Health Questionnaire in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain.

OBJECTIVE: The present study is an attempt to validate the Hindi version of the EuroQoL (EQ-5D-3L) questionnaire for patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). DESIGN: Prospective clinical study. SETTING: The study was conducted on an outpatient basis with the subjects being followed via online platform on day 3. SUBJECT: Native Indian patients above 18 years of age having CLBP who could speak and read Hindi were enrolled in the study. METHODS: This study is a cross-sectional study on 132 patients presenting with CLBP. Hi-SF-36 was used as a reference scale. Pain was evaluated using the numeric rating scale. Psychometric properties including internal consistency, test-retest reliability on day 3 and convergent validity were evaluated. Confirmation factor analysis was carried out in order to establish the relationship between the five dimensions of Hi-EQ-5D-3L and the eight domains of Hi-SF-36. RESULTS: The Cronbach alpha of 0.984 for index value and 0.944 for visual analog scale confirmed internal consistency of the Hi-EQ-5D. Intraclass correlation coefficient was found to be excellent for EQ index value (0.969, 95% CI: 0.954-0.979) and very good for visual analog scale (0.894, 95% CI: 0.844-0.928). Spearman rho correlation coefficients for the index value correlated strongly with all domains except role emotion ( r =0.181 on day 0 and r =0.239 on day 3). A good relationship between Hi-SF-36 and Hi-EQ-5D-3L was confirmed through factor analysis. CONCLUSION: The Hindi version of the EQ-5D-3L demonstrated comprehensibility, reliability and proved to be a valid instrument for the evaluation of health-related quality of life in CLBP patients.

Fascia iliaca block for hip fractures in the emergency department: meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.

BACKGROUND: Fascia iliaca block (FICB) has been used to reduce pain and its impact on geriatric patients with hip fractures. OBJECTIVE: We conducted this meta-analysis to investigate the analgesic efficacy of this block in comparison to standard of care (SOC) when performed by non-anesthesiologist in the emergency department. METHODS: Search on PubMed, SCOPUS, EMBASE, Google Scholar and Cochrane database for randomized and quasi-randomized trials were performed. The primary outcome was to compare pain relief at rest at 2-4 h. The pain relief at various time intervals, reduction in opioid use, the incidence of nausea/ vomiting, delirium and length of hospital stay were the secondary outcomes studied. Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA) was performed for the primary outcome. RESULTS: Eleven trials comprising 895 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Patients receiving FICB had significant better pain relief at rest at 2-4 h with mean difference of 1.59 (95% CI, 0.59-2.59, p = 0.002) with I2 = 96%. However, the certainty of the evidence was low and TSA showed that the sample size could not reach the requisite information size. A significant difference in pain relief at rest and on movement started within 30 min and lasted till 4 h of the block. Use of FICB was associated with a significant reduction in post-procedure parenteral opioid consumption, nausea and vomiting and length of hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: FICB is associated with significant pain relief both at rest and on movement lasting up to 4 h as well as a reduction in opioid requirement and associated nausea and vomiting in geriatric patients with hip fracture. However, the quality of evidence is low and additional trials are necessary.

Effect of balanced anaesthesia with and without modified pectoralis nerve block on postoperative analgesia after breast surgeries: A randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Modified pectoral nerve block (PEC) has been reported to have variable effects on perioperative pain in patients undergoing surgery for carcinoma breast. This randomised controlled trial was conducted to study the effect of modified PEC on postoperative pain relief in patients undergoing breast surgery. METHODS: Fifty patients with carcinoma breast undergoing breast surgery were randomised to receive a modified PEC block consisting of 30 ml of ropivacaine 0.2% after induction of anaesthesia (PEC group) or no block (GA group) in this prospective randomised trial. Time to first rescue analgesia was recorded as primary outcome. Other secondary outcomes recorded were postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, number of rescue boluses and 24-h fentanyl consumption. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in time to first rescue analgesia between the two groups, with mean difference (95% confidence interval) of 22.91 (-6.8 to 52.69) min. Amount of fentanyl required to keep pain VAS less than 3 was also comparable between the two groups, mean (standard deviation) of 42.0 µg (17.42) in GA group versus 43.24 µg (17.22) in PEC group; P = 0.830.20/25 patients required rescue analgesia in GA group as compared to 17/25 in PEC group (P = 0.334). The postoperative VAS scores were also comparable between the groups at all time intervals. CONCLUSION: Balanced anaesthesia supplemented with modified PEC block performed after general anaesthesia did not improve the postoperative pain in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy.

Limited condylar mobility by ultrasonography predicts difficult direct laryngoscopy in morbidly obese patients: An observational study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Unpredictable difficult laryngoscopy remains a challenge for anaesthesiologists, especially in morbidly obese patients. The present study aimed to determine the efficacy of different sonographic measures as predictors of difficult laryngoscopy in morbidly obese patients undergoing elective surgery. METHODS: This observational study evaluated 70 morbidly obese adult patients (body mass index >35 kg/m2) undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia with tracheal intubation. Pre-operative clinical and ultrasonographic variables (anterior condylar translation, tongue thickness, hyomental distance and oral cavity height) associated with difficult direct laryngoscopy ([Cormack Lehane (CL) grade>2]) were analysed. The primary outcome was to determine the efficacy of the above-mentioned sonographic measures as predictors of difficult laryngoscopy (CL grade >2). The secondary outcome compared ultrasonographic predictors with clinical predictors in morbidly obese patients for determining difficult direct laryngoscopy. RESULTS: Amongst the primary outcome measures, limited condylar mobility (anterior condylar translation <9.25 mm) [odds ratio (OR) 0.3, confidence interval (CI):1.04-1.22;P<0.001;area under curve (AUC):0.8] and increased tongue thickness >5.85 cm [OR: 3.2, CI: 1.05-10; P < 0.04; AUC: 0.73] were two independent sonographic predictors for difficult direct laryngoscopy by multivariate logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses in morbidly obese patients. The secondary outcome suggested that as compared to clinical predictors such as Mallampati grade and thyromental distance, ultrasonographic variables such as tongue thickness and limited condylar mobility (sensitivity: 56.4%, 70.9%, 66.7% and 93.3%, respectively) better predicted difficult direct laryngoscopy in morbidly obese patients. CONCLUSION: Limited condylar mobility and increased tongue thickness are independent sonographic predictors of difficult direct laryngoscopy in morbidly obese patients.

The analgesic effectiveness of ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric block for caesarean delivery: A meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

BACKGROUND: An effective analgesia strategy following caesarean delivery should be designed to improve fetomaternal outcomes. Much recent research has focused on the efficacy of ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric (II-IH) block for providing such analgesia. DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effectiveness of II-IH block in patients undergoing caesarean delivery. The primary outcome was the cumulative parenteral morphine equivalents at 24 h. Pain scores at 4 to 6 and 24 h postsurgery, time to first rescue analgesia and adverse effects were the secondary outcomes analysed. DATA SOURCES: Two reviewers searched independently PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar and the Cochrane central registers of a controlled trial from their inception until June 2020. METHODOLOGY: Prospective randomised control trials comparing II-IH block with either systemic analgesia alone or a placebo block (non-active controls) were eligible for inclusion. Only trials that reported their methods comprehensibly and transparently were included. Cochrane methodology was used to assess the risk of bias. Data are presented as mean difference with 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Thirteen trials comprising a total of 858 patients were included. Opioid (intravenous morphine equivalents) consumption was reduced by 15.57 mg (95% CI -19.87 to -11.28; P < 0.00001; I2 = 95%) during the first 24 h in patients receiving II-IH block when compared with placebo or no block. Patients receiving general anaesthesia showed a greater reduction in morphine requirement at 24 h than those receiving neuraxial anaesthesia. Adequate 'information size' for the above outcome was confirmed with trial sequential analysis to rule out the possibility of a false-positive result. II-IH also significantly reduced pain scores at rest more so at 4 to 6 h than at 24 h. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that the use of II-IH blocks is associated with a lower 24 h requirement for intravenous morphine equivalents in patients undergoing caesarean delivery. However, given the methodological limitations, data should be interpreted with caution until more studies are available.

Efficacy of topical agents for prevention of postoperative sore throat after single lumen tracheal intubation: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The optimal choice of prophylactic drugs to decrease postoperative sore throat is unclear. The objective of this network meta-analysis (NMA) was to compare and rank 11 topical agents used to prevent postoperative sore throat. METHODS: Various databases were searched independently for randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) comparing topical agents used for the prevention of postoperative sore throat. Inclusion criteria were parallel group studies comparing intervention with active or inactive control and reporting postoperative sore throat. The primary outcome was postoperative sore throat at 24 hr. Secondary outcomes were early sore throat at 4-6 hr, cough, and hoarseness at 24 hr. RESULTS: Evidence was synthesized from 70 RCTs reporting 7,141 patients. Topical application of lidocaine, corticosteroids, ketamine, magnesium, benzydamine, water-based lubricant, and liquorice applied along the tracheal tube, to the tracheal tube cuff, gargled or sprayed were compared with intracuff air and each other. Bayesian NMA showed that magnesium (odds ratio [OR], 0.10; 95% credible interval [CrI], 0.03 to 0.26), liquorice (OR, 0.14; 95% CrI, 0.03 to 0.55), and steroid application (OR, 0.11; 95% CrI, 0.06 to 0.22) most effectively prevented postoperative sore throat at 24 hr. Topical lidocaine was the least effective intervention. CONCLUSION: Topical application of magnesium followed by liquorice and corticosteroids most effectively prevented postoperative sore throat 24 hr after endotracheal intubation.

RéSUMé: CONTEXTE: Le choix optimal des médicaments prophylactiques pour réduire les maux de gorge postopératoires n'est pas clair. L'objectif de cette méta-analyse en réseau (NMA) était de comparer et classifier 11 agents topiques utilisés pour prévenir les maux de gorge postopératoires. MéTHODE: Des recherches ont été réalisées dans plusieurs bases de données de façon indépendante afin d'en extraire les études randomisées contrôlées (ERC) comparant des agents topiques utilisés pour la prévention des maux de gorge postopératoires. Nos critères d'inclusion étaient des études de groupes parallèles comparant une intervention à un témoin actif ou inactif sur des résultats de maux de gorge postopératoires. Le critère d'évaluation principal était les maux de gorge postopératoires à 24 h. Les critères d'évaluation secondaires comprenaient les maux de gorge précoces à 4-6 h, la toux et l'enrouement à 24 h. RéSULTATS: Les données probantes ont été synthétisées à partir de 70 ERC portant sur 7141 patients. L'application topique de lidocaïne, de corticostéroïdes, de kétamine, de magnésium, de benzydamine, d'un lubrifiant à base d'eau et de la réglisse, appliqués le long du tube endotrachéal, sur le ballonnet du tube endotrachéal, en gargarisme ou en vaporisation, ont été comparées à l'air intra-ballonnet et entre les divers agents. La NMA bayésienne a démontré que l'application de magnésium (rapport de cotes [RC], 0,10; intervalle de crédibilité [CrI] 95 %, 0,03 à 0,26), de réglisse (RC, 0,14; CrI 95 %, 0,03 à 0,55) et de stéroïdes (RC, 0,11; CrI 95 %, 0,06 à 0,22) étaient les méthodes plus efficaces pour prévenir les maux de gorge postopératoires à 24 h. La lidocaïne topique était l'intervention la moins efficace à 24 h. CONCLUSION: L'application topique de magnésium, suivie de celle de réglisse et de corticostéroïdes, est l'approche qui prévient le plus efficacement les maux de gorge postopératoires 24 h après une intubation endotrachéale.

The analgesic efficacy of quadratus lumborum block in caesarean delivery: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

PURPOSE: Quadratus lumborum block (QLB) has recently gained popularity for postoperative analgesia after cesarean delivery (CD) as it provides both visceral and somato-sensory blockade of the abdomen. Aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the analgesic potential of QLB after CD. METHODS: Electronic database from inception to December 2019 was searched systematically for randomized-controlled trials comparing QLB with injection of inactive solution in women undergoing CD. Primary outcome was consumption of morphine at 24 h. Morphine consumption at 48 h, dynamic and static pain scores at various time intervals were the secondary outcomes studied. RESULTS: Seven trials met the inclusion criteria. Morphine consumption was reduced significantly with QLB in comparison to sham or no block at 24 h (mean difference [MD] - 9.84 mg; 95% confidence interval [CI] - 18.16, - 0.50; p = 0.04; I2 = zero). Adequate "information size" for above outcome was confirmed with trial sequential analysis, ruling out any possibility of a false-positive result. QLB significantly reduced pain scores at rest (MD - 1.13; 95% CI - 1.75, - 0.56; p = 0.00) and on movement (MD - 1.48; 95% CI - 2.5, - 0.46; p = 0.01) at 6 h. However, statistically significant difference in pain scores persisted only for dynamic pain at 24 h (MD - 0.55; 95% CI - 1.04, - 0.06; p = 0.03). QLB does not provide any additional analgesic benefit to the parturient receiving intrathecal morphine. CONCLUSION: QLB significantly reduces opioid requirements in CD and may have analgesic effects lasting 24 h.

Pre-emptive multimodal analgesic regimen reduces post-operative epidural demand boluses in traumatic shaft of femur fracture - A randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The efficacy of preemptive multimodal analgesia in post-traumatic patients has not been elucidated. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy of preemptive MMA regimen in reducing the epidural demand boluses in the first 48 hours following the traumatic shaft of femur fractures. METHODS: Patients scheduled for traumatic femur fracture surgery were randomised (n = 135) into two groups in this double blind, placebo controlled trial. Patients received either (Preemptive multimodal group) intravenous acetaminophen 1 gm, diclofenac 75 mg, morphine 3 mg, 75 mg Pregabalin (per oral) or a placebo 30 minutes pre-operatively. Intra-operatively, all patients were managed with spinal and epidural anaesthesia. Post-operatively, patients received patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) programmed to deliver a bolus of 5 ml of 0.2% Ropivacaine with 2 µg/ml of Fentanyl with lockout interval time of 15 min. Primary outcome was number of PCEA boluses received post-operatively over 48 h. Secondary outcomes measures were time to receive first epidural bolus, postoperative VAS scores and episodes of post-operative nausea, vomiting and sedation. Total number of PCEA bolus doses over 48 hours and VAS scores were analysed using Mann-Whitney test. RESULTS: Significant reduction in median number of demand boluses were observed in preemptive multimodal group (3 [2-4]) compared to placebo group (5 [4-7]); P = 0.00. Time to first rescue epidural bolus was significantly greater in preemptive multimodal group than placebo group. CONCLUSION: The use of preemptive MMA regimen reduced the requirement of demand epidural bolus doses.

Role of topical magnesium in post-operative sore throat: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Post-operative sore throat (POST) is a common undesirable consequence of tracheal intubation. Magnesium, an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist, has anti-nociceptive and anti-inflammatory properties, and has been found to be useful in POST prevention in various trials. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to study the efficacy of topical magnesium in preventing POST in adult patients undergoing surgery under general anaesthesia with single lumen tracheal tube. METHODS: Comprehensive literature search was performed in PubMed, Google Scholar, EMBASE, Scopus and the Cochrane central registers of controlled trial databases through July, 2018 and data were pooled using fixed effect modelling followed by random-effect methods (after assessing heterogeneity with fixed modelling). The primary outcome was the incidence of POST at 24 h after surgery/extubation. Comparative results were deliberated as pooled mean difference for continuous variables and Mantel-Haenszel (MH) odds ratio for dichotomous variables. Statistical analysis was done using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis-Version 3 (Biostat Inc., USA). RESULTS: Seven trials involving 726 study participants were included in the final analysis. Incidence of POST at 24 hours was significantly lower in magnesium group (26/363) in comparison to active and non-active control group (89/363); P = 0.00- RR 0.22 (95%CI = 0.12-0.39, I2 = 0%). No significant adverse events were reported with the use of topical magnesium. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic use of topical magnesium before the induction of general anaesthesia seems to be an effective measure to decrease the incidence of POST.

Comparison of bispectral index and end-tidal anaesthetic concentration monitoring on recovery profile of desflurane in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Several techniques have evolved over time to monitor depth of anesthesia and ensure enhanced recovery. This randomized double-blinded trial was designed to compare bispectral index (BIS) or end-tidal anaesthetic concentration (ETAC) monitoring on the recovery characteristics of patients undergoing thoracolumbar spine surgeries. METHODS: Seventy American Society of Anesthesiologist I-II patients of either sex were randomized to Group B - BIS-guided protocol, Group E - ETAC-guided protocol, or Group S - Standard protocol. After intravenous induction, anaesthesia was maintained with desflurane in O2/N2O (50:50) mixture. In BIS, ETAC and Standard groups, inspired end-tidal desflurane concentration was varied to achieve BIS of 45-55, 0.8-1.0 age-corrected minimum alveolar concentration, and haemodynamic parameters within 20% of the baseline, respectively. Time to eye opening (emergence time, the primary outcome), time to extubation, and time to name recall from the discontinuation of the anaesthetic agent were recorded. Incidence of nausea, vomiting, and total analgesic consumption was noted for 24 h. RESULTS: Emergence time (mean ± SD) in ETAC (5.1 ± 1.53 min) and BIS (5.0 ± 2.12 min)-guided groups was significantly lower than Standard group (7.5 ± 2.90 min). Extubation time in ETAC (6.3 ± 2.22 min) and BIS-guided group (6.5 ± 1.78 min) was significantly lower than Standard group (9.0 ± 3.20 min) (P < 0.001). Time to achieve fast track score of more than 12 was significantly less in BIS-guided group (13.12 ± 2.59 min). CONCLUSION: ETAC-guided anaesthesia is comparable to BIS-guided anaesthesia in achieving early recovery.

Minimum alveolar concentration of desflurane with caudal analgesia for laryngeal mask airway removal in anesthetized children.

BACKGROUND: Regional blocks have been shown to decrease the requirement of anesthetic agents. This study was conducted to determine the optimal endtidal concentrations of desflurane for removal of Laryngeal mask airway in children in presence of caudal block. METHODS: Twenty-two children of ASA status I between the age group of 2-10 year undergoing infraumbilical surgery were enrolled in the study. General anesthesia was induced with sevoflurane and oxygen given via mask and laryngeal mask airway inserted. Caudal injection of bupivacaine 0.25%, 1 ml·kg(-1) was administered according to Armitage regimen. Desflurane was used for maintenance of anesthesia. Predecided endtidal concentration of desflurane was maintained for 10 min at the end of surgery and laryngeal mask airway removed. Target concentration in the next patient was thereafter determined by the Dixon up-down method (with 0.5% as a step size). 5% endtidal concentration was kept as the starting concentration. If removal of laryngeal mask airway was not associated with any coughing, teeth clenching, gross purposeful movement, breath holding or laryngospasm, during or within 1 min after removal, it was considered as successful. RESULTS: In the presence of caudal analgesia, endtidal concentration of desflurane required for successful laryngeal mask airway removal in 50% (ED50) children was 3.39 ± 0.38% by Dixon's method. CONCLUSION: Laryngeal mask airway can be successfully removed in 50% of anesthetized children without coughing, moving, or any other airway complications at an endtidal desflurane concentration of 3.4% in the presence of caudal analgesia.

Severe autonomic dysreflexia induced cardiac arrest under isoflurane anesthesia in a patient with lower thoracic spine injury.

We present a case of severe autonomic dysreflexia (AD) progressing to cardiac arrest and death under isoflurane anesthesia. Though AD in chronic cervical spine injury is a common entity, occurrence of such an event in the stage of flaccid paralysis in lower dorsal spinal cord injury is rare, especially under general anesthesia. Manipulation of urinary bladder catheter under light plane of isoflurane anesthesia might be the precipitating factor. Increasing concentration of isoflurane failed to abort the episode or might have aggravated it. High level of suspicion and vigilance is necessary to prevent, diagnose and treat such a condition.